Biomedical subjects

Cengiz Bekir Demirel

Publications and source records attributed to Cengiz Bekir Demirel.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Effectiveness of the jaw-thrust maneuver in opening the airway: a flexible fiberoptic endoscopic study.

OBJECTIVE: A prospective study was carried out to find the exact site of obstruction in sleep model and to quantitatively evaluate the effect of Jaw-thrust maneuver (JTM) in opening the obstructed airway using flexible fiberoptic endoscope. METHODS: Twenty-eight ASA physical status I or II patients with snoring symptom undergoing elective surgery were included. The patients were held in supine position without hyperextension of the neck. Having induced anesthesia, the base of the tongue and laryngeal inlet and/or epiglottis were visualized using endoscope. The patients' epiglottides were classified as leaf-shaped, curved (concaved or omega-shaped) and floppy types. We graded the airway opening at the level of epiglottis into six grades and obstruction at the tongue base level into four grades. The grades during inspiration (GrIns), expiration (GrExp) and after JTM (GrJTM) were recorded and compared with Pearson chi-square test. RESULTS: The strictly curved (Omega-shaped or concaved) epiglottis supplied a salvage pathway for airflow that resisted collapsing with the posterior movement of the tongue base in 2 patients. When we compared GrIns with GrExp for epiglottis the difference was statistically significant (chi(2) = 0.001), but the difference for tongue base was not (chi(2) = 0.152). After JTM, GrJTM for both epiglottis and tongue base were significantly better than GrIns and GrExp (chi(2) < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Tongue base was the principal site of obstruction although during the respiratory cycle the position of epiglottis changed prominently and increased the obstruction in inspiration. JTM alone significantly relieved the obstruction at the tongue base and epiglottis levels and increased the retroglossal airway.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Preoperative multimodal administration of morphine in arthroscopic surgery.

UNLABELLED: INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to demonstrate the possible effects of preoperative intra-articular, intravenous, or intrathecal administration of morphine on postoperative pain management. MATERIALS: Sixty patients undergoing arthroscopic menisectomy were included. Spinal anesthesia was performed in the lateral decubitus position with 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, and the patients were randomized into 4 groups. The IVM (intravenous, i.v., morphine) group received 3 mg of i.v. morphine after completion of spinal anesthesia, the ITM (intrathecal morphine) group received 0.3 mg of morphine together with bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia, the IAM (intra-articular morphine) group received 3 mg intra-articular morphine diluted in 10 ml of saline after spinal anesthesia had been induced but 15 min before surgery, while the C (control) group did not receive any drugs in addition to spinal anesthesia. The sensory block level was determined 15 min after spinal anesthesia. Pain at rest (by visual analogue scale, VAS) and pain at 30 degrees of flexion (by verbal rating scale, VRS) were evaluated during each of the first 2 h of the postoperative period and once every 4 h thereafter until 24 h. In each group; the number of patients in need of analgesics, the timing of the first analgesic intake (duration of analgesia), and the cumulative dose of analgesics were recorded. RESULTS: The mean duration of analgesia in the IAM group was significantly longer and the mean analgesic intake was significantly lower when compared with the other groups (p < 0.05). The mean VAS value of the ITM group at the 4th postoperative hour was significantly lower than that of the other groups. Mean VAS values at 8 and 12 h and mean VRS values at 4 and 8 h were significantly lower in the ITM and IAM groups (p < 0.05). The ITM group had the highest rates of nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and headache (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the preoperative administration of morphine, either intrathecally or intra-articularly, provides postoperative pain relief. Of these two, the intra-articular route seems to be superior in terms of fewer side-effects (nausea, vomiting, and pruritus), longer duration of analgesia, and reduction of total need for analgesics.

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled↗

PubMed2004

Epinephrine in digital block: color Doppler flow imaging.

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine is currently added to local anesthetics for its advantageous vasoconstrictive effects. Traditionally, however, its use is not advised for digital block anesthesia due to the risk of digital gangrene. OBJECTIVE: To observe vasoconstrictive effect of epinephrine in digital block anesthesia. METHODS: Digital blocking with epinephrine containing lidocaine was performed in 24 subjects undergoing surgical procedure of their finger and toes. Digital artery blood flows were studied with color Doppler ultrasonography before digital blocking and at 10th, 60th, and if needed 90th minutes after blocking. Doppler parameters such as peak systolic velocity, end diastolic velocity, and resistive index values were studied. RESULTS: There were statistically significant decrease of blood flow rates and an increase of resistive index in all patients within 10 minutes. At the 10th minute of digital block, four patients had no measurable blood flow, which was restored within 60 or 90 minutes. Others showed diminished but persistent blood flow, which returned to normal within 60 minutes. No systemic or local complication related with epinephrine usage was observed. CONCLUSION: Vasoconstrictive effect of epinephrine in local anesthetics is not persistent and resolves within 60 or 90 minutes. Its use seems to be safe in selected patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

The postoperative analgesic effect of tramadol when used as subcutaneous local anesthetic.

