PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D A Hanley

Publications and source records attributed to D A Hanley.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Could a policy of provision of hip protectors to elderly nursing home residents result in cost savings in acute hip fracture care? The case of Ontario, Canada.

UNLABELLED: Hip fractures are an important problem in nursing homes. Hip protectors are external devices that decrease the risk of hip fracture in elderly nursing home residents. We estimated the overall healthcare cost savings from a hypothetical strategy of provision of hip protectors to elderly nursing home residents in Ontario, Canada. In a recent meta-analysis, we determined that a strategy of provision of hip protectors decreases the risk of hip fracture in nursing home residents. INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to determine whether the provision of hip protectors to all Ontario nursing home residents aged > or =65 years could result in cost savings, stemming from reductions in initial hospitalizations for hip fracture. METHODS: We conducted a cost analysis from a Ministry of Health perspective (one year cycle length). The efficacy of the intervention was estimated from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: A strategy of provision of hip protectors to all 60,775 elderly Ontario nursing home residents could result in an overall mean cost savings of 6.0 million Canadian dollars in one year (95% credibility interval, -26.4 million, 39.7 million), with a probability of cost savings of 0.63 (assuming no additional labor costs). In sensitivity analyses, decreasing hip protector price increased cost savings, whereas additional labor expenditures for application for hip protectors decreased cost savings. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, if hip protectors can be provided to elderly Ontario nursing home residents without additional labor expenditures, there is a reasonable probability that such a strategy may result in healthcare cost savings.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Persistence, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness of an intervention to improve the quality of osteoporosis care after a fracture of the wrist: results of a controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Older patients with fragility fractures are not commonly tested or treated for osteoporosis. Compared to usual care, a previously reported intervention led to 30% absolute increases in osteoporosis treatment within 6 months of wrist fracture. Our objective was to examine longer-term outcomes, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness of this intervention. METHODS: We conducted an extended analysis of a non-randomized controlled trial with blinded ascertainment of outcomes that compared a multifaceted intervention to usual care controls. Patients >50 years with a wrist fracture treated in two Emergency Departments in the province of Alberta, Canada were included; those already treated for osteoporosis were excluded. Overall, 102 patients participated in this study (55 intervention and 47 controls; median age: 66 years; 78% were women). The interventions consisted of faxed physician reminders that contained osteoporosis treatment guidelines endorsed by opinion leaders and patient counseling. Controls received usual care; at 6-months post-fracture, when the original trial was completed, all controls were crossed-over to intervention. The main outcomes were rates of osteoporosis testing and treatment within 6 months (original study) and 1 year (delayed intervention) of fracture, and 1-year persistence with treatments started. From the perspective of the healthcare payer, the cost-effectiveness (using a Markov decision-analytic model) of the intervention was compared with usual care over a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: Overall, 40% of the intervention patients (vs. 10% of the controls) started treatment within 6 months post-fracture, and 82% (95%CI: 67-96%) had persisted with it at 1-year post-fracture. Delaying the intervention to controls for 6 months still led to equivalent rates of bone mineral density (BMD) testing (64 vs. 60% in the original study; p = 0.72) and osteoporosis treatment (43 vs. 40%; p = 0.77) as previously reported. Compared with usual care, the intervention strategy was dominant - per patient, it led to a $13 Canadian (U.S. $9) cost savings and a gain of 0.012 quality-adjusted life years. Base-case results were most sensitive to assumptions about treatment cost; for example, a 50% increase in the price of osteoporosis medication led to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $24,250 Canadian (U.S. $17,218) per quality-adjusted life year gained. CONCLUSIONS: A pragmatic intervention directed at patients and physicians led to substantial improvements in osteoporosis treatment, even when delivered 6-months post-fracture. From the healthcare payer's perspective, the intervention appears to have led to both cost-savings and gains in life expectancy.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Prevalence of and factors associated with glucosamine use in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: Glucosamine is commonly used for the treatment of osteoarthritis, and its use is increasing in the general population. The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) provided an opportunity to examine the prevalence of glucosamine use across age and gender groups, and to assess the factors associated with its use. METHOD: CaMos is a random, population-based sample of 9423 Canadians. Baseline assessments took place in 1996-1997 and the 5-year follow-up assessments in 2001-2002. The primary outcome of this analysis was glucosamine use at year 5. Prevalence estimates were age- and sex-standardized to the Canadian population. A number of factors potentially associated with glucosamine use were identified from the literature. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with glucosamine use. RESULTS: At 5 years, complete data were available for 7652 of the original 9423 participants (81.2%). For men, glucosamine use increased from 0.9% to 4.7% (weighted values), and for women, it increased from 1.3% to 8.2%. Glucosamine use was higher among older participants, those living in western Canada, and those with arthritis, back pain, higher calcium intake from supplements, physical activity and prior glucosamine use. CONCLUSIONS: Glucosamine use increased substantially over 5 years, and its use is associated with a number of factors. Some may use glucosamine to manage pain and symptoms of arthritis and back pain, while others use it as a preventive measure to maintain health.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Health-related quality of life measurements in elderly Canadians with osteoporosis compared to other chronic medical conditions: a population-based study from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

