PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Belpomme

Publications and source records attributed to D Belpomme.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

[The contribution of the physico-chemical environment to the genesis of cancer: what extent and how to measure it?].

The growing incidence of cancers for the last 20 years in France and in Europe confronts scientists with the problem of their origin. Apart from standard factors such as addiction to smoking, alcoholism and overweight due to inadequate diets, the hypothesis that other environmental causes have recently appeared, is formulated. The author aims at reinforcing this hypothesis based on epidemiological, biological and toxicological arguments. Addiction to smoking and alcoholism have significantly decreased for the last 20 to 30 years and the incidence rise concerns cancers that are not related to these factors. Endogenous factors of genetic susceptibility can hardly have changed over one generation and actually can favour interaction with exogenous factors involving either our life style or the environment. The role of biological factors associated with ageing to explain the increase in cancer rate according to age is worth discussing. Many factors (radiation and chemical molecules) present in the environment, factors that international organizations have proven to be certainly, probably or possibly cancer-inducing, are considered. Some acting as mutagenic, others as promoters can add their cancer-inducing effects to smoking or other factors associated with our lifestyle. However, with the exception of smoking, most of the factors associated with our lifestyle are not mutagenic, an observation which leads to consider mutagenic factors from the environment, because any cancer implies the occurrence of mutations at its initiation step. The magnitude of the risk related to environmental factors is not yet known, therefore implying the need for new research aiming at assessing them accurately. Although, as far as public health is concerned, fighting addiction to smoking, alcoholism and unhealthy eating habits needs to be pursued, evidence regarding these new environmental factors of physico-chemical nature poses the problem of their prevention.

Chemical Phenomena↗

Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase II study.

OBJECTIVE: This phase II study was performed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Chemonaive patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed FIGO stage III or IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma were enrolled. Patients received cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on Day 1 and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on Days 1 (after cisplatin) and 8 of a 21-day cycle. RESULTS: Of the 42 female patients (median age 60 years) enrolled, 81% had a Zubrod performance status of 0 or 1. Among the 37 response-evaluable patients, there were 5 (13.5%) pathological complete responses (CRs), 16 (43.2%) pathological partial responses (PRs), and 3 (8.1%) clinical PRs, for an overall response rate of 64.9% (95% CI: 47.4-79.8%) and a pathological response rate of 56.8%. Per an intent-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was 57.1% (95% CI: 41.0-72.3%). After a median follow-up time of 15.8 months, the median survival was 24.0 months and median progression-free survival was 13.4 months. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 69.0 and 33.3% of patients, respectively, with no febrile neutropenia or hemorrhage. Grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting occurred in 35.7% and grade 3 alopecia in 21.4% of the patients. One patient died due to a toxicity-related death (dyspnea). CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin is active and feasible as first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Further clinical trials adding gemcitabine to first-line treatment seem warranted.

Adult↗

Result of two randomized trials comparing nolatrexed (Thymitaq) versus methotrexate in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer.

We report on two randomized trials performed in the USA and Europe, which compared methotrexate and nolatrexed as treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck cancer. Eligibility criteria included: histologically confirmed squamous-cell carcinoma, measurable disease, adequate hematological, renal and hepatic functions, failure of a first-line chemotherapy, and informed consent. Methotrexate 40 mg/m2 was weekly given by short infusion, and nolatrexed 725 mg/m2 per day was administered as a five-day continuous infusion, every three weeks. A total of 139 patients (63 in the USA. 76 in Europe) were randomized based on a ratio of 2/1: 93 and 46 received nolatrexed and methotrexate, respectively. Patient characteristics included 115 males and 24 females; median age 60 years. In the nolatrexed arm, the following grade 3-4 toxicities occurred: neutropenia (29.9%) with 3.1% of febrile neutropenia, mucositis (33.3%), and vomiting (10.3%). In the MTX arm, the grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (7.1%) and mucositis (6.9%). There was no difference in activity between the nolatrexed and the methotrexate treatment: 3.3% and 10.8% of objective responses, 1.9 versus 1.5 months of disease-free progression and 3.5 versus 3.7 months of overall survival, respectively. Nolatrexed has demonstrated a similar activity to methotrexate.

