Biomedical subjects

Clay Mann

Publications and source records attributed to Clay Mann.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Methodological design for economic evaluation in Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) trial.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to describe the rationale and methods for the economic analysis of the PAD trial. The objective of this analysis is to assess whether automated external defibrillators (AEDs) use by lay responders is good value for money. METHODS: Design. This economic evaluation is being conducted concurrently with a randomized trial of (a) control--training to recognize arrest, access 911, and administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) while awaiting arrival of emergency medical services providers versus (b) intervention--training to recognize arrest, access 911, administer CPR, and use an AED while awaiting emergency medical services providers. Lay responders in either group were trained to deliver the study intervention. Population. Participating sites identified distinct units with a population of at least 250 people aged > or = 50 years. Outcome. The primary economic outcome is the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of intervention versus control. RESULTS: Nine hundred ninety-three units including 1260 public and residential locations were randomized. There were 30 survivors in the intervention group and 15 in the control group (P = .03). Sampling will identify program and health care costs. A societal perspective will be adopted. Incremental cost effectiveness will be estimated by using bootstrapping and decision analytic modeling. CONCLUSION: The study will demonstrate whether defibrillation by lay responders improves outcomes at reasonable cost. If so, then the thousands of lives will be improved annually. If not, then limited resources can be invested in other interventions. Our methods also provide a framework for economic evaluations of other interventions for acute cardiovascular events.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Job level risk assessment using task level strain index scores: a pilot study.

This paper explores 2 methods of modifying the Strain Index (SI) to assess the ergonomic risk of multi-task jobs. Twenty-eight automotive jobs (15 cases and 13 controls) were studied. The first method is based on the maximum task SI score, and the second method is modeled on the NIOSH Composite Lifting Index (CLI) algorithm, named cumulative assessment of risk to the distal upper extremity (CARD). Significant odds ratios of 11 (CI 1.7-69) and 24 (CI 2.4-240) were obtained using the modified maximum task and CARD, respectively. This indicates that modification of the SI may be useful in determining the risk of distal upper extremity injury associated with a multi-task job.

Humans↗

PubMed2005

Job level risk assessment using task level ACGIH hand activity level TLV scores: a pilot study.

Existing upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder analytical tools are primarily intended for single or mono-task jobs. However, many jobs contain more than 1 task and some include job rotation. This case/control study investigates methods of modifying an existing tool, the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Hand Activity Level (HAL) Threshold Limit Value (TLV), to assess the upper extremity risk of multi-task jobs. Various methods of combining the task differences and ratios into a job level assessment were explored. Two methods returned significant odds ratios, (p < .05) of 18.0 (95% CI 1.8-172) and 12.0 (95% CI 1.2-120). These results indicate that a modified ACGIH HAL TLV may provide insight into the work-related risk of multi-task jobs. Further research is needed to optimize this process.

Hand↗

PubMed2004

Knowledge of heart attack symptoms in 20 US communities. Results from the Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment Community Trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective treatment for patients with acute myocardial infarction is limited by patient delay in seeking care. Inadequate knowledge of heart attack symptoms may prolong delay. An intervention designed to reduce delay was tested in the Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Community Trial. In this report, the impact on knowledge of heart attack symptoms is presented. METHODS: Twenty communities were randomized to intervention or comparison status in a matched-pair design. Intervention strategies included community organization, public education, professional education, and patient education. The main outcome measures were based on information regarding knowledge of symptoms collected in a series of four random-digit-dialed telephone surveys. RESULTS: Knowledge of REACT-targeted symptoms increased in intervention communities. No change was observed in comparison communities. The net effect was an increase of 0.44 REACT-targeted symptoms per individual (P<0.001). The intervention effect was greater in ethnic minorities, persons with lower household incomes, and those with family or spouse history of heart attack (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The REACT intervention was modestly successful in increasing the general public's knowledge of the complex constellation of heart attack symptoms. The intervention program was somewhat more effective in reaching disadvantaged subgroups, including ethnic minorities and persons with lower income. Despite these successes, the post-intervention level of knowledge was suboptimal.

Adolescent↗