The objective of this research was to determine the relative decrement in health-related quality of life, as measured by the health utilities index mark 3 (HUI3), in osteoporosis compared to other chronic medical conditions. The impact of chronic medical conditions other than osteoporosis on HUI3 measurements had been previously established in the 1996/1997 Canadian National Population Health Survey (NPHS). The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) is a national population-based study in which regional participants were randomly recruited, regardless of presence of osteoporosis. We analyzed data from participants aged > or = 65 years who completed a baseline HUI3 questionnaire and provided information on their medical history (n=3,750). We determined the age- and gender-adjusted mean decrement in HUI3 for several chronic medical conditions, including osteoporosis. The mean changes in HUI3 adjusted for age and gender (with 95% confidence intervals) were as follows: arthritis -0.10 (-0.11, -0.09), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) -0.07 (-0.09, -0.05), diabetes mellitus -0.05 (-0.08, -0.03), heart disease -0.06 (-0.08, -0.04), hypertension -0.02 (-0.03, -0.01), and osteoporosis -0.08 (-0.11, -0.06), respectively (model r2=0.17; P<0.0001). These findings were comparable to those observed in the NPHS, with the exception of osteoporosis, which had not been previously studied in this fashion. The decrement in HUI3 score seen in participants with osteoporosis was comparable to that observed in other chronic medical conditions, such as arthritis, COPD, diabetes mellitus or heart disease.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Effectiveness of alendronate and etidronate in the treatment of osteoporosis in men: a prospective observational study.

The prevalence of osteoporosis in men is higher than previously assumed; consequently, numerous therapies are being investigated to treat these patients. The Canadian Database of Osteoporosis and Osteopenia patients (CANDOO) was analyzed to examine changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in consecutively seen osteoporotic men administered alendronate, etidronate or no bone-active drugs (control) over 1 year. A total of 244 men attending six Canadian osteoporosis clinics were included in the study (42 alendronate, 102 etidronate and 100 control). Multiple imputation was used to model missing data to provide a more robust statistical model. The imputed datasets (five) were analyzed using multivariable linear regression to determine differences between groups in the percent change of lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD from baseline to 1 year. Differences in the percent change in BMD from baseline were most notable at the LS in favor of alendronate (4.3%; 95% CI: 2.1, 6.6 ) and etidronate (2.1%; 95% CI: 0.3, 4.0) therapy when compared with controls. At the LS, alendronate therapy led to significantly greater (2.2%; 95% CI: 0.2, 4.2) gains in BMD as compared to etidronate therapy. Compared to controls, there were no significant differences in FN BMD with alendronate (2.1%; 95% CI: -0.4, 4.7) or etidronate therapy (0.9%; 95% CI: -1.1, 2.8), nor were there significant differences between bisphosphonate groups (1.3%; 95% CI: -1.1, 3.6, in favor of alendronate). While both alendronate and etidronate significantly increased LS BMD in osteoporotic men after 1 year in real-world settings, alendronate therapy resulted in significantly superior gains in LS BMD. The effect of these two bisphosphonates on fractures and FN BMD in osteoporotic men is likely positive, but requires further study.

