Biomedical subjects

Christian Manegold

Publications and source records attributed to Christian Manegold.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Prognostic significance of RASSF1A promoter methylation on survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gemcitabine.

The epigenetic inactivation of genes plays an important role in lung cancer. We have investigated the methylation status of the promoter region of seven genes (APC1A, DAPK, FHIT, p14(ARF), p16(INK4a), RARbeta, RASSF1A) in serum DNA of NSCLC patients. The objective of our study was to reveal the influence of such alterations on overall survival. Blood samples were drawn pretherapeutically. Genomic DNA was purified from serum, treated with sodium bisulfite and hypermethylation was detected by a nested methylation-specific PCR in a group of 92 patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIB and IV NSCLC. All patients received gemcitabine first-line alone or in combination with other drugs. The vast majority (n=87) showed at least one epigenetic alteration. The methylation frequencies of individual genes varied between 25.9 and 47.3%. The hypermethylation status of none of the genes had a significant influence on median overall survival of the total population. In contrast, patients with a methylated RASSF1A gene who showed a partial response survived significantly longer (33.6+/-10.4 month) compared to those with a wild-type allele (12.9+/-4.7 month, P=0.0045). This effect became even more pronounced in combination with p14(ARF) (P=0.0004). This difference was not seen in patients with stable or progressive disease. A multivariate analysis confirmed that RASSF1A methylation was an independent prognostic factor. Our results show that the hypermethylation frequency of single genes and the accumulation of epigenetic alterations in individual samples of NSCLC patients may vary considerably. Molecular parameters such as hypermethylation of RASSF1A or p14(ARF) may be useful prognostic markers in subpopulations.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Promoter methylation of RASSF1A, RARbeta and DAPK predict poor prognosis of patients with malignant mesothelioma.

Hypermethylation occurs frequently in neoplastic cells and affects tumorigenesis. Malignant mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer developing in the thoracic cavity and patients have a rather bad prognosis. Our goal was to determine epigenetic alterations of a series of genes and to analyse the potential correlation of such changes with overall survival. We have analysed the methylation status of the promoter region of nine genes in serum DNA of mesothelioma patients by a nested methylation-specific PCR. Modest methylation frequencies were detected for APC1A (14.3%), RASSF1A (19.5%) and DAPK (20.0%) while hypermethylation of E-cadherin (71.4%) and FHIT (78.0%) occurred at a high incidence. Intermediate values were seen for p16(INK4a) (28.2%), APC1B (32.5%), p14(ARF) (44.2%) and RARbeta (55.8%). The methylation status of none of the single genes significantly influenced prognosis. In contrast, combining RARbeta with either DAPK or RASSF1A showed a significantly shorter overall survival of those patients who had both genes methylated compared to those with only one or no epigenetic alteration (P=0.025 and 0.040, respectively). Similarly, the combination of all three genes revealed a worse prognosis for patients with double or triple methylations compared to the group which had only one or no gene methylated (P=0.028). Our results support the idea that the prognostic value of a combination of epigenetic alterations is superior to the impact of an individual gene alone on overall survival.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Phase III study of gemcitabine and cisplatin with or without aprinocarsen, a protein kinase C-alpha antisense oligonucleotide, in patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine whether aprinocarsen, an antisense oligonucleotide directed against protein kinase C-alpha, when added to the chemotherapy regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin improved survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, were randomly assigned to either a control arm of gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1, or experimental arms consisting of the identical chemotherapy plus aprinocarsen 2 mg/kg/d as continuous infusion for 14 days, starting on either day 1 or 3 days before chemotherapy. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: A total of 670 patients were randomly assigned between the control (n = 328) and experimental arms (n = 342). Due to the results from another phase III study of aprinocarsen in NSCLC, further enrollment was stopped, and the study was terminated early. The median number of cycles was four on the control arm and three on the combined experimental arms. Median overall survival was not different between the two groups (control, 10.4 months [95% CI, 8.6 to 12.2]; experimental, 10.0 months [95% CI, 8.4 to 10.8]; P = .613; hazard ratio = 1.05 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.25]). Response rates (control arm, 35.0%; experimental arms, 28.9%; P = .124) and other time-to-event measures were not significantly different. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were significantly increased for thrombocytopenia (P < .0001), epistaxis, and thrombosis/embolism in the experimental arms. CONCLUSION: Adding aprinocarsen to gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen did not enhance survival and other efficacy measures in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Short-term treatment-related symptoms and quality of life: results from an international randomized phase III study of cisplatin with or without raltitrexed in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: an EORTC Lung-Cancer Group and National Cancer Institute, Canada, Intergroup Study.

