PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D A Kuban

Publications and source records attributed to D A Kuban.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Overexpression of p53 in prostate carcinoma is associated with improved overall survival but not predictive of response to radiotherapy.

p53 gene mutations are among the most common specific genetic alterations in human cancer. Inactivation of p53 and subsequent protein accumulation has been implicated in a variety of human malignancies and associated with prostate cancer progression. In this study, we assessed p53 protein overexpression and gene mutations in prostate carcinoma and investigated associations between p53 alterations and clinicopathological parameters, survival, and response to radiotherapy. We evaluated 58 archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded prostate carcinomas to detect abnormal p53 nuclear protein accumulation using immunohistochemistry. p53 mutational status of tumor DNA was evaluated using polymerase chain reaction-single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis of exons 5-9 and confirmed by direct DNA sequencing. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis was used to determine the association of p53 status with clinical characteristics and response to radiotherapy. Overexpression of p53 was detected in 42 (72%) of 58 primary prostate carcinomas, but was undetectable in 7 samples of benign prostatic hyperplasias or 5 samples of normal prostate tissue. p53 exon 5-9 mutations were detected in 8 (14%) of 58 patient specimens. p53 mutational status, but not overexpression, was associated with higher Gleason scores (p=0.0145). Neither p53 overexpression nor mutation was associated with clinical stage, biochemical disease-free probability, or predictive of response to radiotherapy. p53 protein accumulation was inversely associated with improved overall survival (p=0.0108). Our studies demonstrate that p53 protein accumulation is a frequent alteration in prostate cancer. The disparity between p53 protein overexpression and p53 exon 5-9 mutations suggests the possibility of mutations outside this region or stabilization of wild-type p53 by alternative mechanisms. In our patient population, p53 protein overexpression or mutational status was not predictive of outcome in patients treated with radiation therapy. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate the association between p53 protein overexpression and improved overall survival.

Adolescent↗

Radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: a multi-institutional pooled analysis.

CONTEXT: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) evaluation leads to the early detection of both prostate cancer and recurrences following primary treatment. Prostate-specific antigen outcome information on patients 5 or more years following treatment is limited and available mainly as single-institution reports. OBJECTIVES: To assess the likelihood and durability of tumor control using PSA evaluation 5 or more years after radical external beam radiation therapy and to identify pretreatment prognostic factors in men with early prostate cancer treated since 1988, the PSA era. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective, nonrandomized, multi-institutional pooled analysis of patients treated with external beam radiation therapy alone between 1988 and 1995 at 6 US medical centers. Follow-up lasted up to a maximum of 9 years. Outcome data were analyzed using Cox regression and recursive partitioning techniques. PATIENTS: A total of 1765 men with stage T1b, T1c, and T2 tumors treated between 1988 and 1995 with external beam radiation. The majority (58%) of patients were older than 70 years and 24.2% had initial PSA values of 20 ng/mL or higher. A minimum of 2 years of subsequent follow-up was required for participation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Actuarial estimates of freedom from biochemical failure. RESULTS: The 5-year estimates of overall survival, disease-specific survival, and the freedom from biochemical failure are 85.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.5%-87.6%), 95.1% (95% CI, 94.0%-96.2%), and 65.8% (95% CI, 62.8%-68.0%), respectively. The PSA failure-free rates 5 and 7 years after treatment for patients presenting with a PSA of less than 10 ng/mL were 77.8% (95% CI, 74.5%-81.3%), and 72.9% (95% CI, 67.9%-78.2%). Recursive partitioning analysis of initial PSA level, palpation stage, and the Gleason score groupings yielded 4 separate prognostic groups: group 1, included patients with a PSA level of less than 9.2 ng/mL; group 2, PSA level of at least 9.2 but less than 19.7 ng/mL; group 3, PSA level at least 19.7 ng/mL and a Gleason score of 2 to 6; and group 4, PSA level of at least 19.7 ng/mL and a Gleason score of 7 to 10. The estimated rates of survival free of biochemical failure at 5 years are 81 % for group 1, 69% for group 2, 47% for group 3, and 29% for group 4. Of the 302 patients followed up beyond 5 years who were free of biochemical disease, 5.0% relapsed from the fifth to the eighth year. CONCLUSIONS: Estimated PSA control rates in this pooled analysis are similar to those of single institutions. These rates indicate the probability of success for subsets of patients with tumors of several prognostic category groupings. These results represent a multi-institutional benchmark for evidence-based counseling of prostate cancer patients about radiation treatment.

