PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Christian Ell

Publications and source records attributed to Christian Ell.

26 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Endoscopic resection of superficial esophageal squamous-cell carcinomas: Western experience.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic resection of esophageal squamous-cell neoplasia with curative intent appears to be an alternative treatment to radical surgery when the malignant neoplasia is intraepithelial or limited to the mucosal layer, since the risk for lymph-node metastases is very low. In contrast to Japan, there has so far been only limited experience in Europe and the United States with endoscopic resection in such cases. In the present observational study, we report on the largest prospective series so far in Western countries of patients with early squamous-cell cancer or carcinoma in situ, who were treated using endoscopic resection therapy. METHODS: Between December 1997 and November 2001, 115 patients with a suspicion of early squamous cancer were referred for local endoscopic therapy. A total of 39 patients (mean age 61.4 +/- 10.2 yr) with early esophageal carcinoma (n = 29) and carcinoma in situ (Cis) (n = 10) fulfilled the criteria for local endoscopic therapy and were treated using endoscopic resection. Ten patients had Cis (group A), 19 had mucosal cancer (group B), and 10 had submucosal cancer (group C). All patients in group C were inoperable or had refused surgery. RESULTS: A total of 94 resections were performed. Nine of the 10 patients in group A (90%), 19 of the 19 in group B (100%), and 8 of the 10 in group C (80%) achieved a complete response during a mean follow-up period of 29.7 +/- 14.3 months. Tumor-related deaths occurred in three patients (one in group B, who was inoperable; two in group C, who refused surgery). No major complications such as perforation or bleeding requiring blood transfusion occurred. Minor complications were seen in six patients (15%)-three with minor bleeding after endoscopic resection and three with esophageal stenoses, who were successfully treated using injection therapy or dilatation. Calculated 5-yr survival was 90% in group A, 89% in group B, and 0% in group C. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic resection appears to be an effective and safe method of curative treatment in patients with Cis and mucosal squamous-cell carcinomas of the esophagus. The preferred method in patients with submucosal cancer should be esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy, whenever possible.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed2003

Endoscopic resection in neoplastic lesions of the oesophagus.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection has gained more and more importance in the treatment of early oesophageal neoplasia over the past few years. The choice of the different available techniques depends on the site, the macroscopic type of the tumour and the personal experience of the endoscopist. METHODS: The "suck-and-cut" technique with ligation device or cap should be favoured over normal strip biopsy in the oesophagus because of the size of the resected specimen and the technical feasibility. RESULTS: Endoscopic resection (ER) of high-grade intra-epithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus should be considered as the treatment of choice, due to excellent long-term results. First mid-term results of endoscopic therapy of early squamous cell neoplasia in the oesophagus show promising results; however, long-term results are awaited. CONCLUSION: ER of oesophageal neoplastic lesions is a safe and effective method but should be performed only by experienced endoscopists.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Barrett's esophagus: endoscopic resection.

In experienced hands, ER is a safe method of resecting dysplastic lesions and early carcinomas of the GI tract, and it has decisive advantages compared with other local endoscopic treatment procedures (such as thermal destruction and PDT). The opportunity for histological processing of the resected specimen provides information regarding the depth of invasion of the individual layers of the GI tract wall. Additionally, it has advantages regarding excision with healthy margins. This means that even when there is infiltration of the submucosa that has not been detected before treatment--in which case local endoscopic therapy is no longer appropriate--a patient with early Barrett's cancer still is able to undergo surgical resection. As was shown recently, the morbidity and mortality of ER are significantly dependent on the frequency with which esophagectomy is performed in each center. When there were more than 20 procedures of this type per year, the surgical mortality was 8%, whereas in centers conducting fewer than 10 procedures per year the rate was 21%. In view of the consequent claim that ER should only be performed at high-volume centers, curative endoscopic treatment of early esophageal carcinomas also should be performed only in centers with a similar frequency to that of the surgical high-volume centers. It is only in these conditions that the conclusion is defensible that patients with HGIN or mucosal Barrett's carcinoma should undergo ER with curative intent instead of radical ER. Randomized and controlled studies comparing radical esophagectomy with endoscopic therapy are desirable, but they are difficult to conduct, not least because valid 5-year survival data show no significant difference between patients who have undergone endoscopic treatment for early Barrett's cancers and the average German population of the same age and sex.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

A prospective randomized trial of two different endoscopic resection techniques for early stage cancer of the esophagus.

