PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D C Cronin

Publications and source records attributed to D C Cronin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Open cardiotomy for removal of migrating transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt stent combined with liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic shunts are widely used for the management of variceal bleeding. Complications such as stent misplacement or migration may occur. METHODS: We describe the management of a transjugular intrahepatic shunts stent that migrated across the tricuspid valve in a patient with Child-Pugh category C cirrhosis. RESULTS: An attempt at percutaneous retrieval of the stent was unsuccessful. Due to the unacceptably high risk for mortality from open heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in the setting of cirrhosis, stent removal was deferred until the time of orthotopic liver transplantation. The procedures were performed successfully, and the patient made a good recovery. CONCLUSION: Surgical stent extraction and valve repair can be performed safely along with orthotopic liver transplantation in carefully selected patients with end-stage liver disease.

Cardiac Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2001

Is any method of vascular control superior in hepatic resection of metastatic cancers? Longmire clamping, pringle maneuver, and total vascular isolation.

HYPOTHESIS: Although control of the hepatic vascular pedicle is commonly used during hepatic resection, the optimal method of vascular control continues to be debated. The utility of total or selective vascular isolation, pedicle inflow occlusion, or the absence of vascular isolation during minor and major hepatectomy needs to be examined. DESIGN: Retrospective review of hepatic resections performed for either isolated colorectal or noncolorectal hepatic metastases. SETTING: The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Ill, a tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-one patients who underwent hepatic resection for isolated metastatic liver disease were identified through The University of Chicago Hospitals Tumor Registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraoperative parameters, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and tumor recurrence. RESULTS: Four groups were compared with alternative methods of vascular management, including total vascular isolation, Longmire clamping, Pringle maneuver, or no vascular control. Tumor number and size were not significantly different between groups. Blood loss and transfusion requirements tended to be higher in the total vascular isolation group and were significantly higher compared with the Pringle group (P =.06) and the no vascular control group (P =.04), but this also correlated with a higher incidence of complexity of surgical resection. The highest incidence of postoperative complications occurred in the total vascular isolation group (P<.05). With similar permanent pathologic margins, the rates of intrahepatic recurrence were similar among all groups, with the no vascular control group having the lowest recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: All methods of vascular control appeared equivalent with respect to limiting blood loss and transfusion requirements while providing adequate surgical margins. The highest rates of blood requirements and complications were noted in the total vascular isolation group, which corresponded to the highest incidence of complex resections. The Longmire clamp group incurred the lowest incidence of complications and resulted in identical surgical margins. The application of vascular control is beneficial to surgeons during hepatic resection, but the method of control should be selected based on the location and complexity of resection required and preference of the individual surgeon.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Ethical considerations and rationale of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) is a reality; shortly after its introduction into clinical practice, it is being performed in approximately 50 centers throughout the United States and Europe. The quick development of ALDLT and some deaths among donors repropose old ethical dilemmas and confront the transplant community with new urgent problems. To minimize risks for recipients and, especially, donors, two key questions are addressed: (1) who can or should perform the procedure, and (2) what patient should undergo the procedure. The high risks taken by live donors undergoing a hemihepatectomy seem to be justified by the steadily increasing mortality of adult recipients waiting for transplantation. A comprehensive consent procedure is at the base of responsible decision making for both donors and recipients. In adherence to basic medical criteria, the autonomy of decision of donors and recipients may allow the extension of indications to patients not suitable to undergo transplantation with cadaveric grafts. The broadening of indications is appropriate only in centers with adequate experience and proven expertise in ALDLT. The medical community faces the duty of regulating ALDLT before external influences force undesired policy changes, particularly if not based on medical grounds. Individual centers and patients are ultimately responsible for the correct use of LDLT.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Are concerns over right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy unwarranted?

