PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Culley Carson

Publications and source records attributed to Culley Carson.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Sexual dysfunction and cardiac risk (the Second Princeton Consensus Conference).

Recent studies have highlighted the relation between erectile dysfunction (ED) and cardiovascular disease. In particular, the role of endothelial dysfunction and nitric oxide in ED and atherosclerotic disease has been elucidated. Given the large number of men receiving medical treatment for ED, concerns regarding the risk for sexual activity triggering acute cardiovascular events and potential risks of adverse or unanticipated drug interactions need to be addressed. A risk stratification algorithm was developed by the First Princeton Consensus Panel to evaluate the degree of cardiovascular risk associated with sexual activity for men with varying degrees of cardiovascular disease. Patients were assigned to 3 categories: low, intermediate (including those requiring further evaluation), and high risk. This consensus study from the Second Princeton Consensus Conference corroborates and clarifies the algorithm and emphasizes the importance of risk factor evaluation and management for all patients with ED. The panel reviewed recent safety and drug interaction data for 3 phosphodiesterase (PDE)-5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil), with emphasis on the safety of these agents in men with ED and concomitant cardiovascular disease. Increasing evidence supports the role of lifestyle intervention in ED, specifically weight loss and increased physical activity, particularly in patients with ED and concomitant cardiovascular disease. Special management recommendations for patients taking PDE-5 inhibitors who present at the emergency department and other emergency medical situations are described. Finally, further research on the role of PDE-5 inhibition in treating patients with other medical or cardiovascular disorders is recommended.

Age Distribution↗

Efficacy, safety, and treatment satisfaction of tadalafil versus placebo in patients with erectile dysfunction evaluated at tertiary-care academic centers.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy, safety, and treatment satisfaction of tadalafil 20 mg for erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients evaluated at tertiary-care academic centers. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients were randomly allocated to receive fixed-dose tadalafil 20 mg (n = 146) or placebo (n = 49) for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP), and Global Assessment Question (GAQ); patient and partner treatment satisfaction by the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) and SEP; and safety by adverse events, laboratory values, and vital signs. RESULTS: Mean baseline IIEF erectile function (EF) domain was 12.98. Fifty-one percent of enrolled patients had severe baseline ED, and 82% had organic ED. Pre-existing, ED-associated comorbid conditions were common. When compared with patients treated with placebo, those receiving tadalafil reported significant improvement from baseline in the IIEF EF domain (P <0.001), successful penetration attempts (SEP question 2; P <0.001), successful intercourse (SEP question 3; P <0.001), and all secondary efficacy outcomes (P <0.001). Patients and their sexual partners were also significantly more satisfied with tadalafil treatment (P <0.001), including overall satisfaction (P <0.001) and length of time the treatment worked (P <0.001). Mild or moderate headache, dyspepsia, and myalgia were the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil significantly improved erectile function and patient and partner satisfaction and was well tolerated. These results were observed in a tertiary-care, academic center population with a high incidence of severe, organic ED, and comorbid medical conditions, factors known to compromise erectile function and treatment outcome.

Aged↗

Efficacy of extended-release doxazosin and doxazosin standard in patients with concomitant benign prostatic hyperplasia and sexual dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To report a comprehensive retrospective analysis of the favourable effects of doxazosin extended-release (XL) and doxazosin standard on the sexual health of patients with comorbid benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and erectile dysfunction (ED), augmenting a previous study of 680 patients with symptomatic BPH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with BPH and aged 50-80 years participated in a randomized, double- blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicentre trial, completing a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period before receiving doxazosin XL 4 or 8 mg once daily or doxazosin standard 1-8 mg once daily for 13 weeks. Baseline sexual function and changes from baseline after treatment with doxazosin were evaluated from responses of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire (with dysfunction defined as a score of < or = 3 for any question) and the five domains for erectile function (intercourse satisfaction, orgasmic function, sexual desire and overall sexual satisfaction). RESULTS: Of 680 patients randomized into the trial, 237 (35%) had ED at baseline; in these patients there were statistically and clinically significant improvements in each of the five IIEF domains with XL and standard doxazosin (P < or = 0.0019), with the range of improvement being from 13% to 41%. There were no significant differences between treatment groups. Doxazosin XL consistently improved sexual function, as assessed by the individual questions of the IIEF questionnaire. There was no statistically significant difference between groups for any sexual function question analysed. CONCLUSION: Doxazosin XL and standard improved sexual function in men with concomitant BPH and ED at baseline. This may represent an action independent of relieving lower urinary tract symptoms, because the beneficial effect of doxazosin was reported in patients with no symptomatic BPH.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗

Erection quality scale: initial scale development and validation.