PURPOSE: For malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients with a poor prognosis, maintaining health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is important. This article compares the impact on HRQOL of first-line treatment with cisplatin versus raltitrexed and cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically-proven unresectable MPM, not pretreated with chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, with or without preceding infusion of raltitrexed 3 mg/m2. HRQOL was assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13) tools. Assessments were conducted at baseline, immediately before every treatment cycle, at the end of treatment, and every six weeks for 12 months. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned, 80% were male with a median age of 58 years, WHO performance status 0, 1, and 2, in 25%, 62%, and 13% of cases. The clinical results found raltitrexed and cisplatin to be superior to cisplatin with regard to overall survival (P = .048). The global HRQOL scale was comparable at baseline on both treatment arms (P = .848); at no point was any significant difference apparent on this end point. Both treatments led to an improvement, over time, in dyspnoea. This effect is an important clinically meaningful reduction from baseline in the cisplatin/raltitrexed arm. However, the majority of scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 or LC13 showed stabilization of HRQOL with few clinically significant differences between the treatment arms. CONCLUSION: This study provides important information about the HRQOL of chemotherapy-treated MPM patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Gefitinib monotherapy in chemotherapy-naive patients with inoperable stage III/IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib is an orally active epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity in previously treated patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little is known of its activity as monotherapy in chemotherapy-naive patients. This phase II study (1839IL/0456) evaluated first-line gefitinib in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with proven inoperable stage III/IV NSCLC, no previous chemotherapy, and a performance status of 0-2 received gefitinib 250 mg per day until disease progression. Patient reevaluation was performed by radiography and computed tomography at regular intervals. RESULTS: Fifty-eight of 59 patients were available for analysis. Response rate (complete plus partial responses) was 5% (3 of 58 patients); 40% (23 of 58 patients) exhibited stable disease (overall disease control rate, 45% [26 of 58 patients]). Median progression-free survival was 7 weeks, and median overall survival was 29 weeks. All responders were women and/or nonsmokers with adenocarcinoma or bronchoalveolar carcinoma. Gefitinib treatment was well tolerated; skin toxicities occurred in 71% of patients, including severe skin toxicities in 2 patients, and mild to moderate diarrhea occurred in 50% of patients. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib monotherapy has some efficacy in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage or metastatic NSCLC. However, activity seems to be limited to particular patient groups.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and gene amplification in non-small-cell lung cancer: molecular analysis of the IDEAL/INTACT gefitinib trials.