Alendronate↗
PubMed2005

Bisphosphonates reduce bone mineral loss at ligament entheses after joint injury.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency, and subsequent bisphosphonate (BP) antiresorptive therapy, on the bone mineral interface at the enthesis of remaining ligamentous restraints. METHODS: We measured bone mineral geometry (and subsequent adaptation) at the medial collateral ligament (MCL) origin, using micro-computed tomography (muCT). Groups of normal control, 6 and 14 wk anterior cruciate ligament transected (ACLX), and 6 wk ACLX-BP (risedronate) dosed rabbits were evaluated. Samples were then processed histologically, and the results of mineral adaptation and progression of osteoarthritis (OA) compared to joint laxity values obtained from previous biomechanical testing of the MCL-complex. RESULTS: muCT defined the MCL origin as a symmetrical, metaphyseal depression that contained soft-tissue elements, including fibrocartilage and ligament--as seen in subsequent histological sections. In contrast, the insertions from ACLX animals lost significant bone mineral, with an MCL-insertion volume 1.2 times that of normal controls at 6 wk ACLX, which further increased to 2.3 times that of normal controls at 14 wk ACLX. Significant differences were also measured between 6 and 14 wk ACLX and age-matched normal controls in volume of cortical bone containing the MCL insertion. However, there were no significant differences in the percentage of cortical bone to underlying trabecular bone at the MCL insertion. When comparing muCT mineral adaptation at the MCL-enthesis with historical MCL-complex laxity data, the values for laxity after ACLX increased proportionately as bone mineral at the insertion was lost, and subsequent use of the BP risedronate reduced both mineral loss and MCL-complex laxity. CONCLUSION: Compared to the untreated ACLX condition, administering bisphosphonate immediately after loss of the ACL conserved bone mineral at the MCL enthesis, suggesting the potential to therapeutically influence joint-complex laxity and OA progression.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Accuracy of height loss during prospective monitoring for detection of incident vertebral fractures.

Vertebral fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture, but more than two-thirds remain undetected. We have examined the relationship between height loss and the development of new vertebral fractures to determine whether there is a height loss threshold that has useful clinical accuracy to detect new fractures. We studied 985 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in the placebo arms of the Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy studies. Height was measured annually for 3 years using a wall-mounted stadiometer. New fractures were determined using quantitative and semi-quantitative radiographic morphometry. The relationship between height loss over three years and the number of new vertebral fractures was: height loss (cm) = 0.95 x number of new vertebral fractures-0.4 cm (r = 0.33). The odds ratio for the development of a new fracture increased up to 20.6 (95% confidence interval, 9.3, 45.8) when height loss was greater than 4.0 cm. At a threshold of > 2.0 cm height loss over 3 years, sensitivity was 35.5% for detecting new vertebral fractures and specificity was 93.6%. These findings show that there is a strong relationship between the amount of height loss and the risk of a new vertebral fracture. While there is no cut-off that can reliably rule in a new fracture, height loss of < or = 2.0 cm over 1-3 years has acceptable accuracy for ruling out an incident fracture.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Antiresorptive therapy conserves some periarticular bone and ligament mechanical properties after anterior cruciate ligament disruption in the rabbit knee.

