PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Clément-Claude Abbou

Publications and source records attributed to Clément-Claude Abbou.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Adenocarcinoma of ileal neobladder 20 years after cystectomy.

We present the case of a 67-year-old man with adenocarcinoma of the ileal neobladder 20 years after radical cystoprostatectomy for Stage pT2 transitional bladder cell cancer. A MEDLINE research revealed 9 other cases of the development of a neoplasm in the ileal part of an ileocystoplasty. This observation supports the hypothesis that in an ileal neobladder morphologic and molecular changes can be observed similar to those in the development of colorectal carcinoma. Patients who had an ileal neobladder created are at risk of glandular malignancy and should be closely followed up.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

Simulation training in video-assisted urologic surgery.

The current system of surgical education is facing many challenges in terms of time efficiency, costs, and patient safety. Training using simulation is an emerging area, mostly based on the experience of other high-risk professions like aviation. The goal of simulation-based training in surgery is to develop not only technical but team skills. This learning environment is stress-free and safe, allows standardization and tailoring of training, and also objectively evaluate performances. The development of simulation training is straightforward in endourology, since these procedures are video-assisted and the low degree of freedom of the instruments is easily replicated. On the other hand, these interventions necessitate a long learning curve, training in the operative room is especially costly and risky. Many models are already in use or under development in all fields of video-assisted urologic surgery: ureteroscopy, percutaneous surgery, transurethral resection of the prostate, and laparoscopy. Although bench models are essential, simulation increasingly benefits from the achievements and development of computer technology. Still in its infancy, virtual reality simulation will certainly belong to tomorrow's teaching tools.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2005

Update on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted prostatectomy have been proposed as alternatives to traditional open retropubic prostatectomy. In this review, we update the more recent data concerning the results, technical trends and controversies regarding these novel, minimally invasive procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: As a result of improved patient selection, a better understanding of surgical anatomy, and refinements in surgical techniques, traditional retropubic prostatectomy set the standards very high, leaving little room for improvement. In this review, the results of laparoscopic prostatectomy are compared with contemporary in addition to historical series. Besides the transperitoneal laparoscopic approach, which was almost exclusively used in the initial series, the introduction and development of the extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach meant a significant change in the surgical strategy of a number of teams worldwide. The relative merits of the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches are discussed. Robotic radical prostatectomy is a promising technical innovation that allows us to overcome many of the inherent limitations of laparoscopic surgery. As a result of financial constraints, the experience has been limited to a few centres worldwide. SUMMARY: Although long-term results are still lacking, novel minimally invasive techniques seem to fulfil the highest standards of radical prostatectomy in terms of early oncological cure, functional results and morbidity. A standardization of data collection and evaluation methodology will be indispensable for a better comparison of the different series.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗
PubMed2004

Justification of extraperitoneal laparoscopic access for surgery of the upper urinary tract.

Laparoscopic surgery was originally developed by gynecologists and general surgeons. Based on their experience, the first successful laparoscopic procedures in urology were performed transperitoneally. However, this novel technique transformed traditionally retroperitoneal procedures into transperitoneal procedures, giving free rein to distinct intraperitoneal complications. Retroperitoneal laparoscopy was a later development in urology. This approach has gained increasing popularity throughout the years and has challenged the transperitoneal laparoscopic route in many aspects. This review focuses on the advantages of retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery of the upper urinary tract.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2004

Does the extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach improve the outcome of radical prostatectomy?

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRPE) became the operative procedure of choice for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer in selected urologic centers around the world. Principal advantages are the minimal invasive nature of the procedure, a superior visualization of the operative field because of the magnification of the optical system, an exact and watertight anastomosis, the possibility of early catheter removal, and a potentially reduced amount of blood loss. Recent data show that oncologic outcome is not compromised by the minimal invasive nature of the procedure. However, a major drawback of LRPE is the transperitoneal route of access to the extraperitoneal organ of the prostate. Therefore, principal disadvantages of LRPE are potential intraperitoneal complications. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy is a further advancement of minimal invasive surgery because it overcomes the limitations of LRPE by the strictly extraperitoneal route of access, combining the advantages of minimal invasive surgery with the advantages of an extraperitoneal procedure. This article reviews the literature on minimally invasive (laparoscopic and endoscopic-extraperitoneal) radical prostatectomy.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of early oncologic results of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach.

