PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Charles Flexner

Publications and source records attributed to Charles Flexner.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Interactions between natural health products and antiretroviral drugs: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects.

Concurrent use of natural health products (NHPs) with antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) is widespread among human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. This article reviews the clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between NHPs and ARVs. Many NHPs are complex mixtures and are likely to contain organic compounds that may induce and/or inhibit drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. Although the weight of evidence for the effects of certain NHPs varies and many studies of these products lack scientific rigor, it has been observed that St. John's wort clearly induces cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein and reduces protease inhibitor and nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor concentrations, thereby increasing the likelihood of therapeutic failure. Limited clinical research suggests that intake of garlic and vitamin C results in reductions in ARV concentrations. The intake of milk thistle, Echinacea species, and goldenseal inhibits cytochrome P450 enzymes in vitro and may increase ARV concentrations, but by clinically unimportant amounts. Intake of fish oil reduces ARV-induced hypertriglyceridemia without significantly affecting lopinavir concentrations. Before recommending the use of NHPs as adjuncts to ARV use, studies should first exclude significant pharmacokinetic interactions and ensure that ARV efficacy is maintained.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed2006

Marked intraindividual variability in antiretroviral concentrations may limit the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Effective therapeutic drug monitoring for antiretrovirals requires a better understanding of intraindividual variability in pharmacokinetics. METHODS: We determined concentrations of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease and nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors for 10 patients with undetectable plasma HIV RNA levels who had been receiving stable regimens for > or = 11 months. Plasma samples were collected at the same time of day 3 times per week for up to 4 months. Patients were instructed to take their antiretrovirals at the same time every day. Plasma protease and nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatographic methods. Pharmacokinetic variability was expressed as intraindividual percentage coefficient of variation (ICV), which was calculated as the patient's standard deviation divided by the mean drug concentration for that patient. RESULTS: ICV was determined for 6 drugs for 10 patients, for a total of 17 different patient-drug combinations, using 600 total samples. ICV was unexpectedly high for most patients who were receiving protease inhibitors (ICVs for individual patients taking lopinavir/ritonavir were 24%, 33%, 51%, and 92%; for patients taking nelfinavir/M8 metabolite, they were 30%/44% and 39%/54%; for patients taking ritonavir, they were 34% and 43%; for patients taking saquinavir, they were 52% and 55%). ICVs for patients receiving nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors were lower (for patients receiving efavirenz, they were 7%, 13%, 29%, and 51%; for a patient receiving nevirapine, it was 25%). The median ICV for all patients receiving protease inhibitors (n = 12) was 43.5%, and for all patients receiving nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (n = 5), the median ICV was 25%. CONCLUSIONS: Intraindividual variability in concentrations of antiretrovirals was surprisingly high in virologically suppressed patients. Possible contributors include food effects, concomitant use of prescription and herbal medications, assay variability, or medication timing, which was assessed by self-report. High intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability may limit the utility of single measurements in therapeutic drug monitoring for some antiretroviral agents.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2005

Intermittent HIV-1 viremia (Blips) and drug resistance in patients receiving HAART.

