Prospective timing under dual-task paradigms: attentional and contextual-change mechanisms.
The effect of a concurrent memory task on prospective time estimates by human participants was investigated in two experiments. The objective was to isolate task effects from those of participant timing strategy (self-paced counting) and number of contextual changes during the temporal stimulus. Accordingly, self-paced counting was suppressed by requiring participants to perform a word-reading task during the temporal stimuli, while number of stimulus changes presented during temporal stimuli was controlled. Presence versus absence of the concurrent memory task was manipulated in Experiment 1, and instruction to focus on timing or to focus on memory was manipulated in Experiment 2. There was no significant effect of presence versus absence of the concurrent memory task on time estimates; however, time estimates were shorter when participants were instructed to focus on memory versus timing. In both experiments, time estimates were positively correlated with participants' estimates of the number of words presented during the interval, even though number of words presented was invariant. These findings were generally consistent with resource-allocation attentional accounts of concurrent task effects; however, support for a contextual-change model of timing was also obtained.