PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Craig Dunbar

Publications and source records attributed to Craig Dunbar.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Reducing bounce effects in the Andersen cascade impactor.

The collection efficiency of the Andersen cascade impactor (ACI) can be affected by particle bounce, overload and re-entrainment (or blow-off), collectively referred to as bounce effects. Reduction of bounce effects in the ACI operated at 60 LPM was investigated for placebo large porous particles. Aerodynamic particle size distributions (aPSDs) obtained with the ACI and multi-stage liquid impinger (MSLI) were compared by observation of modes and statistical comparisons of the mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) and geometric standard deviation (sigmag). Particle bounce effects were prevalent in the ACI with uncoated plates, i.e., bi-modal distribution with statistically significant differences in MMAD and sigmag (P<0.05). Coating the impaction plates with a thin layer of vacuum grease and decreasing the ACI stage jet velocities reduced, but did not minimize bounce effects. Bounce effects were minimized using 20-microm pore glass fiber filters saturated in water placed on inverted impaction plates, with good agreement obtained between the ACI and MSLI aPSDs, i.e., mono-modal with no statistically significant differences in MMAD and sigmag (P>0.05). Selection of the impaction substrate material and solvent must be evaluated with the drug product and analytical methods to minimize bounce effects and obtain an accurate measure of the aPSD.

Algorithms↗

Analysis of cascade impactor mass distributions.

The purpose of this paper is to review the approaches for analyzing cascade impactor (CI) mass distributions produced by pulmonary drug products and the considerations necessary for selecting the appropriate analysis procedure. There are several methods available for analyzing CI data, yielding a hierarchy of information in terms of nominal, ordinal and continuous variables. Mass distributions analyzed as a nominal function of the stages and auxiliary components is the simplest approach for examining the whole mass emitted by the inhaler. However, the relationship between the mass distribution and aerodynamic diameter is not described by such data. This relationship is a critical attribute of pulmonary drug products due to the association between aerodynamic diameter and the mass of particulates deposited to the respiratory tract. Therefore, the nominal mass distribution can only be utilized to make decisions on the discrete masses collected in the CI. Mass distributions analyzed as an ordinal function of aerodynamic diameter can be obtained by introducing the stage size range, which generally vary in magnitude from one stage to another for a given type of CI, and differ between CIs of different designs. Furthermore, the mass collected by specific size ranges within the CI are often incorrectly used to estimate in vivo deposition at various regions of the respiratory tract. A CI-generated mass distribution can be directly related to aerodynamic diameter by expressing the mass collected by each size-fractionating stage in terms of either mass frequency or cumulative mass fraction less than the aerodynamic size appropriate to each stage. Analysis of the aerodynamic diameter as a continuous variable allows comparison of mass distributions obtained from different products, obtained by different CI designs, as well as providing input to in vivo particle deposition models. The lack of information about the mass fraction emitted by the inhaler that is not size-analyzed by the CI may be perceived as a disadvantage from the standpoint of comparing the total mass per actuation emitted from the inhaler mouthpiece. However, this is a limitation of the CI measurement technique rather than the data analysis procedure. Data reduction techniques can enable the large quantity of information conveyed in a mass-size distribution to be summarized in terms of representative parameters, but care needs to be exercised if utilizing model size distribution function fitting routines to avoid introducing error by the fitting procedure.

Aerosols↗

Dose delivery characteristics of the AIR pulmonary delivery system over a range of inspiratory flow rates.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo dose delivery characteristics of the AIR pulmonary delivery system over a range of flow rates. A 5-mg placebo powder of engineered particles with low densities (<0.4 g/cc) and large geometric diameters (>5 microm) was delivered via a simple, capsule based, passive dry powder inhaler. The emitted dose, geometric and aerodynamic particle size distributions (aPSDs) were obtained over a range of flow rates (15-60 LPM). The in vitro results demonstrated improved powder dispersion with increasing flow rate through the inhaler. The in vivo dose delivery characteristics were obtained by gamma scintigraphy. Twelve healthy subjects performed the following three inhalation maneuvers: (i) a targeted peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) of 20 +/- 10 LPM, (ii) a deep comfortable inhalation, and (iii) a deep forced inhalation. PIFR and inhaled volume were obtained during the inhalation of the dose using a spirometer. In vivo dose delivery was characterized by high and reproducible emitted doses (mean = 87%; inter and intra-subject CV = 5%) and high lung deposition (mean = 51% of the total dose), with low inter and intra-subject CVs (18% and 13%, respectively) across a range of PIFRs (12-86 LPM). Lung deposition of the total dose was shown not to be dependent on PIFR by analysis of variance across the range of inspiratory flow rates (p = 0.29). This was due to the competing effects of smaller aPSDs, increased extrathoracic deposition and higher emitted doses with increasing PIFR. Fully characterizing the effect of inspiratory flow rate requires analysis of the therapeutic response, as well as in vitro dose delivery and lung deposition.

Analysis of Variance↗

In vitro and in vivo dose delivery characteristics of large porous particles for inhalation.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo dose delivery characteristics of two large porous particle placebo formulations with different mass median aerodynamic diameters (MMAD approximately equal to 3 and 5 microm). In vitro dose delivery characteristics were measured using the multistage liquid impinger (MSLI). In vitro lung deposition was predicted by calculating the extrathoracic deposition using the ICRP model, with the remaining fraction assumed to deposit in the lungs. Healthy subjects were trained to inhale through the AIR delivery system at a target peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) of 60 l/min, The in vivo dose delivery of large porous particles were obtained by gamma-scintigraphy and was characterized by high ( approximately 90%), reproducible emitted doses for both the small and large MMAD powders. The mean in vivo lung deposition relative to the total metered dose were 59.0 and 37.3% for 3 and 5 microm MMAD powders, respectively. The AIR delivery system produced high in vivo lung deposition and low intersubject CVs (approximately 14%) across the range of PIFRs obtained in the study (50-80 l/min), This is relative to a variety of dry powder inhalers (DPI) that have been published in the literature, with in vivo lung deposition ranging from 13 to 35% with intersubject CVs ranging from 17 to 50%. The ICRP model provided a good estimate of the mean in vivo lung deposition for both powders. Intersubject variability was not captured by the ICRP model due to intersubject differences in the morphology and physiology of the oropharyngeal region. The ICRP model was used to predict the regional lung deposition, although these predictions were only considered speculative in the absence of experimental validation.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Bioengineering of therapeutic aerosols.

The new field of therapeutic aerosol bioengineering (TAB), driven primarily by the medical need for inhaled insulin, is now expanding to address medical needs ranging from respiratory to systemic diseases, including asthma, growth deficiency, and pain. Bioengineering of therapeutic aerosols involves a level of aerosol particle design absent in traditional therapeutic aerosols, which are created by conventionally spraying a liquid solution or suspension of drug or milling and mixing a dry drug form into respirable particles. Bioengineered particles may be created in liquid form from devices specially designed to create an unusually fine size distribution, possibly with special purity properties, or solid particles that possess a mixture of drug and excipient, with designed shape, size, porosity, and drug release characteristics. Such aerosols have enabled several high-visibility clinical programs of inhaled insulin, as well as earlier-stage programs involving inhaled morphine, growth hormone, beta-interferon, alpha-1-antitrypsin, and several asthma drugs. The design of these aerosols, limited by partial knowledge of the lungs' physiological environment, and driven largely at this stage by market forces, relies on a mixture of new and old science, pharmaceutical science intuition, and a degree of biological-impact empiricism that speaks to the importance of an increased level of academic involvement.

Administration, Inhalation↗