PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Christian Roux

Publications and source records attributed to Christian Roux.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

How long should patients take medications for postmenopausal osteoporosis?

Several medications have proved effective in reducing the fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The optimal duration of use of these medications remains to be established, however. Gains in bone mineral density (BMD) persisted throughout 10 years of treatment with alendronate or 7 years with risedronate. However, proof of long-term protection against fractures was obtained only for shorter treatment periods, 4 years with alendronate and 5 years with risedronate. The persistence of treatment effects after drug discontinuation varies across medications, and further studies are needed before this point can be incorporated into treatment decisions. With raloxifene, the BMD effect observed after 3 and 4 years persisted when the drug was given for 8 years, and the fracture risk reduction was similar after 4 years and after 3 years. The long-term safety profile also was similar, with a significant decrease in the incidence of invasive estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer and a persistent increase in the risk of deep vein thrombosis. However, a sharp drop in BMD occurred upon raloxifene discontinuation. Thus, 4 years may be appropriate for anti-resorptive drug therapy. However, the optimal treatment duration should be determined on a case-by-case basis according to the results of regular fracture-risk evaluations.

Aged↗

Assessment of femoral neck strength by 3-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry.

Hip fractures due to osteoporosis are accompanied with increased mortality and morbidity. Bone mineral density (BMD [g/cm(2)]) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most important risk factor. However, an overlap exists between results of fractured and nonfractured populations. Macro-architectural parameters of the femur are independent risk factors of fracture. They have been evaluated in two dimensions using X-ray films or DXA scans; therefore, they are highly dependent on patient positioning and interindividual anatomical variations. To overcome this problem, we have previously shown the possibility to reconstruct human femurs using two perpendicular DXA scans and to calculate 3-dimensional (3D) geometric parameters from these reconstructions by a method called 3-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA). The aim of this article is to assess whether the combination of areal BMD and 3D geometric parameters calculated from 3D-XA improves failure load prediction of human proximal femurs in stance phase configuration. Twelve femurs (11 women, 1 man; aged 88+/-9 yr; range: 72-103 yr) were included in this study. The BMD was measured using a Hologic Delphi-W device (Hologic, Waltham, MA) and 3D reconstruction of the femurs was done using two perpendicular DXA scans as previously published. The calculated 3D geometric parameters included femoral neck axis length (FNAL), mid-femoral neck cross-sectional area (mid-FN CSA), neck shaft angle (NSA), and femoral head diameter (FHD). Mechanical testing was performed using stance phase configuration, which resulted in subcapital fractures. The FHD was correlated to mid-FN CSA and FNAL (r=0.68 and 0.76, respectively; p<0.001). Failure load was correlated to age, FHD, NSA, and BMD measurements. Multiple regression analysis showed that femoral neck BMD, FHD, and mid-FN CSA gave the best statistical model for failure load prediction (r(2)=0.84; p<0.002). This is the first study suggesting that combining areal BMD to 3D geometric parameters obtained by 3D-XA improve failure load prediction in human femurs.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Which variables best predict change in rheumatoid arthritis therapy in daily clinical practice?

OBJECTIVE: To determine in clinical practice which clinical status variables for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are most closely associated with a change in disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. METHODS: A prospective monocenter study was conducted in 204 consecutive patients with RA. Rheumatologists recorded patient characteristics, treatments, and disease activity data [tender and swollen joint count (28), morning stiffness, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain (0-100 mm), patient global assessment and physician global assessment, Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP)]. The rheumatologists decided whether or not to initiate or change treatment but were not informed that their decisions were part of the investigation. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate which study variables best predict change in therapy. ROC analysis was used to obtain the cutoff value of the different composite indices (DAS28(ESR), DAS28(CRP), SDAI) for treatment change, as well as sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The variables that were predictive for a change in treatment were (in descending order): swollen joint count, morning stiffness, CRP, tender joint count, and patient global assessment. Composite index values associated with a decision to modify DMARD therapy were: DAS28(ESR) 4.2 (sensitivity 87%, specificity 70%); DAS28(CRP) 3.6 (sensitivity 86%, specificity 78%); and SDAI 15 (sensitivity 90%, specificity 86%). The discriminative ability of SDAI was better than that of DAS28(CRP) or DAS28(ESR). CONCLUSION: In our study, swollen joint count was the variable with the greatest weight, which explains the observed better performance of SDAI.

Antirheumatic Agents↗

Vertebral fracture risk reduction with strontium ranelate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis is independent of baseline risk factors.

