Comparison of solutions for sublingual immunotherapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Administration, Sublingual↗
Biomedical subjects
Claus Bachert
Publications and source records attributed to Claus Bachert.
Nasal IL-5 levels determine the response to anti-IL-5 treatment in patients with nasal polyps.
BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is characterized by an eosinophilic inflammation and high IL-5 levels. OBJECTIVES: Antagonizing the effect of IL-5 is a potential new treatment strategy in patients with nasal polyps. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 2-center safety and pharmacokinetic study, 24 subjects with bilateral nasal polyps were randomized to receive a single intravenous infusion of reslizumab, a humanized anti-human IL-5 mAb, at 3 mg/kg or 1 mg/kg or placebo. We evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of reslizumab, and biologic activity was assessed by means of endoscopic evaluation of polyp size, symptoms, peripheral eosinophil counts, peripheral and local IL-5 levels, eotaxin levels, and eosinophil cationic protein levels. RESULTS: We demonstrated that a single injection of reslizumab up to 3 mg/kg is safe and well tolerated. Blood eosinophil numbers and concentrations of eosinophil cationic protein were reduced up to 8 weeks after treatment in serum and nasal secretions. Individual nasal polyp scores improved only in half of the treated patients for 4 weeks. Responders had increased IL-5 concentrations in nasal secretions at baseline compared with nonresponders, and logistic regression analysis revealed that increased nasal IL-5 levels (>40 pg/mL) predict the response to anti-IL-5 treatment. CONCLUSION: A single injection of anti-IL-5 reduces the size of nasal polyps for 4 weeks in half of the patients, and nasal IL-5 levels predict the response to anti-IL-5 treatment. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Intravenous administration of a humanized anti-human IL-5 mAb is safe and reduces the size of nasal polyps in half of the patients.
Adolescent↗
Levocetirizine improves health-related quality of life and health status in persistent allergic rhinitis.
BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is a chronic respiratory disorder with a detrimental impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and health status. Enhancement and maintenance of patient function and well-being are therefore considered as essential. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether long-term treatment with levocetirizine 5mg improves HRQOL and health status in persistent allergic rhinitis (PER) patients assessed with RQLQ and SF-36 scales over a 6-month period. METHODS: The Xyzal in PER Trial (XPERT) was a multi-center, double-blind, parallel-group study. A total of 551 patients were randomized to receive levocetirizine 5mg or placebo once daily for 6 months and assessed for symptoms, HRQOL (Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire: RQLQ) and health status (SF-36). Sensitivity of the RQLQ and SF-36 to disease severity was tested to ensure their suitability for use in PER patients. Treatment effect was assessed by means of repeated measures analyses. RESULTS: Over the 6-month treatment period, levocetirizine showed statistically significant improvements over placebo in HRQOL (P < 0.001 for all RQLQ domains and overall scores) and health status (P < or = 0.004 for SF-36 physical and mental summary scores; P < 0.05 for all SF-36 scales). The relative improvement of levocetirizine over placebo exceeded the predefined clinically meaningful threshold of 30% for all RQLQ scores and the improvement from baseline was 3 times the established MID for RQLQ. CONCLUSION: The RQLQ and SF-36 could be used to measure HRQOL and health status in PER patients. Long-term treatment with levocetirizine provides sustained improvement of HRQOL and reduces disease burden in PER patients.
Cetirizine↗
Expression of eicosanoid receptors subtypes and eosinophilic inflammation: implication on chronic rhinosinusitis.
