Biomedical subjects

Chintana Paramagul

Publications and source records attributed to Chintana Paramagul.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare computer-aided mammographic density estimation (MDEST) with radiologist estimates of percentage density and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study; patient informed consent requirements were waived. A fully automated MDEST computer program was used to measure breast density on digitized mammograms in 65 women (mean age, 53 years; range, 24-89 years). Pixel gray levels in detected breast borders were analyzed, and dense areas were segmented. Percentage density was calculated by dividing the number of dense pixels by the total number of pixels within the borders. Seven breast radiologists (five trained with MDEST, two not trained) prospectively assigned qualitative BI-RADS density categories and visually estimated percentage density on 260 mammograms. Qualitative BI-RADS assessments were compared with new quantitative BI-RADS standards. The reference standard density for this study was established by allowing the five trained radiologists to manipulate the MDEST gray-level thresholds, which segmented mammograms into dense and nondense areas. Statistical tests performed include Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman agreement method, kappa statistics, and unpaired t tests. RESULTS: There was a close correlation between the reference standard and radiologist-estimated density (R = 0.90-0.95) and MDEST density (R = 0.89). Untrained radiologists overestimated percentage density by an average of 37%, versus 6% for trained radiologists (P < .001). MDEST showed better agreement with the reference standard (average overestimate, 1%; range, -15% to +18%). MDEST correlated better with percentage density than with qualitative BI-RADS categories. There were large overlaps and ranges of percentage density in qualitative BI-RADS categories 2-4. Qualitative BI-RADS categories correlated poorly with new quantitative BI-RADS categories, and 16 (6%) of 260 views were erroneously classified by MDEST. CONCLUSION: MDEST compared favorably with radiologist estimates of percentage density and is more reproducible than radiologist estimates when qualitative BI-RADS density categories are used. Qualitative and quantitative BI-RADS density assessments differed markedly.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate effects of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) involving an interval change classifier (which uses interval change information extracted from prior and current mammograms and estimates a malignancy rating) on radiologists' accuracy in characterizing masses on two-view serial mammograms as malignant or benign. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data collection protocol had institutional review board approval. Patient informed consent was waived for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Ninety temporal pairs of two-view serial mammograms (depicting 47 malignant and 43 benign biopsy-proved masses) were obtained from 68 patient files and were digitized. Biopsy was the reference standard. Eight Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992-accredited radiologists and two breast imaging fellows assessed digitized two-view temporal pairs (in preselected regions of interest only) by estimating likelihood of malignancy and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category without and with CAD. Observers' rating data were analyzed with Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz (DBM) multireader multicase method. Statistical significance of differences was estimated with the DBM method and Student two-tailed paired t test. RESULTS: Average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for likelihood of malignancy across the 10 observers was 0.83 (range, 0.74-0.88) without CAD and improved to 0.87 (range, 0.80-0.92) with CAD (P < .05). The average partial area index above a sensitivity of 0.90 for likelihood of malignancy was 0.35 (range, 0.13-0.54) without CAD and 0.49 (range, 0.18-0.73) with CAD--a nonsignificant improvement (P = .11). For BI-RADS assessment, it was estimated that with CAD, six radiologists would correctly recommend additional biopsies for malignant masses (range, 4.3%-10.6%) and five would correctly recommend reduction of biopsy (ie, fewer biopsies) for benign masses (range, 2.3%-9.3%). However, five radiologists would incorrectly recommend additional biopsy for benign masses (range, 2.3%-14.0%), and one would incorrectly recommend reduction of biopsy (4.3%). CONCLUSION: CAD involving interval change analysis of preselected regions of interest can significantly improve radiologists' accuracy in classifying masses on digitized screen-film mammograms as malignant or benign.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Is lobular carcinoma in situ as a component of breast carcinoma a risk factor for local failure after breast-conserving therapy? Results of a matched pair analysis.

