PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Bakish

Publications and source records attributed to D Bakish.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Quantitative EEG correlates of panic disorder.

Quantitative analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals recorded from multiple scalp sites was used to compare panic disorder patients (n = 34) with normal healthy controls. Patients exhibited greater overall absolute power in the delta, theta, and alpha frequency bands and less relative power in the beta band. Discriminant analysis of absolute power indices correctly classified 75% of the subjects, while relative power indices exhibited a 69% correct-classification rate. Absolute delta and theta power were positively correlated with observer ratings of anxiety, while relative beta power was related to self-ratings of anxiety.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of fluvoxamine, imipramine, and placebo in the treatment of outpatients with panic disorder.

Fluvoxamine and imipramine were compared to placebo in an 8-week doubleblind randomized multicentre trial comprising of 148 outpatients between 19 and 57 years of age (mean: 35) with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of Panic Disorder. mean daily dose at endpoint was: fluvoxamine, 171.4 mg; imipramine 164.7 mg. The mean number of panic attacks per week at baseline were 10.9, 14.4 and 6.5 for fluvoxamine, imipramine and placebo, respectively. The intent-to-treat analysis of the change from baseline (difference score) of the number of panic attacks at endpoint revealed: a difference of 3.3 attacks (95% CI: -0.3, 6.8) between fluvoxamine and placebo and a difference of 6.0 attacks (95% CI: 1.5, 10.5) between imipramine and placebo. Treatment was stopped prematurely in 31 (62%) on fluvoxamine, 16 (33%) on imipramine and 29 (58%) on placebo. The number of patients withdrawing due to intolerance was 13 (26%) for fluvoxamine, 10 (21%) for imipramine and 4 (8%) for placebo. The number of patients withdrawing due to lack of efficacy was 10 (20%) for fluvoxamine, 4 (8%) for imipramine and 12 (24%) for placebo. Overall, this study demonstrated that fluvoxamine was not effective in the treatment of panic disorder but did show a strong effect for imipramine. A chance occurrence of significantly fewer number of panic attacks in the placebo group at baseline may limit the conclusions of this study.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial comparing fluvoxamine and imipramine in the treatment of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia.

This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of fluvoxamine, imipramine, and placebo in the treatment of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. Fifty-four outpatients participated in the randomized, double-blind trial as part of a multicenter trial. After meeting inclusion criteria and completing screening requirements (e.g., laboratory testing, electrocardiogram, physical examination), patients were entered in a single-blind placebo washout phase. They were then randomized to either fluvoxamine, imipramine, or placebo. Measurements completed at each visit included the number and severity of panic attacks per week, the Sheehan Panic and Anticipatory Anxiety Scale, and the Clinical Global Impressions, and others. Results show that fluvoxamine is more effective than placebo and as effective as imipramine in reducing spontaneous panic attacks in moderate to severe panic disorder. However, starting doses of fluvoxamine and imipramine should be low to minimize untoward side effects (such as insomnia and agitation) and maintain compliance.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Synthesis and characterization of an aryl-azidoparoxetine. A novel photo-affinity probe for serotonin-transporter.

Paroxetine is an effective antidepressant drug and potent serotonin (5-HT) uptake inhibitor. It selectively labels 5-HT transporter on platelets and neurons. We report here the synthesis of an aryl-azido derivative of paroxetine, which is a novel photoactive and irreversible ligand for the [3H]paroxetine binding site on the platelet 5-HT transporter. The compound inhibited [3H]paroxetine binding (IC50, 55 nM) and 5-HT uptake (IC50, 12 nM) at equilibrium conditions and inactivated 10-20% of [3H]paroxetine binding sites upon irradiation at 320 nm. SDS-PAGE of platelet protein extract labelled with the radioactive analogue of the synthesized probe revealed the presence of four radioactive bands of which the 71-kDa one was the most prominent.

Affinity Labels↗
PubMed1995

SSRIs in anxious-agitated depression: a post-hoc analysis of 279 patients.

A post-hoc analysis of nine controlled antidepressant trials examined the intensity of the initial anxiety and agitation of depressed patients improved by SSRIs compared with depressed patients improved by norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitors, mixed NE/serotonin reuptake inhibitors and placebo. We report that SSRI responders were more anxious-agitated than NE reuptake inhibitor responders, suggesting a preferential efficacy of SSRIs in agitated depression.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗
PubMed1995

Modelling the cost effectiveness of antidepressant treatment in primary care.

