PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Colin Davey

Publications and source records attributed to Colin Davey.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Dynamics of task sets: evidence from dense-array event-related potentials.

Prior research suggests that task sets facilitate coherent, goal-directed behavior by providing an internal, contextual frame that biases selection toward context-relevant stimulus attributes and responses. Questions about how task sets are engaged, maintained, and shifted have recently become a major focus of research on executive control processes. We employed dense-array (128-channel) event-related potential (ERP) methodology to examine the dynamics of brain systems engaged during the preparation and implementation of task switching. The EEG was recorded while participants performed letter and digit judgments to pseudorandomly-ordered, univalent (#3, A%) and bivalent (G5) stimulus trials, with the appropriate task cued by a colored rectangle presented 450 ms before target onset. Results revealed spatial and temporal variations in brain activity that could be related to preparatory processes common to both switch and repeat trials, switch-specific control processes engaged to reconfigure and maintain task set under conflict, and visual priming benefits of task repetition. Despite extensive practice and improvement, both behavioral and ERP results indicated that subjects maintained high levels of executive control processing with extended task engagement. The patterns of ERP activity obtained in the present study fit well with functional neuroanatomical models of self-regulation of action. The frontopolar and right-lateralized frontal switch effects obtained in the present study are consistent with the role of these regions in adapting to changing contextual contingencies. In contrast, the centroparietal P3b and N384 effects related to the contextual ambiguity of bivalent trials are consistent with the context monitoring and updating functions associated with the posterior cingulate learning circuit.

Adolescent↗

Frontal and posterior sources of event-related potentials in semantic comprehension.

An important question in brain and language research is how activity in multiple brain networks is coordinated over time during semantic comprehension. To address this question, we applied spatiotemporal source analysis to event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded as subjects read words that were meaningful or incongruous in the context of a sentence (N400 paradigm). The incongruous word was placed either early in the sentence or at the end. Source analysis showed activity in language areas of the left hemisphere, right temporal cortex and medial limbic cortex. The initial detection of semantic incongruity (approximately 250 ms) engaged the left prefrontal cortex and left anterior cingulate. In the critical (300-500 ms) interval, regional sources in left and right lateral prefrontal cortex, right temporal cortex, and both anterior and posterior cingulate were responsive to the semantic manipulation. Left hemisphere activity preceded right hemisphere activity, and semantic effects in frontal regions began earlier and were more sustained than the transient effects within posterior cortical regions. Findings are discussed with respect to recent theories of corticothalamic and corticolimbic networks in attention and semantic processing.

Adolescent↗

Corticolimbic mechanisms in emotional decisions.

Midline frontolimbic networks are engaged in monitoring simple actions. They may also provide evaluative control for more complex decisions. Subjects read a trait-descriptive word and responded either "yes" or "no" within 1,500 ms whether it was self-descriptive. By 300 ms, an electrophysiological discrimination between good and bad words was seen over centromedial regions of the frontal lobe for both friend and self-decisions. By 350 ms, an interaction effect between evaluation and endorsement appeared, and by 500 ms, activity specific to self-evaluation was seen in both anterior and posterior midline sites. An evaluative decision thus begins by recruiting motivational and semantic influences within limbic networks, and these influences appear to shape the development of the decision within multiple neocortical regions.

Adult↗