BACKGROUND: A variety of different endoscopic resection techniques for early stage cancer of the upper GI tract have been described that are more effective than strip biopsy. However, there is no report of a prospective randomized comparison of different techniques. METHODS: In a prospective randomized study, 100 consecutive endoscopic resections were performed in 72 patients with early stage esophageal cancer. Fifty endoscopic resections were performed with a "suck-and-ligate" device without prior submucosa injection and 50 with the cap technique with prior submucosa injection of a dilute saline solution of epinephrine. The main assessment criteria were maximum diameter of the resection specimen and of the resection area, and the complication rate. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the two groups with regard to the maximum diameters and calculated area of the resected specimens (ligation group: 16.4 [4.0] x 11 [3.1] mm/185 [84] mm(2) vs. cap group: 15.5 [4.1] x 10.7 [2.7] mm/168 [83] mm(2)), or the maximum diameters and calculated area of the endoscopic resection ulcers after 24 hours (ligation group: 20.6 [4.8] x 14.3 [4.5] mm/314 [160] mm(2) vs. cap group: 18.9 [5.1] x 12.9 [3.8] mm/260 [145] mm(2)). There was only a slight advantage (greater diameter of resection specimens) for the ligation group in patients who had prior endoscopic treatment. There was one minor episode of bleeding in each group; there was no severe complication. In 41 of 72 patients (57%), further endoscopic therapy after endoscopic resection was necessary because of residual neoplasia at the first follow-up endoscopy after resection (61 of 100 resection specimens [61%] had lateral margins that could not be evaluated because of coagulation artifact or contained malignancy but with the base of the lesion free of tumor). CONCLUSIONS: The cap technique with submucosa injection and the ligation technique without submucosa injection are similar with respect to efficacy and safety for endoscopic resection of early stage esophageal cancers.

Esophageal Neoplasms↗
PubMed2002

Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: can heparin prevent acute pancreatitis after ERCP?

BACKGROUND: An exploratory analysis of a prospective study of risk factors for acute pancreatitis after ERCP combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy showed that the frequency of acute pancreatitis was lower in patients who received heparin compared with patients not treated with heparin. The study was continued to further analyze the effect of heparin on the frequency of acute pancreatitis. METHODS: Potential risk factors for acute pancreatitis and outcomes were evaluated prospectively for all ERCP procedures with endoscopic sphincterotomy performed between September 1994 and December 1998. The results were analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods to determine risk factors for complications. Heparin was administered to 32.9% of the patients (heparin group [HEP group], n = 268) for various clinical reasons (low-molecular-weight heparin, n = 208, unfractionated heparin n = 60). A group of 547 patients who did not receive heparin served as control patients (CON group). RESULTS: Eight hundred fifteen patients underwent ERCP with endoscopic sphincterotomy; acute pancreatitis occurred in 6.4% (n = 52). The frequency of acute pancreatitis was significantly lower in the HEP group versus the CON group in the final multivariate model, which included significant risk factors for acute pancreatitis (HEP group: 3.4%, 9/268 vs. CON group: 7.9%, 43/547; p = 0.005). HEP did not increase the risk of hemorrhage (HEP group: 1.1%, 3/268, 2 severe, none fatal vs. CON group: 2.0%, 11/547, 3 severe, 2 fatal). HEP (p = 0.005; OR 0.3: 95% CI [0.16, 0.73]) and the number of risk factors present (p = 0.0001; OR 2.5: 95% CI [1.80, 3.50]) influenced the frequency of acute pancreatitis independently. CONCLUSIONS: Heparin was significantly associated with an extremely low frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis without increasing the risk of hemorrhage after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Because this effect could not be attributed to other known or suspected confounders, our conclusion was that heparin administration before ERCP reduces the risk of pancreatitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Photodynamic therapy of human Barrett's cancer using 5-aminolaevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX: an in-vivo dosimetry study in athymic nude mice.

