Surgical management of polyorchidism in a patient with fertility problems.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Cesare Selli.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Sildenafil is the most prescribed oral agent for patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). Vardenafil is a new phosphodiesterase type 5 (Pde-5) inhibitor that was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration last year to treat patients with ED of various causes. Both of these Pde-5 inhibitors have vasodilating properties and effects on blood pressure (BP), and like nitrates, they work through the nitric oxide cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of these Pde-5 inhibitors on BP and heart rate (HR) in normotensive men with ED by a crossover comparison. Thirty-five patients with ED were enrolled to evaluate and compare the effect of sildenafil (50 mg) and vardenafil (10 mg) on BP and HR. At the screening (baseline [B]) visit, sitting systolic blood pressure (B-SBP), diastolic blood pressure (B-DBP), and HR were measured. We performed a multiple administration for both drugs and, therefore, multiple measurements of BP and HR changes, 3 doses a week, on alternate days, late in the afternoon, and on an empty stomach. B-SBP, B-DBP, and HR were recorded before each 50-mg sildenafil dosing and after 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes. Data were averaged over the 4 time points and compared with the baseline values obtained before each dosing. After a 3-week wash-out period, patients were crossed over to vardenafil (10 mg) with the same study design. After administration of both drugs, we observed a statistically significant decrease of BP and an increase of HR. On average, sildenafil caused a decrease of SBP ranging from 5.1 +/- 3.9 mm Hg during the first dosing to 4.7 +/- 4.2 mm Hg during the third dosing, DBP ranged from 4.4 +/- 4.9 to 4 +/- 4.1 mm Hg, and HR increased 1.8 +/- 2.0 bpm (first dose) and 1.2 +/- 0.9 bpm (third dose). With vardenafil, we recorded a greater variation for SBP and DBP. SBP decreased from 8.02 +/- 8.0 mm Hg during the first dosing to 5.4 +/- 5.5 mm Hg during the third dosing, whereas DBP decreased from 6.6 +/- 7.2 to 5.0 +/- 5.3 mm Hg, respectively. Recorded HR showed an increase of 3.1 +/- 3.2 bpm (first dose) and 2.4 +/- 2.3 bpm (third dose). After the first vardenafil administration, we recorded fainting episodes in 3 patients because of a decrease in BP greater than 20 mm Hg. Two of the patients were in therapy with doxazosin for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Cardiovascular response was not significantly different after the first dose between the 2 treatments. Vardenafil demonstrated clinically significant differences (fainting) with respect to sildenafil only during the first doses. We suggest that before starting therapies with Pde-5 inhibitors, particularly with the newer ones, that baseline cardiovascular parameters are measured and monitored, especially during the first dose, because of the presence of a "first dose effect." Moreover, it is necessary to pay particular attention to those patients in treatment with other drugs that could have a synergistic hypotensive effect as a result of vasodilation potentiation.
BACKGROUND: Nowadays urinary cytology methods in early diagnosis of superficial bladder transitional carcinoma (TCC) allow the identification of about 35-50% of tumors. Cytoscopy and biopsy are reliable but invasive. It has been recently shown that allelic abnormalities detected by microsatellite analysis of DNA extracted from urine sediment can be successfully used in TCC. We performed a comparative study between urinary cytology and microsatellite sequence alterations in patients affected by TCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were recruited for the study. Of these, 45 had cystoscopic diagnosis of TCC, while 7 were without apparent lesions after TUR but presented urinary irritative symptoms after BCG endocavitary administration, and 6 who underwent open surgery for benign prostatic hypertrophy represented the control groups. DNA extraction and PCR analysis were performed by using 13 different primers, while urinary cytology was performed by using an Autocyte Preparation System. RESULTS: Urinary cytology confirmed the presence of TCC in 22% of patients while in 15.5% of them a displastic/inflammatory status was found. Microsatellite analysis allowed the identification of 82% of tumors with a 100% specificity. A high sensitivity was obtained in patients affected by superficial (79%) or G1(80%) tumors. CONCLUSION: Microsatellite analysis represents a highly sensitive and specific marker in TCC diagnosis and monitoring.