CONTEXT: Many patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy experience intermittent episodes of detectable viremia ("blips"), which may raise concerns about drug resistance, lead to costly repeat measurements of viral RNA, and sometimes trigger alterations in therapy. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that blips represent random biological and statistical variation around mean steady-state HIV-1 RNA levels slightly below 50 copies/mL rather than biologically significant elevations in viremia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Between June 19, 2003, and February 9, 2004, patients receiving therapy underwent intensive sampling (every 2-3 days) over 3 to 4 months to define the frequency, magnitude, and duration of blips and their association with drug levels and other clinical variables. Blips were defined as HIV-1 RNA measurements greater than or equal to 50 copies/mL preceded and followed by measurements less than 50 copies/mL without a change in treatment. To determine whether blips result from or lead to drug resistance, an ultrasensitive genotyping assay was used to detect drug resistance mutations before, during, and after blips. Patients were 10 HIV-1-infected asymptomatic adults recruited by clinicians and followed up in the Moore Clinic at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Patients had suppression of viremia to below 50 copies/mL while receiving a stable antiretroviral regimen for 6 months or longer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At each time point, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels were measured in 2 independent laboratories and drug resistance mutations were analyzed by clonal sequencing. RESULTS: With the intensive sampling, blips were detected in 9 of 10 patients. Statistical analysis was consistent with random assay variation around a mean viral load below 50 copies/mL. Blips were not concordant on independent testing and had a short duration (median, <3 days) and low magnitude (median, 79 copies/mL). Blip frequency was not associated with demographic, clinical, or treatment variables. Blips did not occur in relation to illness, vaccination, or directly measured antiretroviral drug concentrations. Blips were marginally associated (P = .08) with reported episodes of nonadherence. Most importantly, in approximately 1000 independent clones sequenced for both protease and reverse transcriptase, no new resistance mutations were seen before, during, or shortly after blips. CONCLUSION: Most blips in this population appear to represent random biological and statistical variation around mean HIV-1 levels below 50 copies/mL rather than clinically significant elevations in viremia.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Tipranavir.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Current status and future prospects of therapeutic drug monitoring and applied clinical pharmacology in antiretroviral therapy.

The consensus of current international guidelines for the treatment of HIV infection is that data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors provide a framework for the implementation of TDM in certain defined scenarios in clinical practice. However, the utility of TDM is considered to be on an individual basis until more data are obtained from large clinical trials showing the benefit of TDM. In April 2004, a panel of experts met in Rome, Italy. This followed an inaugural meeting in Perugia, Italy, in October 2000, which resulted in the article published in AIDS 2002, 16(Suppl 1):S5-S37. The objectives of this second meeting were to review the questions surrounding TDM of antiretroviral drugs and discuss the clinical utility, current concerns and future prospects of drug concentration monitoring in the care of HIV-1-infected individuals. This report, which has been updated to include material published or presented at international conferences up to the end of September 2004, reviews pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data and reports the issues discussed by the panel, offering advice to clinical care providers who may be currently, or are considering incorporating TDM into the routine care of their patients. In addition, the panel formulated a series of position statements that are relevant to the interpretation of current data and can aid the design of future clinical trials.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2005

Therapeutic drug monitoring and drug-drug interactions involving antiretroviral drugs.

The consensus of current international guidelines for the treatment of HIV infection is that data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and protease inhibitors (Pls) provide a framework for the implementation of TDM in certain defined scenarios in clinical practice. However, the utility of TDM is considered to be on an individual basis until more data are obtained from large clinical trials showing the benefit of TDM. In April 2004, a panel of experts met for the second time in Rome, Italy. This was following the inaugural meeting in Perugia, Italy, in October 2000, which resulted in the manuscript published in AIDS 2002, 16(Suppl 1):S5-S37. The objectives of this second meeting were to review and update the numerous questions surrounding TDM of antiretroviral drugs and discuss the clinical utility, current concerns and future prospects of drug concentration monitoring in the care of HIV-1-infected individuals. A major focus of the meeting was to discuss and critically analyse recent and precedent clinical drug-drug interaction data to provide a clear framework of the pharmacological basis of how one drug may impact the disposition of another. This report, which has been updated to include material published or presented at international conferences up to the end of December 2004, reviews recent pivotal pharmacokinetic interaction data and provides advice to clinical care providers on how some drug-drug interactions may be prevented, avoided or managed, and, when data are available, on what dose adjustments and interventions should be performed.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2004

Activity, safety, and immunological effects of hydroxyurea added to didanosine in antiretroviral-naive and experienced HIV type 1-infected subjects: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, ACTG 307.