OBJECTIVE: To examine the ability of several large, experienced transplantation centers to perform right-sided laparoscopic donor nephrectomy safely with equivalent long-term renal allograft function. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Early reports noted a higher incidence of renal vein thrombosis and eventual graft loss. However, exclusion of right-sided donors would deprive a significant proportion of donors a laparoscopically harvested graft. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed among 97 patients from seven centers performing right-sided laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Surgical and postoperative demographic factors were evaluated. Complications were identified and long-term renal allograft function was compared with historical left-sided laparoscopic donor nephrectomy cohorts. RESULTS: Right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed for varying reasons, including multiple left renal arteries or veins, smaller right kidney, or cystic right renal mass. Mean surgical time was 235.0 +/- 66.7 minutes, with a mean blood loss of 139 +/- 165.8 mL. Conversion was required in three patients secondary to bleeding or anatomical anomalies. Mean warm ischemic time was limited at 238 +/- 112 seconds. Return to diet was achieved on average after 7.5 +/- 2.3 hours, with mean discharge at 54.6 +/- 22.8 hours. Two grafts were lost during the early experience of these centers to renal vein thrombosis. Both surgical and postoperative complications were limited, with few long-term adverse effects. Mean serum creatinine levels were higher than open and left laparoscopic donor nephrectomy on postoperative day 1, but at all remaining intervals the right laparoscopic donors had equivalent creatinine values. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy provides similar patient benefits, including early return to diet and discharge. Long-term creatinine values were no higher than in traditional open donor or left laparoscopic donor cohorts. These results establish that early concerns about high thrombosis rates are not supported by a multiinstitutional review of laparoscopic right donor nephrectomies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Portal and mesenteric venous calcification in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of calcification in the portal and mesenteric venous system was studied in patients with advanced cirrhosis undergoing evaluation for liver transplantation. The significance of portal and mesenteric calcification on liver transplantation was also investigated. CONCLUSION: An 11% incidence of portal and mesenteric venous calcification was found in patients with cirrhosis, which was much higher than anticipated. Two (29%) of seven patients who had calcification present on CT and underwent liver transplantation died at surgery as a result of portal venous thrombosis. Thus, venous calcification seen on CT is a significant finding in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Combined liver and kidney transplantation in children.

BACKGROUND: Preexisting renal dysfunction has been reported to significantly increase the morbidity and mortality associated with orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). OLT alone has been recommended for adults and children with end-stage liver disease and reversible causes of renal failure (i.e., hepatorenal syndrome), whereas combined liver and kidney transplantation (LKT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for adults with combined end-stage liver and kidney disease. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of LKT in children. METHODS: Between October of 1984 and 1997, 385 children less than 18 years of age underwent OLT at the University of Chicago. During this same time period 12 patients underwent LKT. Data were gathered by retrospective review of the patients medical records and by interviews conducted with the patients' families. RESULTS: Actuarial patient survival was comparable for children who underwent OLT alone and LKT (69% versus 67% at 5 years). All allograft losses in the LKT group were the result of patient death and occurred within the first 90 postoperative days. Factors associated with decreased patient survival included severity of illness as reflected by United Network of Organ Sharing status and LKT after failed OLT or cadaveric renal transplant. CONCLUSIONS: In children with concomitant endstage liver and kidney disease, LKT can be considered an effective therapeutic option in selected patients. Long-term patient survival in patients undergoing LKT is comparable to that of patients with normal renal function undergoing OLT alone.

Child↗
PubMed2000

Modern immunosuppression.

The current treatment of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) includes prophylaxis at the time of transplant, decreasing or stopping immunosuppresion and initiation of antiviral therapy in patients with polymerase chain reaction or clinical evidence of PTLD, and judicial reintroduction of immunosuppression in patients who have cleared their PTLD and have begun to have rejection. The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, notable side effects, and toxicities of the immunosuppressive agents are described in this article. At the conclusion of each section the author's current practice with these agents and treatment strategies are described.

