PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Claudio Baracchini

Publications and source records attributed to Claudio Baracchini.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

High-grade symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis in the very elderly. A challenge for proponents of carotid angioplasty and stenting.

BACKGROUND: Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is often considered as the preferred treatment for severe carotid occlusive disease in patients labelled as "high risk", including those aged 80 or more. We analyzed 30-day stroke risk and death rates after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for severe symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid disease in patients aged 80 or more, by comparison with the outcome of CAS reported in the recently- published literature. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on a prospectively compiled computerized database of all primary CEAs performed by a single surgeon at our institution from 1990 to 2003. Descriptive demographic data, risk factors, surgical details, perioperative strokes and deaths, and other complications were recorded. RESULTS: In all, 1260 CEAs were performed in 1099 patients; 1145 were performed in 987 patients less than 80 years old, and 115 were performed in 112 patients aged 80 or more. There were 11 perioperative strokes in the 1145 procedures in the younger group, for a stroke rate of 0.8%, and no strokes in the 115 procedures in the older group. The death rates were 0% for the octogenarians and 0.3% for the younger group. CONCLUSION: The conviction that older age means higher risk needs to be revised. Patients aged 80 or more can undergo CEA with no more perioperative risks than younger patients. Proponents of CAS should bear this in mind before recommending CAS as the best therapeutic option for such patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Cerebral hemodynamics after contralateral carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid occlusion: a 10-year follow-up.

We sought to investigate whether carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can achieve long-term cerebral hemodynamic improvement and reduce recurrence of cerebral ischemic events in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with severe (>70%) carotid artery stenosis contralateral to carotid occlusion (CO). Thirty-nine patients with severe carotid lesion contralateral to CO were studied before (1 day) and after CEA (at 7 days, 1, 3 and 6 months, and then yearly thereafter). Collateral flow and cerebral vasomotor reactivity (VMR) were assessed by transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD). A total of 32 unoperated patients with severe carotid lesion contralateral to CO, who were comparable with respect to age and sex, served as a control group. The average period of TCD follow-up was 10 years and was obtained in all patients; during this period, major clinical events (stroke, acute myocardial infarction and death) were also recorded. The proportion of patients with collateral flow via the anterior communicating artery increased significantly from 61.5% before to 89.7% after CEA (P = 0.01). Cerebral VMR ipsilateral to CO improved in 85.7% of patients (30 of 35) within 30 days of CEA, and in all patients within 90 days. No significant spontaneous VMR recovery was recorded in the control group. After the initial recovery, no significant change in VMR was observed in the surgical group or the control group during the follow-up. In conclusion, in patients with severe carotid stenosis, CEA contralateral to symptomatic and asymptomatic CO determines a durable cerebral hemodynamic improvement not only on the side of the CEA but also on the contralateral side, with no difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Extracranial severe carotid stenosis and incidental intracranial aneurysms.

Among 474 patients having 547 carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) over an 80-month period, 11 (2.3%) with symptomatic (n = 8) and asymptomatic (n = 3) severe (>70%) carotid stenosis had 12 asymptomatic intracranial aneurysms (IAs). None had postoperative stroke or died, and none had surgical or endovascular IA treatment before or after CEA. In an average 5-year follow-up, no patients had subarachnoid hemorrhage. Having an IA does not seem to be an additional risk factor for CEA, nor does CEA seem to increase the chance of IA rupture.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Prospective randomized study on asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis and perioperative stroke risk in patients undergoing major vascular surgery: prophylactic or deferred carotid endarterectomy?

