PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Cockcroft

Publications and source records attributed to D Cockcroft.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Performance of creatinine clearance equations on the original Cockcroft-Gault population.

BACKGROUND: Prediction of endogenous creatinine clearance by mathematical equations such as the Cockcroft-Gault formula is used in clinical practice in spite of the reported concern for their limited predictability. The aim of this study is to determine whether the measured creatinine clearance can be predicted accurately by a number of published equations including the recently modified Cockcroft-Gault formula = Cockcroft-Gault formula x 1.73 m2/body surface area from the original Cockcroft-Gault population. METHODS: The performance of the mathematical equations in patients with different creatinine clearance and body mass indices was assessed by computing accuracy at different percentiles, bias and precision from the original Cockcroft-Gault data. RESULTS: Refitting the modified formula to the Cockcroft-Gault data gave superior results compared to the original Cockcroft-Gault formula with an overall accuracy in the general and subgroup analysis above 70% agreement within 30% estimate of the measured creatinine clearance. On the other hand, analysis of the other equations, including the original Cockcroft-Gault, demonstrated a limited accuracy to predict creatinine clearance particularly in patients with creatinine clearance below 50 ml/min with an overall accuracy in less than 1/3 of the calculated creatinine clearance within 30% range from the measured creatinine clearance. CONCLUSION: The current creatinine clearance equations and even the original Cockcroft-Gault formula did not accurately predict the measured creatinine clearance. Normalization for body surface area in the original Cockcroft-Gault formula demonstrated more accuracy to estimate creatinine clearance, particularly in patients with diminished renal function and is recommended to physicians who wish to use the Cockcroft-Gault formula in their practice until more credible formulas are developed.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Risk factors for death from asthma. Prairie Provinces Asthma Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Asthma mortality rates have increased in Canada and worldwide. Within Canada, the highest rates were seen in the prairie provinces. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine risk factors for fatal asthma by comparing those who died of an acute exacerbation with those who attended an emergency department for treatment of asthma. METHODS: The case-control study included all deaths from asthma among those aged 5 to 50 years in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba from November, 1992 through October, 1995 (cases). The 35 fatalities were matched to 209 controls by age, gender, time of the index event and residence. RESULTS: Cases were more likely than controls to have had severe asthma, an unscheduled physician visit in the past year, a past hospitalization for asthma, and to have been intubated. Both groups reported frequent, regular asthma symptoms. Beta-agonist bronchodilator use was more common among cases, as was use in excess of prescribed amounts. Use of inhaled steroids did not differ between groups. Prior to the index event controls were more likely to report a cold or flu (OR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.72) and that medications were "not working" (OR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.71). Cases were more often sad and depressed (OR = 2.88; 95% CI: 1.03 to 8.05). Time between onset/recognition of symptoms and the event was significantly shorter for cases than controls. CONCLUSIONS: Both groups tolerated high levels of regular symptoms, suggesting poor management. Opportunities for intervention existed for both groups near the time of the event. The short time between recognition of symptoms and death suggests patients at increased risk should monitor their condition closely and take action in response to predetermined criteria.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

beta2-Adrenergic receptor haplotypes in mild, moderate and fatal/near fatal asthma.

Excess beta2-agonist use in asthmatics has been associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The mechanisms responsible for these observations are unknown. We hypothesized that polymorphisms of the beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) at amino acid positions 16, 27, and 164, which are known to alter receptor functions in vitro, may predispose asthmatics to fatal/near-fatal asthma and/or modify asthma severity. In preliminary studies we found significant differences in allele frequencies due to ethnic background: Caucasian, Black, Asian Gly16 = 0.61, 0.50, 0.40 and Gln27 = 0.57, 0. 73, 0.80, respectively. beta2AR genotyping was performed on DNA from Caucasians classified as nonasthmatic/nonatopic (n = 84), fatal/near-fatal asthmatics (n = 81) and mild/moderate asthmatics (n = 86). No polymorphism or haplotype was found to be associated with fatal/near-fatal asthma. However, the Gly16/Gln27 haplotype, which undergoes enhanced downregulation in vitro, was substantially more prevalent in moderate asthmatics than in mild asthmatics (p = 0.003, odds ratio = 3.1). We conclude that the beta2AR genotype is not a major determinant of fatal or near-fatal asthma. Furthermore, allele frequency variation among ethnic groups must be considered in clinical studies of beta2AR polymorphisms in asthma.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1998

