Biomedical subjects

Cheryl A Olman

Publications and source records attributed to Cheryl A Olman.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The effect of large veins on spatial localization with GE BOLD at 3 T: Displacement, not blurring.

We used two different methods of region of interest (ROI) definition to investigate the spatial accuracy of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at low and high spatial resolution. The "single-condition localizer" consisted of block alternation between a target stimulus and a mean gray background. The "differential localizer" consisted of block alternation between the target stimulus and another stimulus that filled the complement of the visual field. A separate series of scans, in which the target stimulus was presented briefly with long inter-stimulus intervals, was used to measure the hemodynamic impulse response function (HIRF). As expected, the differential localizer defined more restricted ROIs that better matched the predicted cortical representation of the target stimulus. However, at low resolution (3-mm isotropic) many voxels that responded positively to the target stimulus in the differential protocol responded negatively to the target stimulus in the single-condition localizer and in the HIRF measurements. The localization errors were attributed to voxels near large veins, which were identified based on low mean intensity and high variance. At high resolution (1.2-mm isotropic), the effects of large veins were present, but affected a smaller number of voxels. Thus, the use of differential localizers does not necessarily result in a more accurate indication of the underlying neural activity. Localization errors are reduced at higher spatial resolutions and can be eliminated by identification and removal of voxels dominated by large veins.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Spatially specific FMRI repetition effects in human visual cortex.

The functional MRI (fMRI) response to a pair of identical, successively presented stimuli can result in a smaller signal than the presentation of two nonidentical stimuli. This "repetition effect" has become a frequently used tool to make inferences about neural selectivity in specific cortical areas. However, little is known about the mechanism(s) underlying the effect. In particular, despite many successful applications of the technique in higher visual areas, repetition effects in lower visual areas [e.g., primary visual cortex (V1)] have been more difficult to characterize. One property that is well understood in early visual areas is the mapping of visual field locations to specific areas of the cortex (i.e., retinotopy). We used the retinotopic organization of V1 to activate progressively different populations of neurons in a rapid fMRI experimental design. We observed a repetition effect (reduced signal) when localized stimulus elements were repeated in identical locations. We show that this effect is spatially tuned and largely independent of both interstimulus interval (100-800 ms) and the focus of attention. Using the same timing parameters for which we observed a large effect of spatial position, we also examined the response to orientation changes and observed no effect of an orientation change on the response to repeated stimuli in V1 but significant effects in other retinotopic areas. Given these results, we discuss the possible causes of these repetition effects as well as the implications for interpreting other experiments that use this potentially powerful imaging technique.

Female↗

PubMed2004

BOLD fMRI and psychophysical measurements of contrast response to broadband images.

We have measured the relationship between image contrast, perceived contrast, and BOLD fMRI activity in human early visual areas, for natural, whitened, pink noise, and white noise images. As root-mean-square contrast increases, BOLD response to natural images is stronger and saturates more rapidly than response to the whitened images. Perceived contrast and BOLD fMRI responses are higher for pink noise than for white noise patterns, by the same ratio as between natural and whitened images. Spatial phase structure has no measurable effect on perceived contrast or BOLD fMRI response. The fMRI and perceived contrast response results can be described by models of spatial frequency response in V1, that match the contrast sensitivity function at low contrasts, and have more uniform spatial frequency response at high contrasts.

Adult↗