Biomedical subjects

Claudine Isaacs

Publications and source records attributed to Claudine Isaacs.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Patient-reported outcomes from the TBCRC 022 study of neratinib and ado-trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases.

PURPOSE: In TBCRC 022 (NCT01494662), neratinib and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) demonstrated intracranial activity among patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. However, gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities-particularly diarrhea-were common, potentially impacting quality of life. Clinician-reported adverse event (CTCAE) grading may underestimate the patient experience. We report GI toxicities using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in TBCRC's neratinib-T-DM1 cohort. METHODS: Patients received neratinib (160 mg daily) and T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg IV every 21 days). A pre-planned analysis assessed patient-reported GI toxicities during Cycles 1-4 using the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) GI Diarrhea scale, Systemic Therapy-Induced Diarrhea Assessment Tool (STIDAT), and PRO-CTCAE. Descriptive statistics and linear mixed effects models evaluated symptom trajectories over time. We evaluated agreement for PRO and clinician-reported data. RESULTS: Forty-four patients enrolled; all completed ≥1 PRO. GI symptom burden increased over Cycles 1-3. PROMIS scores worsened significantly by Cycle 2, with a peak mean increase of 6.62 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.67-10.59; p = 0.002) at Cycle 3. STIDAT scores also worsened by Cycle 3 (mean change 0.50; 95%CI: 0.11-0.90; p = 0.015). Based on maximum PRO-CTCAE scores, moderate-to-severe symptoms were reported by 20.5% (diarrhea), 24.4% (appetite loss), and 41.0% (constipation). Agreement between PRO-CTCAE and clinician-reported CTCAE was low (kappa <0.2) with clinicians reporting less toxicity. PROMIS and STIDAT scores were significantly correlated. CONCLUSION: This GI-focused PRO analysis highlights the value of PROs in capturing patient-experienced toxicities that impact quality of life yet are underestimated by clinicians. Incorporating PROs into clinical trials can inform supportive care and prophylactic strategies.

Humans↗

PubMed2003

A prospective randomized pilot study to evaluate predictors of response in serial core biopsies to single agent neoadjuvant doxorubicin or paclitaxel for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer can be correlated with long-term outcomes. Surrogate end-point biomarkers may be used to assess response to the treatment. Most reported studies assessed the effects of combination chemotherapy. We assessed the feasibility of obtaining serial core breast biopsies, and correlated rates of apoptosis, proliferation, and expression of related proteins at baseline, during, and after neoadjuvant single agent chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer with response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Women with a histologically confirmed unresected T(3) or T(4) infiltrating carcinoma of the breast were eligible. The first 20 patients received three cycles of doxorubicin 90 mg/m(2) followed by three cycles of paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2), or the reverse. Nine women received four cycles of each (doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2)). Cycles were administered 14 days apart with filgastrim. End points included: (a). clinical and pathological response; (b). serial apoptotic [terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Tdt)-mediated nick end labeling] and proliferation (immunohistochemistry, IHC) rates; and (c). expression (IHC) of estrogen receptor, HER2, bcl2, and p53. RESULTS: From April 1997 to June 2001, 29 women were randomized. Twelve patients (42%) had a clinical complete response (cCR), and 16 (55%) had a clinical partial response. Five women (17%) had a pathological complete response, 7 (24%) had microscopic residual disease, and 17 (58%) had macroscopic residual disease. Higher baseline apoptosis and proliferation were associated with an improved pathological response (P = 0.006 and 0.003, respectively). Among 14 evaluable patients, apoptosis increased in women who had a cCR to the first agent but not in women without a cCR. Estrogen receptor-positive patients had a worse pathological response (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The selected regimen is efficacious. It is feasible to obtain serial core biopsies that are informative for studies of apoptosis and IHC. This clinical design can serve as a model for combining standard chemotherapy and novel agents.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed2002

Hot flushes.

Almost every woman and some men will encounter hot flushes during their lifetime. Despite the prevalence of the symptoms, the pathophysiology of hot flushes remains unknown. A decline in hormone concentrations might lead to alterations in brain neurotransmitters and to instability in the hypothalamic thermoregulatory setpoint. The most effective treatments for hot flushes include oestrogens and progestagens. However, many women and their physicians are reluctant to accept hormonal treatments. Women want non-pharmacological treatments but unfortunately such treatments are not very effective, and non-hormonal drugs are often associated with adverse effects. Results from recent studies showed that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other similar compounds can safely reduce hot flushes. Moreover, the efficacy of these drugs provides new insight into the pathophysiology of hot flushes. In this critical review, we assess knowledge of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of hot flushes.