The purpose of this study was to assess, in an osteoarthritic (OA) model, whether bisphosphonate (BP) antiresorptive therapy altered periarticular bone and bone-ligament biomechanics and OA progression. We surgically transected the anterior cruciate ligament (ACLX) in two groups of rabbits; the first group was dosed with BP (risedronate, 0.01 mg/kg s.c. daily for 6 wk), the second group remained untreated, and a third group of normal (unoperated) control rabbits was also evaluated. We measured distal femoral bone mineral density (BMD, Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry [DEXA]), medial collateral ligament (MCL) laxity, and bone mechanical function (bone cores mechanically tested in compression). These measures were related to cartilage/joint gross morphology, histology, and measures of vascular volume (gelatin-dye perfusion) for evidence of inflammatory angiogenesis and early OA. BMD by DEXA in 6 wk ACLX animals was 18% less than normal controls (p<0.05). In contrast, BP dosing conserved periarticular BMD; risedronate-treated rabbits had distal femoral BMD only 5% less and not significantly different than normal controls. When the same bone cores were compressed to failure, both ACLX and BP-dosed animals were significantly weaker than normal controls (p<0.05). However, the bone energy to failure and elastic modulus of BP-dosed animals was conserved and not significantly different from normal controls 6 wk after ACLX. Blocking bone resorption with BP also resulted in a significantly improved bone-ligament structural complex. MCL-complex laxity was significantly less in BP-dosed animals (1.2 times that of normal controls) compared to untreated ACLX animals (1.7 times that of normal controls; p<0.05). Blocking bone resorption with risedronate did not suppress osteophytosis and inflammatory angiogenesis, which were significantly increased in the periarticular bone of both untreated and BP treated ACLX animals. Thus, administering BP immediately after ACL loss conserved some periarticular bone and MCL-complex properties in an early OA model.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Two-year efficacy and tolerability of risedronate once a week for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and tolerability of risedronate once-a-week dosing (35 and 50mg) were compared with risedronate daily dosing (5mg) in a 2-year study in women with osteoporosis. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, active-control study with lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) as the primary efficacy endpoint at 1 year. Subjects were women aged 50 years or older, postmenopausal for at least 5 years, and had either a BMD T-score of -2.5 or lower (lumbar spine or total proximal femur) or a T-score lower than -2 and at least one prevalent vertebral fracture. In addition to risedronate treatment, the subjects received 1000 mg daily of elemental calcium supplementation and received vitamin D if the baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) level was low. RESULTS: The results after 1 year of treatment were previously published. Of the 1456 women who were randomized and received study medication, 1127 (77%) completed the 2-year study. Over the 2 years of treatment, the incidence of both new vertebral fractures (2.9, 1.5, and 1.7% for the 5, 35, and 50 mg groups, respectively; for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who p = 0.298) and osteoporosis-related non-vertebral fractures reported as adverse events (5.0, 4.9, and 4.5% for the 5, 35, and 50 mg groups, respectively; p = 0.918) was similar for all 3 treatment groups. The reduction from baseline at Month 24 in bone turnover markers was similar based on an analysis of variance for the 5 mg daily and the 35 mg once-a-week groups. The mean percentage change in lumbar spine BMD after 24 months was 5.17, 4.74, and 5.47% for the 5, 35, and 50 mg groups, respectively. Both the 35 and 50 mg once-a-week treatment groups met the pre-specified criterion of non-inferiority to the 5 mg daily treatment group. No apparent difference in the pattern or distribution of serious and upper gastrointestinal adverse events was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year data agree with the 1-year results demonstrating that the risedronate once-a-week doses are comparable in efficacy and safety to the 5 mg daily dose. Risedronate 35 mg once a week is considered the optimal dose want a once-a-week dosing regimen.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

The association between osteoporotic fractures and health-related quality of life as measured by the Health Utilities Index in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Osteoporotic fractures can be a major cause of morbidity. It is important to determine the impact of fractures on health-related quality of life (HRQL). A total of 3,394 women and 1,122 men 50 years of age and older, who were recruited for the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos), participated in this cross-sectional study. Minimal trauma fractures of the hip, pelvis, spine, lower body (included upper and lower leg, knee, ankle, and foot), upper body (included arm, elbow, sternum, shoulder, and clavicle), wrist and hand (included forearm, hand, and finger), and ribs were studied. Participants with subclinical vertebral deformities were also examined. The Health Utilities Index Mark II and III Systems were used to assess HRQL. Past osteoporotic fractures varied in prevalence from 1.2% (pelvis) to 27.8% (lower body) in women and 0.3% (pelvis) to 29.3% (wrist) in men. Multivariate linear regression analyses [parameter estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI)] indicated that minimal trauma fractures were negatively associated with HRQL and that this relationship depends on fracture type and gender. The multi-attribute scores for the Mark II system were negatively related to hip (-0.05; 95% CI: -0.09, -0.01), lower body (-0.02; 95% CI: -0.03, -0.000), and subclinical vertebral fractures (-0.02; 95% CI: -0.03, -0.00) for women. The multi-attribute scores for the Mark III system were negatively related to hip (-0.09; 95% CI: -0.14, -0.03) and rib fractures (-0.06; 95% CI: -0.11, -0.00) for women, and rib fractures (-0.06; 95% CI: -0.12, -0.00) for men. In conclusion, this study demonstrates a negative association between osteoporotic fractures and quality of life in both women and men.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Associations among disease conditions, bone mineral density, and prevalent vertebral deformities in men and women 50 years of age and older: cross-sectional results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.