PURPOSE: Compare the early oncological results of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed by either an extraperitoneal or a transperitoneal approach. METHODS: 330 consecutive men underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer, the first 165 by transperitoneal approach, and the last 165 by extraperitoneal approach. Clinical stage, serum PSA, Gleason score of biopsy were recorded, as well as operating time, surgical and medical complications, blood loss, length of hospital stay and catheterization time. The weight of the specimen, pathological stage (1997 TNM classification) and status of the surgical margins were noted. The Fisher test as well as the chi2-test were used for statistical analysis. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative characteristics except for Gleason score of the biopsies which was higher in the extraperitoneal group (p < 0.0001). The operating time was longer with the transperitoneal approach (248.5 min vs. 220.0 min, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in transfusion rate (1.2% vs. 5.4%, transperitoneal vs. extraperitoneal, respectively, p = 0.6). There was no difference in hospital stay, medical and surgical complications. Respectively, in the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal groups, there were 108 and 88 pT2 tumors. There were no differences in terms of positive surgical margins between the two groups, 23% and 29.7% (p = 0.21) overall, 13.0% and 17.0% (p = 0.42) in pT2 tumors and 43.6% and 44.7% (p = 0.99) in pT3 tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Extraperitoneal approach offers the same early oncological results as transperitoneal approach with a shorter operative time.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

Robotic renal surgery.

Robotic technology is an expansion of laparoscopic surgery. Robots can be conceived of as specialized laparoscopic tools; their aim is to improve dexterity of the operating surgeon, and therefore they correspond to computer-enhanced telemanipulator devices. For the patient, the advantage of robotic surgery is essentially the advantage of the laparoscopic approach. It gives surgeons tremendous benefits, however, with its intuitive Endowrist and dexterity. From the patient perspective, the biggest difference is between an open operation and one that uses minimally invasive techniques. The contribution of robotics to the evolution of surgery will be obvious if these new systems increase the number of conventionally trained surgeons performing more complex operations using minimally invasive surgical techniques, or if the outcome data from different centers worldwide suggest that the use of advanced technology permits surgeons to have augmented technical performance.

Forecasting↗
PubMed2003

Preparedness in robotically assisted interventions.

For many years, robots have been used in manufacturing to perform a variety of delicate tasks. Their use is now being generalized to other fields, such as biology, domestic applications, and especially medicine, in which they are poised to make a significant contribution. This evolution comes from the progress made in the field of robotics and from recent changes in medical and surgical techniques, namely, developments in medical imaging and a new desire for minimally invasive interventions. This emerging combination of high-precision robotic manipulators, new medical diagnostic techniques, and efficient minimally invasive surgery has not yet been perfected. After a brief discussion of state-of-the-art robotic systems used in urology, this article discusses new challenges presented by robotic minimally invasive surgery. A computer-integrated approach aimed at increasing the efficiency of such interventions through better preparedness is presented. This approach is illustrated by a case study in human nephrectomy and a cardiac animal experiment.

Humans↗
PubMed2003

Laparoscopic and robotic surgical training in urology.

The most important change in urology during the past decade was the development of minimally invasive surgery, particularly laparoscopy. However, the main drawback of laparoscopy is a steep learning curve, which results from the significant changes in the surgical environment. Although laparoscopy can provide important advantages for the patient, including decreased length of hospitalization, decreased analgesic requirement, and a shortened postoperative convalescence, one concern has been whether laparoscopic techniques should be learned solely in the operating room. For example, sports, music, and aviation are practiced before an actual performance is ever undertaken. In this review, the advantages and limitations of all available training modalities in minimally invasive surgery are described. Testing basic laparoscopic skills on inanimate models, becoming familiar with the principles of dissection and hemostasis on living animals, and studying surgical anatomy on cadavers should be considered as indispensable and complementary elements for laparoscopic training in the future. In addition, telementoring with the help of modern image processing and virtual reality eventually may become the basis of tomorrow's surgical instruction.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2003

