PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Claudia R Baquet

Publications and source records attributed to Claudia R Baquet.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

Maryland's Special Populations Network. A model for cancer disparities research, education, and training.

The unequal burden of cancer in minority and underserved communities nationally and in Maryland is a compelling crisis. The Maryland Special Populations Cancer Research Network (MSPN) developed an infrastructure covering Maryland's 23 jurisdictions and Baltimore City through formal partnerships between the University of Maryland School of Medicine, University of Maryland Statewide Health Network, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, and community partners in Baltimore City, rural Eastern Shore, rural Western Maryland, rural Southern Maryland, and Piscataway Conoy Tribe and statewide American Indians. Guided by the community-based participatory framework, the MSPN undertook a comprehensive assessment (of needs, strengths, and resources available) that laid the foundation for programmatic efforts in community-initiated cancer awareness and education, research, and training. The MSPN infrastructure was used to implement successful and innovative community-based cancer education interventions and technological solutions; conduct education and promotion of clinical trials, cancer health disparities research, and minority faculty cancer research career development; and leverage additional resources for sustainability. MSPN engaged in informed advocacy among decision- and policymakers at state and national levels, and its community-based clinical trials program was recognized by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services as a Best Practice Award. The solutions to reduce and eliminate cancer health disparities are complex and require comprehensive and focused multidisciplinary cancer health disparities research, training, and education strategies implemented through robust community-academic partnerships. Cancer 2006. (c) American Cancer Society.

Biomedical Research↗

Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors.

BACKGROUND: Recruitment and participation in clinical trials by minorities, particularly African Americans and rural underserved populations, are low. This report examines predictors of clinical trial recruitment and participation for adult Marylanders. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was used to survey 5154 adults (18 years and older) residing in 13 of the 24 jurisdictions in Maryland, including urban Baltimore City, and the rural regions of Western Maryland and the Eastern Shore. The survey, conducted between December 2001 and March 2003, used Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing and random-digit dialing procedures. Primary dependent variables included "ever asked to participate" (i.e., recruited) and "participated" in clinical trials. RESULTS: 11.1% of the respondents had been recruited to clinical trials. In addition, 59.4% of the respondents recruited to clinical trials actually participated in a clinical trial. Among respondents recruited to clinical trials, black and middle income respondents were significantly less likely to actually participate in clinical trials; whereas, respondents who received information about clinical trials from their health care provider, who were knowledgeable about clinical trials, and those who had the time commitment were significantly more likely to participate in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest serious gaps in efforts to recruit racial/ethnic minorities and residents of rural regions into clinical trials. The findings provide the basis for the development and implementation of community-based educational programs for both the general public and health care professionals, and to enhance availability of community-based clinical trials, especially in the rural areas of the state.

Adult↗

Maryland's Special Populations Cancer Network: cancer health disparities reduction model.

Cancer in Maryland is a serious health concern for minority and underserved populations in rural and urban areas. This report describes the National Cancer Institute (NCI) supported Maryland Special Populations Cancer Network (MSPN), a community-academic partnership. The MSPN's priority populations include African Americans, Native Americans, and other medically underserved residents of rural and urban areas. The MSPN has established a community infrastructure through formal collaborations with several community partners located in Baltimore City, the rural Eastern Shore, and Southern and Western Maryland, and among the Piscataway Conoy Tribe and the other 27 Native American Tribes in Maryland. Key partners also include the University of Maryland Eastern Shore and the University of Maryland Statewide Health Network. The MSPN has implemented innovative and successful programs in cancer health disparities research, outreach, and training; clinical trials education, health disparities policy, and resource leveraging. The MSPN addresses the goal of the NCI and the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to reduce and eventually eliminate cancer health disparities. Community-academic partnerships are the foundation of this successful network.

