PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Catherine V Palmer

Publications and source records attributed to Catherine V Palmer.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds.

Hearing aid users report difficulties using their hearing aids in noisy environments. Problems include understanding speech, loudness discomfort, and annoyance with background noise. Digital noise reduction algorithms have been promoted as a method to solve speech understanding and comfort in noise problems. Research has failed to find improved speech understanding in noise. Little is known about how digital noise reduction affects noise annoyance and aversiveness. The goals of this investigation were to determine how a specific digital noise reduction system affects hearing aid users' perception of noise annoyance and aversiveness and to compare their perceptions to those of normal-hearing listeners. Ratings of noise annoyance and of aversiveness were obtained from 49 participants with moderate sensorineural hearing loss before fitting and after 3 weeks of hearing aid use. Findings were compared to measures obtained from normal-hearing listeners. Perceived annoyance and aversiveness increased with amplification. Annoyance and aversiveness with the hearing aid approximated normal perception. The results of this investigation suggest the need for counseling patients about realistic expectations related to annoyance and aversiveness of sounds at the time of hearing aid fitting.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Analysis of counted behaviors in a single-subject design: modeling of hearing-aid intervention in hearing-impaired patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Clinical procedures related to patients with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) largely fail to address the patient's hearing. Given the challenges of this population, unconventional indicators of treatment efficacy may be required. Palmer et al (1999) reported on caregiver-tracked behaviors as outcome measures for hearing aid intervention. Using these data, hearing aid use and subsequent behavior was modeled as a first-order dynamic system, characterized by responses following an exponential time course. The results of such modeling suggest predictable outcomes of hearing aid intervention, or at least useful parameters of quantification (e.g. time-constant and steady-state response), permitting critical assessment of effects of intervention on negative behaviors versus hearing aid use, comparisons among behaviors, and/or comparisons of hearing-aid-use patterns and behavior counts among patients. Use in this and other difficult-to-test populations warrant further study to evaluate clinical efficacy of the analysis described.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Validity, internal consistency, and test/retest reliability of a localization disabilities and handicaps questionnaire.

Psychometric evaluations were performed on a self-perceived localization disabilities and handicaps questionnaire. Twenty individuals with normal hearing bilaterally, twenty with profound unilateral hearing impairment (UHI), and ten with any degree of bilateral hearing impairment participated. Each subject completed the questionnaire. Comparisons of the responses of the subjects with normal hearing and those with UHI revealed significant differences among the groups for both disabilities and handicaps, establishing construct validity. Cronbach's Alpha correlational analyses of the responses of all subjects with hearing impairment revealed correlations of .900 (disabilities) and .800 (handicaps), establishing internal consistency. Each participant with hearing impairment was asked to complete the questionnaire again after three weeks. Pearson's correlational analyses of the responses at time one versus time two revealed correlations of .900 (disabilities) and .700 (handicaps), establishing test/retest reliability. This questionnaire is an appropriate tool for investigating the self-perceived localization disabilities and handicaps of individuals with hearing impairment.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Changes over time in audiometric thresholds in a group of automobile stamping and assembly workers with a hearing conservation program.

Noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) is among the 10 leading occupational diseases, afflicting between 7.4 and 10.2 million people who work in noise above 85 dBA. Although mandatory hearing conservation programs (HCPs) have been in effect since 1972, this problem persists, as hearing protectors are not consistently used by workers, or may not attenuate to manufacturer's estimates in real world conditions. In this study, information from noise and hearing protection use measurements taken at an automobile assembly plant were used to construct average lifetime noise exposure and hearing protection compliance estimates for use in modeling to predict both total hearing loss and onset of two accepted definitions of hearing loss. There were 301 males and females in this cohort; their mean age was 42.6 (7.2) years, and mean tenure was 14.3 (3.5) years. Average length of follow-up was 14.0 years. There were 16 members of this cohort who had hearing loss at the speech frequencies (defined as an average hearing level > or = 25 dB at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz). In cross-sectional multivariate analyses, years of employment, male gender, and proportion of time wearing hearing protection were the factors most associated with hearing loss at the average of 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz (p < 0.0001) controlling for age, transfer status (as a surrogate for previous noise exposure), race, and lifetime average noise exposure. The most consistent predictor of hearing loss in both univariate and multivariate analyses was percentage of time having used hearing protection during the workers' tenure.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Quantifying and responding to patient needs and expectations.

Comprehensive audiometric testing serves as the cornerstone of adult hearing aid fittings for many clinicians. The data will serve to define the degree, configuration, and site of lesion of the hearing loss. The data will be used in prescriptive formula to preset the hearing aid and may be entered into probe microphone or hearing aid test box equipment to provide verification targets. Clinicians are comfortable obtaining audiometric data, have an accepted way of obtaining these data, and are comfortable discussing these data with patients and other professionals. The patient, however, is not a walking audiogram and may bring all sorts of interesting nuances to the process. Just as part of the clinician's comfort with using audiometric data comes from the standard process of obtaining and reporting these data, the clinician who chooses to go beyond the audiogram in terms of data collection with a patient must have a means for gathering and quantifying additional information. The following case describes a method of obtaining and quantifying the patient's listening and communication needs. The case illustrates the use of these measures in recommending appropriate communication and safety solutions.

Aged, 80 and over↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effectiveness of signal processing strategies for the pediatric population: a systematic review of the evidence.

A systematic review of literature addressing the question "Is there evidence pointing to optimal signal processing for pediatric hearing aid patients?" was conducted. Key words and authors were used as search terms in five databases, and one textbook appendix was reviewed for related references. The levels of evidence that were accepted comprised randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials, cohort, and before/after designs with or without control groups. Two hundred twenty-six articles were identified during the preliminary search with 183 of these eliminated by review of abstracts because they did not meet the search criteria. Forty-three manuscripts were reviewed, with eight meeting the evidence levels and search criteria. The strengths and weaknesses of these studies are highlighted, and the systematic review question is answered in light of these studies. There is evidence to recommend wide dynamic range compression signal processing for pediatric hearing aid users with mild, moderate, and moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss when full-time and consistent audibility is the goal of the hearing aid fitting. Further, there is evidence that audibility across a wide frequency bandwidth as well as across a large range of input levels is essential for pediatric hearing aid users to recognize critical components of the spoken language.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence.

A systematic review of the literature was conducted addressing the following question, "Is there evidence of improvement in communication skills through individual auditory training in an adult hearing-impaired population?" Keywords and authors were used as search terms in eight major indexes, and seven textbooks were reviewed for related references. The level of evidence that was accepted included randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials, cohort, and before/after designs with or without control groups. Two hundred thirteen articles were identified during the preliminary search with 171 of these eliminated by review of abstracts because they did not meet the search criteria. Forty-two manuscripts were reviewed, with six meeting the evidence and search criteria. The strengths and weaknesses of these studies are high-lighted, and the systematic review question is answered in light of these studies. In addition, elements critical to the future of auditory training research and clinical practice are offered.

Adult↗