Female↗

PubMed2002

Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

BACKGROUND: Oral contraceptive use has been associated with an increase in the risk of breast cancer in young women. We examined whether this association is seen in women at high risk of breast cancer because they carry a mutation in one of two breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2. METHODS: We performed a matched case-control study on 1311 pairs of women with known deleterious BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations recruited from 52 centers in 11 countries. Women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer were matched to control subjects by year of birth, country of residence, mutation (BRCA1 or BRCA2), and history of ovarian cancer. All study subjects completed a questionnaire about oral contraceptive use. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived by conditional logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Among BRCA2 mutation carriers, ever use of oral contraceptives was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.72 to 1.24). For BRCA1 mutation carriers, ever use of oral contraceptives was associated with a modestly increased risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.40). However, compared with BRCA1 mutation carriers who never used oral contraceptives, those who used oral contraceptives for at least 5 years had an increased risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.60), as did those who used oral contraceptives before age 30 (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.52), those who were diagnosed with breast cancer before age 40 (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.72), and those who first used oral contraceptives before 1975 (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.17 to 1.75). CONCLUSIONS: Among BRCA1 mutation carriers, women who first used oral contraceptives before 1975, who used them before age 30, or who used them for 5 or more years may have an increased risk of early-onset breast cancer. Oral contraceptives do not appear to be associated with risk of breast cancer in BRCA2 carriers, but data for BRCA2 carriers are limited.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

BACKGROUND: Data concerning the efficacy of bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy for reducing the risk of gynecologic cancer in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations are limited. We investigated whether this procedure reduces the risk of cancers of the coelomic epithelium and breast in women who carry such mutations. METHODS: A total of 551 women with disease-associated germ-line BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were identified from registries and studied for the occurrence of ovarian and breast cancer. We determined the incidence of ovarian cancer in 259 women who had undergone bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and in 292 matched controls who had not undergone the procedure. In a subgroup of 241 women with no history of breast cancer or prophylactic mastectomy, the incidence of breast cancer was determined in 99 women who had undergone bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and in 142 matched controls. The length of postoperative follow-up for both groups was at least eight years. RESULTS: Six women who underwent prophylactic oophorectomy (2.3 percent) received a diagnosis of stage I ovarian cancer at the time of the procedure; two women (0.8 percent) received a diagnosis of papillary serous peritoneal carcinoma 3.8 and 8.6 years after bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy. Among the controls, 58 women (19.9 percent) received a diagnosis of ovarian cancer, after a mean follow-up of 8.8 years. With the exclusion of the six women whose cancer was diagnosed at surgery, prophylactic oophorectomy significantly reduced the risk of coelomic epithelial cancer (hazard ratio, 0.04; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.16). Of 99 women who underwent bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and who were studied to determine the risk of breast cancer, breast cancer developed in 21 (21.2 percent), as compared with 60 (42.3 percent) in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.29 to 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy reduces the risk of coelomic epithelial cancer and breast cancer in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

All in the family: evaluation of the process and content of sisters' communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results.

Despite the potential importance of family communication, little is known about the process and content of communicating BRCA1/2 test results to relatives. The objectives of this observational study were to describe the process and content of communicating BRCA1/2 test results to sisters, and to evaluate whether the proband's carrier status influenced communication outcomes. Participants were 43 women who were the first family member to have genetic testing (probands). Probands reported on communication outcomes for 81 sisters. Process and content variables were evaluated 1-month after receipt of BRCA1/2 test results using the Family Communication Questionnaire (FCQ). Overall, BRCA1/2 test results were communicated to 85% of sisters, and carriers communicated their results to significantly more sisters compared to uninformative (96% vs. 76%, FET = 0.02). The most important reason for communicating results was to provide genetic risk information; however, compared to uninformatives, carriers communicated their results to significantly more sisters to obtain emotional support (74%) and to get advice about medical decisions (42%) (FET = 0.001). Carriers also discussed the possibility of discrimination and recommendations for cancer management with significantly more sisters. Among sisters to whom BRCA1/2 test results were not communicated, the most important reason for not sharing test results was because of emotionally distant relationships. The results of this study suggest that probands are likely to quickly communicate their BRCA1/2 test results to relatives and that although needs for social support may motivate family communication, emotionally distant relationships may be a barrier to communication with relatives.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.

