Biomedical subjects

D Boussaoud

Publications and source records attributed to D Boussaoud.

27 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1993

Primate frontal cortex: neuronal activity following attentional versus intentional cues.

We examined neuronal activity in three parts of the primate frontal cortex: the dorsal (PMd) and ventral (PMv) premotor cortex and a ventrolateral part of the dorsolateral prefrontal (PF) cortex. Two monkeys fixated a 0.2 degrees white square in the center of a video display while depressing a switch located between two touch pads. On each trial, a spatial-attentional/mnemonic (SAM) cue was presented first. The SAM cue consisted of one 2 degrees x 2 degrees square, usually red or green, and its location indicated where a conditional motor instruction would appear after a delay period. The stimulus event containing the motor instruction, termed the motor instructional/conditional (MIC) cue, could be of two general types. It might consist of a single 2 degrees x 2 degrees square stimulus identical to one of the SAM cues presented at the same location as the SAM cue on that trial. When the MIC cue was a single square, it instructed the monkey to move its forelimb to one of the two touch pads according to the following conditional rule: a green MIC cue meant that contact with the right touch pad would be rewarded on that trial and a red MIC cue instructed a movement to the left touch pad. Alternatively, the MIC cue might consist of two 2 degrees x 2 degrees squares, only one of which was at the SAM-cue location: in those cases, one square was red and the other was green. The colored square at the SAM cue location for that trial was the instructing stimulus, and the other part of the MIC cue was irrelevant. When, after a variable delay period, the MIC cue disappeared, the monkey had to touch the appropriate target within 1 s to receive a reward and could break visual fixation. The experimental design allowed comparison of frontal cortical activity when one stimulus, identical in retinocentric, craniocentric, and allocentric spatial location as well as all other stimulus parameters, had two different meanings for the animal's behavior. When a stimulus was the SAM cue, it led to either a reorientation of spatial attention to its location, or the storage of its location in spatial memory. By contrast, when it was the MIC cue, the same stimulus instructed a motor act to be executed after a delay period. For the majority of PMd neurons (55%), post-MIC cue activity exceeded post-SAM cue activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Primate frontal cortex: effects of stimulus and movement.

We compared neuronal activity in the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd), ventral premotor cortex (PMv), and prefrontal (PF) cortex of two rhesus monkeys. The behavioral design was a variant of the instructed delay task which established that: (1) a given visual stimulus could, on different trials, instruct different limb movements and (2) several different visual stimuli could instruct the same movement. Neurons in all frontal areas displayed the often replicated activity patterns that occur during instructed delay tasks, including phasic increases after instruction stimuli (signal-related activity), tonic discharge during an instructed delay period (set-related activity), and phasic premovement discharge (movement-related activity). For signal-, set-, and movement-related activity, the majority of neurons in PMd (51-64%), but only a minority in PF (16-18%) and PMv (32-40%), showed activity levels that significantly depended on the action instructed by that stimulus rather than simply the characteristics of the stimulus per se. Thus, most PMd activity, including the aspects that most resembled a sensory response, reflected factors in addition to the signal. Taken together with the results of related studies, it seems most likely that these other factors are dominated by the motor instructional significance of the stimulus. In addition, many neurons (17-37%) in all examined areas showed activity that significantly depended on which of various stimuli guided the same movement. This finding shows that, in those frontal areas, neuronal activity can be affected by both the action to be taken and the events guiding that action.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Primate premotor cortex: dissociation of visuomotor from sensory signals.

1. If we assume adequate control for attention, memory, and stimulus location, a bona fide sensory response would be unaffected by whether a visuospatial stimulus instructs (1) one limb movement versus another or (2) limb movement versus a shift in spatial attention or memory. Two behavioral methods tested whether apparently sensory responses in the monkey's premotor cortex are strictly that, or, alternatively, whether they reflect the action instructed by a stimulus. 2. When an identical stimulus leads to two different responses, phasic discharge after a visuospatial stimulus is significantly, often dramatically, affected by the response. Similarly, premotor cortex neurons discharge more after a stimulus instructs a limb movement than after the same stimulus instructs a shift in spatial attention or memory. Thus, for the majority of premotor cortex neurons, the hypothesis that phasic poststimulus activity modulation represents a sensory response can be rejected.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Visual topography of area TEO in the macaque.

