PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D C Darland

Publications and source records attributed to D C Darland.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Cell-cell interactions in vascular development.

Research into areas as divergent as hemangiopoiesis and cardiogenesis as well as investigations of diseases such as cancer and diabetic retinopathy have converged to form the face of research in vascular development today. This convergence of disparate topics has resulted in rapid advances in many areas of vascular research. The focus of this review has been the role of cell-cell interactions in the development of the vascular system, but we have included discussions of pathology where the mechanism of disease progression may have parallels with developmental processes. A number of intriguing questions remain unanswered. For example, what triggers abnormal angiogenesis in the disease state? Are the mechanisms similar to those that control developmental neovascularization? Perhaps the difference in development in angiogenesis versus in disease is context driven, that is, an adult versus an embryonic organism. If this is the case, can the controls that curtail developmental vessel formation be applied in pathologies? Can cell-cell interactions be targeted as a control point for new vessel formation? For instance, can perivascular cells be stimulated or eliminated to result in increased vessel stability or instability, respectively? If the hypothesis that mural cell association is required for vessel stabilization is accurate, are there mechanisms to promote or inhibit mural cell recruitment and differentiation as needed? These and other questions lie in wait for the next generation of approaches to discern the mechanisms and the nature of the cell-cell interactions and the influence of the microenvironment on vascular development.

Animals↗

TGF beta is required for the formation of capillary-like structures in three-dimensional cocultures of 10T1/2 and endothelial cells.

New vessels form de novo (vasculogenesis) or from pre-existing vessels (angiogenesis) in a process that involves the interaction of endothelial cells (EC) and pericytes/smooth muscle cells (SMC). One basic component of this interaction is the endothelial-induced recruitment, proliferation and subsequent differentiation of pericytes and SMC. We have previously demonstrated that TGF beta induces the differentiation of C3H/10T1/2 (10T1/2) mesenchymal cells toward a SMC/pericyte lineage. The current study tests the hypothesis that TGF beta not only induces SMC differentiation but stabilizes capillary-like structures in a three-dimensional (3D) model of in vitro angiogenesis. 10T1/2 and EC in Matrigel were used to establish cocultures that form cord structures that are reminiscent of new capillaries in vivo. Cord formation is initiated within 2-3 h after plating and continues through 18 h after plating. In longer cocultures the cord structures disassemble and form aggregates. 10T1/2 expression of proteins associated with the SMC/pericyte lineage, such as smooth muscle alpha-actin (SMA) and NG2 proteoglycan, are upregulated in these 3D cocultures. Application of neutralizing reagents specific for TGF beta blocks cord formation and inhibits expression of SMA and NG2 in the 10T1/2 cells. We conclude that TGF beta mediates 10T1/2 differentiation to SMC/pericytes in the 3D cocultures and that association with differentiated mural cells is required for formation of capillary-like structures in Matrigel.

Animals↗

Activin A and follistatin influence expression of somatostatin in the ciliary ganglion in vivo.

An important developmental question concerns whether neurotransmitter phenotype is an inherent property of neurons or is influenced by target tissues. This issue can be addressed in the avian ciliary ganglion (CG) which contains two cholinergic populations, ciliary and choroid neurons, that differentially express the peptide cotransmitter, somatostatin. The present study tests the hypothesis that differences in the level of expression of activin A and its endogenous inhibitor follistatin in CG neuron target tissues are responsible for selective expression of somatostatin in choroid neurons. Intraocular injection of activin A or follistatin (300 ng injected at E10/E11) in cultured embryos resulted in a 39% increase or a 23% decrease, respectively, in somatostatin-positive neurons relative to controls. Chorioallantoic membrane application of follistatin (1 microgram daily from E7 to E13) reduced somatostatin positive neurons by 54%. Neuron number, size, and target tissue morphology were unaffected by these treatments. Together with our previous studies, these data suggest that activin A and follistatin are target-derived molecules that regulate neuropeptide phenotype in the ciliary ganglion.

Activins↗

Activin A and follistatin expression in developing targets of ciliary ganglion neurons suggests a role in regulating neurotransmitter phenotype.

The avian ciliary ganglion contains choroid neurons that innervate choroid vasculature and express somatostatin as well as ciliary neurons that innervate iris/ciliary body but do not express somatostatin. We have previously shown in culture that activin A induces somatostatin immunoreactivity in both neuron populations. We now show in vivo that both targets contain activin A; however, choroid expressed higher levels of activin A mRNA. In contrast, follistatin, an activin A inhibitor, was higher in iris/ciliary body. Iris cell-conditioned medium also contained an activity that inhibited activin A and could be depleted with anti-follistatin antibodies. These results suggest that development of somatostatin is limited to choroid neurons by differential expression of activin A and follistatin in ciliary ganglion targets.

Activins↗