Biomedical subjects

Christian Jeleazcov

Publications and source records attributed to Christian Jeleazcov.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The discriminant power of simultaneous monitoring of spontaneous electroencephalogram and evoked potentials as a predictor of different clinical states of general anesthesia.

Spontaneous or evoked electrical brain activity is increasingly used to monitor general anesthesia. Previous studies investigated the variables from spontaneous electroencephalogram (EEG), acoustic (AEP), or somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP). But, by monitoring them separately, the available information from simultaneous gathering could be missed. We investigated whether the combination of simultaneous information from EEG, AEP, and SSEP shows a more discriminant power to differentiate between anesthesia states than from information derived from each measurement alone. Therefore, we assessed changes of 30 EEG, 21 SSEP, and 29 AEP variables recorded from 59 patients during four clinical states of general anesthesia: "awake," "light anesthesia," "surgical anesthesia," and "deep surgical anesthesia." The single and combined discriminant powers of EEG, AEP, and SSEP variables as predictors of these states were investigated by discriminant analysis. EEG variables showed a higher discriminant power than AEP or SSEP variables: 85%, 46%, and 32% correctly classified cases, respectively. The frequency of correctly classified cases increased to 90% and 91% with information from EEG + AEP and EEG + AEP + SSEP, respectively. Thus, future anesthesia monitoring should consider combined information simultaneously distributed on different electrophysiological measurements, rather than single variables or their combination from EEG or AEP or SSEP.

Alfentanil↗

PubMed2005

Sedation with GPI 15715, a water-soluble prodrug of propofol, using target-controlled infusion in volunteers.

GPI 15715 is the first water-soluble propofol prodrug that has been studied in humans. Present propofol lipid formulations have well known undesirable properties, for example, pain on injection and increased triglyceride concentrations. We investigated whether GPI 15715 is suitable to achieve and maintain moderate sedation for 2 h. Six male and six female volunteers received a target-controlled infusion of GPI 15715, with an initial propofol target concentration of 1.8 microg/mL and the possibility to adjust the propofol target once after 1 h. Propofol concentrations, the bispectral index, and modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (MOAA/S) scores were monitored. The median MOAA/S score was 4 during the first hour and was 3 during the second hour of infusion. The propofol target had to be changed to 2.4 microg/mL in seven volunteers and to 3.0 microg/mL in two volunteers. A propofol concentration of 1.9 microg/mL had the highest probability to result in an MOAA/S score of 3, which corresponds with moderate sedation. We observed no serious side effects. We conclude that GPI 15715 produces excellent sedation.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Electroencephalogram monitoring during anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil: the impact of second order spectral analysis.

Bispectral analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG) has been used for monitoring anesthesia. The estimation of bicoherence allows us to determine whether a given time series represents a linear random process in cases where the bicoherence is trivial, i.e., a mere constant independent of frequency. In this study, we investigated the proportion of EEG epochs with nontrivial bicoherence during surgical anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil as an indicator for the degree of nonlinearity in the EEG. We reanalyzed 90 h of EEG recorded from 20 patients undergoing abdominal surgery using the Hinich procedure, which provides a statistical test for the following hypothesis: the EEG is a linear random process. In approximately 90% of all artifact-free, stationary EEG epochs, the bicoherence was found to be zero or a mere constant. Under these conditions, the EEG can be considered as a linear random process. Our findings suggest that the spectral information in the frequency domain delivered by the EEG monitoring during anesthesia is largely contained in the power spectrum of the signal. This calls into question the benefit of EEG bispectral analysis for monitoring anesthesia effect.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the new propofol prodrug GPI 15715 and propofol emulsion.

BACKGROUND: GPI 15715 is a new water-soluble prodrug that is hydrolyzed to release propofol. The objectives of this crossover study in volunteers were to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GPI 15715 in comparison with propofol emulsion. METHODS: In two separate sessions, nine healthy male volunteers (19-35 yr, 70-86 kg) received GPI 15715 and propofol emulsion as a target controlled infusion over 60 min. In the first 20 min, the propofol target concentration increased linearly to 5 microg/ml. Subsequently, the targets were reduced to 3 microg/ml and 1.5 microg/ml for 20 min each. The plasma concentrations of GPI 15715 and propofol were measured from arterial and venous blood samples up to 24 h and pharmacokinetics were analyzed. The pharmacodynamic effect was measured by the median frequency of the power spectrum of the electroencephalogram, and a sigmoid model with effect compartment was fitted to the data. RESULTS: Compared with propofol emulsion, propofol from GPI 15715 showed a different disposition function and especially larger volumes of distribution. The propofol effect site concentration for half maximum effect was 2.0 +/- 0.5 microg/ml for GPI 15715 and 3.0 +/- 0.7 microg/ml for propofol emulsion (P < 0.05). Propofol from GPI 15715 did not show a hysteresis between plasma concentration and effect. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with propofol emulsion, propofol from GPI 15715 showed different pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, particularly a higher potency with respect to concentration. These differences may indicate an influence of the formulation.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Does the EEG during isoflurane/alfentanil anesthesia differ from linear random data?

OBJECTIVE: Bispectral analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG) has been used to monitor depth of anesthesia. In the majority of publications this has been done using the so called Bispectral (BIS) Index. The exact relation of this index to bispectral quantities like the bispectrum and its normalized version the bicoherence has not yet been published. In case the EEG is a linear random process the bicoherence is trivial. It is a mere constant independent of the EEG frequency. If the signal is a linear Gaussian random process this constant is zero. In this case both the bispectrum and bicoherence are zero. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of EEG epochs with non-trivial bicoherence during anesthesia with isoflurane/nitrous oxide. METHODS: We reanalyzed 26.4 hr of EEG signal recorded in 8 patients during anesthesia for general abdominal surgery which were stored in digitized form on CD-Rom. The test developed by Hinich for Gaussianity and linearity was applied to these data. The test was validated with various kinds of surrogate data; especially the phase randomized (pr) EEG, synthetic Gaussian random data and the z-component of the Lorenz attractor and its pr version. RESULTS: The proportion of epochs for which a non-trivial bicoherence was detected by the test was as follows: Lorenz data 95%, pr Lorenz data 5%, synthetic Gaussian data 13.8%, pr EEG 5.4%, original EEG 6.2%. CONCLUSION: As expected the test procedure correctly identified for the Lorenz data for 95% of all epochs a non-trivial bicoherence. For the original EEG data we could not find a significant greater percentage of epochs with non-trivial bicoherence than for the pr data and the synthetic Gaussian data. We conclude that the EEG during anesthesia with isoflurane/alfentanil appears to be largely a linear random process.

Alfentanil↗