Adult↗

Verapamil increases the survival of patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Verapamil (VER), a potent calcium channel blocker, has been found to overcome P-gp-mediated multi-drug resistance (MDR) and to increase sensitivity to cytotoxic anticancer drugs in refractory myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The value of VER for treating solid tumors is still a matter for debate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study in 99 patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC), to assess the clinical effect of oral VER given in association with chemotherapy. Instead of retreating patients with anthracycline, we used a partially noncross-resistant regimen (VF), combining vindesine (VDS) and 5-fluorouracil given as a continuous infusion (5-FU CI). Patients were randomly assigned to two cohorts. One cohort (47 patients) was treated in 28-day cycles, each involving the administration of VDS (3 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on days 1 and 10) and 5-FU CI, (400 mg/m2/day i.v. from day 1 to day 10). The other cohort (52 patients) received the same VDS and 5-FU treatment and an additional oral VER treatment (240 mg/day divided in 2 doses), from day 1 to day 28 of each cycle. Patients were treated until progression. RESULTS: The treatment was well tolerated and no side effects that could be attributed to VER were detected. Patients treated with VER had longer overall survival (OS) (median OS: 323 vs. 209 days, P = 0.036) and a higher response rate (27% vs. 11%, P = 0.04) than those not given VER. Progression-free survival (PFS) was also longer but the difference was not statistically significant (median PFS: 4.6 and 2.7 months for the VER and non-VER groups respectively, P = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: This clinical trial demonstrates that a chemosensitizer, such as VER, can increase the survival of MBC patients with acquired anthracycline resistance.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

Adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil, and vincristine versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil: final report after a 16-year median follow-up duration.

PURPOSE: To determine the long-term impact on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy, when prospectively compared by random allocation with standard cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive (N+) breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-nine patients with N+ breast cancer, recruited from eight French cancer centers, were randomized to receive 12 monthly cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, either CMF (n = 112) or doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil (AVCF) (n = 136). All had a negative metastatic work-up before inclusion, which was stratified by accrual center, tumor stage (International Union Against Cancer [UICC]), and menopausal status. RESULTS: No severe adverse effect related to grade 4 (World Health Organization [WHO]) toxicity was observed. There was no difference in second primary tumor incidence between the two arms. The treatment given was 88% of planned for AVCF and 75% for CMF in both premenopausal and menopausal patients. With a median follow-up time of 16 years (range, 13 to 17), the OS and DFS rates are significantly longer in the AVCF arm (56% v 41% [P = .01] for OS, and 53% v 36% [P = .006] for DFS). These differences are significant, irrespective of tumor stage (T1 to T2 v T3 to T4), and remain positive in patients with or without postoperative locoregional radiotherapy (55% of cohort). When analyzed according to menopausal status, the differences remain significant only for premenopausal patients. CONCLUSION: This set of mature controlled data confirms the added value of anthracycline-based combination adjuvant therapy for N+ breast cancer patients when compared with CMF, with both regimens given for 1 year.

Adult↗

Amifostine pretreatment for protection against cyclophosphamide-induced and cisplatin-induced toxicities: results of a randomized control trial in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: Serious cumulative toxicity is a well-recognized consequence of chemotherapy. Amifostine, an organic thiophosphate, has demonstrated the ability to protect selectively a broad range of normal, but not neoplastic, tissues from the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This study was designed to determine if amifostine could reduce the serious toxicities associated with cyclophosphamide and cisplatin (CP), without reducing antitumor efficacy in patients with ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-two patients with advanced ovarian cancer were randomized to receive six cycles of cyclophosphamide (1,000 mg/m2) and cisplatin (100 mg/m2) with or without amifostine (910 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for six cycles. The occurrence of hematologic, renal, neurologic, and ototoxicity was evaluated. Antitumor efficacy was assessed by pathologic tumor response and survival. RESULTS: Pretreatment with amifostine before each cycle of chemotherapy resulted in a reduction of cumulative toxicities. Hematologic toxicity consisted of grade 4 neutropenia associated with fever and/or infection that required antibiotic therapy (P = .005), days in hospital (P = .019), and days on antibiotics (P = .031). Platinum-specific toxicities consisted of protracted serum creatinine elevations (P = 0.004), > or = 40% reduction from baseline in creatinine clearance (P = .001), and severity of neurologic toxicity (P = .029). Twenty-four percent of CP patients compared with 9% of amifostine plus CP patients discontinued therapy because of protocol-specified toxicity (P = .002). Pathologic tumor response rates were 37% with amifostine and 28% in controls, with comparable median survival times of 31 months. Amifostine was generally well tolerated; the principal side effects were emesis and a transient decrease in blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with amifostine reduces the cumulative hematologic, renal, and neurologic toxicities associated with the CP regimen, with no reduction in antitumor efficacy.

