PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Charles Moore

Publications and source records attributed to Charles Moore.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Short-term alcohol and drug treatment outcomes predict long-term outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Although addiction is recognized as a chronic, relapsing condition, few treatment studies, and none in a commercially insured managed care population, have measured long-term outcomes. We examined the relationship of 6-month treatment outcomes to abstinence 5 years post-treatment, and whether the predictors of abstinence at 5 years were different for those who were, and were not, abstinent at 6 months. METHODS: The sample (N=784) is from an outpatient (day hospital and traditional outpatient) managed care chemical dependency program. Subjects were interviewed at baseline, 6 months, and 5 years. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess which individual, treatment and extra-treatment characteristics predicted alcohol and drug abstinence at 5 years. RESULTS: Abstinence at 6 months was an important predictor of abstinence at 5 years. Among those abstinent at 6 months, predictors of abstinence at 5 years were older age, being female, 12-step meeting attendance, and recovery-oriented social networks. Among those not abstinent at 6 months, being alcohol dependent rather than drug dependent, 12-step meeting attendance, treatment readmission, and recovery-oriented social networks predicted abstinence at 5 years. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate a clear association between short-term and long-term treatment success. In addition, these results strongly support the importance of recovery-oriented social networks for those with good short-term outcomes, and the beneficial impact of readmission for those not initially successful in treatment.

Adolescent↗

Services integration and cost-effectiveness.

Alcohol treatment services are increasingly combined with other health and social services to address the needs of multiple-problem clients. Hence, it has been of growing policy interest to find the most effective and the most cost-effective ways of linking these services. This symposium presents some recent studies in this area. The small but growing body of studies in this area has great potential to inform public policy debates.

Alcoholism↗

Utilization and cost impact of integrating substance abuse treatment and primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of integrating medical and substance abuse treatment on health care utilization and cost. RESEARCH DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial assigning patients to one of two treatment modalities: an Integrated Care model where primary health care is provided along with substance abuse treatment within the unit and an Independent Care model where medical care is provided in the HMO's primary care clinics independently from substance abuse treatment. SUBJECTS: Adult patients entering treatment at the outpatient Chemical Dependency Recovery Program in Kaiser Sacramento. MEASURES: Medical utilization and cost for 12 months pretreatment and 12 months after treatment entry. RESULTS: For the full, randomized cohort, there were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups over time. However, among the subset of patients with substance abuse related medical conditions (SAMC), Integrated Care patients had significant decreases in hospitalization rates (P = 0.04), inpatient days (P = 0.05) and ER use (P = 0.02). Total medical costs per member-month declined from 431.12 US dollars to 200.03 US dollars (P = 0.02). Among SAMC Independent Care patients, there was a downward trend in inpatient days (P = 0.08) and ER costs (P = 0.05) but no statistically significant decrease in total medical cost. CONCLUSIONS: (Non)findings for the full sample suggest that integrating substance abuse treatment with primary care, may not be necessary or appropriate for all patients. However, it may be beneficial to refer patients with substance abuse related medical conditions to a provider also trained in addiction medicine. There appear to be large cost impacts of providing integrated care for such patients.

Adult↗

Fructose-1,6-diphosphate alone and in combination with cyclosporine potentiates rat cardiac allograft survival and inhibits lymphocyte proliferation and interleukin-2 expression.

BACKGROUND: Fructose-1,6-diphosphate (FDP) reduces postischemic reperfusion injury and is used alone and in combination with cyclosporine A (CsA) as an immunosuppressant. METHODS: Wistar-Furth rat hearts were grafted to Lewis rats. Activated T-cell proliferation, viability, and interleukin-2 expression were determined. RESULTS: Mean survival in days were: saline 7.12+/-0.64, FDP 350 mg/kg perioperatively 13.5+/-1.4, FDP 350 mg/kg twice daily 11.4+/-0.75, CsA 2.5 mg/kg daily 12+/-0.81, CsA 5.0 mg/kg daily 12.4+/-0.81, CsA 2.5 mg/kg + FDP 350 mg/kg twice daily 17.6+/-0.4, and CsA 5 mg/kg + FDP 350 mg/kg twice daily 28.2+/-0.97. FDP maximally inhibits T-cell proliferation and concomitantly increases cell viability at 5,000 to 500 microg/mL, whereas CsA inhibits at 500 ng/mL. FDP completely inhibited interleukin-2 expression at 5,000 to 500 microg/mL, whereas CsA partially inhibited at 50 to 500 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: FDP + CsA prolongs cardiac survival and FDP inhibits T-cell proliferation.

Animals↗