BACKGROUND: Eicosanoid receptors are G-protein-coupled receptors playing an important immunomodulatory role in airway diseases. However, there is little information on the expression of these receptors and their link with eosinophilic inflammation in paranasal sinus diseases. We aimed with this study to investigate the tissue expression of leukotrienes and prostaglandin E2 receptors in chronic rhinosinusitis patients and the link of this regulation with eosinophilic inflammation. METHODS: Samples were prepared from nasal tissue of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRS, n = 11), with nasal polyps (CRS-NP, n = 13) and healthy subjects (Controls, n = 6). mRNA expression of CysLT1, CysLT2, BLT1, BLT2, E-prostanoid receptors (EP1, EP2, EP3, EP4) and sol-IL-5Ralpha was determined by real-time PCR. Concentrations of PGE2, LTC4/D4/E4, LTB4 and sol-IL-5Ralpha were determined by ELISA and of ECP by ImmunoCap. Protein expression and tissue localization of eicosanoid receptors and activated eosinophils were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: CysLT1 mRNA expression was significantly increased in CRS-NP compared to CRS and controls, and CRS compared to controls, whereas CysLT2 mRNA was enhanced in both CRS groups without differences between them. Levels of both receptors correlated to the number of activated eosinophils, sol-IL-5Ralpha, ECP and LTC4/D4/E4 concentrations in the disease groups. PGE2 protein concentrations and prostanoid receptors EP1 and EP3 were down-regulated in the CRS-NP tissue vs. CRS and controls, whereas EP2 and EP4 expression was enhanced in CRS and CRS-NP patients vs. controls. No differences in BLT receptors were observed between patients and controls. CONCLUSION: CyLTs receptors are up-regulated in nasal polyp tissue and their expression correlate with eosinophilic inflammation supporting previous results. Eicosanoid receptors mRNA pattern observed suggests that down-regulation of EP1 and EP3 in CRS-NP and up-regulation EP2 and EP4 in CRS and CRS-NP groups may have some role in the development of the diseases and their regulation may not be directly linked to eosinophil activation but involve post-transcriptional events mainly related to other inflammatory cell sources.
Adult↗
Pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis.
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogenous disorder and represents a major public health problem. Although insights into the pathophysiology of CRS have largely expanded over the last two decades, the exact etiology and mechanism of persistence is still unrevealed. CRS is a multifactorial disease, and, with variable evidence, impaired ostial patency, mucociliary impairment, allergy, bacterial or fungal infection (or triggering), immunocompromised state, and environmental and genetic factors have been suggested to be associated or risk factors. Pathomechanisms in CRS are better understood currently, allowing us to characterize and differentiate the heterogeneous pathology of chronic sinonasal inflammation based on histopathology, inflammatory pattern, cytokine profile, and remodeling processes. In nasal polyposis (NP), but not CRS without NP, an abundant eosinophilic inflammation and local immunoglobulin E production could be demonstrated, and Staphylococcus-derived superantigens may at least modulate disease severity and expression. These findings question the current assumption that NP is a subgroup of CRS, but suggest that CRS and NP should probably be considered as distinct disease entities.
Cytokines↗
Amphotericin B nasal lavages: not a solution for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.
BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is one of the most common chronic diseases. Recently, it has been suggested that an exaggerated immune response to fungi is crucial in the pathogenesis of the disease. On the basis of this hypothesis, intranasal treatment with amphotericin B should benefit patients with CRS. Data from 2 uncontrolled and 2 controlled trials are conflicting, however. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the role of intranasal antifungal drugs in the treatment of CRS, we conducted a large, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study comparing the effectiveness of amphotericin B nasal lavages with placebo. METHODS: A total of 116 randomly selected patients with CRS were instructed to instill 25 mL amphotericin B (100 microg/mL) or placebo to each nostril twice daily for 3 months. Primary outcomes included a reduction in total visual analog scale (VAS) score and nasal endoscopy score. Secondary outcome measures included peak nasal inspiratory flow, polyp score, quality of life (Short Form-36, Rhinosinusitis Outcome Measure-31), and individual VAS scores. RESULTS: Analysis was based on intention to treat and involved all patients randomly assigned. Mean VAS scores, Short Form-36 and Rhinosinusitis Outcome Measure-31 data, peak nasal inspiratory flow values, nasal endoscopy scores, and polyp scores were similar in both treatment groups at the time of randomization, and no significant differences were observed after 13 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: Amphotericin B nasal lavages in the described dosing and time schedule do not reduce clinical signs and symptoms in patients with CRS. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Amphotericin B nasal lavages in the described dosing and time schedule are ineffective and therefore not advised in the treatment of patients with CRS.
Administration, Intranasal↗
Rhinosinusitis: developing guidance for clinical trials.
The Rhinosinusitis Initiative was developed by 5 national societies. The current guidance document is an expansion of the 2004 publication "Rhinosinusitis: Establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care" and provides templates for clinical trials in antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and symptom-relieving therapies for the following: (1) acute presumed bacterial rhinosinusitis, (2) chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) without nasal polyps, (3) CRS with nasal polyps, and (4) classic allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. In addition to the templates for clinical trials and proposed study designs, the Rhinosinusitis Initiative has developed 6 appendices, which address (1) health outcomes, (2) nasal endoscopy and staging of CRS, (3) radiologic imaging, (4) microbiology, (5) laboratory measures, and (6) biostatistical methods.
Chronic Disease↗
Rhinosinusitis: Developing guidance for clinical trials.