Antibodies↗
PubMed2000

Hepatic resection: effective treatment for primary and secondary tumors.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection is an accepted therapeutic modality for isolated colorectal metastases (CRM) and primary hepatobiliary cancers (PC). Controversy continues regarding the safety, efficacy, and appropriateness of resection for noncolorectal metastases (NCM). METHODS: A retrospective review of 167 resections in 160 patients was performed to evaluate the impact of demographics and perioperative data on survival and recurrence. Statistical analyses were performed by Student t test, analysis of variance, and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. RESULTS: Resections were performed for CRM, 110 of 167 (66%), NCM, 31 of 167 (19%), and PC, 26 of 167 (15%). The interval from primary to metastases was significantly longer in the NCM group than the CRM group (34.7+/-45.1 vs. 18.7+/-23.7 months; P<.01). Mean number of lesions was not different between groups; however, NCM were larger than CRM (5.9+/-4.5 vs 4.5+/-2.9 cm; P<.05). Operative complications were significantly greater for PC (54%) versus CRM and NCM (21% and 19%, respectively; P<.01), although length of stay was similar between groups. Perioperative mortality was 2%. Actuarial survival at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years was CRM 91%, 54%, and 40%, PC 75%, 60%, and 38%, and NCM 68%, 36%, and not available, respectively (CRM vs. NCM; P<.01 at 3 years). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection for primary and secondary malignancy can be performed with minimal morbidity and mortality. Resection of NCM is associated with a lower overall survival compared with CRM and PC. The disease-free interval from resection of the primary to metastasectomy is prolonged and hepatic recurrence infrequent after resection in the NCM group. These results suggest that tumor biology is a critical determinant of outcome after hepatic resection of primary and secondary hepatic tumors.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Primary living-donor liver transplantation at the University of Chicago: technical aspects of the first 104 recipients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of technical modifications on living-donor liver transplants in children since their introduction in 1989. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although more than 4,000 liver transplants are performed every year in the United States, only approximately 500 are performed in children. Living-donor liver transplantation has helped to alleviate the organ shortage for small children in need of liver transplantation. Few centers have amassed a sufficient number of cases to evaluate the impact of the different techniques used in pediatric living-donor liver transplantation. METHODS: From 1989 through 1997, 104 primary living-donor liver transplants were performed at the University of Chicago. Three phases of the living-donor liver transplant program can be defined based on the techniques of vascular reconstruction: phase 1, November 1989 to November 1994 (n = 78); phase 2, November 1994 to January 1996 (n = 6); and January 1996 to present (n = 20). The patients' charts were reviewed retrospectively. The incidence and type of vascular complications and patient and graft survival rates were analyzed. RESULTS: Although the demographics of the patients have not changed during the three phases of the living-donor liver transplant program, the outcomes have improved. Without the use of conduits, the incidence of portal vein complications has significantly decreased from 44% to 8%. The incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis has decreased from 22% to 0% with the use of microvascular techniques. The combined use of both techniques has led to a significant increase in graft survival, from 74% to 94%. CONCLUSIONS: The living-donor liver transplant recipient operation has undergone significant technical changes since its introduction in 1989. These changes have decreased the vascular complications associated with this type of graft. Avoiding the use of vascular conduits and performing microvascular hepatic artery anastomoses are the critical steps in improving graft survival.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗
PubMed1999

Indications, evaluations, and postoperative care of the combined liver-heart transplant recipient.

Multiorgan transplantation is now possible because of improvements in immunosuppression and surgical techniques. Combined liver-heart transplantation (CLHT) is a new option with initial 1-year data reporting 80% 1-year survival rates. Organs transplanted with the liver appear to have less allograft rejection. Within the United States, fifteen CLHTs have been performed. Three CLHTs have been performed at the University of Chicago and are discussed in this article. Guidelines for evaluation and listing criteria for CLHT recipients have not been established in the medical community. Postoperative care of this patient group is demanding and requires a thorough understanding of multiorgan pathophysiology, management of high-incidence acute renal dysfunction, tight intravascular volume regulation, and an experienced multidisciplinary approach to care.

Graft Rejection↗
PubMed1999

Liver transplantation at the University of Chicago.