Combined reporting of cancer control and functional results of radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The results of radical prostatectomy (cancer control, continence and sexual potency) are currently presented separately, while the success of this surgery depends on a combination of good cancer control with maintenance of continence and erections. We propose a score to jointly evaluate and report cancer control and functional results. METHODS: The results of 205 radical prostatectomies were studied at one year. Cancer control was evaluated by PSA. Continence and sexual potency were evaluated by a self-administered questionnaire. Each patient was attributed 0 or 4 points according to the presence of absence of biochemical progression (PSA>0.2 ng/ml), 0 or 2 points according to the presence or absence of urinary incontinence (use of pads) and 0 or 1 point according to the presence or absence of impotence (no erections). The sum of these points provided a score classifying the patient into 8 distinct categories, from 0 to 7, each corresponding to a specific status (from 0 (0+0+0): no cancer control-incontinence-impotence to 7 (4+2+1): cancer control-continence-sexual potency). RESULTS: One year after the operation, 175 (85%) of patients had a PSA less than 0.2 ng/ml, 135 (65.8%) were continent and 64 (32.7%) reported erections. All patients with a score > or =4 had good cancer control, with no functional disorders for a score of 7 (4+2+1) (20%), no disorders of continence for a score of 6 (4+2+0) (31.5%), no disorders of erection for a score of 5 (4+0+1) (8.3%), or with incontinence and impotence for a score of 4 (4+0+0) (21.9%). All patients with a score <4 had a PSA>0.2 ng/ml, but with no functional disorders for a score of 3 (0+2+1) (2.4%), no incontinence for a score of 2 (0+2+0) (8.3%), and no impotence for a score of 1 (0+0+1) (1.9%). 1.9% of patients were incontinent, impotent and showed signs of biochemical progression (score 0=0+0+0). CONCLUSION: This score allows analysis of the global (cancer control and functional) results of radical prostatectomy and would facilitate comparisons between various surgical techniques (type of approach, nerve-sparing techniques) and various centres.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the extraperitoneal approach using the da Vinci robotic system.

PURPOSE: We developed and assessed the feasibility of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed using the da Vinci (Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, California) robotic system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In June 2002, 4 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent extraperitoneal, robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. After development of the extraperitoneal space the surgeon performed laparoscopic prostatectomy from the remote control unit. The assistant aligned and exchanged robotic instruments and used conventional laparoscopic instruments to facilitate prostatectomy. Perioperative data and pathological results were recorded. RESULTS: No difficulties were noted when developing the extraperitoneal space. All additional steps were successfully performed with telerobotics. More distal placement of the robotic ports appeared to improve the feasibility of the extraperitoneal approach. The peritoneum acted as a natural bowel retractor and the distal port placement facilitated use of the assistant ports. Mean operative time was 274 minutes (range 124 to 360). Mean catheterization time and hospital stay were 2.7 and 5.3 days, respectively. A positive margin was observed in 1 patient and pathological stage was pT2 in 3 and pT3 in 1. No postoperative complications or open conversions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The extraperitoneal approach was feasible with the da Vinci robotic system. Distal port placement for the robot appeared to create an ergonomic environment for the surgeon and assistant and more direct prostatic access. While additional clinical experience is required, the extraperitoneal approach may ultimately provide advantages for robotic and nonrobotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Prognostic consequences of the location of positive surgical margins in organ-confined prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the risk of progression in organ-confined prostate cancers (stage pT2), according to the location of positive surgical margins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1988 and 2001, 538 consecutive men underwent radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. All patients had preoperative physical examinations, serum PSA assays (Hybritech assay, N.l. <4 ng/ml) and ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies to confirm diagnosis. Radical prostatectomy specimens were analyzed according to the Stanford protocol. Positive margins were classified as single or multiple and main locations (apex, bladder neck and posterolateral) were noted. Postoperative follow-up data were obtained through routine serum PSA assays. Biochemical recurrence was defined as a single postoperative PSA level >0.2 ng/ml. Biochemical progression was studied in patients with organ-confined tumors (stage pT2) according to the location of the single positive margin. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the actuarial biochemical recurrence-free likelihood and the log-rank test was used for statistical analysis. Differences were considered significant when the p value was <0.05. RESULTS: 371 patients had organ-confined tumors, and 60 patients (16.1%) had solitary positive margins (apex 26, bladder neck 14, posterolaterally 20). Eleven patients (18.3%) had biochemical progression. 5-year biochemical free progression was 54.5, 76.9 and 87.9% for apex, bladder and the posterolateral location, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, a positive surgical margin at the apex was associated with worse clinical prognosis compared to the bladder neck and posterolateral locations.