Adult↗

[Cancers of the base of the tongue and hypopharynx: results of a multicenter randomized trial of chemotherapy prior to locoregional treatment].

The authors report the results of a multicentric randomised trial assessing the effects on survival of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin (100 mg/m2, D1) and fluorouracil (1 g/m2, D2-4) delivered before regional treatment in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of hypopharynx and base of tongue. 133 patients were enrolled in the study, and 121 were included in the analysis, 64 in group A (regional treatment alone) and 27 in group B (chemotherapy followed by regional treatment). Despite a high objective response rate to chemotherapy (primary tumour: 85%, 24% complete; nodes: 63%), overall survival was not significantly higher in group B than in group A.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Adjuvant radiotherapy versus combined sequential chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in the treatment of resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. A randomized trial of 267 patients. GETCB (Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement des Cancers Bronchiques).

BACKGROUND: The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains an unresolved question. METHODS: From October, 1982, to November, 1986, 267 patients with resected NSCLC were included in a randomized trial. The adjuvant allocated treatments were either postoperative radiotherapy, 60 Gy in 6 weeks (radiotherapy group = 129 patients), or three courses of postoperative COPAC (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, cisplatin, vincristine, lomustine) chemotherapy followed by a similar radiotherapy schedule (chemotherapy/radiotherapy group = 138 patients). RESULTS: The sex ratio (M:F) was 19/1; mean age was 57 +/- 9 years. According to postoperative staging, 8 patients were Stage I, 70 were Stage II, and 189 were Stage III. The histologic type was squamous cell carcinoma in 175 patients, adenocarcinoma in 57, and large cell carcinoma in 35. The minimum follow-up was 6 years. Four patients were lost to follow-up. Death was recorded in 233 patients. No significant difference was observed in terms of disease free interval (P = 0.47, log-rank test), or overall survival (P = 0.68, log-rank test). With respect to the first site of relapse, distant metastasis occurred more frequently in the radiotherapy group (P = 0.09, log-rank test) whereas local relapse occurred similarly in both groups (P = 0.27). An interaction was observed between lymph node involvement and treatment in terms of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The COPAC chemotherapy as postoperative treatment failed to improve overall survival in patients with resected NSCLC receiving postoperative radiotherapy but decreased the pattern of metastatic progression, mainly in the N2 patients.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Selective induction of apoptosis in myeloid leukemic cell lines by monoacetone glucose-3 butyrate.

Butyric acid is a potent cell growth inhibitor and differentiation inducer. Our previous studies have shown that MAG=3but, a monosaccharide ester of butyric acid, used at 1 mM, induces apoptosis in the HL-60 cell line. We report here that this drug can also induce apoptosis in the U-937 leukemic cell lines whereas the myeloblastic KG1 and the NB4 promyelocytic leukemic cell lines were refractory to induction of apoptosis. In order to determine what can trigger cells to undergo apoptosis, cell cycle analysis, induction of differentiation and p53, c-myc and Bcl-2 expression was studied. Apoptosis was correlated to an arrest of cell growth in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and to an induction of differentiation through the monocytic pathway in HL-60 and U-937 cells. Time course studies demonstrated DNA fragmentation after few hours incubation with the drug, while morphological signs appeared later (days 2 or 3). Northern blot analysis and flow cytometric studies have shown that cell death induced by MAG=3but was not associated to an overexpression of c-myc and p53. However, in the HL-60 cells, BCL-2 protein expression was decreased after MAG=3but treatment, corroborating the apoptosis observed.

Apoptosis↗

Butyric acid and its monosaccharide ester induce apoptosis in the HL-60 cell line.

Butyric acid is a potent cell growth inhibitor and differentiation inducer (1-4). However, the short plasma half-life of this fatty acid limits its potential therapeutic use (5,6). The recent synthesis of several monosaccharide esters of butyric sodium salt (BuONa) with a prolonged plasma half-life and similar biological properties as the sodium salt opens new perspectives (7-12). We report here that the human myeloid HL-60 cell line can be induced to apoptosis when cultured with one of these esters, monoacetone glucose 3-butyrate (MAG = 3but) or BuONa. Cytospin slide preparations and flow cytometric studies showed that HL-60 cells treated with 1 mM MAG = 3but or BuONa exhibited a reduction in cell volume and condensation of nuclear structure characteristic of apoptosis, associated with monocytic differentiation. Time course studies demonstrated that DNA fragmentation, as determined by agarose gel electrophoresis, was detected 4 hours after incubation with the drugs, while morphologic signs appeared at day 3. Apoptotic cells increased with culture time and reached a maximum at day 6 of 20 +/- 5% with BuONa, 25 +/- 5% with MAG = 3but, and only 5 +/- 2% in controls. These findings suggest that these drugs may exert their actions, at least in part, through induction of apoptosis.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: 1993 consensus statements.