Aged↗

PSA for outcome prediction and posttreatment evaluation following radiation for prostate cancer: do we know how to use it?

Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been shown to be a powerful predictor of expected outcome after radiation for prostate cancer. Additional measures such as recursive partitioning analysis and PSA Cancer Volume calculations are further refining this useful tool to provide the greatest degree of prognostic information. The post-treatment PSA level is also being used as a means to assess therapeutic efficacy rapidly and objectively. Although no single PSA value has been shown to equate to long-term clinical tumor control consistently, consensus has been reached regarding the value of a rising PSA level as an early surrogate for tumor recurrence. Since the first introduction of PSA as a tumor marker, we have become much more comfortable with what it means, the ways it can help us, and how to use it.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

Prostate-specific antigen after radiation therapy. Prognosis by pretreatment level and post-treatment nadir.

After external beam radiation therapy, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most powerful predictor of outcome as measured PSA (biochemical) failure. The post-treatment nadir levels of PSA that predict best for subsequent freedom from PSA failure are debatable, and many nadir levels have been proposed as targets. Although lower nadirs generally are associated with superior outcomes, the identification of a single absolute nadir level was not selected at a recent ASTRO consensus conference. Rather, three consecutive PSA rises above the nadir, with date of failure at the midpoint between the nadir and first rise, were selected as a more useful end point for treatment failure.

Aged↗

High dose rate vaginal brachytherapy in early stage endometrial carcinoma: preliminary analysis.

From 1987 to 1993, 69 women diagnosed with FIGO stages I and II carcinoma of the endometrium underwent postoperative adjuvant irradiation (RT) under protocol with high dose rate (HDR) afterloading vaginal apex brachytherapy. All patients initially underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy. Forty-four women received HDR brachytherapy alone and 25 received external beam RT as well as HDR brachytherapy. The median follow-up was 45 months. The 5-year disease-free survival was 92% and the overall survival rate was 79%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that grade, age, and stage were significant predictors of survival. The overall acute and late side effects were minimal. It appears that HDR vaginal brachytherapy is prevention of vaginal recurrence in endometrial carcinoma and should be considered an effective treatment option.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Prostate-specific antigen for pretreatment prediction and posttreatment evaluation of outcome after definitive irradiation for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the predictive value of pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and the difference between clinical and PSA disease-free status in patients with long-term follow-up after irradiation for prostatic carcinoma. Comparison of the distribution of prognostic factors between surgical and radiation series was also made. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1975-1989, 652 patients with clinical Stage A2-C prostatic adenocarcinoma were definitively irradiated using external beam therapy. One hundred and fifty patients with banked serum and up to 14 years follow-up have pretreatment PSA levels and 355 patients with up to 17 years follow-up have posttreatment values. Treatment failure was analyzed by tumor stage, grade, and four pretreatment PSA categories. Disease-progression was evaluated by clinical and biochemical (PSA) endpoints. Prognostic factors were compared to two surgical series. RESULTS: A significant difference was seen in clinical and PSA disease-free (PSA < or = 4.0 ng/ml) status based on tumor grade, stage, and pretreatment PSA category. Although the expected clinical outcome has been well-documented previously, results based on posttreatment PSA levels show 5-year disease-free survivals reduced by 10-16% and 10-year survivals lessened by 15-39% depending upon the particular tumor grade and stage. The earlier stage, lower grade tumors showed the largest difference between clinical and biochemical recurrence rates at the longest interval from treatment. Even more notable were the differences in the clinical and PSA disease-free rates based on the pretreatment PSA level. Comparing the irradiated patients to two surgical series showed that the former had a larger percentage of more advanced stage tumors with more unfavorable PSA levels as compared to prostatectomy patients. CONCLUSION: With long-term follow-up, the pretreatment PSA level continues to be a powerful predictor of clinical and biochemical outcome in patients irradiated for apparently localized prostate cancer. Differences between clinical and PSA outcome can be considerable, but oftentimes clinically insignificant. The distribution of prognostic factors between radiation and prostatectomy series seems to favor the latter.