BACKGROUND: The goals of the current study were to compare the clinicopathologic presentations of patients with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) as a component of breast carcinoma who were treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) and radiation therapy (RT) with those of patients without LCIS as part of their primary tumor and to report rates of local control by overall cohort and specifically in patients with positive margins for LCIS and multifocal LCIS. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with Stages 0-II breast carcinoma with LCIS (LCIS-containing tumor group, LCTG) that had received BCS+RT treatment at the University of Michigan between 1989 and 2003 were identified. These patients were matched to 121 patients without LCIS (control group) in a 1:2 ratio. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 3.9 years (range, 0.3-18.9 yrs). There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to clinical, pathologic, or treatment-related variables or in mammographic presentation, with the exception of a higher proportion of the LCTG patients who received adjuvant hormonal therapy (P = 0.01). The rates of local control at 5 years were 100% in the LCTG group and 99.1% in the control group (P = 0.86). The presence of LCIS at the margins and the size and presence of multifocal LCIS did not alter the rate of local control. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of LCIS and its presence at the margins did not reduce the excellent rates of local control after BCS+RT. The data suggest that LCIS in the tumor specimen, even when multifocal, should not affect selection of patients for BCS and whole-breast RT.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Clinical and radiologic assessments to predict breast cancer pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the ability of clinical examination, mammography, vascularity-sensitive ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine pathologic complete response (CR) in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants were women with primary measurable, operable invasive breast cancer (Stages I-III) who presented to the University of Michigan Breast Care Center. Eligibility criteria were based on clinical need for chemotherapy as part of the overall treatment plan. The chemotherapy consisted of doxorubicin and docetaxel administered every 3 weeks for four cycles. Tumor size measurements by physical examination and by the three imaging modalities were performed before chemotherapy was initiated and after its completion, prior to definitive surgery. Response criteria were pre-specified in this prospective design, and study radiologists analyzed the mammographic, sonographic and MRI image sets blinded to information from the other modalities and blinded to final histological diagnosis. The pathologic CR rate obtained by the clinical and imaging modalities was compared to pathologic CR as determined pathologically. RESULTS: 41 of 43 enrolled patients had a determination of pathologic response, and 4 patients had a pathologic CR to this chemotherapy (9.8%). The accuracy of physical examination, mammography, ultrasound, and MRI in determining pathologic CR was 75, 89, 82, and 89% respectively (NS). CONCLUSION: Biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains absolutely necessary to determine pathologic CR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as the accuracy of current imaging modalities is insufficient to make this determination. The accuracy of mammography, vascularity-sensitive ultrasound, and MRI were not observed to be significantly different.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Improvement in radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign breast masses on serial mammograms with computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) on radiologists' characterization of masses on serial mammograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty-three temporal image pairs (138 malignant and 115 benign) obtained from 96 patients who had masses on serial mammograms were evaluated. The temporal pairs were formed by matching masses of the same view from two different examinations. Eight radiologists and two breast imaging fellows assessed the temporal pairs with and without computer aid. The classification of accuracy was quantified by using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (A(z)). The statistical significance of the difference in A(z) between the different reading conditions was estimated with the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method for analysis of multireader multicase data and with the Student paired t test for analysis of observer-specific paired data. RESULTS: The average A(z) for radiologists' estimates of the likelihood of malignancy was 0.79 without CAD and improved to 0.84 with CAD. The improvement was statistically significant (P =.005). The corresponding average partial area index was 0.25 without CAD and improved to 0.37 with CAD. The improvement was also statistically significant (P =.005). On the basis of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System assessments, it was estimated that with CAD, each radiologist, on average, reduced 0.7% (0.8 of 115) of unnecessary biopsies and correctly recommended 5.7% (7.8 of 138) of additional biopsies. CONCLUSION: CAD based on analysis of interval changes can significantly increase radiologists' accuracy in classification of masses and thereby may be useful in improving correct biopsy recommendations.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary?