This cross-sectional cohort study of 5566 women and 2187 men 50 years of age and older in the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study was conducted to determine whether reported past diseases are associated with bone mineral density or prevalent vertebral deformities. We examined 12 self-reported disease conditions including diabetes mellitus (types 1 or 2), nephrolithiasis, hypertension, heart attack, rheumatoid arthritis, thyroid disease, breast cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, neuromuscular disease, Paget's disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine whether there were associations among these disease conditions and bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter, as well as prevalent vertebral deformities. Bone mineral density measurements were higher in women and men with type 2 diabetes compared with those without after appropriate adjustments. The differences were most notable at the lumbar spine (+0.053 g/cm2), femoral neck (+0.028 g/cm2), and trochanter (+0.025 g/cm2) in women, and at the femoral neck (+0.025 g/cm2) in men. Hypertension was also associated with higher bone mineral density measurements for both women and men. The differences were most pronounced at the lumbar spine (+0.022 g/cm2) and femoral neck (+0.007 g/cm2) in women and at the lumbar spine (+0.028 g/cm2) in men. Although results were statistically inconclusive, men reporting versus not reporting past nephrolithiasis appeared to have clinically relevant lower bone mineral density values. Bone mineral density differences were -0.022, -0.015, and -0.016 g/cm2 at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter, respectively. Disease conditions were not strongly associated with vertebral deformities. In summary, these cross-sectional population-based data show that type 2 diabetes and hypertension are associated with higher bone mineral density in women and men, and nephrolithiasis may be associated with lower bone mineral density in men. The importance of these associations for osteoporosis case finding and management require further and prospective studies.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

The association between iliocostal distance and the number of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in women and men registered in the Canadian Database For Osteoporosis and Osteopenia (CANDOO).

BACKGROUND: The identification of new methods of evaluating patients with osteoporotic fracture should focus on their usefulness in clinical situations such that they are easily measured and applicable to all patients. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the association between iliocostal distance and vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in patients seen in a clinical setting. METHODS: Patient data were obtained from the Canadian Database of Osteoporosis and Osteopenia (CANDOO). A total of 549 patients including 508 women and 41 men participated in this cross-sectional study. There were 142 women and 18 men with prevalent vertebral fractures, and 185 women and 21 men with prevalent non-vertebral fractures. RESULTS: In women multivariable regression analysis showed that iliocostal distance was negatively associated with the number of vertebral fractures (-0.18, CI: -0.27, -0.09; adjusted for bone mineral density at the Ward's triangle, epilepsy, cerebrovascular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, etidronate use, and calcium supplement use) and for the number of non-vertebral fractures (-0.09, CI: -0.15, -0.03; adjusted for bone mineral density at the trochanter, cerebrovascular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and etidronate use). However, in men, multivariable regression analysis did not demonstrate a significant association between iliocostal distance and the number of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. CONCLUSIONS: The examination of iliocostal distance may be a useful clinical tool for assessment of the possibility of vertebral fractures. The identification of high-risk patients is important to effectively use the growing number of available osteoporosis therapies.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2001

Oral contraceptive use and bone mineral density in premenopausal women: cross-sectional, population-based data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.