Aged↗

Potential benefit of improved local tumor control in patients with prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In the case of prostate carcinoma, radiation therapy is a locally applied treatment modality in a malignancy known for systemic dissemination. Because significant efforts and resources currently are being consumed to improve local tumor control, failure patterns and potential curative gain deserve appropriate assessment. METHODS: From 1975-1989, 647 patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma were definitively irradiated for biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Failure patterns were examined, and survival advantage based on improvement in either local or distant disease control was calculated. Distant metastatic rate and cause-specific survival analyses were used as parameters by which to compare the outcome for patients in whom local tumor control was achieved with patients who experienced local failure, thereby assessing further the importance of the effectiveness of locally applied therapy. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-two (61%) patients at the time of this writing were clinically disease free. Sixty-two (10%) patients failed locally only, 133 (20%) distantly only, and 60 (9%) developed local and distant recurrent disease. Both local and distant failure rates were higher in patients with more advanced stage lesions at presentation, and distant failure rates significantly increased in patients with less differentiated tumors. Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen was found to be useful in predicting recurrence patterns. Overall, there appeared to be more potential for improvement in survival secondary to reducing distant metastasis. The distant survival advantage (DSA) of reducing distant metastases, compared with the local survival advantage (LSA) of improving local tumor control, was 26 versus 14%. Although DSA was greater than LSA within each stage category, the potential to improve survival was most significant in the Stage C group, where DSA was 35% and LSA 16%. Although LSA varied little according to tumor grade, DSA was dependent on tumor grade and varied from 13% for well differentiated lesions to 38% for poorly differentiated lesions. Distant failure free survival at 10 years was 63% for patients with local control and 45% for those with local failure (P = 0.01). Similarly, 10-year cause-specific survival was 75% in locally controlled patients compared with 48% for those with local recurrence (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although better local tumor control should translate into at least modest survival gain for patients with prostate carcinoma, additional advantage may be seen with improved systemic therapy or perhaps earlier diagnosis to reduce further the distant metastasis rate.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Carcinoma of the prostate: race as a prognostic indicator in definitive radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To characterize the racial differences in prognostic factors and treatment outcome for patients undergoing radiation therapy for carcinoma of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1975 through December 1989, 489 white and 157 black men with carcinoma of the prostate underwent irradiation. Factors analyzed were patient age, tumor stage and grade, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, and disease-control and survival rates. RESULTS: More black patients than white patients were found to have poorly differentiated tumors. Black patients had higher PSA levels before and after treatment, resulting in a higher distant failure rate and poorer overall, cause-specific, and disease-free survival rates. CONCLUSION: Black men have more aggressive prostatic tumors, a higher rate of metastasis, and a poorer survival rate than do white men.

Aged↗

Flow cytometric DNA content and clinical outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer given postoperative radiation therapy.

DNA content by flow cytometry was assessed in 47 cases from a series of 130 patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) given radiation therapy postoperatively. This was done in an attempt to identify which patients might benefit, or not benefit, from postoperative radiotherapy. From archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens, 16 of the 47 cases (34%) had DNA diploid tumors while 31 cases (66%) were nondiploid. A diploid DNA content was significantly related to improved overall survival (P = 0.0061) and tumor-free survival (P = 0.0167) but not with frequency of tumor recurrence within the irradiated field. Histological grade was not significantly related to overall survival, tumor-free survival, or frequency of in-field tumor recurrence. DNA content was found in this study of NSCLC patients irradiated postoperatively to be a useful marker for predicting survival but not for predicting local recurrence.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Treatment of clinical local failure after radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma.

