PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Clare Seamark

Publications and source records attributed to Clare Seamark.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Concerning women: questionnaire survey of consultations, embarrassment, and views on confidentiality in general practice among women in their teens, thirties and fifties.

BACKGROUND: Concern exists that women, and in particular teenagers, do not consult in general practice, particularly for contraception because of embarrassment and concern over confidentiality. The aim of this study was to compare reported consultation rates, embarrassment when consulting, and views on confidentiality of women in three age groups. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was used to survey women aged 16-19, 36-39 and 56-59 years attending a semi-rural practice in East Devon, UK in December 1999. RESULTS: Response rates of 57% (teenagers), 79% (women in their thirties) and 89% (women in their fifties) were achieved. In each group over half the respondents had seen a general practitioner (GP) in the previous 3 months. Embarrassment at attending a GP decreased from 38% of teenagers to only 16% of women in their fifties. There was a similar pattern with 78% of teens and 42% of women in their fifties preferring to see a woman doctor for a women's problem and 31% of teens and 18% of women in their fifties expressing a preference for a woman doctor for any problem. Some 97% of women in their thirties and fifties thought a consultation with a GP would be confidential compared with 88% of the teenagers. Only 9% of the teenage group thought the GP might tell their parents about the consultation. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that teenagers were just as likely as older women to have seen a GP in the preceding 3 months. Embarrassment at attending decreased with age, as did the preference to see a female doctor for both women's and any problems. The majority of women in each age group believed a consultation with a GP, or practice nurse, was confidential.

Adolescent↗

The doctor-patient relationship in US primary care.

Changes in the organization of primary care in the UK are driven by a need to improve access and availability, but doctor-patient relationships may suffer. To investigate the importance of such relationships in a different setting, we analysed focus-group data obtained in a primary care facility in the USA (Rochester, NY). The findings pointed to three key factors in these relationships-namely, an asymmetry of perceptions on the two sides, belying the notion of a meeting of experts; the importance on both sides of 'liking'; and the value set by both parties on development of trust. The last two of these factors are probably related to continuity of care, now under threat.

Continuity of Patient Care↗

Questionnaire survey of women aged 56-59 years: consultations in general practice, use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and participation in screening programmes.

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain attitudes to consultations in general practice and the gender of the doctor. To determine whether women participate in the National Health Service (NHS) screening programmes available to them and their use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey to women aged 56-59 years. SETTING: The Honiton Group Practice, East Devon, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and ninety-four of the 334 eligible women returned the questionnaire (response rate 88%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's embarrassment on consulting general practitioners (GPs) and preference for a female doctor. Up-to-date cervical smears and mammography screening in eligible women and use of HRT. RESULTS: A large majority of women (248/294; 84.4%) were not embarrassed when consulting a GP and did not express a preference to see a woman GP for any problem (240/294; 81.6%). However 123/294 (41.8%) did express a preference to see a woman doctor for 'women's problems'. Sixty-five women had had a hysterectomy, and 218 of the remaining 229 (95.2%) had had a smear in the past 5 years. For breast screening, 267/294 (90.8%) had undergone mammography in the previous 3 years. Ninety-three women (32%) were currently on HRT, and on record searching a total of 146 (49.7%) had at some time been HRT users. CONCLUSIONS: Embarrassment does not appear to be a major problem for consultations related to female health. A well-organised general practice with motivated patients can achieve very high uptakes of both cervical and breast screening programmes. Interest in HRT has also risen, with half the women aged 56-59 years having used systemic HRT.

England↗