BACKGROUND: Positive and negative effects on bone mineral density (BMD) have been described as a result of the premenopausal use of oral contraceptives (OCs); increased fracture rates have also been reported. This study assessed the relation between OC use and BMD in a population-based, 9-centre, national sample of women aged 25-45 years. METHODS: Premenopausal women who had been enrolled in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study were classified as having ever been OC users (> or = 3 months) or as having never been OC users (0 to < 3 months). Data were obtained through extensive questionnaires and measuring of participants' weight, height and the BMD of lumbar vertebrae and the proximal femur. RESULTS: Of the sample of 524 women, whose mean age was 36.3 (standard deviation [SD] 5.9) years, 454 had used OCs; their mean age when they started using OCs was 19.8 (SD 3.5) years and the mean duration of use was 6.8 (SD 4.8) years. Women who had ever and those who had never used OCs showed no differences in age, age at menarche, parity, current calcium intake, exercise, body mass index (BMI), education, past irregular cycles or amenorrhea. OC users reported more alcohol and cigarette use and more use of medications to create regular cycles. Mean BMD values (adjusted for age, BMI and height) were 0.02-0.04 g/cm2 (that is, 2.3%-3.7%) lower in OC users, and were significantly lower in the spine and trochanter. The BMD of the spine in OC users was 1.03 (SD 0.12) g/cm2 versus 1.07 (SD 0.12) g/cm2 (95% confidence interval [CI] of difference -0.07 to -0.001) in those who had never used OCs. BMD was neither related to the duration of OC use nor to gynecological age at first use. Current and past users had similar BMD values. INTERPRETATION: National, population-based data show lower BMD values for the trochanter and spine in premenopausal women who have used OCs compared with those who have never used OCs.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed2001

Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture.

CONTEXT: Vertebral fractures significantly increase lifetime risk of future fractures, but risk of further vertebral fractures in the period immediately following a vertebral fracture has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of further vertebral fracture in the year following a vertebral fracture. DESIGN AND SETTING: Analysis of data from 4 large 3-year osteoporosis treatment trials conducted at 373 study centers in North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand from November 1993 to April 1998. SUBJECTS: Postmenopausal women who had been randomized to a placebo group and for whom vertebral fracture status was known at entry (n = 2725). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Occurrence of radiographically identified vertebral fracture during the year following an incident vertebral fracture. RESULTS: Subjects were a mean age of 74 years and had a mean of 28 years since menopause. The cumulative incidence of new vertebral fractures in the first year was 6.6%. Presence of 1 or more vertebral fractures at baseline increased risk of sustaining a vertebral fracture by 5-fold during the initial year of the study compared with the incidence in subjects without prevalent vertebral fractures at baseline (relative risk [RR], 5.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-8.4; P<.001). Among the 381 participants who developed an incident vertebral fracture, the incidence of a new vertebral fracture in the subsequent year was 19.2% (95% CI, 13.6%-24.8%). This risk was also increased in the presence of prevalent vertebral fractures (RR, 9.3; 95% CI, 1.2-71.6; P =.03). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that women who develop a vertebral fracture are at substantial risk for additional fracture within the next year.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

The influence of osteoporotic fractures on health-related quality of life in community-dwelling men and women across Canada.

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) was examined in relation to prevalent fractures in 4816 community-dwelling Canadian men and women 50 years and older participating in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Fractures were of three categories: clinically recognized main fractures, subclinical vertebral fractures and fractures at other sites. Main fractures were divided and analyzed at the hip, spine, wrist/forearm, pelvis and rib sites. Baseline assessments of anthropometric data, medical history, therapeutic drug use, spinal radiographs and prevalent fractures were obtained from all participants. The SF-36 instrument was used as a tool to measure HRQL. A total of 652 (13.5%) main fractures were reported. Results indicated that hip, spine, wrist/forearm, pelvis and rib fractures had occurred in 78 (1.6%), 40 (0.8%), 390 (8.1%), 19 (0.4%) and 125 (2.6%) individuals, respectively (subjects may have had more than one main fracture). Subjects who had experienced a main prevalent fracture had lower HRQL scores compared with non-fractured participants. The largest differences were observed in the physical functioning (-4.0; 95% confidence intervals (CI): -6.0, -2.0) and role-physical functioning domains (-5.8; 95% CI: -9.5, -2.2). In women, the physical functioning domain was most influenced by hip (-14.9%; 95% CI: -20.9, -9.0) and pelvis (-18.1; 95% CI: -27.6, -8.6) fractures. In men, the role-physical domain was most affected by hip fractures (-35.7; 95% CI: -60.4, -11.1). Subjects who experienced subclinical vertebral fractures had lower HRQL scores than those without prevalent fractures. In conclusion, HRQL was lower in the physical functioning domain in women and the role-physical domain in men who sustained main fractures at the hip. Subclinical vertebral fractures exerted a moderate effect on HRQL.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Prevalence of IgA-antiendomysial antibody in asymptomatic low bone mineral density.

