PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Clifford G Rios

Publications and source records attributed to Clifford G Rios.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous surgical techniques described, there have been few studies evaluating the biomechanical performance of acromioclavicular joint reconstructions. PURPOSE: To compare a newly developed anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure and a recently described arthroscopic method using ultrastrong nonabsorbable suture material. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Forty-two fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (72.8 +/- 13.4 years) were randomly assigned to 3 groups: arthroscopic reconstruction, anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction, and a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure. Bone mineral density was obtained on all specimens. Specimens were tested to 70 N in 3 directions, anterior, posterior, and superior, comparing the intact to the reconstructed states. Superior cyclic loading at 70 N for 3000 cycles was then performed at a rate of 1 Hz, followed by a load to failure test (120 mm/min) to simulate physiologic states at the acromioclavicular joint. RESULTS: In comparison to the intact state, the modified Weaver-Dunn procedure had significantly (P < .05) greater laxity than the anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction or the arthroscopic reconstruction. There were no significant differences in bone mineral density (g/cm(2)), load to failure, superior migration over 3000 cycles, or superior displacement. The anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction had significantly less (P < .05) anterior and posterior translation than the modified Weaver-Dunn procedure. The arthroscopic reconstruction yielded significantly less anterior displacement (P < .05) than the modified Weaver-Dunn procedure. CONCLUSION: The anatomical coracoclavicular reconstruction has less anterior and posterior translation and more closely approximates the intact state, restoring function of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A more anatomical reconstruction using a free tendon graft of both the trapezoid and conoid ligaments may provide a stronger, permanent biologic solution for dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. This reconstruction may minimize recurrent subluxation and residual pain and permit earlier rehabilitation.

Acromioclavicular Joint↗

Subpectoral biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation.

The proximal portion of the long head of the biceps is a recognized cause of anterior shoulder pain. This article presents a novel technique for tenodesing the proximal biceps tendon. The tendon is evaluated and tenodesed in the same anatomic position beneath the pectoralis tendon, and is removed entirely from the bicipital groove. The proximal portion of the long head of the biceps tendon is marked near its origin and lysed arthroscopically. The skin incision for the subpectoral open biceps tenodesis is made in the axilla exposing the inferior border of the pectoralis major muscle. The tendon is withdrawn from the joint and out of the incision. A Krackow or other type of interrupted tendon whipstitch is placed in the 10 to 15 mm of tendon proximal to the musculotendinous junction. A bone tunnel is created within the bicipital groove. The tendon/tenodesis driver complex is positioned to create a secure fit within the bone tunnel. Our current series includes 22 cases with short-term follow-up of 2 to 10 months. None of the repairs has pulled out and none of the patients reports persistent pain or loss of function. The subpectoral approach with interference screw fixation appears to be a promising, reproducible technique for tenodesing the biceps.

Bone Screws↗