Since our 1995 report, improvements in patient survival after liver transplantation have widened indications for liver transplantation and led to a greater imbalance between donor supply and need. The organ shortage is the major barrier to liver transplantation at this time. Despite expanded donor criteria, there has been only a marginal increase in the number of liver transplants performed nationally. We have used several approaches to decrease the demand for organs in both adults and children. Our center was one of the first institutions to use reduced-size, living-donor, and split liver transplants routinely. The use of reduced-size liver transplants has decreased as the use of split liver transplantation has increased. Both split liver transplantation and living donor transplantation play an important role in caring for pediatric and adult patients with end-stage and fulminant liver disease. We have concentrated our recent efforts to optimizing the technical aspects of living donor transplantation in order to decrease the need for retransplantation and further organ use. These efforts have dramatically increased graft survival. We have also focused attention on treating patients prior to transplantation in an attempt to eventually abrogate the need for traditional transplantation in some disease processes. With the use of hepatocytes and liver assist devices, we have demonstrated that we can provide a level of metabolic support not achieved with traditional medical therapy for patients with fulminant hepatic failure. As further advances in these therapies are made over the next several years, a concerted effort to bridge patients to recovery will be made. As liver transplantation has become more standardized, it has opened the door to more challenges. We have used liver transplantation in combination with cardiac transplantation to care for selected patients with end stage disease of both organs. This has been remarkably successful for the 3 patients transplanted at the University of Chicago. The immunologic benefit of this combination appears to be a decreased incidence of cardiac rejection. We have standardized the technical components of this combined operation to allow for optimal organ function and patient survival.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

An analysis of hepatic retransplantation in children.

BACKGROUND: The limited supply of organ donors has led some groups to reconsider the role of retransplantation. Historically, except for children with malignancies, extrahepatic sources of sepsis, or severe irreversible neurologic injuries, our institution has offered all children with failing liver grafts the option of retransplantation regardless of their current severity of illness. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of hepatic retransplantation in children in an attempt to identify factors predictive of outcome and to assess the results of our approach to retransplantation. METHODS: Between October 1984 and December 1995, 314 children less than 15 years of age underwent a total of 441 liver transplants. Data were obtained retrospectively by review of hospital records. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up period of 5.3+/-2.7 years, the overall patient survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 77.1% and 67.1%, respectively. Primary allograft survival rates were 65.6% and 56.5%, respectively. Of the 137 patients who developed failure of their primary allograft, 92 underwent retransplantation (29.3% of all primary transplants). Both patient and allograft survival rates were significantly decreased after retransplantation (P<0.0001 versus primary transplants). Univariate and multivariate analysis of retransplanted patients revealed only two factors that were statistically related to patient and graft survival: age at the time of retransplantation (P<0.02 univariate and P<0.05 multivariate) and retransplantation with a reduced-size allograft (P<0.005 univariate and P<0.05 multivariate). In this series, the effect on patient survival of differences in medical condition as reflected by United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status approached, but did not achieve, significance (P=0.08 for UNOS 1 versus UNOS 2 and 3). UNOS status did not affect graft survival. Neither the cause of primary allograft loss or the timing of retransplantation relative to the first transplant were related to outcome. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that the failure of primary hepatic allografts remains a major problem in pediatric liver transplantation and that the overall results of retransplantation were significantly worse than those associated with primary transplants. We have identified a group of children who experienced a significantly worse outcome after retransplantation. This group consisted of children less than 3 years of age retransplanted using reduced-size grafts. Based on this finding, we now attempt to avoid retransplanting young children with reduced-size grafts. By using this approach, we hope to be able to offer children the option of retransplantation with improved results and simultaneously minimize the negative impact on patients awaiting primary transplants.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Incidence and outcome of infection by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus following orthotopic liver transplantation.

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) has become a significant nosocomial pathogen. For this study, the records of 325 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) were reviewed. Thirty-four patients were infected by VRE (incidence of 10.5%, 14% in adults vs. 5% in children, P < 0.01). Common features of patients who developed infections with VRE included previous antibiotic use (25 patients, 15 of whom received vancomycin), co-infection by other pathogens (28 patients), and relaparotomy following OLT (20 patients). Pulmonary and/or renal failure preceded infection by VRE in 11 and 4 adult patients, respectively. Biliary complications were exceedingly common in patients infected by VRE (28 patients) and significantly increased the risk of infection by VRE (21.5% vs. 3.1% for patients without biliary complications, P < 0.0001). Mortality associated with VRE infections was high (56% vs. 19% for patients not infected by VRE, P < 0.0005). The most frequent cause of death was sepsis (16 of 19 patient deaths), often polymicrobial. The high incidence of infection by VRE following OLT, the lack of effective antibiotics for the treatment of VRE, and the association of VRE with patient mortality emphasizes the need to define the risk factors associated with VRE infection. We suggest early surgical intervention to treat complications that may predispose patients to infection by VRE.

Adult↗