Humans↗
PubMed2003

Cadaveric versus porcine models in urological laparoscopic training.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy performed on anesthetized pigs is an established training model. In this pilot study, we performed laparoscopy on cadavers as a training modality for urologists participating in a laparoscopic seminar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared data from two consecutive laparoscopy seminars performed at our institution. The first included a laparoscopy session performed on pigs. The second was in the same setup, yet laparoscopy was performed on fresh cadavers. We analyzed and compared the trainees' perspectives regarding the 2 modalities using a 5-scale satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Seven trainees attended the cadaveric and 9 the porcine laparoscopy session. The two groups were similar in terms of age and previous laparoscopic and urological experience. The general satisfaction of the two training modalities was high in the two groups, as well as their will for another session of the same kind. Yet the trainees ranked their understanding of the surgical anatomy, laparoscopic technique and use of instruments significantly higher in the cadaveric laparoscopy group (p values were 0.007, 0.006 and 0.032, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Cadaveric laparoscopy may offer an ideal surgical environment allowing dissection and performance of complete procedures. In this pilot study, we conducted the first reported cadaveric laparoscopy training seminar in urology. The trainees preferred the cadaveric laparoscopy and found it superior to porcine laparoscopy. We believe that cadaveric laparoscopy is an important training tool, which may be added to the armamentarium of urological laparoscopy training courses.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Simple nephrectomy with retroperitoneal laparoscopy].

OBJECTIVE: Nephrectomy was one of the very first urological procedures to be performed by laparoscopy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy. METHODS: From 1995 to 2002, 88 retroperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomies were performed in 87 patients with a mean age of 45.3 years (range: 18 to 77 years). The intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversion rate, blood loss, operating time and length of hospital stay were studied for each patient. RESULTS: The mean operating time was 114 min (range: 35 to 280 min), mean blood loss was 97.6 ml (range: 0 to 300 ml), there were 3 conversions (3.4%) and the mean length of hospital stay was 4.7 days (range: 2 to 13 days). The main postoperative complications were 2 cases of haematoma and one abscess of the nephrectomy site requiring surgical revision and 3 intraoperative thromboses of arteriovenous fistulas in 3 patients with polycystic kidney disease. CONCLUSION: Due to its low morbidity, laparoscopic simple nephrectomy has probably become the, reference technique for all indications for nephrectomy for benign disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[How to present in a unique fashion the oncologic and functional results after radical prostatectomy].

INTRODUCTION: The results of radical prostatectomy (cancer control, continence and sexual potency) are currently presented separately, while the success of this surgery depends on a combination of good cancer control with maintenance of continence and erections. We propose a score to jointly evaluate and report cancer control and functional results. METHODS: The results of 205 radical prostatectomies were studied at one year. Cancer control was evaluated by PSA and continence and sexual potency were evaluated by a self-administered questionnaire. Each patient was attributed 0 or 4 points according to the presence or absence of biochemical progression (PSA > 0.2 ng/ml), 0 or 2 points according to the presence or absence of urinary incontinence (use of pads) and 0 or 1 point according to the presence or absence of impotence (no erections). The sum of these points provided a socre classifying the patient into 8 distinct categories, from 0 to 7, each corresponding to a specific status (from 0 (0 + 0 + 0): no cancer control-incontinence-impotence to 7 (4 + 2 + 1): cancer control-continence-sexual potency). RESULTS: One year after the operation, 175 (85%) of patients had a PSA less than 0.2 ng/ml, 135 (65.8%) were continent and 64 (32.7%) reported erections. All patients with a score > or = 4 had good cancer control, wit no functional disorders for a score of 7 (4 + 2 + 1) (92%), no disorders of continence for a score of 6 (4 + 2 + 1) (31.5%), no disorders of erection for a score of 5 (4 + 0 + 1) (8.3%), or with incontinence and impotence for a score of 4 (4 + 0 + 0) (21.9%). All patients with a score < 4 had a PSA > 0.2 ng/ml, but with no functional disorders for a score for 3 (0 + 2 + 1) (2.4%), no incontinence for a score of 2 (0 + 2 + 0) (8.3%), and no impotence for a score of 1 (0 + 0 + 1) (1.9%). 1.9% of patients were incontinent, impotent and showed signs of biochemical progression (socre 0 = 0 + 0 + 0). CONCLUSION: This score allows analysis of the global (cancer control and functional) results of radical prostatectomy and would facilitate comparisons between various surgical techniques (type of approach, nerve-sparing techniques) and various centres.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Laparoscopy has become an integral part of urologic surgery. Its indications have been progressively extended to the most advanced oncologic and reconstructive procedures. Within this frame, radical prostatectomy is of major interest, especially considering the incidence and clinical significance of prostate cancer. The procedure comprises several steps of challenging dissection in which the preservation of delicate nerve and muscular structures should be conciliated with safe tumor excision. The intervention ends with vesicourethral anastomosis, which is considered the most difficult reconstructive procedure in urologic laparoscopy. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has gradually become a wholly standardized procedure, and it is now routinely performed in several centers throughout the world.

Humans↗