PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Chantal F Morel

Publications and source records attributed to Chantal F Morel.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Opportunistic screening for broad range of medically relevant secondary findings: Laboratory benefits and burdens.

PURPOSE: Exome and genome sequencing enable opportunistic screening for secondary findings (SFs). We report on exome analysis for a broad range of medically relevant SFs in the setting of the Incidental Genomics randomized clinical trial (NCT03597165). METHODS: Participants had exome sequencing and were randomized to receive only primary cancer findings (control) or cancer findings and a choice of SFs (intervention). RESULTS: Across 279 participants, there were 4441 unique variants in SF genes: 5.0% (221) were reportable pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants, and 81.4% (3615) were nonreportable variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Intervention arm participants had on average 2.6 (SD 1.66, range 0-9) pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and 29.5 VUS (SD 13.2, range 2-74). SFs for monogenic disease risk were reported in 35.3% (49/139) of participants (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics non-cancer subset in 1.4%) and carrier status in 89.3% (117/131). In the intervention arm, variant filtration was 7.7 times longer per case (95% CI 5.3 to 11.3, P < .0001), variant classification was 13.3 times longer (95% CI 10.6 to 16.5, P < .0001), and report preparation was 3.3 times longer (95% CI 2.6 to 4.1, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Although the yield of reportable SFs was high, this was accompanied by many nonreportable VUS and increased efforts for exome analysis.

Humans

DNA-binding affinity and specificity determine the phenotypic diversity in BCL11B-related disorders.

BCL11B is a Cys2-His2 zinc-finger (C2H2-ZnF) domain-containing, DNA-binding, transcription factor with established roles in the development of various organs and tissues, primarily the immune and nervous systems. BCL11B germline variants have been associated with a variety of developmental syndromes. However, genotype-phenotype correlations along with pathophysiologic mechanisms of selected variants mostly remain elusive. To dissect these, we performed genotype-phenotype correlations of 92 affected individuals harboring a pathogenic or likely pathogenic BCL11B variant, followed by immune phenotyping, analysis of chromatin immunoprecipitation DNA-sequencing data, dual-luciferase reporter assays, and molecular modeling. These integrative analyses enabled us to define three clinical subtypes of BCL11B-related disorders. It is likely that gene-disruptive BCL11B variants and missense variants affecting zinc-binding cysteine and histidine residues cause mild to moderate neurodevelopmental delay with increased propensity for behavioral and dental anomalies, allergies and asthma, and reduced type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Missense variants within C2H2-ZnF DNA-contacting &#x3b1; helices cause highly variable clinical presentations ranging from multisystem anomalies with demise in the first years of life to late-onset, hyperkinetic movement disorder with poor fine motor skills. Those not in direct DNA contact cause a milder phenotype through reduced, target-specific transcriptional activity. However, missense variants affecting C2H2-ZnFs, DNA binding, and "specificity residues" impair BCL11B transcriptional activity in a target-specific, dominant-negative manner along with aberrant regulation of alternative DNA targets, resulting in more severe and unpredictable clinical outcomes. Taken together, we suggest that the phenotypic severity and variability is largely dependent on the DNA-binding affinity and specificity of altered BCL11B proteins.

Adolescent

Opportunistic genomic screening has clinical utility: An interventional cohort study.

PURPOSE: Practice is shifting toward genome-first approaches, such as opportunistic screening for secondary findings (SFs). Analysis of SFs could be extended beyond medically actionable results to include non-medically actionable monogenic disease risks, carrier status, pharmacogenomic variants, and risk variants for common complex disease. However, evidence on the clinical utility of returning these results is lacking. We assessed the outcomes of opportunistic screening for a broad spectrum of SFs by evaluating the yield, impact on clinical management, and consistency between SFs and participants' clinical features and family history. METHODS: Adult cancer patients had exome sequencing with the option to learn multiple categories of SFs. Outcomes data were collected through chart review and participant-reported measures up to one year after return of results. RESULTS: All participants (n&#xa0;= 139, 85.6% female, average 54.6 years old) who elected to learn SFs had &#x2265;1 variant reported (100% [139/139]). The yield of reportable findings was highest for pharmacogenomic variants (97.8% [135/138] of participants), followed by common disease risk variants (89.4% [118/132]), carrier status (89.3% [117/131]), and variants related to Mendelian (27.2% [34/125]), medically actionable (15.2% [21/138]), and early-onset neurodegenerative (2.6% [3/117]) disease risks. SFs from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics list (v3.2, noncancer genes) were reported in 1.4% (2/138) of participants. SFs across all categories demonstrated clinical utility by prompting management changes in 28.1% (39/139) of participants. Moreover, a considerable proportion of participants had suggestive clinical features (49.0% (24/49)]) or family history (21.8% (27/124)) potentially related to their SFs. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate there are potential benefits from opportunistic screening for a broad range of SFs.

Humans