Black or African American↗

Esophageal cancer epidemiology in blacks and whites: racial and gender disparities in incidence, mortality, survival rates and histology.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer rate disparities are pronounced for blacks and whites. This study presents black-white esophageal cancer incidence, mortality, relative survival rates, histology and trends for two five-year time periods--1991-1995 and 1996-2000--and for the time period 1991-2000. METHODS: The study used data from the National Cancer Institute's population-based Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) program with submission dates 1991-2000. Age-adjusted incidence, mortality, relative survival rates and histology for esophageal carcinoma were calculated for nine SEER cancer registries for 1991-2000. Rates were analyzed by race and gender for changes over specified time periods. RESULTS: Esophageal cancer age-adjusted incidence of blacks was about twice that of whites (8.63 vs. 4.39/100,000, p < 0.05). Age-adjusted mortality for blacks, although showing a declining trend, was nearly twice that of whites (7.79 vs. 3.96, p < 0.05). Although survival was poor for all groups, it was significantly poorer in blacks than in whites. Squamous cell carcinoma was more commonly diagnosed in blacks and white females, whereas adenocarcinoma was more common among white males (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities in esophageal cancer incidence, mortality, survival and histology exist. Survival rates from this disease have not significantly improved over the decade. These data support the need for advances in prevention, early detection biomarker research and research on new, more effective treatment modalities for this disease.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis of 2677 cases of uterine sarcoma 1989-1999.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association of race with incidence, histology, treatment, and survival in women with uterine sarcoma during the period 1989-1999. METHODS: Uterine sarcomas were defined as leiomyosarcoma, carcinosarcoma, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HGESS), adenosarcoma, and sarcoma not otherwise specified (NOS). We used cases from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program to compare uterine sarcoma among women >35 years of age. Using data from 1989 to 1999, we compared race-specific age-adjusted incidences, histological distributions, extent of disease at diagnosis, and race-specific survival. RESULTS: During the period of 1989-1999, 2677 women were diagnosed with uterine sarcoma, 2098 (78%) of whom were white and 420 (16%) of whom were black, and 159 (6%) of whom were of other races. The overall age-adjusted incidence for blacks was twice that of whites and more than twice that of women of other races (7/10(5) vs. 3.6/10(5) vs. 2.7/10(5), P < 0.0001). Racial differences in the incidence of uterine sarcoma existed for leiomyosarcoma (1.51/10(5) for blacks vs. 0.91/10(5) for whites, and 0.89 for women of other races, P < 0.01) and carcinosarcoma (4.3/10(5) for blacks, vs. 1.7/10(5) for whites, and 0.99 for women of other races, P < 0.001), but not for other histological types. Blacks with stage II disease were less likely to receive radiation in addition to surgery compared to whites (33% vs. 54%, P < 0.05). Five-year relative survival of patients with disease beyond the uterus was significantly longer for those that received radiation and surgery compared to those that received surgery alone. There were no racial differences in survival for women that received similar therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy improved survival for women with stage II-IV disease. Survival of black and white patients who received comparable treatment was similar.

Adult↗

Longitudinal versus cross-sectional methodology for estimating the economic burden of breast cancer: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Projecting future breast cancer treatment expenditure is critical for budgeting purposes, medical decision making and the allocation of resources in order to maximise the overall impact on health-related outcomes of care. Currently, both longitudinal and cross-sectional methodologies are used to project the economic burden of cancer. This pilot study examined the differences in estimates that were obtained using these two methods, focusing on Maryland, US Medicaid reimbursement data for chemotherapy and prescription drugs for the years 1999-2000. METHODS: Two different methodologies for projecting life cycles of cancer expenditure were considered. The first examined expenditure according to chronological time (calendar quarter) for all cancer patients in the database in a given quarter. The second examined only the most recent quarter and constructed a hypothetical expenditure life cycle by taking into consideration the number of quarters since the respective patient had her first claim. RESULTS: We found different average expenditures using the same data and over the same time period. The longitudinal measurement had less extreme peaks and troughs, and yielded average expenditure in the final period that was 60% higher than that produced using the cross-sectional analysis; however, the longitudinal analysis had intermediate periods with significantly lower estimated expenditure than the cross-sectional data. CONCLUSIONS: These disparate results signify that each of the methods has merit. The longitudinal method tracks changes over time while the cross-sectional approach reflects more recent data, e.g. current practice patterns. Thus, this study reiterates the importance of considering the methodology when projecting future cancer expenditure.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Healthcare disparities and models for change.