BACKGROUND: Over the last few days of a 5-day international workshop held in June 1993, a group of specialists in the field of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer tried to reach consensus on a number of issues with implications for standard practice and for research. METHODS: Five groups of experts considered several issues which included: biologic factors, prognostic factors, surgery, management recommendations, dose intensity, supportive care, drug resistance, second-line treatment, investigational drugs, and tumour markers. Discussing the management recommendations, the group attempted to arrive at answers to four questions: Is there in fact a cure rate for advanced ovarian carcinoma? Are there prognostic factors which help to identify patients who will not do well with current therapy? What is the current best therapy for advanced ovarian carcinoma? What directions should research take in advanced ovarian cancer? In a plenary meeting these issues were discussed. RESULTS: Consensus statements were achieved on all topics mentioned above. This article reports on the statements written by the chairmen and approved by the consensus group.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Advanced ovarian cancer. Carboplatin versus cisplatin.

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of the second generation platinum compound carboplatin, debate has taken place about whether this analogue can replace cisplatin in combination chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of ovarian cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present review the pharmacologic characteristics of carboplatin and cisplatin and the results of comparative studies are described. RESULTS: Many of the trials performed comparing carboplatin with cisplatin, either as single agent first-line therapy or in combination chemotherapy suggest equivalent results. However, most of these trials are characterized by an inadequate patient number to detect small but important differences, inadequate carboplatin doses, ratios < 4:1, and crossover to the other analogue which makes survival comparisons difficult. Superior results in terms of either progression-free survival or overall survival have been obtained with cisplatin in two larger randomized studies of combination chemotherapy. Furthermore, another randomized study indicates substantial differences in favour of cisplatin in the subgroup of patients with < 1 cm residual tumour. Generally, there is a lack of long-term follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the presently available data it is recommended that carboplatin should not routinely replace cisplatin in the management of patients with potentially curable small volume disease.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

300 mg/m2 carboplatin (Cb), adriamycin (A) cyclophosphamide (C) (CACb-300) combination in advanced ovarian carcinoma: a feasibility study.

Carboplatin (Cb) is an active drug in ovarian carcinoma that has fewer visceral side effects than cisplatin (CDDP) but higher myelotoxicity, which makes it difficult to combine at efficient doses with other myelotoxic drugs. In a preliminary study in advanced ovarian carcinoma, Rosso et al. showed the maximum tolerated dose of Cb given in combination with cyclophosphamide (C) and adriamycin (A) to be 200 mg/m2. Since the efficacy of Cb may be dose-dependent, as is that of CDDP, we started a feasibility study of a CACb-300 regimen, that is, using Cb at 300 mg/m2 with lower C and A doses. Our data shows that the CACb-300 combination can safely be given in previously untreated patients for at least six 28-day cycles.

Adenocarcinoma↗

[Response of bone metastases to medical treatment: definition of evaluation criteria and classification trials].

Bone metastases are very frequent. Some are sensitive to the action of anticancer drugs. However, there is as yet an unsolved methodological problem in the evaluation of response to these drugs. The uniquely radiological UICC criteria are quite insufficient, in as much as they appear with a long delay and sometimes give erroneous results. In this work we give a brief review of biological and clinical knowledge about bone metastases, and we attempt to give an array of the possible evaluation criteria and their respective value. We propose as a working hypothesis a classification of responses taking into account the criteria: the urinary hydroxyproline to urinary creatinine ratio, the serum dosage of bone isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase and propeptide of type III procollagen (P III NP), and as an essential element, an analysis of all available imaging techniques. A visual study of bone scintillation scans must precede that of radiographs and, when possible, it must be associated to computerized scintillation scanning. When metastasis are located to the pelvis, the vertebral column, or the sternum, a CT scan or better, a nuclear magnetic resonance study (IRM), is indispensable in order to have a direct measure of the tumor extension to soft tissues. Furthermore, in the case of isolated metastases, one of these imaging techniques allows a diagnostic biopsy. Finally an analysis of response at the bone level will always be associated with a measure of their duration and an evaluation of metastases to other sites.

Acid Phosphatase↗