Biomedical subjects

Chris Hague

Publications and source records attributed to Chris Hague.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Syntrophins regulate alpha1D-adrenergic receptors through a PDZ domain-mediated interaction.

To find novel cytoplasmic binding partners of the alpha1D-adrenergic receptor (AR), a yeast two-hybrid screen using the alpha1D-AR C terminus as bait was performed on a human brain cDNA library. Alpha-syntrophin, a protein containing one PDZ domain and two pleckstrin homology domains, was isolated in this screen as an alpha1D-AR-interacting protein. Alpha-syntrophin specifically recognized the C terminus of alpha1D- but not alpha1A- or alpha1B-ARs. In blot overlay assays, the PDZ domains of syntrophin isoforms alpha, beta1, and beta2 but not gamma1 or gamma2 showed strong selective interactions with the alpha1D-AR C-tail fusion protein. In transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells, full-length alpha1D- but not alpha1A- or alpha1B-ARs co-immunoprecipitated with syntrophins, and the importance of the receptor C terminus for the alpha1D-AR/syntrophin interaction was confirmed using chimeric receptors. Mutation of the PDZ-interacting motif at the alpha1D-AR C terminus markedly decreased inositol phosphate formation stimulated by norepinephrine but not carbachol in transfected HEK293 cells. This mutation also dramatically decreased alpha1D-AR binding and protein expression. In addition, stable overexpression of alpha-syntrophin significantly increased alpha1D-AR protein expression and binding but did not affect those with a mutated PDZ-interacting motif, suggesting that syntrophin plays an important role in maintaining receptor stability by directly interacting with the receptor PDZ-interacting motif. This direct interaction may provide new information about the regulation of alpha1D-AR signaling and the role of syntrophins in modulating G protein-coupled receptor function.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Heterodimers of alpha1B- and alpha1D-adrenergic receptors form a single functional entity.

Heterologous expression of alpha(1D)-adrenergic receptors (alpha(1D)-ARs) in most cell types results in intracellular retention and little or no functionality. We showed previously that heterodimerization with alpha(1B)-ARs promotes surface localization of alpha(1D)-ARs. Here, we report that the alpha(1B)-/alpha(1D)-AR interaction has significant effects on the pharmacology and signaling of the receptors, in addition to the effects on trafficking described previously. Upon coexpression of alpha(1B)-ARs and epitope-tagged alpha(1D)-ARs in both human embryonic kidney 293 and DDT(1)MF-2 cells, alpha(1D)-AR binding sites were not detectable with the alpha(1D)-AR selective antagonist 8-[2-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl)ethyl]-8-azaspiro[4,5]decane-7,9-dione (BMY 7378), despite the ability to detect alpha(1D)-AR protein using confocal microscopy, immunoprecipitation, and a luminometer cell-surface assay. However, the alpha(1B)-AR-selective mutant F18A conotoxin showed a striking biphasic inhibition in alpha(1B)/alpha(1D)-AR-expressing cells, revealing that alpha(1D)-ARs were expressed but did not bind BMY 7378 with high affinity. Studies of norepinephrine-stimulated inositol phosphate formation showed that maximal responses were greatest in alpha(1B)/alpha(1D)-AR-coexpressing cells. Stable coexpression of an uncoupled mutant alpha(1B)-AR (Delta12) with alpha(1D)-ARs resulted in increased responses to norepinephrine. However, Schild plots for inhibition of norepinephrine-stimulated inositol phosphate formation showed a single low-affinity site for BMY 7378. Thus, our findings suggest that alpha(1B)/alpha(1D)-AR heterodimers form a single functional entity with enhanced functional activity relative to either subtype alone and a novel pharmacological profile. These data may help to explain why alpha(1D)-ARs are often pharmacologically undetectable in native tissues when they are coexpressed with alpha(1B)-ARs.

Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists↗

PubMed2005

Selective inhibition of alpha1A-adrenergic receptor signaling by RGS2 association with the receptor third intracellular loop.