We performed a 24-week, placebo-controlled, comparative trial of hydroxyurea (HU) monotherapy, didanosine(ddI) monotherapy, and the combination of ddI plus HU administered as 1000 mg qd or 1500 mg qd in antiretroviral-naive and experienced subjects with CD4+ lymphocyte counts of 200-700 cells/mm3. Enrollment included 134 subjects. HU enhanced the antiviral activity of ddI by 1.0 log10 copies/ml after 8 weeks of therapy, with sustained responses over 24 weeks. HU alone over 4 weeks had no effect. Lamivudine resistance had little impact on antiretroviral activity when examined across treatment arms. Increases in absolute CD4+ T cell counts, but not CD4+ T cell percentages, were less in subjects who received HU compared to ddI monotherapy, and lymphoproliferative responses to antigenic and mitogenic stimuli were not altered. Subjects who received HU 1500 mg were more likely to experience dose-limiting hematological toxicities compared to those who received 1000 mg, without any additional antiviral benefit. HU may continue to have a role as a component of HIV therapy.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2004

Simplifying antiretroviral therapy.

The substantial benefits conferred by HAART require strict patient adherence. Many of the initial HAART regimens consisted of a number of large pills that needed to be taken several times daily, sometimes with meal restrictions. The development of once-daily antiretroviral agents has eased some of the burden associated with the intense, difficult schedules of early HAART regimens.. The majority of regimens currently used in treatment-naive HIV-positive patients contain a mixture of agents that are taken on a once- and twice-daily basis. Although this is an improvement over past regimens, the asynchronous administration of pills throughout the day still presents a scheduling challenge for most patients. The newest advance in simplifying antiretroviral therapy is the use of regimens in which all pills are taken at the same time once a day. Choosing drugs for a fully once-daily regimen requires awareness of a number of factors, including pharmacokinetics, potency, durability of response, resistance and safety. At this time, there are a limited number of combinations that can be used as a fully once-daily regimen and few clinical trials evaluating such combinations. Results from initial clinical trials using simplified, once-daily regimens in treatment-naive patients have been promising. Additional studies should add to this experience and provide guidance on the role and timing of such regimens in the management of patients with HIV disease.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2003

Diarrhea-associated HIV-1 APIs potentiate muscarinic activation of Cl- secretion by T84 cells via prolongation of cytosolic Ca2+ signaling.

Aspartyl protease inhibitors (APIs) effectively extend the length and quality of life in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, but dose-limiting side effects such as lipodystrophy, insulin resistance, and diarrhea have limited their clinical utility. Here, we show that the API nelfinavir induces a secretory form of diarrhea in HIV-infected patients. In vitro studies demonstrate that nelfinavir potentiates muscarinic stimulation of Cl(-) secretion by T84 human intestinal cell monolayers through amplification and prolongation of an apical membrane Ca(2+)-dependent Cl(-) conductance. This stimulated ion secretion is associated with increased magnitude and duration of muscarinically induced intracellular Ca(2+) transients via activation of a long-lived, store-operated Ca(2+) entry pathway. The enhanced intracellular Ca(2+) signal is associated with uncoupling of the Cl(-) conductance from downregulatory intracellular mediators generated normally by muscarinic activation. These data show that APIs modulate Ca(2+) signaling in secretory epithelial cells and identify a novel target for treatment of clinically important API side effects.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

A prospective, randomized trial examining the efficacy and safety of clarithromycin in combination with ethambutol, rifabutin, or both for the treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex disease in persons with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

This multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 clinical trial compared the safety and efficacy of 3 clarithromycin-containing combination regimens for the treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) disease in persons with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. A total of 160 eligible patients with bacteremic MAC disease were randomized to receive clarithromycin with either ethambutol (C+E), rifabutin (C+R), or both (C+E+R) for 48 weeks. After 12 weeks of treatment, the proportion of subjects with a complete microbiologic response was not statistically significantly different among treatment arms: the proportion was 40% in the C+E group, 42% in the C+R group, and 51% in the C+E+R group (P=.454). The proportion of patients with complete or partial responses who experienced a relapse while receiving C+R (24%) was significantly higher than that of patients receiving C+E+R (6%; P=.027) and marginally higher than that of patients receiving C+E (7%; P=.057). Subjects in the C+E+R group had improved survival, compared with the C+E group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.83) and the C+R group (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.92).