From a base population of 634 patients with prostate cancer treated by external beam therapy with a median followup of 8 years and 123 patients treated by interstitial brachytherapy with 125iodine (125I) isotope with a median followup of 13 years, those with local failure only were identified. There were 57 external beam radiotherapy (9%) and 15 125I (12%) treated patients with local failure only among the base population. All but 3 patients (2 given external beam radiotherapy and 1 given 125I) were treated with hormonal manipulation without extirpative surgery. The overall cancer-specific median survival with hormonal therapy from the date of local failure was 70 months for 55 patients treated by external beam radiotherapy and 87 months for 14 treated by 125I. Patients with low grade, small volume tumors most likely to benefit from salvage surgery are also those who will experience prolonged survival with hormonal therapy. Patients with local failure only treated by hormonal manipulation had statistically longer cancer-specific survival rates from the date of failure than did similarly treated patients experiencing distant failure with local failure. This finding suggests a difference in the biological aggressiveness between tumors associated with distant and local failure versus local failure only. To select the patients with local failure only who would be candidates for the potentially benefited by salvage surgery, those with pretreatment stage A or B disease who were less than 72 years old were identified. A total of 17 patients treated by external beam radiotherapy and 7 treated by 125I fulfilled these criteria. Therefore, as determined by local failure only, patient age and pre-radiation clinical stage, only 2 to 5% of the patients treated with radiation modalities are ultimately optimal candidates for salvage surgery.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Prognostic significance of post-irradiation prostate biopsies.

Over the last 2 decades, the prognostic significance of post-irradiation prostate biopsy has been debated. Studies with long-term follow-up have shown a predictive effect with regard to local tumor failure and disease-free survival. More recently collected data involve the use of prostate ultrasound and prostate-specific antigen; the latter appears to be a good prognostic indicator on its own. Currently, the practical usefulness of post-treatment biopsy for clinically undetectable disease remains undefined, since definitive therapy for positive findings cannot be widely applied, carries significant morbidity, and, as yet, is of questionable benefit. Further study is certainly necessary, and it is perhaps under these conditions that this post-therapy procedure should be used.

Biopsy↗

Brain metastases from transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder.

Of 293 patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder seen at our institution between April 1977 and December 1987, 9 patients were found to have brain metastasis. Seven of 9 patients were found to have a solitary brain lesion, and in 4 of these, no other site of metastatic disease was identified. Five patients received palliative whole brain irradiation, 3,000 cGy in 10 fractions, due to the presence of multiple lesions of the central nervous system (CNS) or metastases to other sites. The average survival for this group was seven weeks. One patient with a solitary brain metastasis and no other documented metastatic site was hospitalized at another institution, and was managed expectantly receiving only parenteral steroid therapy and survived four weeks. Three patients with solitary lesions and no evidence of other metastatic sites were treated with a combined surgical and radiotherapeutic approach receiving 4,000-5,000 cGy to the lesion site postoperatively. The average survival of that group was twenty-nine months, with one five-year survivor and 1 patient with no evidence of disease fourteen months after treatment. It appears that survival is longer in those patients with solitary lesions, perhaps due, at least in part, to a more aggressive therapeutic approach.

Aged↗

The significance of post-irradiation prostate biopsy with long-term follow-up.