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins act directly on Galpha subunits to increase the rate of GTP hydrolysis and to terminate signaling. However, the mechanisms involved in determining their specificities of action in cells remain unclear. Recent evidence has raised the possibility that RGS proteins may interact directly with G-protein-coupled receptors to modulate their activity. By using biochemical, fluorescent imaging, and functional approaches, we found that RGS2 binds directly and selectively to the third intracellular loop of the alpha1A-adrenergic receptor (AR) in vitro, and is recruited by the unstimulated alpha1A-AR to the plasma membrane in cells to inhibit receptor and Gq/11 signaling. This interaction was specific, because RGS2 did not interact with the highly homologous alpha1B- or alpha1D-ARs, and the closely related RGS16 did not interact with any alpha1-ARs. The N terminus of RGS2 was required for association with alpha1A-ARs and inhibition of signaling, and amino acids Lys219, Ser220, and Arg238 within the alpha1A-AR i3 loop were found to be essential for this interaction. These findings demonstrate that certain RGS proteins can directly interact with preferred G-protein-coupled receptors to modulate their signaling with a high degree of specificity.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗

PubMed2005

Heterodimerization of g protein-coupled receptors: specificity and functional significance.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are cell surface receptors that mediate physiological responses to a diverse array of stimuli. GPCRs have traditionally been thought to act as monomers, but recent evidence suggests that GPCRs may form dimers (or higher-order oligomers) as part of their normal trafficking and function. In fact, certain GPCRs seem to have a strict requirement for heterodimerization to attain proper surface expression and functional activity. Even those GPCRs that do not absolutely require heterodimerization may still specifically associate with other GPCR subtypes, sometimes resulting in dramatic effects on receptor pharmacology, signaling, and/or internalization. Understanding the specificity and functional significance of GPCR heterodimerization is of tremendous clinical importance since GPCRs are the molecular targets for numerous therapeutic drugs.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Heterodimerization with beta2-adrenergic receptors promotes surface expression and functional activity of alpha1D-adrenergic receptors.

The alpha1D-adrenergic receptor (alpha1D-AR) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that is poorly trafficked to the cell surface and largely nonfunctional when heterologously expressed by itself in a variety of cell types. We screened a library of approximately 30 other group I GPCRs in a quantitative luminometer assay for the ability to promote alpha1D-AR cell surface expression. Strikingly, these screens revealed only two receptors capable of inducing robust increases in the amount of alpha1D-AR at the cell surface: alpha1B-AR and beta2-AR. Confocal imaging confirmed that coexpression with beta2-AR resulted in translocation of alpha1D-AR from intracellular sites to the plasma membrane. Additionally, coimmunoprecipitation studies demonstrated that alpha1D-AR and beta2-AR specifically interact to form heterodimers when coexpressed in HEK-293 cells. Ligand binding studies revealed an increase in total alpha1D-AR binding sites upon coexpression with beta2-AR, but no apparent effect on the pharmacological properties of the receptors. In functional studies, coexpression with beta2-AR significantly enhanced the coupling of alpha1D-AR to norepinephrine-stimulated Ca2+ mobilization. Heterodimerization of beta2-AR with alpha1D-AR also conferred the ability of alpha1D-AR to cointernalize upon beta2-AR agonist stimulation, revealing a novel mechanism by which these different adrenergic receptor subtypes may regulate each other's activity. These findings demonstrate that the selective association of alpha1D-AR with other receptors is crucial for receptor surface expression and function and also shed light on a novel mechanism of cross talk between alpha1- and beta2-ARs that is mediated through heterodimerization and cross-internalization.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

PubMed2004

Olfactory receptor surface expression is driven by association with the beta2-adrenergic receptor.

