PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Cristiano Spada

Publications and source records attributed to Cristiano Spada.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Endoluminal fundoplication.

In GERD patients in whom pharmacological therapies are ineffective and anti-reflux surgery is not indicated, a viable option could be proposed. To date, several endoscopic antireflux procedures, involving sewing, injection and/or implant, and radiofrequency are available. The sewing techniques demonstrated good clinical results, with reduction in proton pump inhibitors consumption; despite significant changes in esophageal manometry and/or acid exposure time reduction and healing of esophagitis were noted only in few patients.

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal↗
PubMed2006

Levofloxacin-based triple therapy in first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

BACKGROUND: The standard first-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication are based on clarithromycin and amoxicillin or metronidazole. Recent studies suggested levofloxacin as an alternative option for both first-and second-line H. pylori eradication treatment. AIMS: To compare efficacy and tolerability of two different 7-day standard triple therapies versus 7-day levofloxacin-based triple therapy in first-line treatment for H. pylori infection. METHODS: Three hundred consecutive H. pylori positive patients were randomized to receive: clarithromycin, amoxicillin, esomeprazole (Group A: N = 100); clarithromycin, metronidazole, esomeprazole (Group B: N = 100); or clarithromycin, levofloxacin, esomeprazole (Group C: N = 100). H. pylori status was rechecked by (13)C urea breath test 6 wk after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Sixteen out of 300 patients discontinued treatment because of the occurrence of side effects (Group A, 5; Group B, 7; Group C, 4). The eradication rates in intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses were: Group A, 75% and 79%; Group B, 72% and 77.4%; and Group C, 87% and 90.6%. The eradication rate achieved with levofloxacin-based triple therapy was significantly higher than that with standard therapies in either ITT (87%vs 75%, p <0.05; 87%vs 72%, p <0.01;) or PP analysis (90.6%vs 79%, p <0.05; 90.6 vs 77.4, p <0.05). No difference was found between standard triple therapies. The incidence of side effects was similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: A 7-day levofloxacin-based triple therapy can achieve higher H. pylori eradication rates than standard regimens. These data suggest levofloxacin-based regimens can be the most effective in first-line anti-H. pylori therapy, at least in the Italian population.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Endoscopic removal of malfunctioning biliary self-expandable metallic stents.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic removal of malfunctioning self-expandable metallic biliary stents (SEMS) is difficult and not well described. The aim of this study is to review the indications, the techniques, and the results of SEMS removal in a cohort of patients with malfunctioning stents. METHODS: All patients who underwent an attempt at endoscopic removal of biliary SEMS over a 5-year period were retrospectively identified. The main indications for SEMS removal were the following: distal migration of the stent or impaction to the duodenum, impaction into the bile-duct wall, tissue ingrowth, and inappropriate length of the stent causing occlusion of intrahepatic ducts. SEMS were removed by using foreign-body forceps or polypectomy snares. RESULTS: Endoscopic removal of 39 SEMS (13 uncovered and 26 covered) was attempted in 29 patients (17 men; mean age, 66 years). SEMS extraction was attempted after a mean of 7.5 months (8.75 months standard deviation) post-SEMS insertion. Removal was successful in 20 patients (68.9%) and in 29 SEMS (74.3%). Covered SEMS were effectively removed more frequently than uncovered ones: 24 of 26 (92.3%) and 5 of 13 (38.4%), respectively (p < 0.05). No major complications were recorded. Multivariate analysis showed that the time interval between insertion and removal, SEMS length, stent-mesh design (zigzag vs. interlaced), and indication for removal were not predictive of success at stent removal. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic removal of biliary SEMS is feasible and safe in more than 70% of cases. Because only 38% of uncovered SEMS were removable, the presence of a stent covering is the only factor predictive of successful stent extraction. The presence of diffuse and severe ingrowth was the main feature limiting SEMS removal.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Efficacy of main pancreatic-duct endoscopic drainage in patients with chronic pancreatitis, continuous pain, and dilated duct.

BACKGROUND: The aim of endoscopic treatment in patients with chronic pancreatitis is to achieve decompression of the pancreatic duct, because duct obstruction with increased pressure within the duct is one of the leading causes of pain in these patients. The majority of patients suffer from relapsing pain, thus making it difficult to evaluate the efficacy of therapy. The outcome of endoscopic treatment on pain has been evaluated in patients with continuous pain (present for more than 1 month, at least 5 days per week, requiring daily analgesic therapy) and dilated duct. METHODS: Of 343 patients who underwent endotherapy for chronic pancreatitis in a 15-year period, 22 (6.4%)(19 men, mean age 48 years, alcohol abuse 14) had continuous pain and a dilated pancreatic duct. RESULTS: Endotherapy was successful in all patients, with no procedure-related mortality and only mild complications. Pain disappeared, and analgesics could be discontinued in all patients immediately after endotherapy. Six patients are pain free after a mean period of 5.5 years. One pain-free patient died after 3.4 years from myocardial infarction. Five patients were successfully endoscopically re-treated for pain relapses. Four patients underwent surgery for frequent pain relapses after a mean period of 2.5 years. Six patients were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Endotherapy should be considered as the initial treatment of choice in patients with chronic pancreatitis, dilated duct, and continuous pain.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Hilar tumours.

Tumours that involve the confluence of the bile ducts in the liver hilum provide a major therapeutic challenge. Adequate palliation requires relief of jaundice. Even though jaundice can be relieved if only 30% of the liver is drained, the presence of undrained bile ducts may result in pruritus and a continued risk of cholangitis and hepatic abscess. The biliary anatomy is defined by cholangiography, which today can be performed by magnetic resonance; the stricture is dilated, and plastic or metallic stents are endoscopically inserted over a guidewire. Patients with complex hilar strictures may benefit from the insertion of one or more stents, although there is debate about how many are necessary. The present article provides specific technical details, describes comparative trials of unilateral versus bilateral biliary drainage and explores new techniques that warrant further investigation.

Bile Duct Neoplasms↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Small bowel diseases.

The study of small bowel disease is hampered by the organ length and shape. Malabsorption syndromes, small bowel bleeding, intestinal obstruction are analyzed with reference to the clinical characteristics and present laboratory and instrumental tests used in diagnosis. The introduction of sophisticated diagnostic imaging procedures, both endoscopic and radiologic have contributed to a better understanding of the symptomatic patterns.

Diagnostic Imaging↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Staging of esophageal carcinoma: endoscopic ultrasonography.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has gained ground in the staging of esophageal cancer because of its high accuracy in determining depth of tumor invasion (greater than 80%) and lymph node metastases. The accuracy of EUS increases with increasing stage. However within T1 tumors, EUS performance in distinguishing mucosal (T1m) form submucosal invasion (T1sm) is poor. In this context high-frequency ultrasonography probes can play a major role. The advent of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has dramatically changed the impact of EUS on nodal staging, providing cytological confirmation of malignancy from peritumoral and celiac lymph nodes. Especially celiac node metastases, have a major clinical impact on patient management. Widespread use of EUS in the staging of esophageal cancer should be encouraged. However, EUS should not be considered as first line test for evaluation of these patients and should always be performed after negative CT or PET/CT.

Biopsy, Needle↗