PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Charles Poole

Publications and source records attributed to Charles Poole.

39 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

The darkness at the end of the tunnel: summary and evaluation of an international symposium on light, endocrine systems and cancer.

Research on light at night and cancer is evolving at an accelerating pace, fueled largely by exciting results in rodent toxicology and basic human biology. Epidemiologic research is at a relatively early stage of development in which the exposure surrogates such as shift work and blindness predominate. Causal graphs for shift work, light at night and breast cancer illustrate some of the subtleties that can arise in the use of exposure surrogates of different kinds. Baseline data on circadian rhythms and melatonin cycles among human populations living at different latitudes are needed. Epidemiologic study of this topic is expected to mature soon as studies begin to incorporate quantitative and semiquantitative measurements and personal histories of exposure to light at night. The current emphasis on breast cancer should widen to include other cancers and intermediate outcomes. An advance in epidemiologic studies of blind persons would be to compare cancer rates between the "cortically blind" and the "retinally blind" within levels of visual impairment. Without a proposed intervention to reduce exposure to light at night, attributable fraction and attributable caseload estimates are meaningless. In the near future, both epidemiologic and laboratory research in this area are expected to grow appreciably in scope and scale.

Darkness↗

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses to canarypox vector-based HIV vaccines in HIV-seronegative individuals: a meta-analysis of published studies.

PURPOSE: A successful prophylactic HIV vaccine will probably require neutralizing antibodies and vigorous CTL (CD8+ T-cytotoxic lymphocyte) responses. Canarypox vector-based HIV vaccines (ALVAC-HIV) have been gaining momentum as promising HIV vaccine candidates because of their ability to elicit CTL responses. This quantitative meta-analysis was undertaken to determine a summary estimate of CTL responses to ALVAC-HIV vaccines in HIV-1 seronegative volunteers and to identify reasons for differences among studies in the estimated effects on CTL responses. METHOD: After a literature search and data abstraction, eight randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were selected for meta-analysis. Stratified and random effects meta-regression analyses were performed to search for response differences among studies. RESULTS: Of the various study characteristics, the number of immunizations and the vaccine dose were associated with the likelihood of developing CTL responses. It was not possible to distinguish the effect of either the number of immunizations or the vaccine dose on CTL responses because these two study characteristics were highly associated with each other. CONCLUSION: More trials are warranted to determine the ideal dose/immunization schedule that would elicit maximal CTL responses.

AIDS Vaccines↗

Preventable drug-related hospital admissions.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of preventable drug-related hospital admissions (PDRAs) and to explore if selected study characteristics affect prevalence estimates. METHODS: Keyword search of MEDLINE (1966-December 1999), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-December 1999), and hand search. Two reviewers independently selected studies published in peer-reviewed journals and extracted crude prevalence estimates and study characteristics. Trials had to specifically address consequences of drug therapy requiring hospital admission and include a quantitative preventability assessment. Stratified analysis and meta-regression were used to explore the association between study characteristics and prevalence estimates. DATA SYNTHESIS: Fifteen studies reported a median PDRA prevalence of 4.3% (interquartile range [IQR] 3.1-9.5%). The median preventability rate of drug-related admissions was 59% (IQR 50-73%). No evidence of publication bias related to study size could be determined. Because the individual study results were highly heterogeneous (Cochran's Q = 176, df = 14; p < 0.001), no meta-analytic summary estimate was computed. Stratified analysis suggested an association between prevalence estimates and 3 study characteristics: exclusion of first admissions (readmission studies: average PDRA prevalence of 14.0 %, estimated prevalence OR = 3.7); mean age of admissions >70 (OR = 2.1); and inclusion of "indirect" drug-related morbidity, such as omission errors or therapeutic failure (OR = 1.9). There was little evidence of other associations with prevalence estimates, such as selection of specific hospital units, exclusion/inclusion of planned admissions, country, and specified methods of PDRA case ascertainment. CONCLUSIONS: Drug-related morbidity is a significant healthcare problem, and a great proportion is preventable. Study methods in prevalence reports vary and should be considered when interpreting findings or planning future research.

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions↗