The aim of this study was to estimate the cost effectiveness of nefazodone compared with imipramine or fluoxetine in treating women with major depressive disorder. Clinical decision analysis and a Markov state-transition model were used to estimate the lifetime health outcomes and medical costs of 3 antidepressant treatments. The model, which represents ideal primary care practice, compares treatment with nefazodone to treatment with either imipramine or fluoxetine. The economic analysis was based on the healthcare system of the Canadian province of Ontario, and considered only direct medical costs. Health outcomes were expressed as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs were in 1993 Canadian dollars ($Can; $Can1 = $US0.75, September 1995). Incremental cost-utility ratios were calculated comparing the relative lifetime discounted medical costs and QALYs associated with nefazodone with those of imipramine or fluoxetine. Data for constructing the model and estimating necessary parameters were derived from the medical literature, clinical trial data, and physician judgement. Data included information on: Ontario primary care physicians' clinical management of major depression; medical resource use and costs; probabilities of recurrence of depression; suicide rates; compliance rates; and health utilities. Estimates of utilities for depression-related hypothetical health states were obtained from patients with major depression (n = 70). Medical costs and QALYs were discounted to present value using a 5% rate. Sensitivity analyses tested the assumptions of the model by varying the discount rate, depression recurrence rates, compliance rates, and the duration of the model. The base case analysis found that nefazodone treatment costs $Can1447 less per patient than imipramine treatment (discounted lifetime medical costs were $Can50,664 vs $Can52,111) and increases the number of QALYs by 0.72 (13.90 vs 13.18). Nefazodone treatment costs $Can14 less than fluoxetine treatment (estimated discounted lifetime medical costs were $Can50,664 vs $Can50,678) and produces slightly more QALYs (13.90 vs 13.79). In the sensitivity analyses, the cost-effectiveness ratios comparing nefazodone with imipramine ranged from cost saving to $Can17,326 per QALY gained. The cost-effectiveness ratios comparing nefazodone with fluoxetine ranged from cost saving to $Can7327 per QALY gained. The model was most sensitive to assumptions about treatment compliance rates and recurrence rates. The findings suggest that nefazodone may be a cost-effective treatment for major depression compared with imipramine or fluoxetine. The basic findings and conclusions do not change even after modifying model parameters within reasonable ranges.

Antidepressive Agents↗
PubMed1995

A comparison of placebo responders and nonresponders in subgroups of depressive disorder.

The objective of this study was to determine if the placebo treatment response varied in subgroups of depressed patients (single episode, recurrent, and double depression). Data from placebo-treated patients from seven placebo-controlled clinical trials were pooled and analyzed retrospectively. The placebo response rate was highest for females with a single episode of depression (66.7%) and lowest for females with recurrent depressive episodes (13.3%). Among patients experiencing their first episode, placebo responders had lower Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) total scores at baseline and lower ratings of pschomotor retardation than nonresponders. For patients having a recurrence of an episode, placebo responders had lower baseline ratings of somatic anxiety. The major finding was that patients suffering from their first depressive episode differed from patients with recurrent depressive episodes in the rate of placebo response, effect of gender, and the clinical symptoms that were associated with a positive placebo response.

Antidepressive Agents↗
PubMed1995

Serotonergic markers in platelets of patients with major depression: upregulation of 5-HT2 receptors.

The uptake of [3H]5-HT and the density (Bmax) as well as affinity (Kd) of 5-HT uptake sites labelled with [3H]paroxetine and of 5-HT2 receptors labelled by [3H]LSD were determined in platelets from 25 medication-free patients with major depression and 20 normal controls. The density (Bmax) of 5-HT2 receptors was found to be significantly increased (by 52%) in platelets from depressed patients, particularly females. No changes were found in the affinity (Kd) of 5-HT2 receptors and in 5-HT uptake or [3H]paroxetine binding parameters. Density of 5-HT2 receptors positively correlated with that of [3H]paroxetine sites in control but not in depressed subjects. No correlation was found between the HAMD scores and Bmax of [3H]LSD binding. The results suggest that upregulation of platelet 5-HT2 receptors is a useful biological marker in major depression, particularly in females.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

A Canadian multicentre placebo-controlled study of a fixed dose of brofaromine, a reversible selective MAO-A inhibitor, in the treatment of major depression.

In a 6-week double-blind study, 220 patients with major depression (mostly outpatients) were randomly assigned to receive a fixed dose of brofaromine 150 mg daily (n = 111) or placebo (n = 109) after a 1-week single-blind placebo washout. Except for the HAM-D sleep items, brofaromine was superior to placebo on measures of depression as determined by the four methods of assessing drug efficacy: (1) psychiatric symptom rating (HAM-D 17-item less the three sleep items); (2) self-rating scale (Beck Depression Inventory); (3) Clinical Global Assessment of Efficacy; and (4) drop-out rate due to lack of efficacy. Most commonly reported adverse events with brofaromine were: headache, nausea, dizziness and sleep disturbance. Brofaromine was found to be an effective antidepressant, superior to placebo with a good tolerability profile.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Brainstem evoked potentials in panic disorder.

Patient reports and laboratory tests support the notion that panic attacks are generated by stimulation of brainstem nuclei. Scalp-recorded brainstem auditory evoked potentials may serve as a unique measurement strategy for the noninvasive assessment of the role of brainstem functioning in panic disorder. Ipsilateral and contralateral BSAEP recordings were examined in response to separate left and right ear click stimulation in 28 patients with a diagnosis of panic disorder and in 18 normal controls. Latency measures did not differentiate between the patient and control groups but amplitudes of wave III and V were found to be larger in patients. These findings are discussed in relation to pathophysiological and neurochemical theories of panic and specific emphasis is placed on serotonergic function.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1994

Psychopharmacological treatment response of patients with a DSM-III diagnosis of dysthymic disorder.

