PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Blumfield

Publications and source records attributed to D Blumfield.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Differential perceptions, behaviors, and motivations among African Americans, Latinos, and whites suspected of heart attacks in two hospital populations.

To evaluate the hypothesis that socioeconomic status would exert greater influence on patients' care-seeking behavior than racial/ethnic group status, we undertook a sequential study of African-American, Latino, and white patients hospitalized for acute chest pain from August 1988 through July 1990 at two sites. The study took place in an urban public medical center and an urban private health maintenance organization medical center, which provide care to mixed racial/ethnic groups of lower and middle socioeconomic status, respectively, in Los Angeles. Three concurrent case series of African-American, Latino, and white patients hospitalized for acute chest pain were recruited. The racial/ethnic distribution of the total group was African Americans, 448; Latinos, 487; and whites, 499. The main outcome measure was the length of time patients spent in deciding to seek emergency medical care for acute chest pain and the associated perceptions, behaviors, and motivations involved in deciding to seek care. For the total group, public hospital site and lack of health insurance were the strongest significant predictors of a longer decision phase, whereas differential symptom perceptions, consultation with medical professionals, and use of paramedic transport were significant predictors of shorter duration. Multiple regression results were similar in separate analyses demonstrated significant differences in patients' perceptions of symptom intensity and incapacitation within racial/ethnic groups related to socioeconomic status, as well as in specific behavior and motivation in seeking care. The study concluded that socioeconomic status as determined by hospital site exerted a stronger influence on patients' care-seeking behavior for acute chest pain than racial/ethnic status. Specific care-seeking behaviors of minority and lower-socioeconomic-status patients in the use of medications and paramedics in the face of acute symptoms should be targeted in future educational programs.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Acute chest pain in African Americans: factors in the delay in seeking emergency care.

OBJECTIVES: African Americans have been shown to have longer delay times than the majority population in seeking care for acute cardiac problems. The purpose of this study was to determine whether socioeconomic factors affect delay times. METHODS: Structured interviews were administered to 254 African Americans admitted to a public hospital and 194 African Americans admitted to a private hospital for suspected acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Patient characteristics found by multiple regression analysis to affect decision-making and travel time for care-seeking were structural access to care, persistence of symptoms, degree of incapacitation, consultation with a layperson, consultation with medical professionals, and mode of transportation. CONCLUSIONS: Within-group differences were found to be related to socioeconomic status. Strategies to increase knowledge about heart attack symptoms, improve access to care, and improve the socioeconomic status of at-risk African Americans are indicated.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1993

Rose Questionnaire responses among black, Latino, and white subjects in two socioeconomic strata.

We administered the Rose Questionnaire to 1442 black, white, and Latino patients (approximately equal numbers) who sought care for acute chest pain at two medical centers. Of these, 718 subjects were enrolled at a large public hospital serving a low-socioeconomic status population and 724 at a large health maintenance organization hospital serving a middle-class clientele. Using the standard definition of Rose angina, multivariate logistic regression analysis identified five factors that contributed to the relative risk of a positive response: family history of myocardial infarction (2.48), history of peripheral vascular disease (1.41), history of high blood pressure (1.29), history of high cholesterol (1.26), and low-socioeconomic status hospital (0.78). Inquiring about shortness of breath as a substitute for chest pain or an alternative complaint in set one of the Rose Questionnaire did not increase the number of positive responses or differentiate between the socioeconomic groups or race-ethnic subgroups. Having a prior history of self-reported risk factors clearly defined a group with greater likelihood of a positive response to the Rose Questionnaire. Receiving care at a large public hospital (ie, being in a low-socioeconomic status group) was associated with reduced likelihood of having "typical" angina in comparison to receiving care at a health maintenance organization (middle socioeconomic status) for white subjects but not for Latinos and blacks.

Black or African American↗
PubMed1993

Chest pain admissions: characteristics of black, Latino, and white patients in low- and mid-socioeconomic strata.

To assess the potential impact of socioeconomic status (SES) factors on health-care seeking behavior for suspected acute coronary artery disease symptoms, equal numbers of black, Latino, and white patients seeking care for chest pain at two large hospital emergency rooms were studied. Differences between low and middle SES groups with respect to pre-attack health, health history, ethnicity, gender, and modes of transportation to the hospital were explored. Highly significant self-reported differences between low SES and middle SES patients were found as follows: low SES subjects were more likely to describe themselves as being in fair to poor general health (68% versus 18%), had more frequent chest pain, reported other types of heart disease, were more often current smokers, more likely to be black or Latino, and to be younger. Members of the low SES group also were less [corrected] likely to have known cholesterol levels, to have used estrogen, to have had a prior ECG or cardiac surgery, to be nonsmokers, to have had a stress test, and to have typical angina. Middle SES subjects more often described typical angina, prior use of estrogen (females), congenital, rheumatic, or family history of heart disease, prior knowledge of high cholesterol, were more likely to be of the male gender, and to be older than the low SES cohort. The data reveal that low SES subjects, with markedly less health-care resources compared with middle SES subjects, have a worse general health and cardiac risk profile despite the fact that they were significantly younger (mean age 53.4 versus 60.7, P < .001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Black or African American↗
PubMed1990

Combined alpha/beta-blockade versus beta 1-selective blockade in essential hypertension in black and white patients.

The purpose of this multicenter investigation was to determine the efficacy and safety of the alpha/beta-blocker labetalol versus the beta 1-selective beta-blocker atenolol in white and black patients with essential hypertension. Equal numbers of black and white patients were enlisted to form four treatment groups (white patients taking either labetalol or atenolol and black patients taking either labetalol or atenolol). Two hundred ninety-two patients (152 white and 140 black patients) with essential hypertension characterized by a standing diastolic blood pressure of 105 to 119 mm Hg (inclusive) were recruited for this trial. Patients were randomized to either labetalol (dosage titrated from 200 to 1600 mg/day) or atenolol (dosage titrated from 50 to 100 mg/day). The therapeutic goal was achievement of a standing diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or less or a fall of 15 mm Hg in diastolic pressure from baseline value at the end of the placebo run in period. At the end of the study there were no significant differences in blood pressure or heart rate changes in the supine position between the labetalol and atenolol groups. In contrast, labetalol produced greater reduction in both the standing systolic and diastolic blood pressure (-12/-13 mm Hg, respectively) compared with atenolol (-7/-9 mm Hg; p less than 0.05; p less than 0.005, respectively). The greatest decrease in blood pressure was observed in white patients receiving labetalol. In black patients the decrease in blood pressure was greater in those treated with labetalol compared with atenolol, particularly with respect to the systolic blood pressure. We conclude that the alpha 1-blocking property of labetalol provides an additional lowering of the blood pressure over that seen with beta 1-blockade alone, especially in the standing position, and this enhanced efficacy is not confined to one radical group.

Atenolol↗