Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D B Forsyth.
Digital imaging has several potential advantages over traditional cephalometry. These include storage, transmission, and enhancement of images, reduced exposure to radiation for patients, and the possibility of automated cephalometric analysis. This paper outlines some of these advantages, discusses the limitations of digital imaging and suggests possible future developments.
The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic quality of conventional cephalometric radiographs with that of digital image counterparts. The random error associated with angular and linear measurements recorded on the digital images was greater than on the conventional radiographs. In addition, there was a systematic error producing statistically significant differences in the majority of angular and linear measurements between the digital images and the conventional radiographs. The errors that occurred with some measurements were of sufficient magnitude to be of clinical significance, particularly in a cephalometric situation where a high degree of accuracy is required. It is therefore suggested that, for digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, a pixel matrix larger than 512 x 512 with more than 64 gray levels is required to maintain the diagnostic quality of the original radiograph.
A system is described which automatically identifies cephalometric landmarks on digital cephalometric radiographs. The accuracy of the automated system in identifying nineteen cephalometric landmarks is assessed. The accuracy obtained with the automated system is less than that of manual tracing. The automated system has particular difficulty in identifying landmarks which lie on poorly defined structures where there is a poor signal to noise ratio.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.