Biomedical subjects

D Candal

Publications and source records attributed to D Candal.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Evaluation of a sensitive/less-sensitive testing algorithm using the 3A11-LS assay for detecting recent HIV seroconversion among individuals with HIV-1 subtype B or E infection in Thailand.

The development of a serologic algorithm to determine recent HIV seroconversion, using sensitive/less-sensitive testing strategies, has generated widespread interest in applying this approach to estimate HIV-1 incidence in various populations around the world. To evaluate this approach in non-B subtypes, longitudinal specimens (n = 522) collected from 90 incident infections among injecting drug users in Bangkok (subtype B infection, n = 18; subtype E infection, n = 72) were tested by the 3A11-LS assay. Standardized optical density (SOD) was calculated, using median values, and the window period between seroconversion as determined by sensitive and less sensitive tests was estimated by a maximum-likelihood model described previously. Our results show that the mean window period of the 3A11-LS assay was 155 days (95% CI, 128-189 days) for subtype B but was 270 days (95% CI, 187-349 days) for subtype E specimens from Thailand. About 4% of individuals with incident subtype E infections remained below the threshold (SOD of 0.75), even 2 years after seroconversion. Among the patients with clinical AIDS and declining antibodies, none of the 7 individuals with subtype B, but 10 (8.7%) of 115 with subtype E infections, were misclassified as recent infections. Lowering the cutoff to an SOD of 0.45 for subtype E specimens resulted in a mean window period of 185 days (95% CI, 154-211 days), with all individuals seroconverting, and reduced the number of subtype E-infected patients with AIDS who were misclassified as having recent infection to 2.6%. Our results demonstrate that the 3A11-LS assay has different performance characteristics in detecting recent infections among individuals infected with subtypes B or E. Determining appropriate cutoffs and mean window periods for other HIV-1 subtypes will be necessary before this approach can be reliably implemented in settings where non-B subtypes are common.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Efficacy of a less-sensitive enzyme immunoassay (3A11-LS) for early diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 infection in infants.

We evaluated a less-sensitive enzyme immunoassay (3A11-LS) for its possible use for early diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in infants. The results were compared with those from the immunoglobulin G-capture enzyme immunoassay. A total of 239 sera from 77 infants were tested. All 25 sera from the 10 infants born to seronegative mothers were found to be negative by both assays. Forty-one seroreverting infants showed a complete decay of maternal antibodies by 4 months by the 3A11-LS assay. However, the assay detected HIV antibodies in only 9 (36%) of 25 sera collected from infected infants between 4 and 6 months and in 27 (63%) of 43 sera collected after 6 months of age. Further analysis with alternative cutoff values indicated that the 3A11-LS had a sensitivity of 12 to 44% and a specificity of 90 to 100% for infants between 4-6 months of age. This data suggest that a diagnosis of HIV infection in some of the infants could be made after 4 months of age by the 3A11-LS assay, although a negative 3A11-LS test result may not rule out infection and may require a further followup.

Antibodies, Viral↗

PubMed2000

Diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection with different subtypes using rapid tests.

We evaluated six rapid tests for their sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection using 241 specimens (172 HIV-1 positive, 69 HIV-1 negative) representing different HIV-1 subtypes (A [n = 40], B [n = 47], C [n = 28], E [n = 42], and F [n = 7]). HIVCHEK, Multispot, RTD and SeroStrip were 100% sensitive and specific. Capillus failed to identify two of eight subtype C specimens (overall sensitivity of 98. 85%), while the SUDS test (the only test approved by the Food and Drug Administration) gave false-positive results for 5 of 69 seronegative specimens (specificity of 93.24%). Our results suggest that although rapid tests perform well in general, it may be prudent to evaluate a rapid test for sensitivity and specificity in a local population prior to its widespread use.

HIV Infections↗

PubMed1998

The development and evaluation of a probe hybridization method for subtyping HIV type 1 infection in Uganda.

We developed a method for large-scale screening of HIV-1 genotypic variation based on DNA probe hybridization. Nested PCR amplifications were performed to generate fragments in the env C2-V3 region and also in the gp41 region, which encompasses the immunodominant domain. The proviral DNA sequences were derived from 68 samples and phylogenetically analyzed. For comparison, the C2-V3 fragment was used in DNA probe hybridization to rapidly determine the infecting HIV subtype. The hybridizing probes were designed on the basis of the two most prevalent subtypes in Uganda, A and D. The results were compared to evaluate the feasibility of using this hybridization method for large-scale genotypic screening. Sequence analysis of the 68 amplified PCR fragments showed that 39 were subtype A and 29 were subtype D. The results of DNA hybridization to the amplified products with A and D subtype-specific probes were more than 90% concordant with the subtypes determined by sequence analysis. Our findings suggest that probe hybridization with subtype-specific probes is effective for large-scale screening of HIV-infected populations. Application of this method will significantly reduce the time needed for large, population-based investigations.

DNA Probes↗