Previous studies have mapped the visuotopic organization of visual areas from V1 through V4 in the occipital cortex and of area TE in the temporal cortex, but the cortex in between, at the occipito-temporal junction, has remained relatively unexplored. To determine the visuotopic organization of this region, receptive fields were mapped at 1,200 visually responsive sites on 370 penetrations in the ventral occipital and temporal cortex of five macaques. We identified a new visual area, roughly corresponding to cytoarchitectonic area TEO, located between the ventral portion of V4 and area TE. Receptive fields in TEO are intermediate in size between those in V4 and TE and have a coarse visuotopic organization. Collectively, receptive fields in TEO appear to cover nearly the entire contralateral visual field. The foveal and parafoveal representation of TEO is located laterally on the convexity of the inferior temporal gyrus, and the peripheral field is represented medially on the ventral surface of the hemisphere, within and medial to the occipitotemporal sulcus. Beyond the medial border of TEO, within cyteoarchitectonic area TF, is another visually responsive region, which we have termed VTF; this region may also have some crude visual topography. Bands of constant eccentricity in TEO appear to be continuous with those in V2, V3v, and V4. The upper field representation in TEO is located adjacent to that in ventral V4, with a representation of the horizontal meridian forming the boundary between the two areas. The lower field representation in TEO is located just anterior to the upper field but is smaller. In contrast to the orderly representation of eccentricity in TEO, we found little consistent representation of polar angle, other than the separation of upper and lower fields. The results of injecting anatomical tracers in two animals suggest that TEO is an important link in the pathway that relays visual information from V1 to the inferior temporal cortex. TEO is thus likely to play an important role in pattern perception.

Animals↗

PubMed1990

Pathways for motion analysis: cortical connections of the medial superior temporal and fundus of the superior temporal visual areas in the macaque.

To identify the cortical connections of the medial superior temporal (MST) and fundus of the superior temporal (FST) visual areas in the extrastriate cortex of the macaque, we injected multiple tracers, both anterograde and retrograde, in each of seven macaques under physiological control. We found that, in addition to connections with each other, both MST and FST have widespread connections with visual and polysensory areas in posterior prestriate, parietal, temporal, and frontal cortex. In prestriate cortex, both areas have connections with area V3A. MST alone has connections with the far peripheral field representations of V1 and V2, the parieto-occipital (PO) visual area, and the dorsal prelunate area (DP), whereas FST alone has connections with area V4 and the dorsal portion of area V3. Within the caudal superior temporal sulcus, both areas have extensive connections with the middle temporal area (MT), MST alone has connections with area PP, and FST alone has connections with area V4t. In the rostral superior temporal sulcus, both areas have extensive connections with the superior temporal polysensory area (STP) in the upper bank of the sulcus and with area IPa in the sulcal floor. FST also has connections with the cortex in the lower bank of the sulcus, involving area TEa. In the parietal cortex, both the central field representation of MST and FST have connections with the ventral intraparietal (VIP) and lateral intraparietal (LIP) areas, whereas MST alone has connections with the inferior parietal gyrus. In the temporal cortex, the central field representation of MST as well as FST has connections with visual area TEO and cytoarchitectonic area TF. In the frontal cortex, both MST and FST have connections with the frontal eye field. On the basis of the laminar pattern of anterograde and retrograde label, it was possible to classify connections as forward, backward, or intermediate and thereby place visual areas into a cortical hierarchy. In general, MST and FST receive forward inputs from prestriate visual areas, have intermediate connections with parietal areas, and project forward to the frontal eye field and areas in the rostral superior temporal sulcus. Because of the strong inputs to MST and FST from area MT, an area known to play a role in the analysis of visual motion, and because MST and FST themselves have high proportions of directionally selective cells, they appear to be important stations in a cortical motion processing system.

Animals↗

PubMed1985

Activity of neurons in the cat substantia nigra pars reticulata during drinking.

