PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Charles Parnot

Publications and source records attributed to Charles Parnot.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Coupling ligand structure to specific conformational switches in the beta2-adrenoceptor.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate a wide variety of physiological functions in response to structurally diverse ligands ranging from cations and small organic molecules to peptides and glycoproteins. For many GPCRs, structurally related ligands can have diverse efficacy profiles. To investigate the process of ligand binding and activation, we used fluorescence spectroscopy to study the ability of ligands having different efficacies to induce a specific conformational change in the human beta2-adrenoceptor (beta2-AR). The 'ionic lock' is a molecular switch found in rhodopsin-family GPCRs that has been proposed to link the cytoplasmic ends of transmembrane domains 3 and 6 in the inactive state. We found that most partial agonists were as effective as full agonists in disrupting the ionic lock. Our results show that disruption of this important molecular switch is necessary, but not sufficient, for full activation of the beta2-AR.

Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists↗

Systems analyses reveal two chaperone networks with distinct functions in eukaryotic cells.

Molecular chaperones assist the folding of newly translated and stress-denatured proteins. In prokaryotes, overlapping sets of chaperones mediate both processes. In contrast, we find that eukaryotes evolved distinct chaperone networks to carry out these functions. Genomic and functional analyses indicate that in addition to stress-inducible chaperones that protect the cellular proteome from stress, eukaryotes contain a stress-repressed chaperone network that is dedicated to protein biogenesis. These stress-repressed chaperones are transcriptionally, functionally, and physically linked to the translational apparatus and associate with nascent polypeptides emerging from the ribosome. Consistent with a function in de novo protein folding, impairment of the translation-linked chaperone network renders cells sensitive to misfolding in the context of protein synthesis but not in the context of environmental stress. The emergence of a translation-linked chaperone network likely underlies the elaborate cotranslational folding process necessary for the evolution of larger multidomain proteins characteristic of eukaryotic cells.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Sequential binding of agonists to the beta2 adrenoceptor. Kinetic evidence for intermediate conformational states.

The beta2 adrenoreceptor (beta2AR) is a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activated by catecholamines. Agonist activation of GPCRs leads to sequential interactions with heterotrimeric G proteins, which activate cellular signaling cascades, and with GPCR kinases and arrestins, which attenuate GPCR-mediated signaling. We used fluorescence spectroscopy to monitor catecholamine-induced conformational changes in purified beta2AR. Here we show that upon catecholamine binding, beta2ARs undergo transitions to two kinetically distinguishable conformational states. Using a panel of chemically related catechol derivatives, we identified the specific chemical groups on the agonist responsible for the rapid and slow conformational changes in the receptor. The conformational changes observed in our biophysical assay were correlated with biologic responses in cellular assays. Dopamine, which induces only a rapid conformational change, is efficient at activating Gs but not receptor internalization. In contrast, norepinephrine and epinephrine, which induce both rapid and slow conformational changes, are efficient at activating Gs and receptor internalization. These results support a mechanistic model for GPCR activation where contacts between the receptor and structural determinants of the agonist stabilize a succession of conformational states with distinct cellular functions.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

Lessons from constitutively active mutants of G protein-coupled receptors.

In the past decade, the concept of constitutive activity has profoundly modified our understanding of G protein-coupled-receptors (GPCRs). Here, we review the contribution of constitutively active mutants (CAMs) to our understanding of three aspects of GPCR physiopathology: (1) GPCR activation is a complex mechanism involving both the release of inactive state conformational constraints, mimicked by most CAMs, and the creation of new interactions that stabilize the active state and are mimicked by a restricted set of CAMs; (2) GPCR phosphorylation, internalization and desensitization processes are activated by receptor conformations, which partly overlap those activating G protein; (3) natural CAMs, mostly affecting GPCRs of the endocrine system, are found in several hereditary and acquired diseases, including cancers. One major remaining question is how CAMs recapitulate the different structural modifications of the agonist-induced active conformation(s) of the wild-type receptor. This characterization is a prerequisite for further use of CAMs as ligand-free models of active GPCRs in structural, cellular and physiological studies.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Constitutive internalization of constitutively active agiotensin II AT(1A) receptor mutants is blocked by inverse agonists.

As constitutively active mutants (CAMs) mimic an active conformation, they can be used to characterize the process of G protein-coupled receptor activation. Here, we used CAMs to study the link between activation and internalization of the angiotensin II AT(1A) receptor. The cellular localization of fluorescently tagged N111A, I245T, and L305Q mutants was determined by confocal microscopy. In the absence of ligand, CAMs were mostly located in intracellular vesicles, whereas the wild-type AT(1A) was found at the cell surface. After 2 h incubation with inverse agonist, losartan, CAMs were translocated to the plasma membrane. Similar observations were made in H295, a human adrenocortical cell line which expresses physiologically the AT(1) receptor. This phenomenon, which was not dependent on protein synthesis and the pharmacology and kinetics of which were similar to the recycling of the wild-type receptor, was called "externalization". After externalization and losartan removal, the L305Q CAM underwent rapid ligand-independent endocytosis, with the same kinetics and temperature sensitivity as the angiotensin II-induced internalization of the wild-type AT(1A). Moreover, the addition of a second mutation known to block internalization (Delta 329 truncation) prevented intracellular localization of the CAM. These data show that AT(1A) CAMs are constitutively and permanently internalized and recycled. This mechanism is different from the down-regulation observed for CAMs of other G protein-coupled receptors and thus defines a new paradigm for the cellular regulation of CAMs.

Amino Acid Substitution↗