PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Charles M Rudin

Publications and source records attributed to Charles M Rudin.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The Genomic Landscape of MYC-, MYCL-, and MYCN-Amplified Solid Tumors.

PURPOSE: MYC, MYCN, and MYCL amplifications are recurrent oncogenic events across solid tumors. Currently, no standardized selection biomarker is available to identify patients with MYC-dependent tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We analyzed copy-number alterations of MYC family genes and their features in more than 68,000 tumor-normal paired samples from pediatric and adult patients sequenced with MSK-IMPACT (Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets) and annotated with FACETS (Fraction and Allele-Specific Copy Number Estimates from Tumor Sequencing). The relationship between amplification features and MYC mRNA expression levels were evaluated in more than 10,000 samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). RESULTS: Across MSK Cancer Center samples, MYC amplifications were most common, found in 2,949 samples compared with 310 in MYCL and 217 in MYCN. Although MYCN and MYCL amplifications were predominantly focal (<10 Mb, 79% and 93%, respectively), MYC amplifications were frequently broader (>10 Mb, 62%). Although most tumor types showed similar features between broad and focal amplifications of MYC, in select cancer types, we identified differing co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity patterns with other disease-specific drivers. Furthermore, although MYC-amplified TCGA samples showed higher mRNA expression than wild-type ones, the focality of MYC amplification was seen to have limited influence on expression levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that MYC dependency likely depends on many factors, including, but not limited to, total copy number of the detected amplification, lineage-specific factors, concomitant presence or absence of additional oncogenic alterations, and in some cases amplification focality.

Humans

Patient-reported outcomes with tarlatamab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy: results from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial.

BACKGROUND: Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is associated with a high symptom burden and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This prespecified analysis from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for tarlatamab versus standard-of-care (SoC) chemotherapy following first-line platinum-based therapy. METHODS: DeLLphi-304 is a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 3 study in adults with ES-SCLC. PROs were assessed using validated instruments, including the EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-LC13, FACT-G GP5, BPI-SF, and the EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale. Change from baseline, response rates, and time to deterioration in these PROs were analyzed. RESULTS: PRO data from all 509 patients enrolled were evaluated. Compliance with QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 assessments remained above 69% through 19&#xa0;weeks. A higher proportion of patients receiving tarlatamab achieved symptom or functional improvement at 19&#xa0;weeks compared with SoC in chest pain (19% vs 10%), cough (35% vs 26%), dyspnea (22% vs 7%), physical functioning (13% vs 8%), and global health status (23% vs 15%), respectively. Tarlatamab also delayed deterioration in symptoms, physical functioning, and pain at worst relative to SoC. FACT-G GP5 results indicated that patients receiving tarlatamab were less bothered by treatment side effects over time. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to its previously reported antitumor activity, tarlatamab demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms and HRQoL compared with SoC. These findings support a favorable benefit-risk profile of tarlatamab in patients previously treated for ES-SCLC.

Humans

Immune biomarkers and response to checkpoint inhibition of BRAFV600 and BRAF non-V600 altered lung cancers.

BACKGROUND: While 2-4% of lung cancers possess alterations in BRAF, little is known about the immune responsiveness of these tumours. METHODS: Clinical and genomic data were collected from 5945 patients with lung cancers whose tumours underwent next-generation sequencing between 2015 and 2018. Patients were&#xa0;followed through 2020. RESULTS: In total, 127 patients with metastatic BRAF-altered lung cancers were identified: 29 tumours had Class I mutations, 59 had Class II/III alterations, and 39 had variants of unknown significance (VUS). Tumour mutation burden was higher in Class II/III than Class I-altered tumours (8.8 mutations/Mb versus 4.9, P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), but this difference was diminished when stratified by smoking status. The overall response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) was 9% in Class I-altered tumours and 26% in Class II/III (P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.25), with median time on treatment of 1.9 months in both groups. Among patients with Class I-III-altered tumours, 36-month HR for death in those who ever versus never received ICI was 1.82 (1.17-6.11). Nine patients were on ICI for >2 years (two with Class I mutations, two with Class II/III alterations, and five with VUS). CONCLUSIONS: A subset of patients with BRAF-altered lung cancers achieved durable disease control on ICI. However, collectively no significant clinical benefit was seen.

Biomarkers, Tumor