PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Charles W Anderson

Publications and source records attributed to Charles W Anderson.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparison of linear, nonlinear, and feature selection methods for EEG signal classification.

The reliable operation of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) based on spontaneous electroencephalogram (EEG) signals requires accurate classification of multichannel EEG. The design of EEG representations and classifiers for BCI are open research questions whose difficulty stems from the need to extract complex spatial and temporal patterns from noisy multidimensional time series obtained from EEG measurements. The high-dimensional and noisy nature of EEG may limit the advantage of nonlinear classification methods over linear ones. This paper reports the results of a linear (linear discriminant analysis) and two nonlinear classifiers (neural networks and support vector machines) applied to the classification of spontaneous EEG during five mental tasks, showing that nonlinear classifiers produce only slightly better classification results. An approach to feature selection based on genetic algorithms is also presented with preliminary results of application to EEG during finger movement.

Algorithms↗

Linear and nonlinear methods for brain-computer interfaces.

At the recent Second International Meeting on Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) held in June 2002 in Rensselaerville, NY, a formal debate was held on the pros and cons of linear and nonlinear methods in BCI research. Specific examples applying EEG data sets to linear and nonlinear methods are given and an overview of the various pros and cons of each approach is summarized. Overall, it was agreed that simplicity is generally best and, therefore, the use of linear methods is recommended wherever possible. It was also agreed that nonlinear methods in some applications can provide better results, particularly with complex and/or other very large data sets.

Algorithms↗

Recognition memory for faces in schizophrenia patients and their first-degree relatives.

It has consistently been shown that schizophrenia patients are impaired in recognition memory for faces. However, studies have not examined the specificity of this deficit relative to other cognitive functions nor the relationship between this deficit and particular schizophrenia symptoms. In addition, no studies have examined recognition memory for faces in unaffected biological relatives of schizophrenia patients who likely share some of the genetic diathesis for this disorder without presenting the potential confounds of mentally ill study samples. The Faces subtests from the Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition were used to evaluate recognition memory for faces in 39 schizophrenia patients, 33 of their first-degree relatives and 56 normal controls. Both schizophrenia patients and their relatives were impaired, relative to control participants, in recognition memory for faces after partialing out group differences in spatial attention or verbal memory. Further, recognition memory for faces was associated with positive symptoms in the schizophrenia group and schizotypal personality traits in the relative group. These findings may have important implications for reducing etiological heterogeneity among schizophrenia populations, identifying disorder susceptibility among their relatives and furthering understanding of disorder etiology.

Adolescent↗