PURPOSE: Despite the increasingly widespread availability of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing, little is known about the psychologic impact of such testing in the clinical setting. The objective of this study was to examine the long-term psychologic impact of receiving BRCA1/2 test results within a clinic-based testing program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The participants were 279 high-risk women who underwent genetic counseling and testing for alterations in the BRCA1/2 genes. At baseline (before genetic testing) and at 6 months after the disclosure of mutation status, we measured perceived risk for breast and ovarian cancer, cancer-specific distress, and general distress. We examined the impact of the test result on each of these outcomes at the 6-month follow-up. Analyses were conducted separately for probands and their relatives who were unaffected with cancer. RESULTS: We found no effect of test result among affected probands. Among unaffected relatives, we found that participants who received definitive negative test results exhibited significant reductions in perceived risk and distress compared with participants who received positive test results. Importantly, relatives who received positive test results did not exhibit increased distress or perceived risk. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that clinic-based BRCA1/2 testing can lead to psychologic benefits for individuals who receive negative test results. At 6 months after disclosure, those who receive positive or uninformative test results do not exhibit increased psychologic distress or perceived risk.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Breast and ovarian cancer screening practices in healthy women with a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer.

Studies in women with a family history of cancer demonstrate a wide variability in the uptake of cancer screening measures. Little data exist regarding the breast and ovarian cancer screening practices of women who are members of hereditary breast cancer families. In order to address this issue, we examined the screening behaviors and the determinants of screening in a clinic based group of 216 women with a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer who were participating in a free genetic counseling and testing research program. At baseline, prior to obtaining genetic counseling or testing, 50% of women ages 30-39, 83% of those age 40-49, 69% of those 50-64, and 53% of those >65 reported having a mammogram in the prior year. Adherence to mammography recommendations was correlated with age, number of relatives with breast cancer, and income. Twenty percent of participants had at least one CA- 125 performed and 31 % had ever obtained a screening ultrasound. Having at least one relative with ovarian cancer was very strongly associated with ovarian cancer screening [OR = 12.3, 95% CI = 4.6-33 for CA-125; OR=4.9, 95% CI=2.4, 10.1 for ultrasound]. No association between cancer worries/distress and either breast or ovarian cancer screening was found. In conclusion, the breast and ovarian screening uptake in healthy women from hereditary breast cancer families is suboptimal, even for women over age 50, for whom annual mammography is clearly indicated. These findings indicate a need for better education about screening guidelines for high-risk women.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Utilization of breast cancer screening in a clinically based sample of women after BRCA1/2 testing.

We conducted a prospective, observational study to determine breast cancer screening practices among self-referred high-risk women who pursued genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Of the 107 unaffected women included in this study, 41 were BRCA1/2 carriers and 66 women tested negative for a mutation previously identified in their family. All of the women underwent comprehensive pre- and posttest genetic counseling, and completed baseline and 12-month follow-up telephone interviews. The baseline (pretest) interview assessed potential predictors of mammography use, including demographics and psychosocial variables. During the year after the receipt of BRCA1/2 test results, 47% of the noncarriers and 59% of the carriers reported that they had had a mammogram [chi(2) (1, n = 107) = 1.35; P = 0.24]. Only 39% of carriers ages 25-39 reported having a mammogram, versus 74% of carriers age > or =40 [chi(2) (1, n = 41) = 5.10; P = 0.02]. Among noncarriers ages 50 and older, 83% had an annual mammogram. Factors independently associated with mammography use included age (<40, > or =40; odds ratio, 7.5; confidence interval, 2.6-21.5) and test result (odds ratio, 4.6; confidence interval, 1.1-18.7). The effects of perceived likelihood of having a BRCA1/2 gene alteration and the interaction between test result and perceived likelihood were not significant. As expected, most carriers (95%) and noncarriers (77%) obtained a clinical breast exam within the year after the receipt of test results. These data suggest that in carriers, overall, the use of breast cancer screening including mammography is good, although there was a relatively low uptake rate of mammography in younger carriers. Noncarriers had very good adherence to general population screening guidelines.

Adult↗