Olfactory receptors (ORs) comprise more than half of the large class I G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily. Although cloned over a decade ago, little is known about their properties because wild-type ORs do not efficiently reach the cell surface following heterologous expression. Receptor-receptor interactions strongly influence surface trafficking of other GPCRs, and we examined whether a similar mechanism might be involved in OR surface expression. Olfactory neurons are known to express beta-adrenergic receptors (ARs), and we found that coexpression with beta(2)-ARs, but not any other AR subtypes, dramatically increased mouse 71 (M71) OR surface expression in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. A persistent physical interaction between M71 ORs and beta(2)-ARs was shown by coimmunoprecipitation and by cointernalization of the two receptors in response to their specific ligands. Also, coexpression of wild-type M71 ORs with beta(2)-ARs resulted in cAMP responses to the M71 ligand acetophenone. Finally, in situ hybridization studies showed extensive colocalization of M71 OR and beta(2)-AR expression in mouse olfactory epithelium. These data demonstrate the successful heterologous surface expression of a functional wild-type OR and reveal that persistent physical association with other GPCRs can control OR surface expression.

Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists↗

PubMed2004

Subtype-selective noncompetitive or competitive inhibition of human alpha1-adrenergic receptors by rho-TIA.

The 19-amino acid conopeptide (rho-TIA) was shown previously to antagonize noncompetitively alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptors (ARs). Because this is the first peptide ligand for these receptors, we compared its interactions with the three recombinant human alpha(1)-AR subtypes (alpha(1A), alpha(1B), and alpha(1D)). Radioligand binding assays showed that rho-TIA was 10-fold selective for human alpha(1B)-over alpha(1A)- and alpha(1D)-ARs. As observed with hamster alpha(1B)-ARs, rho-TIA decreased the number of binding sites (B(max)) for human alpha(1B)-ARs without changing affinity (K(D)), and this inhibition was unaffected by the length of incubation but was reversed by washing. However, rho-TIA had opposite effects at human alpha(1A)-ARs and alpha(1D)-ARs, decreasing K(D) without changing B(max), suggesting it acts competitively at these subtypes. rho-TIA reduced maximal NE-stimulated [(3)H]inositol phosphate formation in HEK293 cells expressing human alpha(1B)-ARs but competitively inhibited responses in cells expressing alpha(1A)- or alpha(1D)-ARs. Truncation mutants showed that the amino-terminal domains of alpha(1B)- or alpha(1D)-ARs are not involved in interaction with rho-TIA. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis of rho-TIA showed F18A had an increased selectivity for alpha(1B)-ARs, and F18N also increased subtype selectivity. I8A had a slightly reduced potency at alpha(1B)-ARs and was found to be a competitive, rather than noncompetitive, inhibitor in both radioligand and functional assays. Thus rho-TIA noncompetitively inhibits alpha(1B)-ARs but competitively inhibits the other two subtypes, and this selectivity can be increased by mutation. These differential interactions do not involve the receptor amino termini and are not because of the charged nature of the peptide, and isoleucine 8 is critical for its noncompetitive inhibition at alpha(1B)-ARs.

Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists↗

PubMed2004

RGS2 binds directly and selectively to the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor third intracellular loop to modulate Gq/11alpha signaling.

RGS proteins serve as GTPase-activating proteins and/or effector antagonists to modulate Galpha signaling events. In live cells, members of the B/R4 subfamily of RGS proteins selectively modulate G protein signaling depending on the associated receptor (GPCR). Here we examine whether GPCRs selectively recruit RGS proteins to modulate linked G protein signaling. We report the novel finding that RGS2 binds directly to the third intracellular (i3) loop of the G(q/11)-coupled M1 muscarinic cholinergic receptor (M1 mAChR; M1i3). This interaction is selective because closely related RGS16 does not bind M1i3, and neither RGS2 nor RGS16 binds to the G(i/o)-coupled M2i3 loop. When expressed in cells, RGS2 and M1 mAChR co-localize to the plasma membrane whereas RGS16 does not. The N-terminal region of RGS2 is both necessary and sufficient for binding to M1i3, and RGS2 forms a stable heterotrimeric complex with both activated G(q)alpha and M1i3. RGS2 potently inhibits M1 mAChR-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in cell membranes by acting as an effector antagonist. Deletion of the N terminus abolishes this effector antagonist activity of RGS2 but not its GTPase-activating protein activity toward G(11)alpha in membranes. These findings predict a model where the i3 loops of GPCRs selectively recruit specific RGS protein(s) via their N termini to regulate the linked G protein. Consistent with this model, we find that the i3 loops of the mAChR subtypes (M1-M5) exhibit differential profiles for binding distinct B/R4 RGS family members, indicating that this novel mechanism for GPCR modulation of RGS signaling may generally extend to other receptors and RGS proteins.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Cell surface expression of alpha1D-adrenergic receptors is controlled by heterodimerization with alpha1B-adrenergic receptors.