Directives de la Societe canadienne de thoracologie pour l'asthme professionnel canadian thoracic society guidelines for occupational asthma

OBJECTIVE: To provide broad guidelines and principles to help primary care physicians, occupational physicians, allergists and respirologists with the recognition, diagnosis and management of patients with occupational asthma (OA). OPTIONS: These guidelines are mainly directed towards OA induced by a workplace sensitizing agent. However, irritant-induced asthma and workplace aggravation of underlying asthma are also addressed, and some consideration is given to other differential diagnoses. OUTCOMES: To enable the assessing physician to investigate patients with possible OA appropriately and to provide guidelines for appropriate early referral when specialized investigations are required. To provide an understanding of the appropriate management strategies following objective diagnosis. EVIDENCE: The key diagnostic and management recommendations were based on a critical review of the literature and by specialist consensus meetings. VALUES: Evidence was categorized as follows. Level 1: Evidence from at least one randomized, controlled trial. Level 2: Evidence from at least one well-designed clinical trial without randomization, from cohort or case-control analytical studies, preferably from more than one centre, from multiple time series or from dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments. Level 3: Evidence from the opinions of respected authorities based on clinical experience, descriptive studies or reports of expert committees. Evidence was further subdivided as follows: A. Good evidence to support a recommendation for use; B. Moderate evidence to support a recommendation for use; C. Poor evidence to support a recommendation for or against use; D. Moderate evidence to support a recommendation against use; E. Good evidence to support a recommendation against use. BENEFITS, HARM AND COSTS: The medical and socioeconomic risks and benefits of an incorrect diagnosis of OA and of failure to diagnose true OA were considered in the recommendations. VALIDATION: The document has been reviewed and endorsed by the Canadian Thoracic Society, the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and The College of Family Physicians of Canada. CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence for rapid investigation and objective categorization of presented symptoms into OA, aggravation of underlying asthma, unrelated asthma or other diagnoses. OA should be suspected in all adult onset asthmatics whose asthma begins or worsens while they are working. Investigations should be directed to an objective assessment of asthma and then to an assessment of the work relationship, using a combination of investigations as feasible, which may include immunological tests, pulmonary function assessed during work and away from work, and specific challenge tests. Early specialist referral is recommended for diagnosis. Management strategies include general asthma management in addition to measures to avoid further exposure to a relevant workplace sensitizer. Compensation issues and other workers at risk of developing OA also need to be considered when the diagnosis is made.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1993

Is the association between inhaled beta-agonist use and life-threatening asthma because of confounding by severity?

We have previously reported an increasing dose-response relationship between the regular use of beta-agonist inhalers and the risk of asthma death and near death among a cohort of 12,301 subjects who had been dispensed 10 or more prescriptions of asthma drugs from January 1980 to April 1987. That analysis was based solely on information obtained from linkable computerized data bases. Such an association might be explained in part by the tendency of patients with more severe asthma, that is, those at greatest risk for an adverse outcome, to use more beta-agonist medication. To further examine this potential confounding by severity, we gathered clinical information independently from the field on the 129 case patients and their 655 control patients from the matched case-control analysis of 12,301 subjects. In 68% of the control patients with a life-threatening episode and 75% of the matched control subjects, we obtained a valid questionnaire from at least one physician who had seen the patient during the previous 2 yr. Acceptable information on hospitalizations because of asthma was obtained in 87% of those hospitalized. Clinical features associated with an increased risk of fatal and near-fatal asthma were: a history of loss of consciousness or seizures during a previous asthma attack (odds ratio, 10.2; 95% CI, 3.9 to 26.7), a history of attacks of asthma precipitated by eating certain foods (odds ratio, 5.1; 95% CI, 2.4 to 11.1), a clinical score designed to reflect the severity of prior attacks of asthma leading to hospitalization, and prior respiratory acidosis among those in whom a blood gas determination was recorded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1992

The use of beta-agonists and the risk of death and near death from asthma.