We compared the perioperative (30-day) stroke risk in asymptomatic patients with severe carotid stenosis who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) before or after major vascular surgery. Seventy-nine patients with asymptomatic severe carotid lesion were randomly assigned to group I (n = 40) or group II (n = 39) to receive prophylactic CEA (within 1 week before major surgery) or deferred CEA (between 30 days and 6 months after major surgery), respectively. All procedures were eversion CEAs performed under deep general anesthesia and cerebral protection involving continuous electroencephalographic monitoring for selective shunting. There were no perioperative deaths or strokes relating to the major surgical procedure in either group. All group II patients underwent deferred CEA as planned (median 47 days, range 38-94) with no subsequent perioperative deaths or strokes. Two of these patients (5.1%) suffered a minor stroke, however, 65 and 78 days after their major surgical procedure, while awaiting carotid revascularization. Although data emerging from this analysis indicate that severe asymptomatic carotid disease may be safely postponed in patients undergoing major noncarotid vascular surgery, only a multicenter prospective study could determine the most appropriate management of this subset of patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Surgical vs medical treatment for isolated internal carotid artery elongation with coiling or kinking in symptomatic patients: a prospective randomized clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Whether surgically correcting symptomatic carotid elongation with coiling or kinking in the absence of an atherosclerotic lesion of the carotid bifurcation (isolated elongation) is effective in preventing stroke remains a controversial issue. The hypothesis behind this study was that surgical correction of symptomatic isolated carotid elongation with coiling or kinking could yield better results, in terms of stroke prevention and freedom from late stroke or carotid occlusion, than medical treatment. METHODS: We conducted a prospective clinical study randomly assigning symptomatic patients with isolated carotid elongation to undergo either elective surgery or medical treatment, with surgery reserved for any new onset or worsening of symptoms. The follow-up ranged from 1 month to 10 years (median, 5.9; mean, 6.2 years) and was obtained for all patients. The study end points were perioperative (30-day) stroke and mortality, late stroke, and stroke-related death and late carotid occlusions. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were randomly assigned for surgery and 90 for medical treatment. Overall, 139 carotid surgical corrections were performed in 129 patients. All 92 patients in the surgical arm had an elective operation; 10 of these patients later developed symptoms on the opposite side (7 hemispheric and 3 retinal transient ischemic attacks) and had contralateral internal carotid artery surgery. An additional 37 patients (41.1%) randomly assigned to medical treatment crossed over to the surgical group within a mean of 16.8 months after randomization due to new hemispheric symptoms or worsening nonhemispheric complaints. There were no perioperative strokes or deaths. The incidence of late hemispheric and retinal transient ischemic attacks was significantly lower in the surgical than in the medical group, respectively, 7.6% (7 of 92) vs 21.1% (19 of 90) (P = .01) and 3.2% (3 of 92) vs 12.2% (11 of 90) (P = .03). Late strokes, 2 (2.2%) of which were fatal, occurred only in the medical group (6 of 90, 6.6%; P = .01). Late carotid occlusions also developed only in the medical group (5 of 90, 5.5%; P = .02). All surgically treated carotid elongations were analyzed histologically and 78 (56.%) of 139 showed atypical and typical patterns of fibromuscular dysplasia. CONCLUSIONS: The overall results of this trial indicate that surgical correction of symptomatic isolated carotid elongations with coiling or kinking is better for stroke prevention than medical treatment.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Octogenarians with contralateral carotid artery occlusion: a cohort at higher risk for carotid endarterectomy?

PURPOSE: Carotid angioplasty and stenting has been proposed as a treatment option for carotid occlusive disease in patients at high risk, including those 80 years of age or older or with contralateral carotid occlusion. We analyzed 30-day mortality and stroke risk rates of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients aged 80 years or older with concurrent carotid occlusive disease. METHODS: From a retrospective review of 1000 patients undergoing 1150 CEA procedures to treat symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid lesions over 13 years, we identified 54 patients (5.4%) aged 80 years or older with concurrent contralateral carotid occlusion. These patients were compared with 38 patients (3.8%) aged 80 years or older with normal or diseased patent contralateral carotid artery and 81 patients (8.1%) younger than 80 years with contralateral carotid occlusion. All CEA procedures involved either standard CEA with patching or eversion CEA, and were performed by the same surgeon, with the patients under deep general anesthesia and cerebral protection involving continuous perioperative electroencephalographic monitoring for selective shunting. Shunting criteria were based exclusively on electroencephalographic abnormalities consistent with cerebral ischemia. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality and stroke rate in patients aged 80 years or older with concurrent contralateral carotid occlusion was zero. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of high-risk CEA needs to be revisited. Patients with two of the criteria considered high risk in the medical literature, that is, age 80 years or older and contralateral carotid occlusion, can undergo CEA with no greater risks or complications. Until prospective randomized trials designed to evaluate the role of carotid angioplasty and stenting have been completed, CEA should remain the standard treatment in such patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Durability of carotid endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic stenoses.