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2003

Effect of simultaneous versus staggered dosing on pharmacokinetic interactions of protease inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether pharmacokinetic interactions between the protease inhibitors saquinavir soft gel, nelfinavir, and ritonavir are affected by the timing of administration. STUDY DESIGN: We used an open-label, 6-period, incomplete Latin square crossover study in 18 human immunodeficiency virus-negative subjects. Each received single oral doses of 2 of the 3 protease inhibitors during each of 6 periods. Single doses were given either simultaneously or separated by 4 hours. The order of the periods was balanced, and periods were separated by 2 days. We measured protease inhibitor concentrations over a 24-hour period by HPLC and estimated pharmacokinetic parameters by noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: Median saquinavir area under the curve (AUC) increased by 62-fold when ritonavir was coadministered, by 50-fold when ritonavir was given 4 hours earlier, and by 16-fold when saquinavir preceded ritonavir by 4 hours. Saquinavir AUC increased by 7-fold when nelfinavir was coadministered. Nelfinavir AUC increased by 2.5-fold with coadministration of ritonavir and by 1.8- and 2.1-fold when ritonavir was administered before nelfinavir and after nelfinavir, respectively. Ritonavir AUCs were unaffected by coadministration of the other drugs. The effect of ritonavir on the kinetics of saquinavir persisted for at least 48 hours after a single dose of ritonavir, suggesting the possibility of metabolic intermediates that form inhibitory complexes. CONCLUSION: Except for saquinavir followed by ritonavir, there is little difference in protease inhibitor exposure for simultaneous or staggered doses. The persistent effect of ritonavir suggests the possibility that lower doses and longer dosing intervals might be effective when ritonavir is used to boost concentrations of other protease inhibitors.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Steady-state pharmacokinetic interaction of modified-dose indinavir and rifabutin.

BACKGROUND: Combined administration of the human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor indinavir (800 mg every 8 hours) with the antimycobacterial rifabutin (300 mg daily) results in a significant decrease in indinavir concentrations with subsequent risk of treatment failure, as well as a significant increase in rifabutin concentrations with increased toxicity. Therefore this study was designed to evaluate alternative dosing regimens. METHODS: Eighteen healthy volunteers received 300 mg rifabutin daily alone for 14 days and then 1000 mg indinavir every 8 hours plus rifabutin at a reduced dose of 150 mg daily, given at 8 am or noon in a randomized crossover sequence for 14 days. Ten human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects received 800 mg indinavir every 8 hours for 14 days and then 1000 mg indinavir every 8 hours plus 150 mg rifabutin daily at 8 am for 14 days. Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetic sampling was performed at the end of each 14-day study period. RESULTS: Indinavir, 1000 mg every 8 hours, coadministered with 150 mg rifabutin daily produced an area under the concentration-time curve similar to that of 800 mg indinavir every 8 hours. The mean area under the concentration-time curve values of rifabutin and 25-desacetyl rifabutin, when 150 mg rifabutin every morning was coadministered simultaneously with 1000 mg indinavir every 8 hours, were 70% and 120% higher than with 300 mg rifabutin daily alone. Drug concentrations were not different when rifabutin and indinavir were administered simultaneously at 8 am or staggered by 4 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing indinavir's dose to 1000 mg every 8 hours when coadministered with rifabutin at a reduced dose of 150 mg daily compensates for rifabutin induction of indinavir metabolism. Rifabutin concentrations were still higher than with rifabutin alone despite a 50% reduction of rifabutin dose, which is the current recommendation when these 2 drugs are combined. The clinical significance of the increase in rifabutin and 25-desacetyl rifabutin concentrations is not known.

Adolescent↗