With Healthy People 2010 making the goal of eliminating health disparities a national priority, policymakers, researchers, medical centers, managed care organizations (MCOs), and advocacy organizations have been called on to move beyond the historic documentation of health disparities and proceed with an agenda to translate policy recommendations into practice. Working models that have successfully reduced health disparities in managed care settings were presented at the National Managed Health Care Congress Inaugural Forum on Reducing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care on March 10-11, 2003, in Washington, DC. These models are being used by federal, state, and municipal governments, as well as private, commercial, and Medicaid MCOs. Successful models and programs at all levels reduce health disparities by forming partnerships based on common goals to provide care, to educate, and to rebuild healthcare systems. Municipal models work in collaboration with state and federal agencies to integrate patient care with technology. Several basic elements of MCOs help to reduce disparities through emphasis on preventive care, community and member health education, case management and disease management tracking, centralized data collection, and use of sophisticated technology to analyze data and coordinate services. At the community level, there are leveraged funds from the Health Resources and Services Administration's Bureau of Primary Health Care. Well-designed models provide seamless monitoring of patient care and outcomes by integrating human and information system resources.

Cultural Diversity↗

Resources and use of the intensive care unit in patients who undergo surgery for ovarian carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to determine the association of age, comorbid illness, and length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) in women who underwent oophorectomy for ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: The authors conducted a population-based analysis of all women with a primary or secondary diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma who underwent oophorectomy between 1994-1999. Chi-square tests and Student t tests were used to determined differences in means or proportions. Multivariate regression methods were used to build predictive models. RESULTS: Of 8109 women who were admitted, 1412 women underwent oophorectomy, 1045 of 1412 women (74%) underwent hysterectomy, 325 of 1412 women (23%) underwent intestinal surgery, and 296 of 1412 women (21%) were admitted to the ICU. Overall (+/- standard deviation) LOS was 8.3 days +/- 6.90 days, and the total charges were $16,675 +/- $15,590 (1999 dollars). Patients who underwent intestinal surgery were older (62.5 years vs. 57.1 years; P = 0.01), had a longer LOS (11.62 days vs. 7.33 days; P = 0.01), had a longer ICU stay (1.15 days vs. 0.58 days; P = 0.01), and had a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (16.01 vs. 8.73; P = 0.01) compared with patients who did not undergo intestinal surgery. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that age, intestinal surgery, CCI, ICU stay, and African-American race were associated with LOS and contributed indirectly to total charges, whereas age and ICU say were the two most important direct determinants of total charges. CONCLUSIONS: Advancing age, ICU stay, intestinal surgery, African-American race, and comorbid illness were the most prominent predictors of LOS, whereas age and ICU stay were the most important factors predicting total charges in women who underwent oophorectomy for ovarian carcinoma.

Adult↗

Use of ICD-9 coding as a proxy for stage of disease in lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of using ICD-9-CM codes indicating metastases as a proxy to classify lung cancer patients by stage of disease. RESEARCH DESIGN: This retrospective database analysis used diagnosis codes to classify subjects to either localized or advanced-stage disease and then compared this classification to the tumor registry staging, which was considered as the 'gold standard.' SUBJECTS AND MEASURES: Study subjects included all lung cancer patients treated at our academic institution during 1996-1997, who were also members of a large insurance company. Data were derived from inpatient cancer-related claims linked with our institution's tumor registry data. Advanced-stage disease (stages II to IV) was defined by claims indicating lymph node involvement or metastases (ICD-9 codes 196-199.1). The tumor registry stagings of the disease for these patients were clustered into two groupings, stages 0-I (localized) and stages II-IV (advanced). RESULTS: Tumor registry entries were identified for 66/77 (85.7%) patients. A total of 19 out of 22 local disease patients (sensitivity of 86.4%) and 30 out of 44 advanced disease patients (sensitivity of 68.2%) were classified correctly by ICD-9 code. A total of 19 out of 33 patients with local disease codes (PPV of 57.6%) and 30 out of 33 patients with advanced disease codes (PPV = 90.9%) were properly identified. CONCLUSIONS: For a population of lung cancer patients in an academic institution who were under a private insurance plan, the ICD-9 coding was associated with a sensitivity and positive predictive values that were consistent with previously reported estimates using Medicare-SEER data. The use of such data to classify patients to disease stages should be executed with caution as under-reporting might exist. Continued attention to discharge abstracting will be needed to improve the validity of this technique.