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine frequency of invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at excisional biopsy in women with atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) at percutaneous core-needle biopsy (CNB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of results in 6,081 consecutive patients who underwent CNB at two institutions revealed that in 35 (0.58%), LCIS (n = 15) or ALH (n = 20) was the pathologic finding with highest risk. Patient age range was 41-84 years (mean, 59 years). Of 35 patients, 26 (74%) underwent excisional biopsy and nine (26%) underwent mammographic follow-up for longer than 2 years. Lesions with a pathologic upgrade were noted when invasive cancer or DCIS occurred at the CNB site. CNB results in patients with a diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) (75 of 6,081 [1.2%]) were reviewed; these patients underwent subsequent excisional biopsy. Statistical comparison of frequency of upgrading of lesions in patients with a diagnosis of LCIS or ALH at CNB and in those with a diagnosis of ADH at CNB was performed (Pearson chi(2) test). RESULTS: In six (17%) of 35 (95% CI: 4.7%, 29.6%) patients, lesions were upgraded to DCIS (n = 4) or invasive cancer (n = 2). In 15 patients with LCIS diagnosed at CNB, lesions in four (27%) were upgraded to either DCIS or invasive cancer. In 20 patients with ALH diagnosed at CNB, lesions were upgraded to DCIS in two (10%). Lesions in nine patients who underwent mammographic follow-up were stable. No mammographic or technical findings distinguished patients with upgraded lesions from those whose lesions were not upgraded. In 12 (16%) of 75 (95% CI: 7.7%, 24.3%) patients with ADH, lesions were upgraded. Difference between the upgrade rate in patients with LCIS or ALH and that in those with ADH was not significant (P =.88). CONCLUSION: Lesions in 17% of patients with LCIS or ALH at CNB were upgraded to invasive cancer or DCIS; this rate was similar to the upgrade rate in patients with ADH. Excisional biopsy is supported when LCIS, ALH, or ADH is diagnosed at CNB.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a noncommercial computer-aided detection (CAD) program for breast cancer detection with screening mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A CAD program was developed for mammographic breast cancer detection. The program was applied to 2,389 patients' screening mammograms at two geographically remote academic institutions (institutions A and B). Thirteen radiologists who specialized in breast imaging participated in this pilot study. For each case, the individual radiologist performed a prospective Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment after viewing of the screening mammogram. Subsequently, the radiologist was shown CAD results and rendered a second BI-RADS assessment by using knowledge of both mammographic appearance and CAD results. Outcome analysis of results of examination in patients recalled for a repeat examination, of biopsy, and of 1-year follow-up examination was recorded. Correct detection with CAD included a computer-generated mark indicating a possible malignancy on craniocaudal or mediolateral oblique views or both. RESULTS: Eleven (0.46%) of 2,389 patients had mammographically detected nonpalpable breast cancers. Ten (91%) of 11 (95% CI: 74%, 100%) cancers were correctly identified with CAD. Radiologist sensitivity without CAD was 91% (10 of 11; 95% CI: 74%, 100%). In 1,077 patients, follow-up findings were documented at 1 year. Five (0.46%) patients developed cancers, which were found on subsequent screening mammograms. The area where the cancers developed in two (40%) of these five patients was marked (true-positive finding) by the computer in the preceding year. Because of CAD results, a 9.7% increase in recall rate from 14.4% (344 of 2,389) to 15.8% (378 of 2,389) occurred. Radiologists' recall rate of study patients prior to use of CAD was 31% higher than the average rate for nonstudy cases (10.3%) during the same time period at institution A. CONCLUSION: Performance of the CAD program had a very high sensitivity of 91% (95% CI: 74%, 100%).

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Computerized characterization of breast masses on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.

We are developing computer vision techniques for the characterization of breast masses as malignant or benign on radiologic examinations. In this study, we investigated the computerized characterization of breast masses on three-dimensional (3-D) ultrasound (US) volumetric images. We developed 2-D and 3-D active contour models for automated segmentation of the mass volumes. The effect of the initialization method of the active contour on the robustness of the iterative segmentation method was studied by varying the contour used for its initialization. For a given segmentation, texture and morphological features were automatically extracted from the segmented masses and their margins. Stepwise discriminant analysis with the leave-one-out method was used to select effective features for the classification task and to combine these features into a malignancy score. The classification accuracy was evaluated using the area Az under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, as well as the partial area index Az(0.9), defined as the relative area under the ROC curve above a sensitivity threshold of 0.9. For the purpose of comparison with the computer classifier, four experienced breast radiologists provided malignancy ratings for the 3-D US masses. Our dataset consisted of 3-D US volumes of 102 biopsied masses (46 benign, 56 malignant). The classifiers based on 2-D and 3-D segmentation methods achieved test Az values of 0.87+/-0.03 and 0.92+/-0.03, respectively. The difference in the Az values of the two computer classifiers did not achieve statistical significance. The Az values of the four radiologists ranged between 0.84 and 0.92. The difference between the computer's Az value and that of any of the four radiologists did not achieve statistical significance either. However, the computer's Az(0.9) value was significantly higher than that of three of the four radiologists. Our results indicate that an automated and effective computer classifier can be designed for differentiating malignant and benign breast masses on 3-D US volumes. The accuracy of the classifier designed in this study was similar to that of experienced breast radiologists.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2004

An observer study comparing spot imaging regions selected by radiologists and a computer for an automated stereo spot mammography technique.