The Rhinosinusitis Initiative was developed by 5 national societies. The current guidance document is an expansion of the 2004 publication, "Rhinosinusitis: Establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care" and provides templates for clinical trials in antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and symptom-relieving therapies for the following: (1) acute presumed bacterial rhinosinusitis, (2) chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) without nasal polyps, (3) CRS with nasal polyps, and (4) classic allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. In addition to the templates for clinical trials and proposed study designs, the Rhinosinusitis Initiative has developed 6 appendices, which address (1) health outcomes, (2) nasal endoscopy and staging of CRS, (3) radiologic imaging, (4) microbiology, (5) laboratory measures, and (6) biostatistical methods.
Chronic Disease↗
The role of sinus disease in asthma.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Some time ago, a link between upper and lower respiratory disease was described, which gave rise to the concept of 'united airways disease'. This concept primarily refers to the well established link between allergic rhinitis and asthma, but it also covers a possible link between sinus disease and asthma (allergic or nonallergic) and other lower airway disease. RECENT FINDINGS: The current classification of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) includes disease without and with nasal polyps, which are considered subgroups of CRS. Different patterns of inflammatory and regulatory cytokines (involving distinguishable T-helper lymphocyte populations) and of remodelling markers, however, were recently described to differentiate nasal polyposis from CRS, yielding two discrete entities. These patterns resemble those of lower airway diseases, such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and suggest a common aetiological/pathogenetic background. Whereas the link between nasal polyps and asthma is well established (indeed, asthma improves after medical or surgical treatment of sinus disease), that between CRS and lower airway disease is not well understood. Recently, Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins, acting as superantigens, were identified as a possible link between nasal polyps and asthma, resulting in severe disease manifestations in both upper and lower airways. SUMMARY: The role played by sinus disease in asthma is only partially understood, largely because of deficits in the clinical classification and in basic knowledge of pathophysiological pathways. Recent research into upper airway and sinus inflammation and remodelling may reveal new perspectives and lead to a classification of sinus disease, which will facilitate appropriate clinical and epidemiological studies.
Asthma↗
[Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Guidelines of the DGAI in association with the DDG].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Conjunctivitis, Allergic↗
Ultra-short-course seasonal allergy vaccine (Pollinex Quattro): viewpoints.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
The innate immune system and its role in allergic disorders.
BACKGROUND: There has been an increasing prevalence of allergic diseases in the Western world over the last decades. The hygiene hypothesis has been proposed as a possible explanation for this epidemical trend in allergy. A key role in this theory is assigned to the reduced microbial stimulation of the Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in early life, which could lead to a weaker Th1 response and a stronger Th2 response to allergens. The individual immunological response is determined by the interplay between the dose and timing of exposure to endotoxins, other environmental factors and genetic predisposition. In the development and progression of allergic disorders, the innate immune system plays an important role. OBJECTIVE: In this review, we discuss the paradoxical effects that may appear when the innate immune components are triggered. We review the influence of changes in the gene sequence and TLR expression in relation to the overall pattern of commensals and pathogens. We explored the possibility of alternative stimulations of the immune system by CpG oligodeoxynucleotides and probiotics as therapeutic devices against this endemic disease in Western society. METHODS: Selection of papers was based on the importance of their contribution to the understanding of innate immunity and its implications. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The innate immune system plays an important role in both the protection against and the enhancement of allergic disorders, but the mechanisms are still unclear. Nevertheless, gene polymorphisms and triggers of the innate immune system provide therapeutic targets for protection against and treatment of allergic disorders.
Humans↗
Treating acute rhinosinusitis: comparing efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray, amoxicillin, and placebo.
BACKGROUND: Intranasal corticosteroids used with antibiotics are known to improve rhinosinusitis symptoms compared with antibiotic therapy alone. However, the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid monotherapy for acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis is not established. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) versus amoxicillin and placebo in patients with acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis. METHODS: In this double-blind, double-dummy trial, subjects (> or =12 years; N = 981) were randomized to MFNS 200 microg once daily or twice daily for 15 days, amoxicillin 500 mg 3 times daily for 10 days, or respective placebo. Follow-up was 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean am/pm major symptom score over the treatment phase. Secondary efficacy endpoints included total symptom score. Safety assessments included disease recurrence during follow-up and adverse event monitoring. RESULTS: Mometasone furoate nasal spray 200 microg twice daily was significantly superior to placebo (P < .001) and amoxicillin (P = .002) at improving major symptom score. Starting on day 2, MFNS 200 microg twice daily improved total symptom score throughout treatment versus amoxicillin (P = .012) and placebo (P < .001). Global response to treatment was significantly greater with MFNS 200 microg twice daily versus amoxicillin (P = .013) and placebo (P = .001). Although significantly superior to placebo, MFNS 200 microg once daily was not superior to amoxicillin for the primary or secondary efficacy endpoints. All treatments were well tolerated with a similar incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis, MFNS 200 microg twice daily produced significant symptom improvements versus amoxicillin and placebo, without predisposing the patient to disease recurrence or bacterial infection.
