PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Chao Qin

Publications and source records attributed to Chao Qin.

41 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Corticosterone acts directly at the amygdala to alter spinal neuronal activity in response to colorectal distension.

Administration of glucocorticoids to the amygdaloid nucleus facilitates visceromotor responses to colorectal distension in rats. The aim of this study was to determine if colorectal hypersensitivity develops through central modulation of spinal neuronal activity. Stereotaxic delivery of corticosterone (n = 10) or cholesterol (control, n = 10) onto the dorsal margin of the amygdala was performed on male Fischer-344 rats. Seven days later, extracellular potentials of single L(6)-S(1) spinal neurons were examined for responses to colorectal distension (CRD, 20-80 mmHg, 20 s) in sodium pentobarbital anesthetized and paralyzed animals. The proportions of neurons that responded to noxious CRD in corticosterone-implanted (62/186, 33%) and cholesterol-implanted (55/163, 34%) animals were virtually identical. However, the mean excitatory response of spinal neurons to CRD in corticosterone-treated rats was significantly greater (26.7 +/- 2.2 vs. 16.4 +/- 1.8 imp/s, P < 0.01) and the duration was longer (37.0 +/- 3.9 vs. 25.8 +/- 1.5 s, P < 0.05) than in the control group. No significant differences were found in neural responses to nonnoxious and noxious mechanical stimulation of somatic fields between corticosterone-implanted and control groups. In conclusion, our data support the hypothesis that central stimulation of the amygdala by corticosterone sensitizes the lumbosacral spinal neurons that mediate visceromotor reflexes to CRD.

Amygdala↗

Differential effects of urinary bladder distension on high cervical projection neurons in primates.

Projection neurons located in high cervical segments of primates are generally excited instead of inhibited by cardiopulmonary spinal inputs, which enter thoracic dorsal roots. Thus, high cervical neurons with axons that either ascend to the thalamus or descend to thoracolumbar spinal segments can process and transmit excitatory cardiac information. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the excitatory effects observed to cardiopulmonary afferent stimulation are a universal response in high cervical projection neurons to spinal visceral inputs. Urinary bladder distension (UBD) was used to stimulate visceral afferent inputs that enter lumbosacral dorsal roots. Effects were determined on extracellular activity of either spinothalamic tract (STT) neurons or descending propriospinal neurons that were recorded in high cervical segments of anesthetized monkeys. Results showed that 17/34 STT neurons were inhibited by UBD and 3/34 STT neurons were excited. Widespread visceral inputs, therefore, can excite high cervical STT neurons but the majority of responsive STT neurons were inhibited by UBD. Effects of UBD on high cervical descending propriospinal neurons were significantly different from responses in STT neurons. Extracellular activity of fewer propriospinal neurons was affected by UBD and responses were more variable; 3/26 neurons were inhibited, 5/26 neurons were excited and one neuron was excited/inhibited by UBD. These results showed that the generally excitatory responses of high cervical projection neurons to cardiopulmonary inputs were not duplicated by stimulation of sensory input from the urinary bladder. Furthermore, results of this study indicated that effects of sensory inputs on spinal neurons might vary depending on axonal projections of the neurons examined.

Animals↗

Convergent pathways for cardiac- and esophageal-somatic motor reflexes in rats.

Chest pain of esophageal and cardiac origin is often difficult to distinguish due to similar sensations and localization. We have shown that spasm-like contractions of the spinotrapezius muscles evoked by noxious cardiac stimulation could potentially sensitize muscle afferent fibers and produce angina-like referred pain. In this study, we proposed that a similar type of spinotrapezius contraction evoked by esophageal stimulation could produce nociceptive responses with similar quality and localization as evoked by cardiac stimulation. An objective of this study was to show convergence of pathways to the spinotrapezius muscles by measuring electromyographic (EMG) activity between the cardiac- and esophageal-motor reflexes. We also investigated afferent pathways of esophageal-motor reflexes by disrupting or activating the left sympathetic chain and vagus nerves; these pathways form the afferent limbs of the cardiac-motor reflexes. Results showed that more than 95% of animals responding to noxious cardiac stimulation also responded to esophageal distension. Transection of the left sympathetic chain to reduce upper thoracic visceral afferent innervation significantly decreased cardiac-evoked EMG activity or total motor unit potentials (t-MUP). In contrast, however, the transection did not significantly decrease t-MUP evoked by esophageal distension. Bilateral vagotomy and vagal afferent stimulation increased and decreased the cardiac-evoked t-MUP, respectively. However, the same vagal manipulations did not influence t-MUP evoked by esophageal distension. This study demonstrated that the spinotrapezius muscle could be activated by noxious stimulation of two different visceral organs. The spinotrapezius muscle contractions evoked by esophageal distension are produced in part by activation of esophageal afferent fibers found in upper thoracic sympathetic nerves, but not by activation of the vagus nerves.