UNLABELLED: Strontium ranelate (2 g/day) was studied in 5082 postmenopausal women. A reduction in incident vertebral fracture risk by 40% was shown after 3 years. This effect was independent of age, initial BMD, and prevalent vertebral fractures. INTRODUCTION: Strontium ranelate is an orally active treatment able to decrease the risk of vertebral and hip fractures in osteoporotic postmenopausal women. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of strontium ranelate according to the main determinants of vertebral fracture risk: age, baseline BMD, prevalent fractures, family history of osteoporosis, baseline BMI, and addiction to smoking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We pooled data of two large multinational randomized double-blind studies with a population of 5082 (2536 receiving strontium ranelate 2 g/day and 2546 receiving a placebo), 74 years of age on average, and a 3-year follow-up. An intention-to-treat principle was used, as well as a Cox model for comparison and relative risks. RESULTS: The treatment decreased the risk of both vertebral (relative risk [RR] = 0.60 [0.53-0.69] p < 0.001) and nonvertebral (RR = 0.85 [0.74-0.99] p = 0.03) fractures. The decrease in risk of vertebral fractures was 37% (p = 0.003) in women <70 years, 42% (p < 0.001) for those 70-80 years of age, and 32% (p = 0.013) for those > or = 80 years. The RR of vertebral fracture was 0.28 (0.07-0.99) in osteopenic and 0.61 (0.53-0.70) in osteoporotic women, and baseline BMD was not a determinant of efficacy. The incidence of vertebral fractures in the placebo group increased with the number of prevalent vertebral fractures, but this was not a determinant of the effect of strontium ranelate. In 2605 patients, the risk of experiencing a first vertebral fracture was reduced by 48% (p < 0.001). The risk of experiencing a second vertebral fracture was reduced by 45% (p < 0.001; 1100 patients). Moreover, the risk of experiencing more than two vertebral fractures was reduced by 33% (p < 0.001; 1365 patients). Family history of osteoporosis, baseline BMI, and addiction to smoking were not determinants of efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a 3-year treatment with strontium ranelate leads to antivertebral fracture efficacy in postmenopausal women independently of baseline osteoporotic risk factors.

Bone Density↗

[Osteoporosis].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Humans↗

Diagnosis of vertebral fractures by vertebral fracture assessment.

Vertebral fractures are independent risk factors for both vertebral and peripheral fractures and only one-third of these fractures come to clinical attention. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) is a radiographic method using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to assess vertebral deformities during bone density measurement. We performed VFA of the spine from T4 to L5 on a Delphi W device (Hologic, Bedford, MA) in 136 postmenopausal patients (69+/-10 yr). These patients also had X-rays of the thoracic and lumbar spine. VFA was independently compared with X-rays by two rheumatologists, for the diagnosis of vertebral fractures at both the patient and vertebral levels. Using X-rays, 61 patients (45%) had at least one vertebral fracture. The percentage of unreadable vertebrae was 1% and 12.4% on X-rays and VFA, respectively (p<0.0001). At the patient level, VFA allowed to diagnose if the patient had no fracture or had at least one fracture in 74% of patients. In 11.2% of cases, VFA misclassified the patients. At the vertebral level, diagnostic efficacy of VFA as compared with X-rays was 97%. Concordance between both observers was good (kappa-score=0.69). We designed an algorithm for decision of performing X-rays in postmenopausal women: Using results of VFA would avoid X-rays in 32% of our patients. VFA is a reliable technique with low radiation, and is easily and rapidly applicable during bone density measurement by DXA, which could improve management of osteoporotic patients.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Cross-cultural validation and analysis of responsiveness of the QUALIOST: QUAlity of Life questionnaire In OSTeoporosis.

BACKGROUND: The QUALIOST was designed for use with the SF-36 to measure established osteoporosis-specific quality of life (QoL). The reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) and validity of the questionnaire were established in a stand-alone psychometric validation study. The objective of this paper is to provide additional information on the instrument's responsiveness using clinical trial data, along with the reliability and validity of translated versions. METHODS: The Spinal Osteoporosis Therapeutic Intervention (SOTI) was an international clinical trial comparing strontium ranelate to placebo on the occurrence of new vertebral fracture in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. QoL was a secondary endpoint, assessed using the SF-36 and QUALIOST at baseline and every six months, with the main analysis at 3-year follow-up. Questionnaire acceptability, analysis of the hypothesised structure, internal consistency reliability and responsiveness to clinical change over time were assessed at the 3-year follow up. RESULTS: 1592 patients from 11 countries completed at least one QoL questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the questionnaires were assessed on cross-sectional (N = 1486) and longitudinal (N = 1288) data. Item discriminant validity of the QUALIOST was excellent, as was item convergent validity, with 100% of item-scale correlations being above the 0.40 level. Internal consistency reliability was also extremely good, with high Cronbach's alpha scores above the 0.70 benchmark. Responsiveness results were consistent for all QUALIOST scores, indicating that greater decreases in QoL corresponded to greater numbers of fractures experienced. QUALIOST scores also differed according to the type of fracture suffered. This was demonstrated by increased effect sizes for more severe vertebral fractures (clinical vertebral and painful vertebral). In comparing responsiveness, the QUALIOST scores were generally more consistent than those of the SF-36. Most notably, the QUALIOST was more responsive with regard to painful vertebral fractures than the SF-36. CONCLUSION: The QUALIOST is a reliable and valid tool for measuring QoL in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Being available in several validated language versions, it is ready to be used in a variety of settings, including international clinical trials.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Statins in rheumatology.

