PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D B Fry

Publications and source records attributed to D B Fry.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

On tune deafness (dysmelodia): frequency, development, genetics and musical background.

With the aid of the Distorted Tunes Test a group of British adults could be established whose melodic aptitude was below a certain level and whom we called tune deaf. They are only a fraction of those popularly called tone deaf. The Distorted Tunes Test is only slightly correlated with pitch discrimination, short term tonal memory or number memory. In children ability to pass the Distorted Tunes Test develops at greatly varying speeds and to a varying degree, reaching stability in adolescence. Tune deafness has a familial distribution and segregates in a way suggesting an autosomal dominant trait with imperfect penetrance. Some degree of positive assortative mating has been established. Some people, unfamiliar with the British melodies which form the basis of the test, pass it. This indicates the existence of a partly innate and partly acquired competence to judge what is acceptable and what is not, within the tradition of Western popular or classical music. This seems to indicate the existence of some deep structure of tonality, comparable with Chomsky's deep language structure. Asians who have not been much exposed to this kind of music find the task very difficult.

Adolescent↗

Simple reaction-times to speech and non-speech stimuli.

Two experiments were carried out involving the measurement of simple reaction-time when subjects responded to speech and to non-speech stimuli. In the first, subjects were required to make a speech response (uttering the vowel [a: ]) to one speech stimulus (the vowel [a: ]) and three non-speech stimuli (a complex tone, a telephone bell and a click). The click stimulus gave significantly longer reaction-times than the other three stimuli; since all stimuli were equated for peak intensity delivered to the subjects' ears, this was due to the short duration of the click (25 msec). There was no evidence that compatibility between the speech stimulus and the speech response had any influence on reaction-time. The second experiment employed a 2 X 2 design with 2 stimuli and 2 response modes. The stimuli were the vowel [a: ] and the telephone bell; the response modes were key-pressing and uttering the vowel [a: ]. The speech stimulus and the speech response gave significantly longer reaction-times than the non-speech simtulus and response. The minimum time for a reaction requiring speech reception is of the order of 180 msec. and the use of the motor speech mechanism adds about 30 msec. to reaction-time. Again no interaction was found between stimulus and response and this is probably due to the extremely simple nature of the speech tasks imposed.

Adolescent↗