PURPOSE: Most cases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with dramatic responses to gefitinib have specific activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), but the predictive value of these mutations has not been defined in large clinical trials. The goal of this study was to determine the contribution of molecular alterations in EGFR to response and survival within the phase II (IDEAL) and phase III (INTACT) trials of gefitinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the frequency of EGFR mutations in lung cancer specimens from both the IDEAL and INTACT trials and compared it with EGFR gene amplification, another genetic abnormality in NSCLC. RESULTS: EGFR mutations correlated with previously identified clinical features of gefitinib response, including adenocarcinoma histology, absence of smoking history, female sex, and Asian ethnicity. No such association was seen in patients whose tumors had EGFR amplification, suggesting that these molecular markers identify different biologic subsets of NSCLC. In the IDEAL trials, responses to gefitinib were seen in six of 13 tumors (46%) with an EGFR mutation, two of seven tumors (29%) with amplification, and five of 56 tumors (9%) with neither mutation nor amplification (P = .001 for either EGFR mutation or amplification v neither abnormality). Analysis of the INTACT trials did not show a statistically significant difference in response to gefitinib plus chemotherapy according to EGFR genotype. CONCLUSION: EGFR mutations and, to a lesser extent, amplification appear to identify distinct subsets of NSCLC with an increased response to gefitinib. The combination of gefitinib with chemotherapy does not improve survival in patients with these molecular markers.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Randomized phase III study of cisplatin with or without raltitrexed in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: an intergroup study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Group and the National Cancer Institute of Canada.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase III trial to determine whether first-line treatment with raltitrexed, a thymidine synthase inhibitor, and cisplatin results in superior outcome compared with cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with histologically proven advanced MPM, not pretreated with chemotherapy, WHO performance status (PS) 0 to 2, and adequate hematological, renal, and hepatic function were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 80 mg/m2 IV on day 1, alone (arm A) or combined with raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 (arm B). In patients with measurable disease, response was monitored using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Health related quality of life (HRQOL) was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and Lung Module (QLQ-LC13). RESULTS: Two hundred fifty patients were randomized: 80% male; median age, 58 years; and WHO PS, 0, 1, 2 in 25, 62, and 13% of cases, respectively. There were no toxic deaths. The main grade 3 or 4 toxicities observed were neutropenia and emesis, reported twice as often in the combination arm. Among 213 patients with measurable disease, response rate was 13.6% (arm A) versus 23.6% (arm B; P = .056). No difference in HRQOL was observed on any of the scales. Median overall and 1-year survival in arms A and B were 8.8 (95% CI, 7.8 to 10.8) v 11.4 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 15), respectively, and 40% v 46%, respectively (P = .048). CONCLUSION: A combination of raltitrexed and cisplatin improves overall survival compared with cisplatin alone. This study confirms that a combination of cisplatin and an antifolate is superior to cisplatin alone in patients with MPM, without harmful effect on HRQOL.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with improved survival in gefitinib-treated chemorefractory lung adenocarcinomas.

PURPOSE: Activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) confer a strong sensitivity to gefitinib, a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of EGFR. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We examined EGFR mutations at exons 18, 19, and 21 in tumor tissue from 68 gefitinib-treated, chemorefractory, advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients from the United States, Europe, and Asia and in a highly gefitinib-sensitive non-small cell lung cancer cell line and correlated their presence with response and survival. In addition, in a subgroup of 28 patients for whom the remaining tumor tissue was available, we examined the relationship among EGFR mutations, CA repeats in intron 1 of EGFR, EGFR and caveolin-1 mRNA levels, and increased EGFR gene copy numbers. RESULTS: Seventeen patients had EGFR mutations, all of which were in lung adenocarcinomas. Radiographic response was observed in 16 of 17 (94.1%) patients harboring EGFR mutations, in contrast with 6 of 51 (12.6%) with wild-type EGFR (P < 0.0001). Probability of response increased significantly in never smokers, patients receiving a greater number of prior chemotherapy regimens, Asians, and younger patients. Median survival was not reached for patients with EGFR mutations and was 9.9 months for those with wild-type EGFR (P = 0.001). EGFR mutations tended to be associated with increased numbers of CA repeats and increased EGFR gene copy numbers but not with EGFR and caveolin-1 mRNA overexpression (P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of EGFR mutations is a major determinant of gefitinib response, and targeting EGFR should be considered in preference to chemotherapy as first-line treatment in lung adenocarcinomas that have demonstrable EGFR mutations.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2005

Treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the elderly: results of an international expert panel.

The best treatment for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still debated. To guide clinical management of these patients and suggest the priorities for clinical research in this field, an International Expert Panel met in Naples, Italy, on April 19 to 20, 2004. Results and conclusions based on a review of evidence available in the literature to date are presented in this article. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is recommended to better define prognosis and to predict tolerance to treatment. In the first randomized study dedicated to elderly NSCLC patients, single-agent vinorelbine showed superiority over supportive care alone, both in terms of survival and quality of life. In a large randomized trial, gemcitabine plus vinorelbine failed to show any advantage over either agent alone. Subset analyses suggest that the efficacy of platinum-based combination chemotherapy is similar in fit older and younger patients, with an acceptable increase in toxicity for elderly patients. These data should be interpreted cautiously because retrospective subgroup analyses are encumbered by selection bias; hence, randomized trials dedicated to platinum-based chemotherapy for nonselected elderly patients are warranted. Several promising biologic therapies are under investigation; however, with present data, target-based agents as first-line treatment for elderly NSCLC patients are not yet recommended. Clinical research, with trials specifically designed for elderly patients, is mandatory. With the current evidence, single-agent chemotherapy with a third-generation drug (vinorelbine, gemcitabine, a taxane) should be the recommended option for nonselected elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Platinum-based chemotherapy is a viable option for fit patients with adequate organ function. Best supportive care remains important, in addition to chemotherapy or as the exclusive option for patients who are unsuitable for more aggressive treatment.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2005

Topotecan and etoposide as first-line therapy for extensive disease small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial of a platinum-free regimen.