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality from asthma appear to be increasing, and it has been suggested that medications used to treat asthma are contributing to this trend. We investigated a possible association between death or near death from asthma and the regular use of beta 2-agonist bronchodilators. METHODS: Using linked health insurance data bases from Saskatchewan, Canada, we conducted a matched case-control study of subjects drawn from a cohort of 12,301 patients for whom asthma medications had been prescribed between 1978 and 1987. We matched 129 case patients who had fatal or near-fatal asthma with 655 controls (who had received medications for asthma but had not had fatal or near-fatal events) with respect to region of residence, age, receipt of social assistance, and previous hospitalization for asthma. RESULTS: The use of beta-agonists administered by a metered-dose inhaler was associated with an increased risk of death from asthma (odds ratio, 2.6 per canister per month; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 3.9) and of death or near death from asthma, considered together (odds ratio, 1.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.6 to 2.4). For death from asthma, use of the beta-agonist fenoterol was associated with an odds ratio of 5.4 per canister, as compared with 2.4 for the beta-agonist albuterol. On a microgram-equivalent basis, the odds ratio for this outcome with fenoterol was 2.3, as compared with 2.4 with albuterol. CONCLUSIONS: An increased risk of death or near death from asthma was associated with the regular use of inhaled beta 2-agonist bronchodilators, especially fenoterol. Regardless of whether beta-agonists are directly responsible for these adverse effects or are simply a marker for more severe asthma, heavy use of these agents should alert clinicians that it is necessary to reevaluate the patient's condition.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1991

Clinical complexity and epidemiologic uncertainty in case-control research. Fenoterol and asthma management.

Two recent epidemiologic case-control studies suggested that fenoterol, a selective beta-adrenergic agonist, was associated with an increase in the risk of asthma death. The results of these studies were criticized because of methodologic problems in the choice and selection of control subjects; the different methods used to gather exposure data in cases and control subjects; and because of inadequate classification and adjustment for asthma severity. In response to this controversy, a new study is underway, the Saskatchewan Asthma Epidemiology Project. The SAEP includes two complementary studies, an historic cohort and a case-control analysis, that employ the computerized databases of the Saskatchewan Health Department. A unique aspect of the SAEP is the attempt to incorporate knowledge of asthma physiology and management into the design of the studies. Specifically, the study design recognized the role of antiinflammatory drugs in asthma treatment; the distinction between asthma death and near-fatal asthma; the severity of asthma; patterns of drug use; and the distinction between inadequate clinical care and disease severity. The strategies we employed in the SAEP may prove helpful to investigators whenever clinical and biologic processes create sources of potential bias requiring special procedures for the design and analysis of epidemiologic studies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

A 3-month evaluation of the efficacy of nedocromil sodium in asthma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nedocromil sodium conducted by a Canadian multicenter study group.

Nedocromil sodium is a pyranoquinoline dicarboxylic acid derivative, formulated in a metered-dose inhaler. Because nedocromil sodium has in vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory properties, it was evaluated in a group of steroid-dependent patients with asthma to observe how well it might be tolerated and for evidence of any beneficial effects. In a double-blind, group-comparative study, 127 patients received nedocromil sodium and 61 received placebo, administered as two puffs of 2 mg, four times per day, for 12 weeks. Ten patients developed adverse reactions, seven receiving active drug and three patients receiving placebo. Two patients of each group withdrew because of worsening asthma. Despite selecting patients whose asthma was stable, when they were receiving established therapeutic regimens that included steroids and bronchodilators, it was found that diary-card symptom scores, morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate values, and inhaled beta-agonist usage all demonstrated slight but significant benefit with addition of nedocromil sodium. It is concluded that the inhaled, anti-inflammatory agent, nedocromil sodium, may be added to asthma-treatment regimens with the reasonable expectation of further modest symptomatic benefit.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Sodium cromoglycate in ragweed-allergic conjunctivitis.

