PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Claudia M Francesconi

Publications and source records attributed to Claudia M Francesconi.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Cell cycle regulators at the ocular surface.

The ocular surface provides an outstanding model to examine the regulation of the proliferative cell cycle. Cells within the cornea and conjunctiva exhibit a wide range of proliferative abilities ranging from the rapidly proliferating cells in the basal cell layer of the epithelium to the quiescent keratocytes and endothelial cells. In this review, dedicated to Dr David Maurice, we will discuss four families of proteins known to regulate the cell cycle. These families include: (1) the cyclins; (2) the CIP/KIP family of cell cycle inhibitors--consisting of p21, p27, and p57; (3) the INK4 family of cell cycle inhibitors--including p16, p15, p18, and p19; and (4) the retinoblastoma family--consisting of pRb, p107, and p130. Members of all of these families have been localized in various cells in the ocular surface. We will discuss how these proteins are involved in regulating cell proliferation both in normal homeostasis and during wound healing.

Cell Cycle↗

Comparison of topographic corneal irregularity after LASIK and intrastromal corneal ring segments in the same patients.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the irregularity of the corneal surfaces of 14 patients after LASIK in 1 eye and placement of intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) in the other eye. METHODS: In a within-patient comparison, Orbscan corneal topography was used to retrospectively compare the corneal surface irregularity of LASIK-treated and ICRS-treated eyes at an outpatient tertiary-care ophthalmology clinic in Sao Paulo, Brazil. For the anterior corneal surface, irregularity measurements were compared for both the central and peripheral areas of the cornea. The differences between each group were analyzed for statistical significance. RESULTS: The corneal surfaces of eyes treated with ICRS were found to be more irregular than the corneal surfaces of eyes treated with LASIK, the mean irregularity being 1.91 for LASIK-treated eyes and 3.12 for ICRS-treated eyes in the anterior corneal surface and 0.51 for LASIK-treated eyes and 0.87 for ICRS-treated eyes in the posterior corneal surface. A statistically significant difference was noted only in the posterior surfaces. CONCLUSIONS: When measured with Orbscan topography, ICRS-treated eyes show more corneal surface irregularity than LASIK-treated eyes. The difference in outcome for the two types of treatment may be due to the mechanical effect of the ICRS on the shape of the cornea.

Astigmatism↗