In the treatment of extensive disease of small cell lung cancer (ED SCLC) there is an urgent need for more effective and better-tolerated drug regimens. We report on a prospective phase II trial performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a platinum-free regimen--containing topotecan and etoposide--in the first-line treatment of ED SCLC. Between December 1999 and July 2001, 28 chemotherapy-naive patients with ED SCLC were recruited; 9 patients had stage IIIB disease and 19 patients had stage IV disease. Based on phase I results, patients received treatment with intravenous topotecan 1 mg/m2 (days 1-5) followed by intravenous etoposide 75 mg/m2 (days 8-10). Treatment courses were repeated every 28 days for a maximum of 6 cycles. A confirmed response rate of 46.4% with 1 complete response (CR) and 12 partial responses (PR) (95% CI=27.5-66.1%) was observed. Stable disease (SD) was observed in 18% of patients. The median time to response was 7.9 weeks (range: 7.7-15.1 weeks) and median survival was 29.9 weeks (range from 3.3 to 91.4 weeks). Main toxicities encountered were haematological with Grade III/IV neutropenia in 2.6/1.5% of courses and Grade III/IV thrombocytopenia in 1.8%/0.7% of courses. These toxicities were manageable and were not associated with clinical sequels. Non-haematological toxicities were generally mild with no Grade III/IV toxicities reported apart from Grade III alopecia. The combination therapy of topotecan and etoposide is active in first-line chemotherapy for patients with ED SCLC. The regimen showed a tolerable safety profile. Since drug scheduling plays a critical role in the combination of topoisomerase I and II inhibitors, concurrent administration of topotecan and etoposide might increase the efficacy.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Pemetrexed combined with oxaliplatin or carboplatin as first-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To determine efficacy and toxicity of two pemetrexed-based regimens in chemonaive patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) plus oxaliplatin 120 mg/m(2) (PemOx) or pemetrexed plus carboplatin AUC6 (PemCb). All drugs were given on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for up to six cycles. Folic acid and vitamin B(12) were given to all patients to minimize pemetrexed-related toxicities. RESULTS: Forty-one patients received PemOx and 39 received PemCb. Objective tumor response rates were 26.8% for PemOx patients (95% confidence interval, 14.2-42.9) and 31.6% for PemCb patients (95% confidence interval, 17.5-48.7). Median time to progression was 5.5 and 5.7 months, respectively, for PemOx and PemCb. Median overall survival times were 10.5 months for both treatment groups (range, <1 to >20 months). The 1-year survival rate was 49.9% for PemOx patients and 43.9% for PemCb patients. Common toxicity criteria grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities among PemOx patients were grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (7.3%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (2.4%), and grade 3 anemia (2.4%). PemCb patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (25.6%), grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (17.9%), and grade 3 anemia (7.7%). Grade 3 vomiting occurred in three PemOx patients and grade 3 fatigue occurred in three PemCb patients. One grade 3 neurosensory toxicity occurred in the PemOx group. Three patients (PemOx 1 and PemCb 2) experienced febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy measures for both regimens seem similar to the most effective chemotherapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (platinum combinations) with less hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity. Comparing either of these two regimens to platinum-based therapies in a large randomized trial is warranted.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