Ninety-four patients, Stage A2-C, definitively irradiated for adenocarcinoma of the prostate from 1975 to 1981 underwent digitally directed transperineal needle biopsy of a clinically negative prostate gland at least 18 months post-therapy. Ten of 55 patients (18%) treated with Iodine-125 implantation and 7 of 39 patients (18%) externally irradiated were found to have positive biopsy specimens. Overall, clinical local failure occurred in 53% of patients with positive biopsy results but in only 18% with negative specimens, p = .006. The false negative biopsy rate in patients treated with I-125 was nearly three times that for external beam, 24% versus 9%, perhaps because of the greater possibility of inhomogeneous dose distribution with I-125, allowing for a higher degree of sampling error. Actuarial local failure at 5 years was 44% versus 8% with positive and negative biopsies, respectively, and 75% versus 24% at 10 years (p = .0001). The distant metastatic rate was twice as high in biopsy-positive as compared to biopsy-negative patients, 71% versus 35%, p = .015. Actuarially, only 19% of patients with a positive biopsy are NED at 10 years as compared to 62% of those with a negative biopsy (p = .0001). PSA values are supportive in those patients thought to be disease-free. The incidence of positive biopsy and associated local recurrence are in keeping with clinical treatment failure rates as reported in multiple studies to date.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Nuclear roundness factor and local failure from definitive radiation therapy for prostatic carcinoma.

Of 375 patients with prostatic carcinoma treated definitively with radiation therapy at this institution with at least a 5 year follow-up, 23 patients failed locally only, 72 failed with distant metastasis only, 60 had both local and distant failure, while 220 showed no evidence of disease. In search for a possible marker for local failure following radiation therapy, we examined several nuclear morphometric parameters which have been shown to correlate with the biologic aggressiveness of this disease. The 23 locally failed only patients were matched with 23 no evidence of disease patients for stage, grade, treatment modality, prior surgery, age at diagnosis and race. Archival hematoxylin and eosin slides were obtained for 22 of the 23 matched pairs, and morphometric features, including nuclear roundness factor and nuclear area, as well as numbers of nucleoli were assessed using computer-assisted image analysis in both tumor cells and normal prostatic epithelium. Tumor nuclei from the locally failed only patients had significantly higher nuclear roundness factor values (p = 0.0089) compared with tumor cells from no evidence of disease patients. Analysis of these data by clinical stage demonstrated no significant differences between the locally failed only and no evidence of disease patients. Likewise, there were no significant differences in nuclear roundness factor values of locally failed only and no evidence of disease patients with poorly or moderately well-differentiated tumors. However, there was a highly significant difference (p = 0.0012) in the nuclear roundness factor values of locally failed only and no evidence of disease patients with well-differentiated tumors. Thus, there appears to be a subset of patients with well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the prostate who have significantly more irregular tumor nuclei and who fail locally only following definitive radiation therapy.

Aged↗

Hemibody irradiation in advanced prostatic carcinoma.

In summary, hemibody irradiation has developed as a safe, efficient technique for palliating multiple sites of symptomatic osseous metastases, which occur so often in advanced prostatic carcinoma. The rapidity, frequency, and duration of pain relief, as well as the convenience to the patient of a solitary treatment to multiple symptomatic areas simultaneously, make this type of treatment especially appealing. By following premedication and radiation dose guidelines, both acute and delayed side effects can be kept tolerable or at a minimal incidence. Although sequential hemibody radiation has also been explored as "systemic" therapy, the results in prostatic carcinoma have not proved dramatic, and complications have been considerable. Hormonal therapy would certainly seem to be less life-threatening and equally beneficial according to present data. As a palliative treatment, however, hemibody irradiation is a pragmatic option for relieving prostatic cancer pain.

Bone Neoplasms↗

Local failure after definitive radiation or surgical therapy for carcinoma of the prostate and options for prevention and therapy.

The incidence of local failure and its relation to distant failure following definitive therapy of carcinoma of the prostate is discussed. Local failure may arise from incomplete resection, tumor spillage, clones of radioresistant cells, development of new tumors in an organ left in situ, or inadequate treatment portals. The authors review the various measures used as prophylaxis or treatment of local failure in relation to clinical and pathologic stage.

Combined Modality Therapy↗