PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Chongguang Chen

Publications and source records attributed to Chongguang Chen.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Heterodimerization and cross-desensitization between the mu-opioid receptor and the chemokine CCR5 receptor.

Cross-desensitization between micro-opioid receptor agonists and CC chemokines was shown to occur in immune cells and in the central nervous system. However, these cells do not permit examination of potential mechanisms at cellular levels due to low levels and mixed populations of receptors. In this study, we investigated possible interactions and biochemical mechanisms of cross-desensitization between the mu-opioid and chemokine CCR5 receptors coexpressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged micro-opioid receptor coimmunoprecipitated with FLAG (Asp-Tyr-Lys-Asp-Asp-Asp-Asp-Lys)-tagged chemokine receptor CCR5 in cells expressing the two receptors, but not in a mixture of cells transfected with one of the two receptors, indicating that the two receptors form heterodimers. Treatment with the mu-opioid receptor agonist DAMGO ([D-Ala(2), N-Me-Phe(4), Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin), the chemokine RANTES (Regulated on Activation, Normal T cell-Expressed and -Secreted) (CCL5), or both, did not affect the level of coimmunoprecipitation. DAMGO and RANTES (CCL5) induced chemotaxis in CHO cells coexpressing both receptors, and preincubation with either DAMGO or RANTES (CCL5) profoundly inhibited chemotaxis caused by the other. DAMGO pretreatment enhanced phosphorylation of the chemokine CCR5 receptor and reduced RANTES (CCL5)-promoted [35S]GTP gamma S binding. Conversely, RANTES (CCL5) preincubation slightly increased phosphorylation of the mu-opioid receptor and significantly reduced DAMGO-induced [35S]GTP gamma S binding. These results indicate that activation of either receptor affected G protein coupling of the other, likely due to enhanced phosphorylation of the receptor. Heterodimerization between the two receptors may contribute to the observed cross-desensitization.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Selective inactivation of CCR5 and decreased infectivity of R5 HIV-1 strains mediated by opioid-induced heterologous desensitization.

The opiates are well-established immunomodulatory factors, and recent evidence suggests that mu- and delta-opioid receptor ligands alter chemokine-driven chemotactic responses through the process of heterologous desensitization. In the present report, we sought to examine the capacity of mu- and delta-opioids to modulate the function of chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4, the two major human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coreceptors. We found that the chemotactic responses to the CCR1/5 ligand CCL5/regulated on activation, normal T expressed and secreted, but not the CXCR4 ligand stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha/CXCL12 were inhibited following opioid pretreatment. Studies were performed with primary monocytes and Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with CCR5 and the micro-opioid receptor to determine whether cross-desensitization of CCR5 was a result of receptor internalization. Using radiolabeled-binding analysis, flow cytometry, and confocal microscopy, we found that the heterologous desensitization of CCR5 was not associated with a significant degree of receptor internalization. Despite this, we found that the cross-desensitization of CCR5 by opioids was associated with a decrease in susceptibility to R5 but not X4 strains of HIV-1. Our findings are consistent with the notion that impairment of the normal signaling activity of CCR5 inhibits HIV-1 coreceptor function. These results have significant implications for our understanding of the effect of opioids on the regulation of leukocyte trafficking in inflammatory disease states and the process of coreceptor-dependent HIV-1 infection. The interference with HIV-1 uptake by heterologous desensitization of CCR5 suggests that HIV-1 interaction with this receptor is not passive but involves a signal transduction process.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2002

Ezrin-radixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein-50/Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor (EBP50/NHERF) blocks U50,488H-induced down-regulation of the human kappa opioid receptor by enhancing its recycling rate.

