Biomedical subjects

Charalampos Papachristou

Publications and source records attributed to Charalampos Papachristou.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Microsatellites versus Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in confidence interval estimation of disease loci.

With cost-effective high-throughput Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) arrays now becoming widely available, it is highly anticipated that SNPs will soon become the choice of markers in whole genome screens. This optimism raises a great deal of interest in assessing whether dense SNP maps offer at least as much information as their microsatellite (MS) counterparts. Factors considered to date include information content, strength of linkage signals, and effect of linkage disequilibrium. In the current report, we focus on investigating the relative merits of SNPs vs. MS markers for disease gene localization. For our comparisons, we consider three novel confidence interval estimation procedures based on confidence set inference (CSI) using affected sib-pair data. Two of these procedures are multipoint in nature, enabling them to capitalize on dense SNPs with limited heterozygosity. The other procedure makes use of markers one at a time (two-point), but is much more computationally efficient. In addition to marker type, we also assess the effects of a number of other factors, including map density and marker heterozygosity, on disease gene localization through an extensive simulation study. Our results clearly show that confidence intervals derived based on the CSI multipoint procedures can place the trait locus in much shorter chromosomal segments using densely saturated SNP maps as opposed to using sparse MS maps. Finally, it is interesting (although not surprising) to note that, should one wish to perform a quick preliminary genome screening, then the two-point CSI procedure would be a preferred, computationally cost-effective choice.

Chromosome Mapping↗

PubMed2006

A two-step procedure for constructing confidence intervals of trait loci with application to a rheumatoid arthritis dataset.

Preliminary genome screens are usually succeeded by fine mapping analyses focusing on the regions that signal linkage. It is advantageous to reduce the size of the regions where follow-up studies are performed, since this will help better tackle, among other things, the multiplicity adjustment issue associated with them. We describe a two-step approach that uses a confidence set inference procedure as a tool for intermediate mapping (between preliminary genome screening and fine mapping) to further localize disease loci. Apart from the usual Hardy-Weiberg and linkage equilibrium assumptions, the only other assumption of the proposed approach is that each region of interest houses at most one of the disease-contributing loci. Through a simulation study with several two-locus disease models, we demonstrate that our method can isolate the position of trait loci with high accuracy. Application of this two-step procedure to the data from the Arthritis Research Campaign National Repository also led to highly encouraging results. The method not only successfully localized a well-characterized trait contributing locus on chromosome 6, but also placed its position to narrower regions when compared to their LOD support interval counterparts based on the same data.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗

PubMed2006

A comparison of methods for intermediate fine mapping.

The arrival of highly dense genetic maps at low cost has geared the focus of linkage analysis studies toward developing methods for placing putative trait loci in narrow regions with high confidence. This shift has led to a new analytic scheme that expands the traditional two-stage protocol of preliminary genome scan followed by fine mapping through inserting a new stage in between the two. The goal of this new "intermediate" fine mapping stage is to isolate disease loci to narrow intervals with high confidence so that association studies can be more focused, efficient, and cost-effective. In this paper, we compared and contrasted five methods that can be used for performing this intermediate step. These methods are: the lod support approach, the generalized estimating equations (GEE) method, the confidence set inference (CSI) procedure, and two bootstrap methods. We compared these methods in terms of the coverage probability and precision of localization of the resulting intervals. Results from a simulation study considering several two-locus models demonstrated that the two bootstrap methods yield intervals with approximately correct coverage. On the other hand, the 1-lod support intervals, and those produced by the GEE method, tend to significantly undercover the trait locus, while the regions obtained by the CSI incline to overcover the gene position. When the observed coverage of the confidence intervals produced by all the methods was held to be the same, those obtained through the CSI procedure displayed a higher ability to localize loci, especially when these loci have a minor contribution to the trait and when the amount of data available for the analysis is relatively small. However, with very large sample sizes, lod support intervals emerged as a winner. Application of the methods to the data from the Arthritis Research Campaign National Repository led to intervals containing the position of a known trait locus for all methods, with the greatest precision achieved by the CSI.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗

PubMed2005

Interval estimation of disease loci: development and applications of new linkage methods.

Three variants of the confidence set inference (CSI) procedure were proposed and applied to both the simulated and the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) data. For each of the two applications, we first performed a preliminary genome scan study based on the microsatellite markers using the GENEHUNTER+ software to identify regions that potentially harbor disease loci. For each such region, we estimated the sibling identity-by-descent sharing probability distribution at the putative disease locus. Based on these estimated probabilities, the CSI procedures were employed to further localize the disease loci using the single-nucleotide polymorphism markers, leading to confidence intervals/regions for their locations. For our analysis with the simulated data, we had knowledge of the simulating models at the time we performed the analysis.

Alcoholism↗

PubMed2005

A confidence set inference procedure for gene mapping using markers with incomplete polymorphism.

A recent approach for gene mapping based on confidence set inference (CSI) promises several advantages, including avoidance of corrections for multiple tests, availability of confidence intervals with known statistical properties, and sufficient localizations of disease genes. This paper proposes an extended CSI procedure that can handle markers with incomplete polymorphism, thereby increasing the applicability of the set of CSI methods in practical situations. Simulation studies show that the new procedure retains the main advantages of the original CSI. Although it generally requires more data to achieve a similar power, this increase is moderate for markers with 80% heterozygosity or higher. We also investigate the effects of relative risk estimates and disease models. Our analyses show that perturbation from actual relative risks or multilocus disease models generally leads to reduction in power or inflation in type I error, as expected. Nevertheless, for certain classes of two-locus disease models, CSI can still perform well, with reasonably high actual coverage probabilities for at least one of the disease loci. Application of CSI to the data provided by the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 yields encouraging results, as they compare favorably to those obtained from GENEHUNTER using its NPL sib-pair method.

Chromosome Mapping↗

PubMed2003

Linkage analysis of the simulated data - evaluations and comparisons of methods.

The goal of this study is to evaluate, compare, and contrast several standard and new linkage analysis methods. First, we compare a recently proposed confidence set approach with MAPMAKER/SIBS. Then, we evaluate a new Bayesian approach that accounts for heterogeneity. Finally, the newly developed software SIMPLE is compared with GENEHUNTER. We apply these methods to several replicates of the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated data to assess their ability to detect the high blood pressure genes on chromosome 21, whose positions were known to us prior to the analyses. In contrast to the standard methods, most of the new approaches are able to identify at least one of the disease genes in all the replicates considered.

Bayes Theorem↗