Recently, it has been shown that tramadol was an effective local anesthetic in minor surgery. In this study, its efficacy for relieving postoperative pain was evaluated. Forty patients undergoing minor surgery (lipoma excision and scar revision) under local anesthesia were included. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups: In group T (n = 20), 2 mg/kg tramadol, and in group L (n = 20), 1 mg/kg lidocaine were given subcutaneously. In both groups, the injection volume was 5 mL containing 1/200,000 adrenalin. The degree of the erythema, burning sensation, and pain at the injection site were recorded. Incision response, which is a degree of the pain sensation during incision, was recorded and graded with the visual analog scale (VAS) 0-10. After incision, VAS values were recorded at 15-min intervals. When the VAS score of the pain during surgery exceeded 4, an additional 0.5 mg/kg of the study drug was injected and this dosage was added to the total amount. Patients were discharged on the same day. Subjects with VAS > or =4 were advised to take paracetamol as needed. No side effects were recorded in either group except for 1 patient complaining of nausea in group T at the 30th min of operation. After 24 h, patients were called and the time of first analgesic use and total analgesic dose taken during the postoperative period were recorded. During the 24 postoperative hours, 18 of 20 (90%) subjects did not need any type of analgesia in group T, whereas this number was 10 (50%) in group L (P < 0.05). The time span before taking first analgesic medication was longer (4.9 +/- 0.3 h) in group T than that of group L (4.4 +/- 0.7 h) (P < 0.05). We propose that tramadol can be used as an alternative drug to lidocaine for minor surgeries because of its ability to decrease the demand for postoperative analgesia.

Acetaminophen↗

PubMed2003

A prospective randomized study comparing perioperative outcome variables after epidural or general anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery.

General and regional anesthesia (spinal and epidural) can be performed successfully for lumbar disc surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the superiority of general anesthesia or epidural anesthesia techniques in lumbar laminectomy and discectomy. Sixty patients undergoing lumbar partial hemilaminectomy and discectomy were randomly divided into two groups receiving standardized general anesthesia (GA) or epidural anesthesia (EA). Demographically, both groups were similar. Surgical onset time (36.72 +/- 5.47 vs. 25.40 +/- 7.83 minutes) was longer in the EA group, but total anesthesia time (154.32 +/- 35.73 vs. 162.40 +/- 26.79 minutes) did not differ between the two groups. Surgical time (118.80 +/- 35.42 vs. 139.60 +/- 26.80 minutes) was longer in the GA group. The heart rate and mean arterial pressure values of the EA group measured 15, 20, and 25 minutes after local anesthetic administration to the epidural catheter were found to be lower than in the GA group measured after induction of general anesthesia. The frequency of bradycardia (EA vs. GA, 3 vs. 2), tachycardia (3 vs. 7), and hypotension (6 vs. 4) during anesthesia did not differ between the groups, but the occurrence of hypertension (1 vs. 7) was higher in the GA group. Blood loss was less in the EA group than in the GA group (180.40 +/- 70.38 vs. 288.60 +/- 112.51 mL). Postanesthesia care unit (PACU) heart rate and mean arterial pressure were higher in the GA group. Peak pain scores in PACU and postoperative 24 hours were higher in the GA group when compared with the EA group. Nausea was more common in the GA group both in PACU and 24 hours after surgery. There was no difference between the hospitalization duration of the groups. In conclusion, this study suggests that EA is an important alternative to GA during lumbar disc surgery.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Comparison of propofol and sevoflurane for laryngeal mask airway insertion.

In this study, we compared haemodynamic changes, laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion time, and complications in patients anesthetized by inhalation of sevoflurane with those of intravenous induction with propofol. One hundred patients, aged between 20-40 years were enrolled in this study. Group 1 received propofol (2.5 mg/kg i.v.) and group 2 received sevoflurane (6%+50% N2O+50% O2) by inhalation using the tidal volume technique. LMA insertion time was found to be significantly longer in sevoflurane group than in propofol group. Mean arterial blood pressure was significantly lower within each group after induction in comparison to before induction values. In both groups, the LMA was successfully inserted in all patients. The quality of anaesthesia according to patients was significantly higher in the propofol group (80%) than in sevoflurane group (30%). Odor perception was significantly higher in sevoflurane group (84%) than in propofol group (38%). Apnoea was significantly higher in propofol group (40%) than in sevoflurane group (0%). Sevoflurane is an alternative to propofol for induction of anaesthesia and has a lower incidence of apnoea. Other complication rates are not higher than which propofol but the longer duration of induction time is a disadvantage.

Adult↗