PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Cheng-fei Zhang

Publications and source records attributed to Cheng-fei Zhang.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

[Clinical evaluation of the effect of angulation apical X-rays and the X-rays with file in diagnosing multiple canals in mandibular anterior teeth and premolars].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate different angle projection technique for the clinical detection and treatment of multiple canals in mandibular anterior teeth and premolars. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-seven in vivo mandibular anterior teeth and premolars were selected from two hundred and fourteen patients. Four kinds of radiographs were taken for each tooth. The radiograph was taken at a horizontal angles of 0, 20 - 30 degrees from the mesial or distal of the tooth with and without files in canal. If a radiolucent line or files was present mesial or distal to the main canal, an additional canal was suspected. If the tooth appeared to have one large canal in the cervical or middle third of the root which disappeared or constricted as it traveled in an apical direction, an additional canal was suspected. The root canals were instrumented with ProTaper in crown-down mode and filled with laterally condensed gutta-percha and paste, the root canal configurations were classified into Types I - V. RESULTS: 60.92% multiple canals and 26.44% long oval canals were detected and treated from suspected multiple canals. The sensitivity of angle projection technique with file in X-ray diagnosing of multiple canals was 93.0%, and second canal was missed in four cases. The multiple canals in the 247 mandibular anterior teeth and premolars were present in central incisors: 9.43% (5 of 53); lateral incisors: 38.33% (23 of 60); canines: 15.90% (7 of 44), first premolar: 40.38% (21 of 52); second premolar: 2.63% (1 of 38). CONCLUSIONS: The different angle projection technique will assist the clinician in the detection and treatment of multiple canals in mandibular anterior teeth and premolar, and angle projection technique with file detected more multiple canals.

Adult↗

[Comparative study of resosolv and chloroform in retreatment of canal obturated with resinifying agent].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possibility for removal of resinifying agent, time required for removal and the working length loss by Resosolv or Chloroform. METHODS: 40 human teeth (80 root canals) obturated with FR phenolaldehyde agent were divided into four groups, 20 root canals per group. Group A: Resosolv with K file; group B: chloroform with K file; group C: Resosolv with Ultrasonic K file; group D: Chloroform with ultrasonic K file. Calculating the pereentage for removal of resinifying agent, time required for removal and the working length loss. RESULTS: The effectiveness of Resosolv for removing resinifying agent was better than chloroform. 87.5% of canals could be negotiated by Resosolv; 45% of canals be negotiated by chloroform. CONCLUSION: Resosolv is an effective solvent for canals obturated with resinifying agent.

Chloroform↗

[Location and negotiation of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate prevalence, location, negotiation and the effect of operating microscope (OM) in the treatment of the second mesiobuccal canal (MB2) in maxillary molars. METHODS: 113 maxillary molars were studied. The crowns of the teeth were removed 1 mm above the chamber bottom for searching MB2 canal. Initially location and negotiation of MB2 canal were attempted without OM. Teeth in which MB2 canal were not located or negotiated were further explored under OM. Canal orifices including MB orifice, MB2 orifice and palatal orifice were filled by red gutta-percha cones, then the teeth were scanned by scanner. The images were analyzed by Image-Proplus 4.0 software to measure the relationship between MB2 canal and other canals. RESULTS: The MB-MB2 distance is (1.47 +/- 0.54) mm, MB-P distance is (5.77 +/- 0.66) mm, the vertical distance from MB2 to MB-P line is (0.53 +/- 0.28) mm, the angle between MB-P line and MB-MB2 line is 23.07 degrees +/- 13.08 degrees. MB2 orifices were located in 70 teeth (61.9%) and negotiated in 53 teeth (46.9%) without OM. With OM, additional MB2 orifices were located in other 6 teeth, 4 were negotiated; and 2 were negotiated in which MB2 canal were not negotiated without OM. CONCLUSIONS: MB2 canal can be located in 67.3% and negotiated in 52.2% of maxillary molars. Ability to locate and negotiate MB2 canal is facilitated by OM. The MB2 canal was located less than 1 mm mesially to the MB-P line and 2 mm palatally from the MB orifice.

Dental Pulp Cavity↗