OBJECTIVES: The Erection Quality Scale (EQS) is a new, self-report measure for assessing the quality of penile erections. It is intended to complement existing diagnostic and outcome measures (eg, International Index of Erectile Function, Sexual Encounter Profile) in both clinical practice and outcomes research in erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: The initial phases of development and psychometric validation of the EQS are described. Specifically, qualitative research in patients and healthy men was used to generate relevant constructs. On the basis of the findings from these phases, and recommendations from an expert panel, seven constructs were selected for inclusion. Multiple items with different formats were drafted to measure each of the key constructs. An iterative process of cognitive testing, item revision, and item reduction was used to identify the 15 most appropriate items and their optimal response scales. This version of the scale was tested in a 200-subject discriminant validity study designed to gather data for a psychometric evaluation. Participants were classified into ED-untreated, ED-treated, and healthy control groups to evaluate the discriminant validity of the measure in men with different levels of erectile function. RESULTS: The study results supported a robust single-factor structure, indicating that the EQS provides an overall index of erection quality. An intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 denotes adequate test-retest reliability. Furthermore, the EQS correlated well with existing measures and differentiated patients from the three ED classifications, a preliminary indication of discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings presented provide evidence of the scale's potential utility for measuring erection quality in future studies.

Adult↗

Role of fluoroquinolones in the treatment of serious bacterial urinary tract infections.

Serious urinary tract infections (UTIs) in adults--defined as acute complicated UTIs or pyelonephritis requiring initial intravenous antimicrobials and/or hospitalisation and nosocomial infections--cause significant morbidity and economic burden. In the US, UTIs are responsible for nearly 7 million outpatient physician office visits, 1 million emergency room visits and over 100 000 hospital admissions annually. Complicated UTIs often affect patients with underlying functional, metabolic or anatomical defects of the urinary tract, whereas most nosocomial UTIs (~80%) are related to short- or long-term catheterisation. Serious UTIs are often difficult to treat because infection involves a diverse array of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, coupled with increasing antimicrobial resistance in some uropathogens, and a higher rate of recurrent infections. Although Escherichia coli remains a common aetiology (< or =60%), other Enterobacteriaceae, Gram-negative bacilli (e.g. Pseudomonas aeruginosa), and Gram-positive bacteria (e.g. Staphylococcus aureus) are frequently isolated. Patients with long-term catheterisation have UTIs typically caused by organisms that produce biofilms making eradication even more difficult. Overall, aetiology and resistance patterns are not predictable for those with serious UTIs, necessitating confirmation by culture and susceptibility testing.Numerous intravenous and oral antimicrobial treatment options are available and the majority of patients with serious UTIs will need initial intravenous therapy because of the possibility of bacteraemia/sepsis or impaired gastrointestinal absorption. Many experts concur that empirical therapy for the institutionalised or hospitalised patient with a serious UTI should include an intravenous antipseudomonal agent because of an increased risk of urosepsis. While state-of-the-art treatment guidelines are lacking for these infections, targeted therapy should be initiated once susceptibility data are known. The use of targeted therapy--emphasising the "correct antibacterial spectrum" and pharmacodynamic superiority--is likely to provide important benefits (e.g. reduced morbidity and associated costs, reduced emergence of resistance). Agents commonly prescribed include aminoglycosides, beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, imipenem, advanced-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. Fluoroquinolones are often recommended when conventional agents have failed or are less desirable (e.g. toxicity/hypersensitivity concerns), or when resistance is high. Several pivotal clinical trials support the use of fluoroquinolones for serious UTIs with most experience garnered with ciprofloxacin, including a new once-daily extended-release tablet formulation.Treatment of patients with serious UTIs remains challenging. Physicians should choose empirical therapy based on patient demographics/medical history, presumed aetiology and local resistance patterns until more definitive guidelines become available.

Acute Disease↗

The role of dihydrotestosterone in benign prostatic hyperplasia.

This article examines the role of the androgen dihydrotestosterone (DHT) in the healthy and diseased prostate and considers the implications of the data on DHT for therapeutic approaches to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Development and maintenance of the normal prostate, as well as development of BPH, depend on a functional androgen-signaling axis, components of which include: (1) testosterone synthesis in the testes and adrenal glands; (2) conversion of testosterone to DHT; (3) transport of DHT to target tissues; and (4) binding of DHT to the androgen receptor with consequent modulation of genes. DHT plays a beneficial role in the developing prostate but it can be detrimental in the adult prostate in that it causes pathologic prostate growth. The role of DHT in other adult tissues is uncertain. DHT has not been shown to perform beneficial functions unique from testosterone in the adult male, and it is believed that its fundamental effect is to amplify testosterone's weaker hormonal signal. Increased understanding of the cellular mechanisms by which the androgen-signaling axis functions has led to advances in treatment for prostate disease. In BPH, the 5alpha-reductase inhibitors--the only class of therapy to act at the pathophysiologic substrate of the disease--arrest the disease process, reduce prostate volume, improve symptoms, and reduce the risk of acute urinary retention and BPH-related surgery. The availability of dutasteride, the first dual (Type 1/Type 2) 5alpha-reductase inhibitor, offers the opportunity for rapid and consistent inhibition of DHT.

3-Oxo-5-alpha-Steroid 4-Dehydrogenase↗