Acute Disease↗
Aspirin compared with acetaminophen in the treatment of fever and other symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection in adults: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-dose, 6-hour dose-ranging study.
BACKGROUND: Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and acetaminophen (paracetamol) are frequently used to treat fever and other symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). Both are available over the counter for use at the standard recommended doses of 500 and 1000 mg per single use. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the efficacy, safety profiles, and tolerability of aspirin 500 and 1000 mg and acetaminophen 500 and 1000 mg compared with placebo in adult patients with acute febrile URTI of suspected viral origin. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial conducted in Ukraine and Russia. Patients with URTI and acute fever of > or =38.5 degrees C received a single dose of aspirin 500 or 1000 mg, acetaminophen 500 or 1000 mg, or matching placebo. Oral body temperature was measured in the clinic at specified time points up to 6 hours after dosing. The intensity of other symptoms of URTI was rated by patients at baseline and at 2, 4, and 6 hours after dosing (scale from 0 = none to 10 = severe). The primary efficacy measure was the AUC for the change in orally measured body temperature from the time of treatment (baseline) to 4 hours after dosing. Secondary outcome measures included the change in body temperature from baseline to specified time points between 0.5 and 6 hours after dosing, the difference between baseline and the lowest measured body temperature, the time to the lowest measured body temperature, and the intensity of other symptoms of URTI (ie, headache, sinus sensitivity to percussion, sore throat, achiness, and feverish discomfort). Tolerability was monitored by recording of adverse events. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled (78 in both aspirin groups, 79 in both acetaminophen groups, 78 in the placebo group). Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable in the 5 groups; 51% of patients were male, with a mean age of 37.4 years and a mean body weight of 74.3 kg. The AUC values for the change in body temperature 0 to 4 hours after dosing were 3.18 (95% CI, 2.78-3.57) for aspirin 500 mg, 4.26 (95% CI, 3.84-4.68) for aspirin 1000 mg, 3.13 (95% CI, 2.77-3.49) for acetaminophen 500 mg, 4.11 (95% CI, 3.73-4.49) for acetaminophen 1000 mg, and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.38-1.13) for placebo. In terms of the primary efficacy variable, all active treatments were significantly superior to placebo (P < 0.001, 1-sided t test), with no significant differences between them. Reductions in body temperature were significantly greater with the 1000-mg doses of both active treatments compared with the 500-mg doses (P< 0.001, 1-sided t test). The mean maximum temperature reductions were 1.32 degrees C, 1.25 degrees C, 1.67 degrees C,1.71 degrees C, and 0.63 degrees C in the respective treatment groups. Significant reductions were seen in the mean intensity of headache, achiness, and feverish discomfort with all active treatments at most time points (P < 0.001), but not in sinus sensitivity to percussion or sore throat. All treatments were equally well tolerated, and no clinically significant adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-dose study, aspirin 500 and 1000 mg and acetaminophen 500 and 1000 mg were more effective against fever and other symptoms of URTI than placebo. Both active treatments showed dose-related efficacy, and there was no significant difference between equal doses of the 2 agents. Safety profiles and tolerability were also comparable between treatments.
Acetaminophen↗
Prostaglandin, leukotriene, and lipoxin balance in chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyposis.