A pilot trial of gefitinib in combination with docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Despite improvements in conventional treatment, patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a poor prognosis, leaving a significant unmet need for novel treatments. One such novel, biologically targeted agent is the orally active epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib. This open-label pilot trial investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of 2 doses of gefitinib (250 and 500 mg per day) combined with docetaxel (75 mg/m2) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC as first- and second-line chemotherapy. Eighteen patients were recruited: 6 received gefitinib 250 mg per day plus docetaxel; 12 received gefitinib 500 mg per day plus docetaxel. Combination therapy was feasible with no overlapping toxicities. No patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at 250 mg per day; 1 patient had 2 DLT events at 500 mg per day (grade 3 rash and diarrhea for >4 days). Adverse events were mild to moderate, including fatigue, mucositis, nausea, anorexia, rash, diarrhea, and fever. Docetaxel did not appear to alter steady-state exposure to gefitinib. The effect of gefitinib on exposure to docetaxel was equivocal; with the exception of 2 patients in the gefitinib 250 mg per day dose group, there appeared to be no trend toward a higher or lower exposure to docetaxel when given in the presence of gefitinib compared with that when given alone. Combination therapy was associated with antitumor activity and responses were seen with gefitinib in 2 of 6 patients at 250 mg per day and 4 of 12 patients at 500 mg per day. This combination is feasible and has an acceptable and predictable safety profile, as well as associated antitumor activity.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2005

Randomized multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine versus docetaxel as first-line therapy with second-line crossover in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: A randomized phase II study was performed to determine whether single-agent gemcitabine or docetaxel with the introduction of the opposite agent in case of disease progression (ie, in the second-line setting) is feasible and effective in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The doses were 1,000 mg/m2 for gemcitabine and 35 mg/m2 for docetaxel, each given on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. After a planned interim analysis, the docetaxel/gemcitabine arm (ie, docetaxel followed by gemcitabine) was closed after enrollment of 49 patients because of poor predefined feasibility. A total of 98 patients were recruited to the gemcitabine/docetaxel arm (ie, gemcitabine followed by docetaxel). RESULTS: Quality of life remained near baseline levels during the administration of 6 cycles of gemcitabine/docetaxel chemotherapy, whereas it deteriorated after 2 cycles of docetaxel/gemcitabine. Toxicity was comparable between arms. Median times to progression were 4.3 months and 2.2 months with gemcitabine/docetaxel and docetaxel/gemcitabine, respectively, and median overall survival times were 9 months (gemcitabine/docetaxel) and 5 months (docetaxel/gemcitabine; P=0.029, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that first-line gemcitabine followed by second-line weekly docetaxel is feasible, with promising survival in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had a performance status 0 to 2, previous treatment with one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced NSCLC, and adequate organ function. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) day 1 with vitamin B(12), folic acid, and dexamethasone or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1 with dexamethasone every 21 days. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-one patients were randomly assigned. Overall response rates were 9.1% and 8.8% (analysis of variance P =.105) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months for each arm, and median survival time was 8.3 versus 7.9 months (P = not significant) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. The 1-year survival rate for each arm was 29.7%. Patients receiving docetaxel were more likely to have grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (40.2% v 5.3%; P <.001), febrile neutropenia (12.7% v 1.9%; P <.001), neutropenia with infections (3.3% v 0.0%; P =.004), hospitalizations for neutropenic fever (13.4% v 1.5%; P <.001), hospitalizations due to other drug related adverse events (10.5% v 6.4%; P =.092), use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (19.2% v 2.6%, P <.001) and all grade alopecia (37.7% v 6.4%; P <.001) compared with patients receiving pemetrexed. CONCLUSION: Treatment with pemetrexed resulted in clinically equivalent efficacy outcomes, but with significantly fewer side effects compared with docetaxel in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and should be considered a standard treatment option for second-line NSCLC when available.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Gefitinib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial--INTACT 2.