We have investigated whether Ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM)-binding phosphoprotein-50/Na(+)/H(+) exchanger regulatory factor (EBP50/NHERF), a PDZ domain-containing phosphoprotein, is associated with the human kappa opioid receptor (hkor) and whether it regulates the trafficking and signaling of the hkor. When expressed in CHO cells stably transfected with the FLAG-tagged hkor (FLAG-hkor), EBP50/NHERF co-immunoprecipitated with FLAG-hkor, and the PDZ domain I, but not the PDZ domain II, of EBP50/NHERF was involved in the interaction. Treatment with the agonist (-)-(trans)-3,4- dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidiny)cyclohexyl]benzeneacetamide (U50,488H) enhanced the association of EBP50/NHERF with FLAG-hkor. Expression of EBP50/NHERF, but not a truncated form lacking the ERM-binding domain, abolished U50,488H-induced down-regulation of FLAG-hkor, which was apparently due to an increase in the recycling rate of internalized receptors. However, expression of EBP50/NHERF did not affect U50,488H binding affinity and U50,488H-stimulated [(35)S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding and p42/p44 MAP kinase activation, nor did it affect U50,488H-induced desensitization and internalization of FLAG-hkor. To determine the motif of FLAG-hkor involved in EBP50/NHERF binding, we generated two mutants, FLAG-hkor-A and FLAG-hkor-EE, in which one Ala or two Glu residues were added to the C terminus, respectively. Neither FLAG-hkor-A nor FLAG-hkor-EE co-immunoprecipitated with EBP50/NHERF, and U50,488H-induced down-regulation of FLAG-hkor-A and FLAG-hkor-EE were not affected by expression of EBP50/NHERF. Thus, EBP50/NHERF binds to the C terminus of FLAG-hkor and blocks the down-regulation of FLAG-hkor. The C-terminal sequence of the hkor, NKPV, is distinctly different from the sequence D(S/T)XL, the optimal C-terminal motif in the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor for EBP50/NHERF binding. EBP50/NHERF may have a broader binding specificity and may interact with a subset of G protein-coupled receptors to serve as a recycling signal for these receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Molecular basis of differences in (-)(trans)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidiny)-cyclohexyl]benzeneacetamide-induced desensitization and phosphorylation between human and rat kappa-opioid receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

The agonist (-)(trans)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidiny)-cyclohexyl]benzeneacetamide [(-)U50,488H] caused desensitization of the human kappa-opioid receptor (hkor) and Flag-tagged hkor (Flag-hkor) but not the rat kappa-opioid receptor (rkor) and Flag-tagged rkor (Flag-rkor) stably expressed in CHO cells as assessed by guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thiotriphosphate) binding. In addition, (-)U50,488H stimulation enhanced phosphorylation of the Flag-hkor, but not Flag-rkor. (-)U50,488H-induced phosphorylation of the Flag-hkor was reduced by expression of the dominant negative mutant GRK2-K220R, demonstrating the involvement of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). However, expression of GRK2 and arrestin-2 or GRK3 and arrestin-3 did not result in desensitization or phosphorylation of the Flag-rkor after (-)U50,488H pretreatment. To understand the molecular basis of the species differences, we constructed two Flag-tagged chimeric receptors, Flag-h/rkor and Flag-r/hkor, in which the C-terminal domains of Flag-hkor and Flag-rkor were switched. When stably expressed in CHO cells, Flag-r/hkor, but not Flag-h/rkor, was desensitized and phosphorylated after exposure to (-)U50,488H, indicating that the C-terminal domain plays a critical role in the differences. We then generated a Flag-hkor mutant, in which S358 was mutated to N (Flag-hkorS358N) and a Flag-rkor mutant, in which N358 was substituted with S (Flag-rkorN358S). Although Flag-hkorS358N was not phosphorylated or desensitized by (-)U50,488H stimulation, Flag-rkorN358S underwent (-)U50,488H-induced desensitization with slightly increased phosphorylation. These results indicate that there are differences in (-)U50,488H-induced desensitization and phosphorylation between the hkor and the rkor. In addition, the C-terminal domain plays a crucial role in these differences and the 358 locus contributes to the differences. Our findings suggest caution in extrapolating studies on kappa-opioid receptor regulation from rats to humans.

3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cycloh↗