We are developing an automated stereo spot mammography technique for improved imaging of suspicious dense regions within digital mammograms. The technique entails the acquisition of a full-field digital mammogram, automated detection of a suspicious dense region within that mammogram by a computer aided detection (CAD) program, and acquisition of a stereo pair of images with automated collimation to the suspicious region. The latter stereo spot image is obtained within seconds of the original full-field mammogram, without releasing the compression paddle. The spot image is viewed on a stereo video display. A critical element of this technique is the automated detection of suspicious regions for spot imaging. We performed an observer study to compare the suspicious regions selected by radiologists with those selected by a CAD program developed at the University of Michigan. True regions of interest (TROIs) were separately determined by one of the radiologists who reviewed the original mammograms, biopsy images, and histology results. We compared the radiologist and computer-selected regions of interest (ROIs) to the TROIs. Both the radiologists and the computer were allowed to select up to 3 regions in each of 200 images (mixture of 100 CC and 100 MLO views). We computed overlap indices (the overlap index is defined as the ratio of the area of intersection to the area of interest) to quantify the agreement between the selected regions in each image. The averages of the largest overlap indices per image for the 5 radiologist-to-computer comparisons were directly related to the average number of regions per image traced by the radiologists (about 50% for 1 region/image, 84% for 2 regions/image and 96% for 3 regions/image). The average of the overlap indices with all of the TROIs was 73% for CAD and 76.8% +/- 10.0% for the radiologists. This study indicates that the CAD determined ROIs could potentially be useful for a screening technique that includes stereo spot mammography imaging.

Biophysical Phenomena↗

PubMed2004

Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.

Correlation of information from multiple-view mammograms (e.g., MLO and CC views, bilateral views, or current and prior mammograms) can improve the performance of breast cancer diagnosis by radiologists or by computer. The nipple is a reliable and stable landmark on mammograms for the registration of multiple mammograms. However, accurate identification of nipple location on mammograms is challenging because of the variations in image quality and in the nipple projections, resulting in some nipples being nearly invisible on the mammograms. In this study, we developed a computerized method to automatically identify the nipple location on digitized mammograms. First, the breast boundary was obtained using a gradient-based boundary tracking algorithm, and then the gray level profiles along the inside and outside of the boundary were identified. A geometric convergence analysis was used to limit the nipple search to a region of the breast boundary. A two-stage nipple detection method was developed to identify the nipple location using the gray level information around the nipple, the geometric characteristics of nipple shapes, and the texture features of glandular tissue or ducts which converge toward the nipple. At the first stage, a rule-based method was designed to identify the nipple location by detecting significant changes of intensity along the gray level profiles inside and outside the breast boundary and the changes in the boundary direction. At the second stage, a texture orientation-field analysis was developed to estimate the nipple location based on the convergence of the texture pattern of glandular tissue or ducts towards the nipple. The nipple location was finally determined from the detected nipple candidates by a rule-based confidence analysis. In this study, 377 and 367 randomly selected digitized mammograms were used for training and testing the nipple detection algorithm, respectively. Two experienced radiologists identified the nipple locations which were used as the gold standard. In the training data set, 301 nipples were positively identified and were referred to as visible nipples. Seventy six nipples could not be positively identified and were referred to as invisible nipples. The radiologists provided their estimation of the nipple locations in the latter group for comparison with the computer estimates. The computerized method could detect 89.37% (269/301) of the visible nipples and 69.74% (53/76) of the invisible nipples within 1 cm of the gold standard. In the test data set, 298 and 69 of the nipples were classified as visible and invisible, respectively. 92.28% (275/298) of the visible nipples and 53.62% (37/69) of the invisible nipples were identified within 1 cm of the gold standard. The results demonstrate that the nipple locations on digitized mammograms can be accurately detected if they are visible and can be reasonably estimated if they are invisible. Automated nipple detection will be an important step towards multiple image analysis for CAD.

Algorithms↗