BACKGROUND: Upper airway diseases and especially the aspirin hypersensitivity syndrome have been linked to changes in the arachidonic acid cascade; however, the specificity of these changes and their relation to inflammatory reactions in these diseases still remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the tissue eicosanoid production in 3 subgroups of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and control subjects and to correlate it with the severity of inflammation and clinical manifestation of aspirin sensitivity. METHODS: Samples were prepared from sinonasal tissue of patients with CRS with (CRS-NP group, n = 13) and without nasal polyposis (CRS group, n = 11), sinonasal tissue of patients with nasal polyposis and aspirin sensitivity (CRS-ASNP group, n = 13), and normal nasal mucosa from healthy subjects (NM group, n = 8). Real-time PCR was applied for mRNA quantification of COX-2, 5-lipoxygenase, leukotriene C 4 synthase, and 15-lipoxygenase. Enzyme immunoassays were used to measure IL-5, eosinophil cationic protein, and eicosanoid (leukotriene [LT] C 4 , LTD 4 , and LTE 4 ; lipoxin A 4 ; and prostaglandin E 2 [PGE 2 ]) concentrations. RESULTS: COX-2 mRNA and PGE 2 concentrations were similar in the CRS and NM groups but significantly decreased in nasal polyp tissue, especially in the CRS-ASNP group. LTC 4 synthase, 5-lipoxygenase mRNA, LTC 4 , LTD 4 , and LTE 4 concentrations increased with disease severity among the patient groups. 15-Lipoxygenase and lipoxin A 4 concentrations were increased in all CRS groups compared with in the NM group but were significantly downregulated in the CRS-ASNP group when compared with the CRS-NP group. IL-5 and eosinophil cationic protein were increased in both groups of nasal polyp tissue compared with in the NM and CRS groups and correlated directly with LTC 4 , LTD 4 , and LTE 4 concentrations and inversely with PGE 2 concentrations. CONCLUSION: Changes of tissue eicosanoid metabolism do occur in CRS, even in the absence of clinical aspirin sensitivity, and these changes appear to be related to the severity of eosinophilic inflammation.
Adult↗
Efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and tolerability of mometasone furoate, levocabastine, and disodium cromoglycate nasal sprays in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend intranasal glucocorticosteroids as first-line therapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and tolerability of the topical glucocorticosteroid mometasone furoate, the topical antihistamine levocabastine hydrochloride, and the cromone disodium cromoglycate in seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: This study was performed during the 2003 grass pollen season as an open, randomized, parallel-group, single-center study of 123 patients assigned to receive mometasone furoate (200 microg once daily), levocabastine hydrochloride (200 microg twice daily), or disodium cromoglycate (5.6 mg 4 times daily). Symptom scores and nasal inspiratory peak flow measurements were recorded in a patient diary. The global efficacy of the study medication was evaluated by patients after treatment. Eosinophil cationic protein concentrations were measured in nasal secretions before and after treatment. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated as medication cost per treatment success. RESULTS: Mometasone furoate therapy was significantly superior to the use of levocabastine or disodium cromoglycate with respect to all nasal symptoms, the global evaluation of efficacy, and eosinophil cationic protein concentration. Furthermore, mometasone furoate therapy was significantly superior to disodium cromoglycate therapy with respect to nasal inspiratory peak flow. Medication cost per treatment success was lowest with mometasone furoate use and highest with levocabastine use. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to compare mometasone furoate nasal spray with nonsteroidal topical treatments for seasonal allergic rhinitis. Mometasone furoate nasal spray was confirmed as a first-choice topical treatment option for seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Administration, Intranasal↗
Impact of RNA quality on reference gene expression stability.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Belgium↗
Pharmacological management of nasal polyposis.
Nasal polyposis affects nearly 4% of the total population in Western countries, and presents a real challenge to the physician because of its severity, chronicity and recurrence rate. Characteristic histomorphological features of polyps are an eosinophilic inflammation and the destruction of connective tissue; recent research has focused on cytokines, chemokines, growth factors and metalloproteinases to explain these features, as the aetiology of nasal polyposis remains largely unclear. Currently, topical and systemic corticosteroids are first-choice drug therapy approaches, and good evidence from controlled trials is available for topical, but not for systemic, corticosteroid therapy. Surgery is indicated if adequate drug treatment fails, which often needs to be maintained after surgery. There is limited experience for other drugs, such as antihistamines, leukotriene antagonists and frusemide (furosemide), which may be added to corticosteroid therapy in selected patients. Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) desensitisation may be a therapeutic option for patients who do not respond to corticosteroids or surgery. Recently, antibiotics such as macrolides have been suggested to have therapeutic activity based on their anti-inflammatory properties but large-scale controlled trials are lacking. New approaches are currently evolving, specifically targeting eosinophilic recruitment (chemokine receptor 3, eotaxin) and inflammation (interleukin-4, -5, -13), immunoglobulin-E, or tissue remodeling by reducing the activity of metalloproteinases. This review summarises current knowledge on pathogenesis as well as established and future approaches in the pharmacological management of bilateral eosinophilic nasal polyposis.
Administration, Topical↗