Statins were developed for the treatment of lipid disorders and have been proved to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality when used for primary or secondary prevention. Beneficial effects in patients with osteoporotic fractures or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been suggested but remain unproven. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are increased in patients with RA or systemic lupus erythematosus, who should undergo serum lipid assays. When these show dyslipidemia, statin therapy should be started according to current recommendations.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗

Safety and efficacy of risedronate in patients with age-related reduced renal function as estimated by the Cockcroft and Gault method: a pooled analysis of nine clinical trials.

UNLABELLED: The incidences of osteoporosis and renal insufficiency increase with age. We studied the influence of renal function on the safety and efficacy of risedronate 5 mg daily in osteoporotic women. Risedronate was safe and effective in osteoporotic women with mild, moderate, or severe age-related renal impairment. INTRODUCTION: The incidences of both osteoporosis and renal insufficiency increase with age; thus, the effect of renal impairment on the safety and efficacy of osteoporosis treatments is a clinical concern. Risedronate is a pyridinyl bisphosphonate well established as safe and effective in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Currently, there is little available information about the effect of bisphosphonate treatment in patients with renal insufficiency. This retrospective analysis was conducted to study the influence of renal function on the safety and efficacy of risedronate in a population of osteoporotic women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Combined data from nine randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III risedronate trials were analyzed. The patients in these studies had no markedly abnormal laboratory parameters that were considered clinically significant and no evidence of significant disease. This analysis included patients who received placebo (n = 4,500) or risedronate 5 mg (n = 4,496) for up to 3 years (average duration of exposure, 2 years) and who had renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CrCl] < 80 ml/min). CrCl was estimated by the Cockcroft and Gault method, based on age, weight, and serum creatinine. Patients were categorized as having mild (CrCl >or=50 to <80 ml/min), moderate (CrCl >or=30 to <50 ml/min), or severe (CrCl < 30 ml/min) renal impairment. RESULTS: Of the patients studied, renal impairment at baseline was mild in 48% (mean [range] serum creatinine, 0.9 [0.4-1.6] mg/dl), moderate in 45% (1.1 [0.6-1.9] mg/dl), and severe in 7% (1.3 [0.7-2.7] mg/dl). In both the placebo and risedronate treatment groups, the patients with the most severe renal impairment were older and had more severe osteoporosis. The incidences of overall adverse events and of renal function-related adverse events were similar in the placebo and risedronate 5 mg groups regardless of renal function. Furthermore, evaluation of changes from baseline in serum creatinine revealed no difference in renal function between the placebo and risedronate 5 mg groups in any of the renal impairment subgroups at any time-point. In all three subgroups, risedronate effectively preserved BMD and reduced the incidence of vertebral fractures. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that risedronate is safe and effective in osteoporotic women with age-related mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment.

Age Factors↗

Septic knee arthritis after intra-articular hyaluronate injection. Two case reports.

Intraarticular sodium hyaluronate injection to treat osteoarthritis is associated with minor side effects. Infections seem uncommon. We report two cases of septic knee arthritis. One patient was an 80-year-old woman who was admitted for Staphylococcus aureus knee arthritis after several intraarticular injections of sodium hyaluronate and corticosteroids. In the other patient, a 78-year-old woman, Neisseria mucosa knee arthritis occurred after a single sodium hyaluronate injection. Faultless aseptic technique is essential when administering hyaluronate viscosupplementation. Patients should be informed of the risk of septic arthritis.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

[Paget's disease, workup and monitoring].

Paget's disease is a progressive bone disease, characterized by bone hypertrophy and increased bone resorption. The pain and deformity that characterize its clinical course are not simple to assess, but it has a characteristic radiographic appearance. In most cases, treatment can be monitored through biological markers of bone turnover. Total alkaline phosphatase is the best marker and measurement of collagen breakdown products is useful in difficult cases. The goal of treatment is the normalization of these biological markers, to prevent complications of the disease.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗

Bone status in primary hyperparathyroidism assessed by regional bone mineral density from the whole body scan and QUS imaging at calcaneus.