OBJECTIVE: Celiac disease (CD) is a relatively common gastrointestinal disorder that can be asymptomatic. However, even among asymptomatic patients a long-term reduction in bone mineral density (BMD) is found. Excellent noninvasive screening tests for CD are now available. Studies using older screening techniques have suggested a 10-fold increased prevalence of CD among patients with low BMD, but this has not been confirmed with current testing methodology. We set out to confirm these prevalence estimates using antiendomysial antibody testing. METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients referred to our outpatient endocrinology clinic for evaluation of idiopathic low BMD were studied. In addition to the routine evaluation, patients completed a symptom questionnaire and underwent serological testing for the presence of the IgA antiendomysial antibody (EMA). All patients with a positive EMA underwent small bowel biopsy and permeability studies. RESULTS: EMA results were available on 96 patients; 78/96 patients were female and the mean age was 57 yr (range 18-86 yr). Seven of 96 (7.3% [95% CI 2.1-12.5%]) were EMA-positive, but all tests were low titer (< or = 1:20). However, none of the biopsies showed any histopathological features of CD, nor did EMA status correlate with any of the clinical or laboratory features assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high rate of weakly positive antibody tests, our data do not support an increased prevalence of CD among asymptomatic patients referred for evaluation of low BMD. Without an increase over the background prevalence, the high cost of EMA testing argues against routine use of this test for screening of this population.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed2001

Positive effect of etidronate therapy is maintained after drug is terminated in patients using corticosteroids.

Following a 52-wk randomized controlled trial of intermittent cyclic etidronate therapy in patients using corticosteroids, we performed a 52-wk open-label trial of calcium alone in 114 corticosteroid-treated patients to determine whether the beneficial effect of etidronate is maintained after the drug is discontinued. All patients were given 500 mg/d of elemental calcium. Sixty-one and 53 patients made up the former placebo and etidronate groups, respectively. A total of 89 (98%) of patients in the former placebo and etidronate groups remained on corticosteroids throughout the second year. The mean (SE) percentage change in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter were compared between groups. The difference between groups in mean percentage change from baseline (wk 0, initiation of etidronate or placebo therapy) in the bone density of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter, following 104 wk, was 3.8 (0.9), 3.0 (1.1), and 4.3 (1.1), respectively (p < 0.05, all sites), in favor of the former etidronate group. While not significant, the former placebo group demonstrated a slightly larger rate of decline in bone density over the second year than the former etidronate group at all three sites. Following the discontinuation of etidronate therapy, there was no accelerated bone loss and there was evidence of a residual protective effect in both the lumbar spine and femoral neck for up to 1 yr posttreatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group.

BACKGROUND: The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36) is a widely used measure of health-related quality of life. Normative data are the key to determining whether a group or an individual scores above or below the average for their country, age or sex. Published norms for the SF-36 exist for other countries but have not been previously published for Canada. METHODS: The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study is a prospective cohort study involving 9423 randomly selected Canadian men and women aged 25 years or more living in the community. The sample was drawn within a 50-km radius of 9 Canadian cities, and the information collected included the SF-36 as a measure of health-related quality of life. This provided a unique opportunity to develop age- and sex-adjusted normative data for the Canadian population. RESULTS: Canadian men scored substantially higher than women on all 8 domains and the 2 summary component scales of the SF-36. Canadians scored higher than their US counterparts on all SF-36 domains and both summary component scales and scored higher than their UK counterparts on 4 domains, although many of the differences are not large. INTERPRETATION: The differences in the SF-36 scores between age groups, sexes and countries confirm that these Canadian norms are necessary for comparative purposes. The data will be useful for assessing the health status of the general population and of patient populations, and the effect of interventions on health-related quality of life.

Activities of Daily Living↗