alpha(1)-Adrenergic receptors (ARs) belong to the large Class I G protein-coupled receptor superfamily and comprise three subtypes (alpha(1A), alpha(1B), and alpha(1D)). Previous work with heterologously expressed C-terminal green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged alpha(1)-ARs showed that alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-ARs localize to the plasma membrane, whereas alpha(1D)-ARs accumulate intracellularly. We recently showed that alpha(1D)- and alpha(1B)-ARs form heterodimers, whereas alpha(1D)- and alpha(1A)-ARs do not. Here, we examined the role of heterodimerization in regulating alpha(1D)-AR localization using both confocal imaging of GFP- or CFP-tagged alpha(1)-ARs and a luminometer-based surface expression assay in HEK293 cells. Co-expression with alpha(1B)-ARs caused alpha(1D)-ARs to quantitatively translocate to the cell surface, but co-expression with alpha(1A)-ARs did not. Truncation of the alpha(1B)-AR extracellular N terminus or intracellular C terminus had no effect on surface expression of alpha(1D)-ARs, suggesting primary involvement of the hydrophobic core. Co-transfection with an uncoupled mutant alpha(1B)-AR (Delta12alpha(1B)) increased both alpha(1D)-AR surface expression and coupling to norepinephrine-stimulated Ca(2+) mobilization. Finally, GFP-tagged alpha(1D)-ARs were not detected on the cell surface when expressed in rat aortic smooth muscle cells that express no endogenous ARs, but were almost exclusively localized on the surface when expressed in DDT(1)MF-2 cells, which express endogenous alpha(1B)-ARs. These studies demonstrate that alpha(1B)/alpha(1D)-AR heterodimerization controls surface expression and functional coupling of alpha(1D)-ARs, the N- and C-terminal domains are not involved in this interaction, and that alpha(1B)-AR G protein coupling is not required. These observations may be relevant to many other Class I G protein-coupled receptors, where the functional consequences of heterodimerization are still poorly understood.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2004

The N terminus of the human alpha1D-adrenergic receptor prevents cell surface expression.

We previously reported that truncation of the N-terminal 79 amino acids of alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors (Delta(1-79)alpha(1D)-ARs) greatly increases binding site density. In this study, we determined whether this effect was associated with changes in alpha(1D)-AR subcellular localization. Confocal imaging of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged receptors and sucrose density gradient fractionation suggested that full-length alpha(1D)-ARs were found primarily in intracellular compartments, whereas Delta(1-79)alpha(1D)-ARs were translocated to the plasma membrane. This resulted in a 3- to 4-fold increase in intrinsic activity for stimulation of inositol phosphate formation by norepinephrine. We determined whether this effect was transplantable by creating N-terminal chimeras of alpha(1)-ARs containing the body of one subtype and the N terminus of another (alpha(1A)NT-D, alpha(1B)NT-D, alpha(1D)NT-A, and alpha(1D)NT-B). When expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, radioligand binding revealed that binding densities of alpha(1A)-or alpha(1B)-ARs containing the alpha(1D)-N terminus decreased by 86 to 93%, whereas substitution of alpha(1A)- or alpha(1B)-N termini increased alpha(1D)-AR binding site density by 2- to 3-fold. Confocal microscopy showed that GFP-tagged alpha(1D)NT-B-ARs were found only on the cell surface, whereas GFP-tagged alpha(1B)NT-D-ARs were completely intracellular. Radioligand binding and confocal imaging of GFP-tagged alpha(1D)- and Delta(1-79)alpha(1D)-ARs expressed in rat aortic smooth muscle cells produced similar results, suggesting these effects are generalizable to cell types that endogenously express alpha(1D)-ARs. These findings demonstrate that the N-terminal region of alpha(1D)-ARs contain a transplantable signal that is critical for regulating formation of functional bindings, through regulating cellular localization.