Animals↗

Spinal inhibitory effects of cardiopulmonary afferent inputs in monkeys: neuronal processing in high cervical segments.

Noxious stimulation of spinal afferents inhibits primate spinothalamic tract (STT) neurons in segments distant from the region of afferent entry. Inhibitory effects of cardiopulmonary sympathetic afferent (CPSA) stimulation remain after C(1) transection but disappear with spinal transection between C(3) and C(7). We hypothesized that spinal inhibitory effects produced by CPSA stimulation are processed by neurons in C(1)-C(3) segments. One purpose of this study in anesthetized monkeys was to determine whether chemical activation of high cervical neurons reduced sacral STT cell responses to colorectal distension (CRD) and urinary bladder distension (UBD). First, effects and interactions of pelvic and cardiopulmonary visceral afferent inputs were determined in 10 monkeys on extracellular activity of sacral STT neurons recorded in deep dorsal horn. CRD and UBD increased activity in 95 and 91% of sacral STT neurons, respectively. CPSA and cardiopulmonary vagal stimulation decreased activity in 84 and 56% of STT neurons, respectively. CPSA stimulation decreased CRD-evoked activity in six of eight sacral STT neurons and decreased UBD-evoked activity in five of eight STT neurons tested. Excitatory amino acid application at C2 segment decreased CRD-evoked responses in 7 of 10 sacral STT neurons and decreased UBD-evoked responses in 9 of 12 STT neurons. The second purpose of this study was to examine responses of C(1)-C(3) descending propriospinal neurons to stimulation of cardiopulmonary afferent fibers. If C(1)-C(3) neurons process CPSA input to suppress STT transmission, then CPSA stimulation should excite C(1)-C(3) neurons with descending projections. Effects of thoracic vagus nerve stimulation also were examined. Vagal stimulation inhibits STT neurons in segments below C(3) but excites C(1)-C(3) STT neurons; we theorized that vagal inhibition of sensory transmission might relay in high cervical segments and, therefore, excite C(1)-C(3) descending propriospinal neurons. Extracellular discharge rate was recorded for C(1)-C(3) neurons antidromically activated from thoracic or lumbar spinal cord in 24 monkeys. CPSA stimulation increased activity of 16 of 45 neurons and inhibited one cell. Thoracic vagus stimulation increased activity of 20 of 43 neurons and inhibited one cell; stimulation of abdominal vagus fibers did not affect activity of six of six cells that were excited by thoracic vagal input. Mechanical stimulation of somatic fields excited 30 of 41 neurons tested. All neurons activated by visceral input received convergent somatic input from noxious pinch of somatic receptive fields that generally included the neck and upper body; 11 C(1)-C(3) propriospinal neurons did not respond to any afferent input examined. Results of these studies were consistent with the idea that modulation of spinal nociceptive transmission might involve neuronal connections in high cervical segments.

Animals↗

Upper thoracic respiratory interneurons integrate noxious somatic and visceral information in rats.

The aim of this study was to determine if thoracic respiratory interneurons (TRINs) might receive peripheral noxious somatic and visceral inputs. Extracellular potentials of 78 respiration-related T(3) neurons, whose activity was driven by central respiratory output, were recorded from the intermediate zone in pentobarbital anesthetized, paralyzed, and ventilated male rats. These neurons were identified as interneurons by their locations and by the absence of antidromic activation from the cervical sympathetic trunk and cerebellum. Thoracic esophageal distension (ED) was produced by water inflation of a latex balloon (0.1-0.5 ml, 20 s). A catheter was placed in the pericardial sac to administer 0.2 ml bradykinin (10(-5) M) for noxious cardiac stimulation. Of 78 TRINs examined for ED, activity of 24 TRINs increased and activity of 8 TRINs decreased. Intrapericardial bradykinin increased activity in 26/65 TRINs tested and decreased activity in 5 TRINs. Seventy-four TRINs were tested for effects of brush, pressure, and pinch of the chest and upper back areas. No TRINs responded to brushing hair. Low-threshold responses to pressure were observed in 27 TRINs. Fourteen TRINs were wide dynamic range and 4 TRINs had high-threshold responses. Peripheral stimuli affected all types of TRINs, including inspiratory, expiratory, and biphasic neurons. Simultaneous phrenic recordings showed that effects of various somatic and visceral stimuli on TRINs were independent of central respiratory drive. Various somatovisceral and viscerovisceral patterns of input were observed in TRINs. The results suggested that TRINs participate in intraspinal processing and integration of nociceptive information from somatic fields and visceral organs.

Animals↗