In spite of its significant morbidity, dysthymic disorder has been under-researched, therefore effective treatment options are limited. This article presents data suggesting that dysthymia can be treated effectively with psychopharmacologic agents. A double-blind, placebo-controlled 7-week drug trial comparing imipramine to ritanserin, a serontonin-2 antagonist, indicated that both drugs were significantly more effective than placebo in alleviating dysthymia symptoms. Imipramine was slightly more effective than ritanserin, as indicated by ratings on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Zerssen Self-Rating Scale; however, imipramine also produced more side effects. On the basis of this study, we continued an open protocol for treating dysthymic patients with a specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine. This open-label study indicated that fluoxetine was successful in reducing the dysthymia symptoms, particularly in the subaffective sub-type. These studies confirm the need for further research into the treatment options for patients suffering from dysthymia.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Combined SSRI-moclobemide treatment of psychiatric illness.

BACKGROUND: To determine the efficacy and safety of a serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) combined with moclobemide in the treatment of 11 patients with various DSM-III-R diagnoses. METHOD: Subjects received moclobemide in doses of 150 to 800 mg/day together with sertraline (N = 5) in doses of 25 to 200 mg/day or fluvoxamine (N = 6) in doses of 50 to 200 mg/day. Patients were carefully monitored for side effects and for clinical response at the end of the trial, which lasted a minimum of 5 weeks. RESULTS: The combination was tolerated extremely well. Insomnia was the most common side effect, occurring in 5 of 11 subjects. A marked or complete therapeutic response was noted in 8 of 11 subjects. CONCLUSION: This open clinical trial suggests that combined SSRI-moclobemide treatment appears to be safe and well tolerated. It may also have therapeutic effects in treatment-refractory patients.

1-Naphthylamine↗
PubMed1993

Ritanserin, imipramine, and placebo in the treatment of dysthymic disorder.

Fifty outpatients with dysthymic disorder (DSM-III) were divided by double-blind randomized assignment into three groups given ritanserin, imipramine, and placebo, respectively. The trial was of 7 weeks' duration; by week 6, imipramine was clearly superior to placebo, whereas by week 7, both drugs caused significantly more improvement than the placebo. Although imipramine had slightly greater efficacy than ritanserin, it also had significantly more side effects. This was particularly evident in the higher dropout rate with imipramine. The efficacy and side effect profile of ritanserin makes it well tolerated and acceptable with dysthymic patients who, although they do not respond as quickly as patients with major depressive disorder, do show significant improvement, given sufficient time.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Brofaromine in depression: a Canadian multicenter placebo trial and a review of standard drug comparative studies.

Brofaromine is a new, reversible, and selective type-A monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) that also has serotonin reuptake inhibitory properties. Its dual pharmacologic effects offer promise in the treatment of a wide spectrum of depressed patients while producing less severe anticholinergic side effects in comparison with standard drugs. A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study including 220 patients was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brofaromine in major depression. This study of a fixed-dose design and 6 weeks' duration found that brofaromine was significantly better than placebo on the Overall Evaluation of Efficacy, Beck self-rating scale, HAM-D Bech subscale, HAM-D total 14 items (minus the three sleep items), HAM-D depressed mood item and retardation factor, and worse than placebo on the insomnia items of HAM-D. Significantly more patients on placebo than on brofaromine did not complete the trial due to lack of efficacy. In comparative controlled studies (n = 899), brofaromine was found to be at least as efficacious as tricyclic antidepressants (imipramine) and standard MAOIs (tranylcypromine and phenelzine). Reductions of at least 50% in the HAM-D total score were seen in 58-66% of patients treated with either brofaromine or imipramine (n = 609). Brofaromine also was found to be of comparable efficacy to tranylcypromine in two clinical trials (n = 132), one of which included patients considered to have a treatment-resistant depression (n = 39). In another double-blind study that compared brofaromine (150 mg/day) to phenelzine (45 mg/day) (n = 158), there was no difference between brofaromine and phenelzine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Reversible monoamine oxidase-A inhibitors in panic disorder.

Monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors are known to be effective in panic disorder, but a high incidence of adverse reactions have limited their use. The new, selective, and reversible MAO-A inhibitors exemplified by brofaromine and moclobemide do not require dietary restrictions, have fewer drug interactions, and are better tolerated. This paper reports a randomized, double-blind, 8-week trial in which the efficacy and safety of brofaromine was compared to clomipramine in patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. Both treatments achieved a significant and comparable reduction in the number of panic attacks, and were equally effective in all the parameters measured. Side effects were typical of the drug class. Further trials are required to evaluate this promising new treatment.

Agoraphobia↗