PURPOSE: Although many studies have well established that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is beneficial in selected patients with severe carotid disease, only a few large studies have focused on the durability of the surgical procedure. Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS) has recently been proposed as a potential alternative to CEA. We analyzed the incidence of late occlusion and recurrent stenosis after CEA. METHODS: Over 13 years 1000 patients underwent 1150 CEA procedures to treat symptomatic and asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis. CEA procedures involving either traditional CEA with patching (n = 302) or eversion CEA (n = 848) were all performed by the same surgeon, with patients under deep general anesthesia and cerebral protection involving continuous electroencephalographic monitoring for selective shunting. All patients underwent postoperative duplex ultrasound scanning and clinical follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. New neurologic events, late occlusions, and recurrent stenoses 50% or greater were recorded. Complete follow-up (mean, 6.2 years; range, 6-156 months) was obtained in 95% of patients (949 of 1000), for an overall average of 95% of procedures (1092 of 1150). Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier life table method. RESULTS: Perioperative (30-day) mortality rate was 0.3% (3 of 1000), and stroke rate was 0.9% (11 of 1150), with a combined mortality and stroke rate of 1.2%. The incidence of late occlusion and recurrent stenosis 70% or greater was 0.6% and 0.5%, respectively, with a combined occlusion and restenosis rate of 1.1%. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the rate of freedom from occlusion, restenosis 70% or greater, and combined occlusion and restenosis 70% or greater at 12 years was 99,4%, 99.5%, and 98.8%, respectively. Occlusion and restenosis developed asymptomatically. CONCLUSIONS: CEA is a low-risk procedure for treating severe symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid disease, with excellent long-term durability. Proponents of CAS should bear this in mind before considering CAS as a routine alternative to CEA.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Carotid endarterectomy in high-risk patients: a challenge for endovascular procedure protocols.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have sought to identify certain patient population subsets that may be more appropriate for carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). Current CAS protocols include "high-risk" patients. The goal of this study was to compare the perioperative outcome of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) between high-risk and non-high-risk patients. METHODS: During a 54-month period, 392 consecutive CEAs were performed in 363 patients (29 bilateral) by a single surgeon and entered prospectively into a registry. A high-risk patient subset (126, 35%) was defined by the presence of a severe medical comorbidity (ie, cardiac dysfunction, pulmonary dysfunction, renal insufficiency) or particular anatomic features (ie, contralateral carotid occlusion, ipsilateral carotid restenosis after CEA, and "high" carotid bifurcation). Of the 126 CEAs, 96 (76%) were performed for symptomatic lesions. Endpoints of the study were perioperative stroke, cardiac complication, or death. RESULTS: Overall, there were three ischemic strokes (1%) and four cardiac complications (1%). None of the patients died. The stroke and cardiac complication rates for the high-risk and non-high-risk groups were similar (1/126, 1% versus 2/237, 1% and 3/126, 2% versus 1/237, 1%, respectively), but the cardiac morbidity rate was statistically higher in patients with severe medical comorbidity (P=.03), especially in the subset with cardiac dysfunction (P=.005). CONCLUSIONS: CEA can be performed in high-risk patients with perioperative neurologic and cardiac complication rates comparable with those recorded in other patients. The definition of a "high-risk" patient should not be considered per se a reason to abandon CEA in favor of CAS.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Carotid endarterectomy contralateral to carotid artery occlusion: analysis from a randomized study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Many studies have reported the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) contralateral to an occluded internal carotid artery (ICA), with varying results. This study analyzed perioperative and late outcomes in a recent trial in which patients were randomized to carotid eversion endarterectomy (CEE) or traditional CEA with patching (CEAP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 336 primary CEAs (310 patients) 68 were contralateral to an occluded ICA (group I). The remaining 268 CEAs served as control group (group II). All patients underwent clinical follow-up and duplex ultrasonography at 1, 6, and 12 months and every year thereafter. Endpoints of the study were early and late neurological events, and deaths. RESULTS: Group I had a significantly higher incidence of perioperative electroencephalic changes and need for shunting. The perioperative stroke rate in group I was almost three times as high as in group II, but the difference was not significant. Similarly, the perioperative minor neurological event and death rates, as with the cumulative stroke-free and survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years, were comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: CEA contralateral to an occluded ICA can be implemented with perioperative stroke and mortality rates and late stroke-free and survival rates comparable to CEA with no contralateral ICA occlusion.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Carotid eversion endarterectomy: perioperative outcome and restenosis incidence.

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for stroke prevention can be performed with minimal perioperative mortality and morbidity rates. The type of surgical technique used is important to achieve optimal outcome from CEA. The purpose of this study was to analyze the perioperative and late results of carotid eversion endarterectomy (CEE) in more than 400 procedures. From August 1992 to December 1999, 402 primary CEEs were performed in 388 selected patients for symptomatic (235/58.4%) and asymptomatic (167/41.6%) carotid lesions. During the same period, 234 primary CEAs with patch closure were performed in 229 selected patients. All CEAs were carried out with continuous electroencephalographic monitoring for selective shunting, using deep general anesthesia. All patients underwent postoperative duplex ultrasound study and clinical follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months and every year thereafter. The mean follow-up was 50 months (range 3-88). Main end points were perioperative stroke and death, and restenosis. Our results showed that use of the CEE procedure can reduce perioperative mortality and stroke risk rates to around zero and results in no restenosis.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Early versus delayed carotid endarterectomy after a nondisabling ischemic stroke: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Although many retrospective and a few prospective studies have analyzed the outcome of early and delayed carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after a recent minor or nondisabling stroke (ie, a minimal and stabilized focal neurologic deficit of acute onset persisting for more than 24 hours and not leading to a handicap or to a significant impairment of daily living activities), the optimal timing of surgery remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the perioperative death and stroke rates of CEA performed within 30 days (early group) or more than 30 days (delayed group) after a nondisabling ischemic stroke in patients with carotid bifurcation disease. METHODS: During a 4-year period, of 86 patients experiencing a minor stroke, 45 were randomized to undergo early CEA and 41 to undergo delayed CEA. All patients underwent preoperative cerebral computed tomography, duplex ultrasonographic scanning and angiography of the supra-aortic trunks. All CEAs were carotid eversion endarterectomies and were performed by the same surgeon, using deep general anesthesia, with continuous electroencephalographic monitoring for the selective shunting. The perioperative death and stroke rates were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: No perioperative deaths occurred in either group. No recurrent strokes occurred during the waiting period in the delayed group. The incidence of perioperative stroke was comparable in the 2 groups (1 of 45, 2% vs 1 of 41, 2%). The mean follow-up was 23 months (range, 6 to 50 months). Survival rates after 1, 2, and 3 years were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early CEA after a nondisabling ischemic stroke can be performed safely with perioperative mortality and stroke rates comparable with those of delayed CEA. The timing of surgery does not seem to influence the benefit of the CEA.

Brain Ischemia↗