PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Charles G Peterfy

Publications and source records attributed to Charles G Peterfy.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Short tau inversion recovery and proton density-weighted fat suppressed sequences for the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee with a 1.0 T dedicated extremity MRI: development of a time-efficient sequence protocol.

Aim of this study was to develop a time-efficient sequence protocol for a 1.0 T dedicated MR system to be used for whole-organ scoring of osteoarthritis (OA). Thirty-four knees were examined using a protocol that included fat suppressed fast spin echo proton density weighted sequences (PDFS) in three planes plus a coronal STIR sequence. Two radiologists scored each knee by consensus for five OA features. In separate sessions, all knees were scored using three different combinations of sequences: (1) all four sequences (reference protocol, 16 min 31 s scanning time), (2) three PDFS sequences without STIR ("No STIR", 12 min 25 s scanning time) and (3) sagittal and axial PDFS sequences plus a coronal STIR sequence ("No PDFS", 11 min 49 s scanning time). Agreement of the readings using both subsets of sequences compared to the reference protocol was evaluated using weighted kappa statistics. kappa-coefficients showed good or excellent agreement for both sequence subsets in comparison to the reference protocol for all assessed features. kappa-coefficients for No PDFS/No STIR: bone marrow abnormalities (0.74/0.67), subarticular cysts (0.84/0.63), marginal osteophytes (0.77/0.71), menisci (0.75/0.79), tibial cartilage (0.71/0.78). Optimization of sequence protocols consisting of three sequences results in time savings and cost efficiency in imaging of knee OA without loss of information over a more time consuming protocol.

Female↗
PubMed2005

The evidence for magnetic resonance imaging as an outcome measure in proof-of-concept rheumatoid arthritis studies.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has now been used extensively in cross-sectional and observational studies as well as in controlled clinical trials to assess disease activity and joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MRI measurements or scores for erosions, bone edema, and synovitis have been developed and validated by several groups. The OMERACT criteria require that outcome measures demonstrate adequate validity, discriminative power, and feasibility if they are to be useful in clinical trials. Specific performance targets for these criteria depend on the scientific, regulatory, logistical, and financial context of the study in question. We review the extent to which MRI assessments of joint erosion, bone edema, and synovitis fulfil these criteria, particularly as they relate to proof-of-concept RA clinical trials.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2004

Fixed-flexion radiography of the knee provides reproducible joint space width measurements in osteoarthritis.

The validity of a non-fluoroscopic fixed-flexion radiographic acquisition and analysis protocol for measurement of joint space width (JSW) in knee osteoarthritis is determined. A cross-sectional study of 165 patients with documented knee osteoarthritis participating in a multicenter, prospective study of chondroprotective agents was performed. All patients had posteroanterior, weight-bearing, fixed-flexion radiography with 10 degrees caudal beam angulation. A specially designed frame (SynaFlexer) was used to standardize the positioning. Minimum medial and lateral JSW were measured manually and twice by an automated analysis system to determine inter-technique and intra-reader concordance and reliability. A random subsample of 30 patients had repeat knee radiographs 2 weeks apart to estimate short-term reproducibility using automated analysis. Concordance between manual and automated medial JSW measurements was high (ICC=0.90); lateral compartment measurements showed somewhat less concordance (ICC=0.72). There was excellent concordance between repeated automated JSW measurements performed 6 months apart for the medial (ICC=0.94) and lateral (ICC=0.86) compartments. Short-term reproducibility for the subsample of 30 cases with repeat acquisitions demonstrated an average SD of 0.14 mm for medial JSW (CV=4.3%) and 0.23 mm for lateral JSW (CV=4.0%). Fixed-flexion radiography of the knee using a positioning device provides consistent, reliable and reproducible measurement of minimum JSW in knee osteoarthritis without the need for concurrent fluoroscopic guidance.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Multispectral analysis of bone lesions in the hands of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Quantitative measures of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease progression can provide valuable tools for evaluation of new treatments during clinical trials. In this study, a novel multispectral (MS) MRI analysis method is presented to quantify changes in bone lesion volume (DeltaBLV) in the hands of RA patients. Image registration and MS analysis were employed to identify MS tissue class transitions between two serial MRI exams. DeltaBLV was determined from MS class transitions between two time points. The following three classifiers were investigated: (a) multivariate Gaussian (MVG), (b) k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), and (c) K-means (KM). Unlike supervised classifiers (MVG, k-NN), KM, an unsupervised classifier, does not require labeled training data, resulting in potentially greater clinical utility. All MS estimates of DeltaBLV were linearly correlated (r(p)) with manual estimates. KM and k-NN estimates also exhibited a significant rank-order correlation (r(s)) with manual estimates. For KM, r(p) = 0.94 p < 0.0001, r(s) = 0.76 p = 0.002; for k-NN, r(p) = 0.86 p = 0.0001, r(s) = 0.69 p = 0.009; and for MVG, r(p) = 0.84 p = 0.0003, r(s) = 0.49 p = 0.09. Temporal classification rates were as follows: for KM, 90.1%; for MVG, 89.5%; and for k-NN, 86.7%. KM matched the performance of k-NN, offering strong potential for use in multicenter clinical trials. This study demonstrates that MS tissue class transitions provide a quantitative measure of DeltaBLV.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Imaging of bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common type of inflammatory arthritis, with a prevalence of 1% in the United States. Recently introduced disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs have been extremely successful in preventing irreversible joint damage, particularly if initiated early. Accordingly, accurate and early diagnosis of RA has become imperative. This shift places increased demands on imaging to identify even the slightest traces of erosive joint damage and predict future structural and functional deterioration. Unfortunately, conventional radiography has been shown to be insensitive for bone erosions, particularly in early stages of the disease. Computed tomography (CT) is rarely used, but its tomographic perspective offers advantages over projectional radiography. Ultrasound (US) detects more erosions than radiography does and also can evaluate synovitis. Scintigraphy also can detect inflammation and bone turnover at sites of active erosion. It lacks spatial resolution but offers greater anatomical coverage, making whole-body assessments possible. Of all imaging modalities, however, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows the greatest sensitivity for detecting and monitoring bone erosions and also can detect and follow pre-erosive features of RA, such as synovitis, bone marrow edema or osteitis, and tendinous and ligamentous abnormalities. In this article, we review the appearance of bone erosions on conventional radiography and alternative imaging modalities including MRI, CT, US, and scintigraphy. We also review alternative acquisition techniques for MRI in RA and discuss the utility of fat suppression and contrast enhancement.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2004