Binding Sites↗

PubMed2004

Olfactory receptor localization and function: an emerging role for GPCR heterodimerization.

Research on olfaction has been fraught with considerable frustration because none of the hundreds of olfactory receptors make it to the cell surface on their own when expressed in heterologous systems. Recent work indicates that the heterodimerization of olfactory receptors with beta2-adrenergic receptors results in surface expression of these G protein-coupled receptors. Similar conclusions--that heterodimerization is essential for surface expression of olfactory receptors--have been drawn from research in Drosophila utilizing completely different knockout and functional approaches. Together these findings may unlock the solution to a problem that has plagued the molecular study of olfaction since the cloning of the first olfactory G protein-coupled receptor over twelve years ago.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor subtypes: non-identical triplets with different dancing partners?

Alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors are one of the three subfamilies of G protein coupled receptors activated by epinephrine and norepinephrine to control important functions in many target organs. Three human subtypes (alpha(1A), alpha(1B), alpha(1D)) are derived from separate genes and are highly homologous in their transmembrane domains but not in their amino or carboxyl termini. Recent advances in our understanding of these "non-identical triplets" include development of knockout mice lacking single or multiple subtypes, new insights into subcellular localization and trafficking, identification of allosteric modulators, and increasing evidence for an important role in brain function. Although all three subtypes activate the same G(q/11) signaling pathway, they also appear to interact with different protein binding partners. Recent evidence suggests they may also form dimers, and may initiate independent signals through pathways yet to be clearly elucidated. Thus, this subfamily represents a common phenomenon of a group of similar but non-identical receptor subtypes activated by the same neurotransmitter, whose individual functional roles remain to be clearly established.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Relationship between alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor-induced contraction and extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation in the bovine inferior alveolar artery.

The endogenous adrenergic agonists norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine regulate vascular tone by stimulating alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors (ARs) on smooth muscle cells to cause contraction. In addition, alpha(1)-ARs also couple to growth factor pathways, through stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). MAPKs are a family of serine-threonine kinases that include extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and a variety of other kinases that are able to activate transcription factors when stimulated. We examined alpha(1)-AR stimulation of contraction and ERK activation in the bovine inferior alveolar artery (BIAA), using in vitro contraction studies and Western blotting. Using antagonists selective for individual adrenergic receptor types, we found that only alpha(1)-ARs were coupled to ERK activation and contraction. NE stimulated contraction (EC(50) = 11 microM) and ERK activation (EC(50) = 21 microM) with similar potency. Using alpha(1)-AR subtype-selective antagonists, we identified the alpha(1)-AR subtypes coupled to each response. Affinity values for alpha(1)-AR subtype-selective antagonists were consistent with alpha(1A)-AR-mediated contraction. In contrast, simultaneous treatment with concentrations of these antagonists selective for each alpha(1)-AR subtype (alpha(1A)-, alpha(1B)-, and alpha(1D)-AR) was required to inhibit ERK activation, suggesting that all three alpha(1)-ARs activate ERK in BIAA. Transmural electrical stimulation of BIAA segments resulted in activation of ERK, which was inhibited by the alpha(1)-AR-selective antagonist BE 2254 (2-[[beta-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]aminomethyl]-1-tetralone). These data suggest that in an intact artery, NE released from sympathetic nerves stimulates alpha(1)-ARs to cause contraction and ERK activation, and that redundancy among subtypes exists for alpha(1)-AR activation of ERK.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