PURPOSE: Preclinical studies indicate that gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE), an orally active epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, may enhance antitumor efficacy of cytotoxics, and combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin had acceptable tolerability in a phase I trial. Gefitinib monotherapy demonstrated unparalleled antitumor activity for a biologic agent, with less toxicity than docetaxel, in phase II trials in refractory, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial evaluated gefitinib plus paclitaxel and carboplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under concentration/time curve of 6 mg/min/mL (day 1 every 3 weeks) plus gefitinib 500 mg/d, gefitinib 250 mg/d, or placebo. After a maximum of six cycles, daily gefitinib or placebo continued until disease progression. End points included overall survival, time to progression (TTP), response rate (RR), and safety evaluation. Results A total of 1,037 patients were recruited. Baseline demographic characteristics were well balanced. There was no difference in overall survival (median, 8.7, 9.8, and 9.9 months for gefitinib 500 mg/d, 250 mg/d, and placebo, respectively; P =.64), TTP, or RR between arms. Expected dose-related diarrhea and skin toxicity were observed in gefitinib-treated patients, with no new significant/unexpected safety findings from combination with chemotherapy. Subset analysis of patients with adenocarcinoma who received > or = 90 days' chemotherapy demonstrated statistically significant prolonged survival, suggesting a gefitinib maintenance effect. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib showed no added benefit in survival, TTP, or RR compared with standard chemotherapy alone. This large, placebo-controlled trial confirmed the favorable gefitinib safety profile observed in phase I and II monotherapy trials.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial--INTACT 1.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE) to standard first-line gemcitabine and cisplatin provides clinical benefit over gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gefitinib has demonstrated encouraging efficacy in advanced NSCLC in phase II trials in pretreated patients, and a phase I trial of gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin showed favorable tolerability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable stage III or IV NSCLC. All patients received up to six cycles of chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of the 3-week cycle) plus either gefitinib 500 mg/d, gefitinib 250 mg/d, or placebo. Daily gefitinib or placebo was continued until disease progression. End points included overall survival (primary), time to progression, response rates, and safety evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 1,093 patients were enrolled. There was no difference in efficacy end points between the treatment groups: for the gefitinib 500 mg/d, gefitinib 250 mg/d, and placebo groups, respectively, median survival times were 9.9, 9.9, and 10.9 months (global ordered log-rank [GOLrank] P =.4560), median times to progression were 5.5, 5.8, and 6.0 months (GOLrank; P =.7633), and response rates were 49.7%, 50.3%, and 44.8%. No significant unexpected adverse events were seen. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC did not have improved efficacy over gemcitabine and cisplatin alone. The reasons for this remain obscure and require further preclinical testing.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: past results and recent developments.

This review summarises results of previously conducted clinical trials and subsequently presents data arising from all phase II-III studies on chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) published since the last relevant overview. While response rates exceeding 30% have barely been achieved with established cytotoxic drugs in MPM therapy, novel chemotherapeutic agents and their combinations appear somewhat more promising. This applies especially to the antimetabolites, and in particular to pemetrexed which produced response rates of up to 45% in combination with platinum compounds. Raltitrexed combined with oxaliplatin has also been shown to be effective, and gemcitabine--applied as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin--as well as vinorelbine appear to improve quality of life in patients presenting with MPM. Data can now be more precisely analysed by increasingly implemented randomised studies, applying a standardised staging system, and distinguishing prognostic groups. While chemotherapy for MPM remains a challenging task, important steps have clearly been made in the past years to combat this aggressive disease. Publication of results from a phase III trial of pemetrexed with cisplatin in a peer reviewed journal may soon establish a standard of care.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

PubMed2004

Inadequacy of the RECIST criteria for response evaluation in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

UNLABELLED: The newly introduced Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), which relies on a single largest dimension of tumor rather than on the product of perpendicular diameters World Health Organisation (WHO) is intended to simplify the assessment of tumor response. PURPOSE: Is to evaluate the performance and validity of the RECIST compared to the WHO criteria. DESIGN: Thirty-four consecutive patients with bidimensionally measurable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) were evaluated prospectively. RESULTS: In 27% (9/34) a discrepancy was found between the WHO and RECIST response evaluation 9% (3/34) concerned best responses and 18% (6/34) objective confirmed responses. In 24% (8/34) disease progression was missed by RECIST. The percentage of patients in whom one or more discordance's between WHO and RECIST were detected was 47, 88% due to underscoring by RECIST. In a subgroup of 24 MPM patients with bidimensionally measurable pleural lesions only, the discrepancy rate was 29%, always due to underscoring by RECIST. However, when in the same subgroup the modified RECIST response evaluation was used the discrepancy rate was 21% and in all cases due to underscoring by WHO. CONCLUSION: For MPM bidimensional WHO response evaluation cannot automatically be replaced by RECIST because MPM has a non-spherical growth pattern. Our recommendation is to use the WHO criteria for bidimensional measurable lesions, RECIST for unidimensional measurable lesions and a modified RECIST response evaluation, in which the short axis perpendicular to the chest wall is used, for thickened pleural rind disease, according to the method used in the recently completed pemetrexed (Alimta) trial for MPM.

Disease Progression↗