Humans↗

Resource utilization for patients undergoing hysterectomy with or without lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to study the association of age, comorbid illness, race, and type of hospital with resource use in patients undergoing hysterectomy and lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer. METHODS: The study was a population-based analysis of patients undergoing hysterectomy with a diagnosis of endometrial cancer in Maryland 1994-1996. Chi-square and t tests determined differences in means or proportions. Multivariate logistic regression methods were used to build predictive models. RESULTS: The 1281 women underwent total abdominal hysterectomy, 91%; total vaginal hysterectomy, 6%; radical hysterectomy, 2.5%, laparoscopically assisted total vaginal hysterectomy, 0.3%; 32% also underwent lymph node dissection. Neither age, nor race, nor comorbid illness influenced admission to teaching hospitals. Co-morbidity was documented in 56% of cases. African Americans were more likely to have one (P = 0.002) or >1 co-morbid illness (P = 0.045) than Caucasians. The most common complications were anemia (13.6%), infection/fever (12%), cardiac (9.4%), pneumonia (8%), ileus (5%), and bowel obstruction (5%). These complications occurred with higher frequency in teaching hospitals (P = 0.0001), In large hospitals (P = 0.0001), and in African American patients compared to Caucasians (P = 0.028). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that older age, admission to teaching or large hospitals, lymph node dissection, heart disease, and African American race were associated with significantly higher resource use. CONCLUSION: We documented age and racial/ethnic differences in comorbid illness, complications, and resource utilization for patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. The differences in resource use for teaching hospitals may be reflective of the severity of complications, which are indirectly determined by length of stay. Given the higher costs and skills required to care for elderly women with comorbid disease and complications, quantification of the complexity of care is of utmost importance for allocation of sufficient resources for the care of women with endometrial cancer.

Adult↗

Early detection and screening for ovarian cancer: does physician specialty matter?

OBJECTIVE: To examine physician factors associated with ovarian cancer screening. METHODS: Postal questionnaires to Maryland primary care physicians. Bivariate tests for statistical significance used X-Square and Student's t tests. Multivariate analysis and logistic regression were used to analyze responses based on specialty type, gender, and work experience. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of the 375 were male, 44%, females; 33%, OB/GYN; and 67%, family/internal medicine (FM/IM). The mean age was 47 and the mean number of years in practice was 16. OB/GYNs provided more ovarian cancer counseling, OR 2.64 (CI 1.55, 4.48) and were more likely to respond correctly to knowledge questions--i.e., reduction of ovarian cancer risk with oral contraceptive (OCP) use than IM/FM, OR 8.57 (CI 3.54, 20.8). Overall, there were few gender differences in approach to evaluation, but male physicians were less likely to be aware of the relationship of OCP use to ovarian cancer risk than females, OR 0.48 (CI 0.25, 0.91). IF/FM physicians were less likely to order CA-125 for patients (of any age) based upon symptoms of bloating or physical examination alone. OB/GYN physicians, OR 4.77 (2.73, 8.34) and physicians with > 15 years in practice, OR 2.79 (1.46, 5.35) attended more meetings on ovarian cancer than non OB/GYNs or those with less experience. Although 74% indicated access to the Internet, just 16% to 26% used the Internet for cancer information; OB/GYNs used the Internet less frequently than FM/IMs, OR 0.53 (0.28, 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Specialty was more predictive of knowledge, approach to evaluation, and counseling than gender or experience.

Clinical Competence↗

Health disparities research--a model for conducting research on cancer disparities: characterization and reduction.

The existence of disparities in health has gained national attention. While racial disparities in health have been documented for decades, "health disparities research" has not been described or defined. Health disparities may occur in categories such as racial/ethnic, age, and in geographic categories such as rural/urban, as well as in socioeconomic status. This paper, using the documented racial disparities in cancer for blacks and whites, presents a framework and model for documenting disparities, designing and conducting health disparities research, and applying the results of this research to reduce or eliminate disproportionate rates. The model consists of four components: 1. Surveillance 2. Explanatory Research 3. Intervention Research: Development and Evaluation 4. Translation/Application of Research Results. This model is presented to assist researchers in systematically addressing health disparities through well designed, well conducted, and well applied research. The Special Populations Cancer Research Networks are an 18 member national network of grants that focus on cancer disparities research, community awareness and participatory research, increased accrual of minorities to clinical trials, and training of minority investigators. The primary objective of the University of Maryland School of Medicine's grant is to reduce cancer rate disparities in underserved communities.

Black or African American↗