Extracellular activity of single neurons in the pars reticulata of the Substantia Nigra (SNpr) was recorded in cats during drinking. Two groups of cells were distinguished: I. Somatosensory cells which responded by a short decrease in firing rate to the arrival of water against the upper lip. We suggest that these stimulus-related responses reflect a complex process linked to preparation of buccolingual movements. II. Action-related cells which were de-activated at the beginning or during the entire drinking period but without modulation in relation to the individual movements of jaws and tongue. We suggest that de-activation of these cells during drinking operates as a gating mechanism which allows implementation of complex motor sequences by cortical and/or subcortical structures.

Animals↗

PubMed1985

Role of the cat substantia nigra pars reticulata in eye and head movements. I. Neural activity.

Single unit activity was recorded in the Substantia Nigra pars reticulata (SNpr) of cats trained to orient their gaze toward visual and/or auditory targets. Cells in the SNpr have a steady high rate of spontaneous activity ranging from 35 to 120 spikes per second. The neurons respond to sensory stimuli or in relation to saccadic eye movements with a decrease or a cut-off of the spontaneous discharge. Among 109 cells recorded in the SNPR 60 were responsive to visual stimuli (mean latency = 118 ms). Most of the receptive fields which were plotted were large encompassing part of the ipsilateral field. Thirty nine (39) cells were responsive to auditory stimuli (mean latency = 81 ms). A majority of these cells showed a better response for stimuli located in the contralateral hemifield. In a few cells, the sensory responses were modulated by the subsequent orienting behavior of the animals. Thirty one (31) cells showed a response in relation to saccades. These units typically stopped discharging between 50 and 300 ms prior to the onset of the saccade. 39% of these units also responded in relation to spontaneous saccades in the dark. 61% of the saccadic cells also responded to sensory stimuli in the absence of saccades. Six (6) cells were found to respond to active head movements. These results are discussed in the framework of the role that the basal ganglia might have in the selection of the sensory stimuli that trigger orienting behaviors.

Animals↗

PubMed1985

Role of the cat substantia nigra pars reticulata in eye and head movements. II. Effects of local pharmacological injections.

Guided and reflex eye movements were studied in cats trained to make orienting saccades toward visual and auditory targets. Injections of a GABA-agonist (Muscimol) or GABA-antagonists (Bicuculline and Picrotoxin) were made in the Substantia Nigra pars reticulata (SNpr). Bicuculline and Picrotoxin, whether unilaterally or bilaterally injected had no effect on the posture nor the oculomotor performance of the animals. Neck muscle activity remained symmetrical. Unilateral injections of Muscimol produced oro-facial akinesia, reduction of the number of eye movements, contralateral head turning, visual neglect mostly (but not only) for ipsilateral visual space. Balance between the gains of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in the two directions of movement was changed. Gain was decreased for the ipsilateral rotation. The optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) was not affected. Contralateral neck muscles were hypertonic. After bilateral injections of Muscimol, the cats did not orient. The VOR was normal when the injections induced no postural asymmetry. Hypertony was bilateral. Implications of these results for the role of the basal ganglia in motor control are discussed. We suggest that in Parkinson's disease the fixed inhibitory drive of the SNpr on the tectum and on the thalamus is disrupted.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Subcortical connections of visual areas MST and FST in macaques.

To examine the subcortical connections of the medial superior temporal and fundus of the superior temporal visual areas (MST and FST, respectively), we injected anterograde and retrograde tracers into 16 physiologically identified sites within the two areas in seven macaque monkeys. The subcortical connections of MST and FST were found to be very similar. Both areas were found to be reciprocally connected with the pulvinar, mainly with its medial subdivision, and with the claustrum. Nonreciprocal projections from both MST and FST were consistently found in the striatum (caudate and putamen), reticular nucleus of the thalamus, and the pontine nuclei. The labeled terminals in the pons were in the dorsolateral, lateral, dorsal, and peduncular nuclei. Additional nonreciprocal projections were found in one MST and one FST case to the nucleus of the optic tract, and, in one FST case, to the lateral terminal nucleus. Finally, three cases showed a nonreciprocal projection to FST from the basal forebrain. The subcortical structures containing label following MST and FST injections were largely the same as those labeled after injections of the middle temporal visual area (MT), but the label within each structure after MST and FST injections was more widespread than that from MT, overlapping the distribution of label that has been reported after injections of parietal visual areas. This finding is consistent with the known contributions of MST and FST to the functions of parietal cortex, such as eye-movement control.

Animals↗