To assess the bone mineral density status in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), we studied 64 females with PHPT and 17 healthy women. Regional BMD (arms, trunk, legs) from the whole body scan and conventional sites (lumbar spine, femur, radius) were assessed by DXA. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging measurements were performed at calcaneus. Sixteen women had history of renal lithiasis, 11 had low impact fracture and 37 women had neither renal lithiasis nor fracture. In the entire group, the mean Z-scores were significantly decreased at all sites (lumbar spine, femur, radius). In all clinical subgroups, the mean Z-scores were significantly decreased at radius. The mean Z-scores in premenopausal women were significantly decreased comparatively to postmenopausal women at lumbar spine and femur. In a group of PHPT females matched to controls for age and BMI, only BMD values at radius were lower in PHPT patients than in control (P < 0.03). However, from the whole body scan data, all sites but no trunk were significantly involved in PHPT patients (P < 0.04). Using QUS measurements at calcaneus, the BUA but not SOS in PHPT females was significantly lower (P = 0.03) than in controls. Our results suggest that low BMD at lumbar spine and femur is encountered preferentially in premenopausal women. The BMD decrease predominates at limbs in PHPT with presumably a gradient from proximal to distal part of the limbs. Indeed, the distal part of the limbs are the most affected areas in PHPT whatever the amount of cortical or trabecular bone.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

[Osteoporosis and hormone replacement therapy].

Hormone replacement therapy prevents bone loss and the increase in bone resorption due to the hormone deficiency in oestrogen in postmenopausal women. The WHI (Women's Health Initiative) randomised, double-blind study against placebo, demonstrated that which all the epidemiological trials had already suggested: replacement therapy can reducing by around 30% the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women. Administration of hormone replacement therapy requires account being taken of (in view of the uncertainties regarding the anti-fracture effect of low dose therapy): the duration (in view of the absence of remnant effect of the product on bone loss and on the risk of fracture) and the benefit/risk ration (in view of the benefits demonstrated on climacteric disorders, but the increase in risk of breast cancer). The menopause is the occasion to assess individual risks, notably vascular and of fractures, taking into account the clinical risk factors and measurement of bone density.

Bone Density↗

What is the role of DXA, QUS and bone markers in fracture prediction, treatment allocation and monitoring?

There is evidence that treatment can decrease the risk of fractures in osteoporotic patients, and screening of these patients is therefore relevant. Diagnosis of osteoporosis is based on the T-score calculated from bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. BMD measurements have been widely used for the management of osteoporosis, and a low BMD is a strong risk factor for fractures. But BMD measurement has several limitations in both diagnosis, prediction of fracture risk, and treatment follow-up. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters, an alternative to BMD in the assessment of bone, are independent risk factors for osteoporotic fracture. However, the use of QUS cannot be recommended for both allocation and monitoring of treatment. Biochemical markers of bone remodelling can be useful for both prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of treatment if sources of variability are controlled.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Recommendations for monitoring antiresorptive therapies in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Antiresorptive agents are effective in preventing and treating postmenopausal osteoporosis, provided they are taken as directed. Regular physical examinations including height measurements may fail to ensure optimal compliance. Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is indispensable for determining whether treatment is warranted. The measurement can be repeated after 2 years at least, provided quality-control procedures are adequate. BMD changes over time should be compared to the least significant change calculated from the in vivo BMD reproducibility at the measurement center. However, BMD changes are not correlated with the fracture risk reduction induced by antiresorptive treatment. Biochemical markers for bone turnover can be monitored after only 3-6 months provided steps are taken to control for intraindividual variability. They are useful when patient compliance is poor or the treatment response inadequate.

Biomarkers↗

Chondrocalcinosis secondary to hypomagnesemia in Gitelman's syndrome.

Chondrocalcinosis can be associated with hyperparathyroidism, hemochromatosis, hypophosphatasia, and hypomagnesemia. Gitelman syndrome (GS), an inherited disorder due to loss of function mutations of the gene encoding the distal convoluted tubule Na-Cl cotransporter (NCCT), is characterized by hypokalemia metabolic alkalosis, hypomagnesemia, and hypocalciuria. A 53-year-old man, with history of recurrent joint effusions and pains affecting knees and wrists, had transient episodes of muscle pain, weakness, cramping, and fatigue over a one-year period. Laboratory tests showed hypokalemia, metabolic alkalosis, hypocalciuria, and hypomagnesemia related to genetically proven GS. Radiographs of affected joints revealed calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition. This observation points out the necessity to look for Mg depletion (and especially GS) in the biological investigation of chondrocalcinosis. Additionally, the association between GS (NCCT inactivation) and high bone mineral density provides a new insight into the possible role of thiazides in osteoporosis management.

Bartter Syndrome↗