Rheumatoid arthritis of the hand and wrist: comparison of three imaging techniques.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the relative results from conventional high-field-strength 1.5-T MRI, 0.2-T low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, and radiography to detect and grade bone erosions, joint-space narrowing, and synovitis in the hands and wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with rheumatoid arthritis underwent conventional high-field-strength MRI, low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, and conventional radiography of both hands and wrists. Two independent reviewers searched for the presence and extent of bone erosions, joint-space narrowing, and synovitis. Bone erosions (E scores) and joint-space narrowing (J scores) were evaluated at 14 and 13 sites, respectively, on conventional high-field-strength MRI, low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, and radiography, using the Sharp-Genant scoring system. Synovitis (S scores) were evaluated at 13 sites on conventional high-field-strength MRI and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI. RESULTS: For the detection of bone erosions, we found no significant difference (p = 0.71) between conventional high-field-strength MRI (mean +/- SD E score, 27.5 +/- 9.8) and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI (28.8 +/- 10.0), but a significant difference (p < 0.001) appeared between MRI and radiography (13.1 +/- 8.3). J scores derived from MRI (conventional high-field-strength MRI, 15.2 +/- 8.3; low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, 14.5 +/- 10.4) were higher than those derived from radiography (12.7 +/- 9.6), although the difference was not significant (p = 0.70). Conventional high-field-strength MRI (S score, 35.1 +/- 8.6) and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI (30.8 +/- 10.2) were equivalent (p = 0.14) for the evaluation of synovitis. The interobserver agreement for MRI scores was good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.83-0.94). CONCLUSION: Conventional high-field-strength MRI and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI showed similar results in terms of cross-sectional grading of bone erosions, joint-space narrowing, and synovitis in the hands and wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

New developments in imaging in rheumatoid arthritis.

Despite the advances made in medical imaging over the past 3 decades and the central role that magnetic resonance imaging and other sophisticated technologies now play in routine clinical practice, patients with rheumatoid arthritis have benefited relatively little from these advances thus far. Over the past few years, however, evidence has accumulated to show that magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography can identify joint damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis earlier and more sensitively than other techniques can, and that these techniques can directly visualize and monitor changes in synovium and bone that precede actual bone erosion. Much of this development is being driven by the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries as they search for novel therapies to combat this disease. Accordingly, the imaging tools that ultimately will be used to direct patients to specific therapies and then to monitor treatment effectiveness and safety are currently being refined and validated in rigorous multicenter and multinational clinical trials aimed at gaining regulatory approval of these new therapies. As these therapies become available for clinical use, we can anticipate increased demand for expertise and experience in evaluating disease progression and treatment response, and to the emergence of magnetic resonance imaging systems specifically adapted for this application. The following discussion reviews the current status of this development, and notable advances that have been reported in the literature in the past year.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2002

MR findings in knee osteoarthritis.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability. Recent advances in drug discovery techniques and improvements in understanding the pathophysiology of osteoarthritic disorders have resulted in an unprecedented number of new therapeutic agents. Of all imaging modalities, radiography has been the most widely used for the diagnosis and management of the progression of knee OA. Magnetic resonance imaging is a relatively recent technique and its applications to osteoarthritis have been limited. Compared with conventional radiography, MR imaging offers unparalleled discrimination among articular soft tissues by directly visualizing all components of the knee joint simultaneously and therefore allowing the knee joint to be evaluated as a whole organ. In this article we present the MR findings in knee OA including cartilage abnormalities, osteophytes, bone edema, subarticular cysts, bone attrition, meniscal tears, ligament abnormalities, synovial thickening, joint effusion, intra-articular loose bodies, and periarticular cysts.

Bone Cysts↗
PubMed2002

Imaging of the disease process.

Until recently, imaging evaluation of osteoarthritis (OA) has relied primarily on conventional radiography. Using radiography in clinical practice or clinical research, however, has been fraught with difficulty. Techniques for reproducibly acquiring serial radiographs of joints have improved considerably over the past several years. However, the greatest promise for advancing knowledge about OA and its treatment lies in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its unique ability to examine the joint as a whole organ. In contrast to conventional radiography, MRI can directly visualize the articular cartilage, synovium, menisci, and other intra-articular structures important to the functional integrity of joints. There have been considerable advances in MRI of articular cartilage in particular over the past several years. However, much of this has come from small cross-sectional studies, and published longitudinal studies remain quite scant. The following discussion reviews the current status of imaging in OA and points to where changes might be anticipated in the future.

Arthrography↗