Corina van de Pol | PubMed Health

PubMed2006

Normal-eye Zernike coefficients and root-mean-square wavefront errors.

PURPOSE: To compare aberrometry measurements from multiple sites and compute mean Zernike coefficients and root-mean-square (RMS) values for the entire data pool to serve as a reference set for normal, healthy adult eyes. SETTING: Northeastern State University, Tahlequah, Oklahoma, USA. METHODS: Data were collected from 10 laboratories that measured higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in normal, healthy adult eyes using Shack-Hartmann aberrometry (2560 eyes of 1433 subjects). Signed Zernike coefficients were scaled to pupil diameters of 6.0 mm, 5.0 mm, 4.0 mm, and 3.0 mm and corrected to a common wavelength of 550 nm. The mean signed and absolute Zernike coefficients across data sets were compared. Then, the following were computed: overall mean values for signed and absolute Zernike coefficients; polar Zernike magnitudes and RMS values for coma-like aberrations (Z(3)(+/-1) and Z(5)(+/-1) combined); spherical-like aberrations (Z(4)(0) and Z(6)(0) combined); and 3rd-, 4th-, 5th-, and 6th-order, and higher-order aberrations (orders 3 to 6). RESULTS: The different data sets showed good agreement for Zernike coefficients values across most higher-order modes, with greater variability for Z(4)(0) and Z(3)(-1). The most prominent modes and their mean absolute values (6.0-mm pupil) were, respectively, Z(3)(-1) and 0.14 microm, Z(4)(0) and 0.13 microm, and Z(3)(-3) and 0.11 microm. The mean total higher-order RMS was 0.33 microm. CONCLUSIONS: There was a general consensus for the magnitude of HOAs expected in normal adult human eyes. At least 90% of the sample had aberrations less than double the mean values reported here. These values can serve as a set of reference norms.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia.

BACKGROUND: Refractive surgery has stimulated the development of aberrometers, which are instruments that measure higher-order aberrations. The purpose of this study was to test one clinical aberrometer, the Complete Ophthalmic Analysis System (COAS), for its accuracy, repeatability, and instrument myopia for measuring sphere and astigmatism and its repeatability for measuring higher-order aberrations. METHODS: Aberrations of 56 normal eyes (28 subjects) were measured with and without cycloplegia using a COAS, a conventional autorefractor and by subjective refraction. We evaluated lower-order accuracy (sphere and astigmatism) of the COAS and autorefractor by comparing that data with that of subjective refraction. We also tested COAS lower- and higher-order repeatability for 5 measurements taken in less than 1 minute. We evaluated instrument myopia by comparing cycloplegic and noncycloplegic measurements of the same eye. Data were analyzed for a 5.0-mm-diameter pupil. RESULTS: Mean COAS spherical error was between -0.1 and +0.4 diopters (D), depending on cycloplegia and the kind of sphere power computation selected. Cylinder power errors were less than 0.1 D. COAS repeatability coefficients were better than 0.25 D, and instrument myopia was less than 0.4 D. These were comparable with those of autorefraction. Higher-order repeatability was sufficient to allow reliable measurement of normal third-order aberrations and spherical aberration. CONCLUSIONS: Accuracy, repeatability, and instrument myopia of the COAS are similar to those of a conventional autorefractor. Accuracy and repeatability are also similar to those of subjective refraction. Like an autorefractor, the COAS provides instantaneous, objective measurements of sphere and astigmatism, but it also measures higher-order aberrations. We found that it is capable of reliably measuring problematic higher-order aberrations and is therefore a valuable asset for modern clinical eye care.

Adult↗