OBJECTIVE: There has been a dramatic increase in recent years in the incidence of Barrett's oesophagus and the oesophageal adenocarcinoma associated with it. Alongside surgical treatment for early Barrett's carcinomas, endoscopic treatment procedures such as photodynamic therapy (PDT), which have much lower complication and mortality rates, will play an increasing role in the future. In this study, the effects of light energy dose, light fractionation and oxygenation on the efficacy of PDT were investigated for the first time in an in-vivo nude mice tumour model bearing a human Barrett's carcinoma. DESIGN: A total of 387 NMRI strain (nu/nu) nude mice with thymic aplasia (total 53 controls) were transplanted with human Barrett's carcinoma and treated with laser light at 635 nm (light dose 0-200 J/cm2, fluence rate 400 mW/cm2). 5-Aminolaevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX (5-ALA-PpIX) (100 mg 5-ALA/kg body weight administered orally) was used as the photosensitizer. METHODS: Fractionation studies were performed at 0, 50, 100 and 150 J/cm2. The light dose was administered in four equal fractions divided by three irradiation-free intervals of 120 s. Oxygenation studies were carried out at 150 J/cm2 with simultaneous oxygen supply of 2, 6 and 8 l oxygen/min. RESULTS: Dosimetry studies demonstrated a positive correlation between increase in light dose and tumour destruction up to 150 J/cm2 when using either continuous or fractionated light delivery. The optimal light energy dose was 150 J/cm2. Neither fractionation of light nor simultaneous oxygenation enhanced the efficacy of the PDT. CONCLUSION: This is the first study in the literature that proves the efficiency of PDT with 5-ALA-PpIX in human Barrett's adenocarcinoma and that demonstrates an exact dosimetry of the optimal light energy dose (150 J/cm2). No general recommendation can be made for the use of fractionation or oxygenation in clinical PDT.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Local endoscopic therapy for intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia and early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus: acute-phase and intermediate results of a new treatment approach.

BACKGROUND: Radical oesophageal resection has until now been regarded as the gold standard for treatment in intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia or early adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. However, the mortality and morbidity rates are substantial. DESIGN: A new therapeutic approach involving low-risk endoscopic therapy modalities was examined in the framework of a prospective study. PATIENTS: A total of 115 patients with intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia (19) and early adenocarcinoma (96) in Barrett's oesophagus. METHODS: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) was used in 70 patients, and photodynamic therapy (PDT) was used in 32 patients. The two procedures were combined in ten patients. Three patients underwent primary treatment with argon plasma coagulation (APC). The average follow-up was 34 +/- 10 months (range 24-60 months). RESULTS: Complete local remission was achieved in 98%. The overall complication rate was 9.5%. Major complications, such as perforation and severe bleeding, did not occur. Minor complications included not haemoglobin relevant bleeding (drop of haemoglobin less than 2 g/dl) (5) and stenosis (3) after EMR, and long-lasting odynophagia (1) and sunburn (2) after PDT. In all, 13 patients have died so far, but in only one case due to the underlying disease. The calculated overall 3-year survival rate is 88%. During the follow-up period, a 30% rate of metachronous lesions was observed; endoscopic therapy was performed successfully in all but one of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: These good acute-phase and intermediate results, along with low morbidity rates and no mortality, suggest that the organ-preserving local endoscopic procedure including EMR and PDT is an attractive alternative to oesophageal resection. Therefore, endoscopic therapy might replace radical oesophageal resection in future in cases of intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia and early mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's oesophagus.

Adenocarcinoma↗