Sodium cromoglycate (SCG), in a 4% solution instilled into each eye 4 times daily, was compared with placebo in a double-blind, noncrossover trial in 30 matched patients with troublesome ragweed pollen-induced conjunctivitis. In the SCG group, eye symptom scores were significantly less (p = 0.05), and all patients judged that their symptoms were improved over the previous year (p less than 0.05). Less antihistamine was used by the SCG group but the difference was not significant. It was concluded that SCG was effective in the treatment of ragweed-induced seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Canadian Thoracic Society guidelines for occupational asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To provide broad guidelines and principles to help primary care physicians, occupational physicians, allergists and respirologists with the recognition, diagnosis and management of patients with occupational asthma (OA). OPTIONS: These guidelines are mainly directed towards OA induced by a workplace sensitizing agent. However, irritant-induced asthma and workplace aggravation of underlying asthma are also addressed, and some consideration is given to other differential diagnoses. OUTCOMES: To enable the assessing physician to investigate patients with possible OA appropriately and to provide guidelines for appropriate early referral when specialized investigations are required. To provide an understanding of the appropriate management strategies following objective diagnosis. EVIDENCE: The key diagnostic and management recommendations were based on a critical review of the literature and by specialist consensus meetings. VALUES: Evidence was categorized as follows. Level 1: Evidence from at least one randomized, controlled trial. Level 2: Evidence from at least one well-designed clinical trial without randomization, from cohort or case-control analytical studies, preferably from more than one centre, from multiple time series or from dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments. Level 3: Evidence from the opinions of respected authorities based on clinical experience, descriptive studies or reports of expert committees. Evidence was further subdivided as follows: A. Good evidence to support a recommendation for use; B. Moderate evidence to support a recommendation for use; C. Poor evidence to support a recommendation for or against use; D. Moderate evidence to support a recommendation against use; E. Good evidence to support a recommendation against use. BENEFITS, HARM AND COSTS: The medical and socioeconomic risks and benefits of an incorrect diagnosis of OA and of failure to diagnose true OA were considered in the recommendations. VALIDATION: The document has been reviewed and endorsed by the Canadian Thoracic Society, the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and The College of Family Physicians of Canada. CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence for rapid investigation and objective categorization of presented symptoms into OA, aggravation of underlying asthma, unrelated asthma or other diagnoses. OA should be suspected in all adult onset asthmatics whose asthma begins or worsens while they are working. Investigations should be directed to an objective assessment of asthma and then to an assessment of the work relationship, using a combination of investigations as feasible, which may include immunological tests, pulmonary function assessed during work periods and away from work, and specific challenge tests. Early specialist referral is recommended for diagnosis. Management strategies include general asthma management in addition to measures to avoid further exposure to a relevant workplace sensitizer. Compensation issues and other workers at risk of developing OA also need to be considered when the diagnosis is made.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

What is new since the last (1999) Canadian Asthma Consensus Guidelines?

The objective of the present document is to review the impact of new information on the recommendations made in the last (1999) Canadian Asthma Consensus Guidelines. It includes relevant published studies and observations or comments regarding what are considered to be the main issues in asthma management in children and adults in office, emergency department, hospital and clinical settings. Asthma is still insufficiently controlled in a large number of patients, and practice guidelines need to be integrated better with current care. This report re-emphasises the need for the following: objective measures of airflow obstruction to confirm the diagnosis of asthma suggested by the clinical evaluation; identification of contributing factors; and the establishment of a treatment plan to rapidly obtain and maintain optimal asthma control according to specific criteria. Recent publications support the essential role of asthma education and environmental control in asthma management. They further support the role of inhaled corticosteroids as the mainstay of anti-inflammatory therapy of asthma, and of both long acting beta2-agonists and leukotriene antagonists as effective means to improve asthma control when inhaled corticosteroids are insufficient. New developments, such as combination therapy, and recent major trials, such as the Children's Asthma Management Project (CAMP) study, are discussed.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Risk of fatal and near-fatal asthma in relation to inhaled corticosteroid use.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between patterns of use of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate and the risk of fatal and near-fatal asthma. DESIGN: Nested case-control analysis of a historical cohort; a further analysis. SETTING: The 12,301 residents of Saskatchewan aged 5 to 54 years who were dispensed 10 or more asthma drugs from 1978 to 1987. PATIENTS: The 129 persons who experienced asthma death (n = 44) and near-death (n = 85) and their 655 controls matched as to age and date of entry into the cohort, with the additional matching criteria of at least one hospitalization for asthma in the prior 2 years, region of residence, and having received social assistance. MAIN OUTCOME: Life-threatening attacks of asthma defined as death due to asthma or the occurrence of hypercarbia, intubation, and mechanical ventilation during an acute attack of asthma. RESULTS: After accounting for the risk associated with use of other medications and adjustment for markers of risk of adverse events related to asthma, subjects who had been dispensed, on average, one or more metered-dose inhalers of beclomethasone per month over a 1-year period had a significantly lower risk of fatal and near-fatal asthma (odds ratio, 0.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 0.6). CONCLUSION: These data support recent guidelines from several countries that recommend the use of inhaled corticosteroids in moderate and severe asthma.

Administration, Inhalation↗