PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Charles J Brainerd

Publications and source records attributed to Charles J Brainerd.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Item method directed forgetting diminishes false memory.

Directed forgetting may reduce DRM false memory illusion by interfering with meaning processing. Participants were presented with a list composed of six 10-word semantically associated sub-lists, and they were either (a) asked to remember all list items of (b) asked to remember all associates from sub-lists and to forget all associates from other sub-lists. All participants were requested to recall and recognise list items. Although directed forgetting effects have been previously reported only for true responses in the DRM paradigm with the list method, we also found directed forgetting for false responses with the item method. Such forgetting instructions reduced both verbatim and meaning processing, decreasing both the intrusion and the false alarm rate. These results are consistent with two-process explanations of DRM false memories, such as fuzzy-trace theory, and add to our understanding of false memory editing.

Adult↗

Prognostic value of concordant seizure focus localizing data in the selection of temporal lobectomy candidates.

This study was performed to test the hypotheses that (a) resection of the temporal lobe epileptic focus, amenable to noninvasive as opposed to invasive localization, is associated with superior seizure outcome and (b) that quadruple (versus lesser degrees of) concordance of seizure focus localizing data predicts superior seizure-free outcome. Eighty-three patients underwent invasive (subdural-EEG) and/or noninvasive (video/scalp-EEG, SPECT, PET, MRI, neuropsychological testing) evaluation. All patients underwent anterior temporal lobectomy and amygdalohippocampectomy (ATL/AH) and seizure outcome was assessed at minimum one-year follow-up. At 34.8 +/- 2.5 months following ATL/AH, outcome was superior for patients in whom the seizure focus was amenable to noninvasive compared to invasive localization (80% versus 40% seizure-free, X2 = 14.03, p < 0.05). Seizure outcome was superior for patients with quadruple, compared to all lesser degrees of, concordance of seizure focus localizing data (85% versus 51% seizure-free, X2 = 7.34, p < 0.05). Post-ATL/AH, seizure outcome is superior in patients (1) harboring an epileptic focus amenable to noninvasive localization and (2) with quadruple concordance of seizure focus localizing data. These findings support the development of temporal lobectomy selection criteria including up to four invasive and/or noninvasive concordant seizure focus localizing techniques.

Adolescent↗